Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Vet Ophthalmol ; 26 Suppl 1: 81-88, 2023 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36749146

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Determine the precorneal retention time of five different ocular lubricants commonly used in dogs. ANIMALS STUDIED: Six healthy Beagle dogs (n = 12 eyes). PROCEDURES: Five ocular lubricants were studied: Artificial Tears Solution® (1.4% polyvinyl alcohol), I-Drop® Vet Plus (0.25% hyaluronate), Optixcare® Eye Lube Plus (0.25% hyaluronate), Systane® Ultra (0.4% polyethylene glycol 400 and 0.3% propylene glycol), and Artificial Tears Ointment® (mineral oil/white petrolatum). Each lubricant was mixed with 10% sodium fluorescein to achieve 1% fluorescein formulations. Following topical administration of 35 mg in each eye, tear fluid was collected with capillary tubes at selected times (0, 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 90, 120, 180 min) and fluorescein concentrations were measured with a computerized scanning ocular fluorophotometer. RESULTS: Tear fluorescence was significantly greater with Artificial Tears Ointment® compared with other lubricant formulations from 1 to 20 min post-administration. Median (range) precorneal retention times were significantly different among the 5 lubricants, ranging from 40 minutes (20-90 min) for Artificial Tears Ointment®, 35 min (20-90 min) for Systane® Ultra, 30 min (10-60 min) for I-Drop® Vet Plus, 25 min (10-60 min) for Optixcare® Eye Lube Plus, and 10 min (10-20 min) for Artificial Tears Solution®. Precorneal retention time was significantly lower for Artificial Tears Solution® compared with the other 4 formulations. CONCLUSIONS: This study established normative data for the retention time of common lubricants on the ocular surface of dogs, which may be used to guide clinicians with their choice of lubricant and frequency of administration.


Assuntos
Doenças do Cão , Síndromes do Olho Seco , Cães , Animais , Lubrificantes Oftálmicos , Fluorofotometria/veterinária , Síndromes do Olho Seco/veterinária , Soluções Oftálmicas , Pomadas , Lubrificantes , Lágrimas , Fluoresceínas
2.
Eye (Lond) ; 21(1): 83-9, 2007 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16294201

RESUMO

AIMS: Woodpeckers possess mechanisms protecting the eye from shaking/impact. Mechanisms available to woodpeckers but not humans may help explain some eye injuries in Shaken Baby syndrome (SBS). METHODS: Gross dissection and histologic examination of eyes and orbits of seven woodpeckers. RESULTS: All birds showed restricted axial globe movement due to the tight fit within the orbit and fascial connections between the orbital rim and sclera. The sclera was reinforced with cartilage and bone, the optic nerve lacked redundancy, and the vitreous lacked attachments to the posterior pole retina. CONCLUSIONS: Woodpecker eyes differ from human infants by an inability of the globe to move axially in the orbit, the sclera to deform, and the vitreous to shear the retina. These findings support current hypotheses that abusive acceleration-deceleration-induced ocular injury in human infants may be related to translation of vitreous within the globe and the globe within the orbit. The woodpecker presents a natural model resistant to mechanical forces that have some similarity to SBS.


Assuntos
Aves/anatomia & histologia , Traumatismos Oculares/prevenção & controle , Olho/anatomia & histologia , Fenômenos Fisiológicos Oculares , Animais , Aves/fisiologia , Movimentos Oculares , Humanos , Lactente , Músculos Oculomotores/anatomia & histologia , Órbita/anatomia & histologia , Esclera/fisiologia , Síndrome do Bebê Sacudido/prevenção & controle , Especificidade da Espécie , Corpo Vítreo/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA