Multicenter observational study on functional bowel disorders diagnosed using Rome III diagnostic criteria in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The Rome III diagnostic criteria had been used to diagnose functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) world wide, and functional bowel disorders (FBDs) including irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) have recently attracted the attention of Japanese physicians. However, there have been few reports on the prevalence of FBDs diagnosed by the Rome III diagnostic criteria. AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of FBDs diagnosed according to the diagnostic criteria of Rome III in Japan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients who were booked for colonoscopy were enrolled from eight institutions in Japan. This study was a prospective observational study in the period from April 2013 to December 2013. Patients filled out FGID questionnaires of Rome III when they were waiting for colonoscopy. RESULTS: Data for 1200 patients who underwent colonoscopy were analyzed. A total of 547 patients (45.6%) were diagnosed with FBDs. Out of those patients, 9.1% had IBS. According to the Rome III diagnostic criteria, 134 patients (11.2%) had functional bloating (FB), 73 (6.1%) had functional constipation (FC), 40 (3.3%) had functional diarrhea (FD), and 191 (15.9%) had unspecified functional bowel disorder (UFBD). Patients with FBDs had significantly higher rates of almost all symptoms (abdominal pain, hard or lumpy stools, loose or watery stools, and bloating) than those in the controls. CONCLUSIONS: In Japan, the prevalence of FBDs and IBS is high, similar to that in the US. Many patients with FBDs have multiple symptoms.

Daclatasvir and asunaprevir in hemodialysis patients with hepatitis C virus infection: a nationwide retrospective study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in hemodialysis patients and worsens their prognosis, while antiviral therapy options are limited. Recently, clinical trial and real-world, small-scale studies have reported excellent responses to direct-acting antivirals in patients with advanced chronic kidney diseases. However, real-world, large-scale data were lacking. This large multicenter analysis included HCV-infected hemodialysis patients receiving combination therapy with a nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) inhibitor, daclatasvir (DCV), and a protease inhibitor, asunaprevir (ASV). METHODS: Twenty-three centers in Japan participated in this study of 123 hemodialysis patients with genotype 1 HCV infection, who received DCV/ASV combination therapy between November 2014 and March 2016. We collected and analyzed data relating to treatment outcome, baseline clinical information, laboratory measurements (during and after the treatment), and adverse events. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (31.7%) had advanced liver fibrosis, 12 (9.8%) had histories of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and 18 (14.6%) had baseline resistance-associated variants (RAVs) of NS5A. The overall sustained virological response (SVR)12 rate was 95.9% (118/123). Notably, all patients with HCC and 94.4% (17/18) of those with NS5A RAVs achieved SVR12. Significant factors associated with non-SVR were advanced fibrosis and the interleukin-28B non-TT genotype at rs8099917. Four patients (3.3%) discontinued therapy because of adverse events including elevated serum alanine transaminase levels (n = 2), rash (n = 1), and HCC (n = 1); all of these achieved SVR12. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world, nationwide study revealed that DCV/ASV combination therapy was safe and highly effective for hemodialysis patients with genotype 1 HCV infections. This study was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000024227).

Safety and efficacy of daclatasvir and asunaprevir in hepatitis C virus-infected patients with renal impairment.

AIM: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a risk factor for end-stage renal disease, renal graft failure, and hemodialysis patient mortality. However, the efficacy of direct-acting antiviral therapy for HCV-infected patients with renal impairment is unclear. Additionally, the promising NS5B inhibitor sofosbuvir has not been recommended for patients with severe renal impairment. In this prospective, multicenter study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of daclatasvir and asunaprevir combination therapy, with a focus on patients with renal impairment. METHODS: The study included 322 genotype 1 HCV-infected patients who received daclatasvir and asunaprevir combination therapy. The safety and sustained virological response was examined at 12 weeks after the end of treatment and safety was evaluated according to renal function. RESULTS: Of 322 patients, 5% (16/322) and 2.5% (8/322) had chronic kidney disease stage G3b (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], 30-44 mL/min/1.73 m2 ) and stage G4/5 (eGFR, 15-29/<15 mL/min/1.73 m2 ), respectively. Baseline presence of the NS5A resistance-associated variant, previous simeprevir treatment, and HCV RNA titers, which were predictors of a sustained viral response, were similar between patients with eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 and eGFR >45 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Notably, the 12-week sustained viral response rate was comparable in patients with eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (100%, 24/24) and those with eGFR >45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (88.9%, 265/298; P = 0.07). Treatment discontinuation rates and adverse events, including alanine aminotransferase elevation, anemia, and renal disorders, were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Daclatasvir and asunaprevir combination therapy for patients with renal dysfunction was highly effective and safe.

Efficacy and safety of daclatasvir and asunaprevir combination therapy in chronic hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND: HCV infection in chronic hemodialysis patients is high, has a poor prognosis and high risk of renal graft failure, and requires nosocomial infection control measures. However, options of anti-HCV therapy in such patients are limited and unsatisfactory. In this study, we report effectiveness and safety of HCV-NS5A-inhibitor daclatasvir (DCV) and protease-inhibitor asunaprevir (ASV) combination therapy for hemodialysis patients with HCV infection. METHODS: This study was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000016355. Thirty-four dialysis patients were treated with DCV/ASV combination therapy between January 2015 and November 2015. Of those, 21 patients who were followed more than 12 weeks after treatment ended were included. We evaluated the 12-week sustained virologic response (SVR12) and adverse events during treatment. RESULTS: Of the 21 patients, four had compensated liver cirrhosis and three had resistance-associated variant of NS5A (NS5A RAVs)-Y93H at baseline. Overall, total of 95.5 % (20/21) of the patients achieved SVR12. Of note, all patients with cirrhosis or NS5A RAVs achieved SVR12. One relapser patient at 4 weeks post-treatment had NS3 D168E RAVs at baseline. A total of 20 patients (95.5 %) completed the 24-week therapy. One patient discontinued treatment at week 12 due to ALT elevations and achieved SVR12. CONCLUSIONS: DAV and ASV combination therapy for chronic hemodialysis patients with HCV infection was highly effective and well tolerated, even in elderly patients and patients with liver cirrhosis and NS5A-RAVs.

Factors affecting response to proton pump inhibitor therapy in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a multicenter prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, the first-line treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), is not always effective. This study aimed to examine the effect of pretreatment patient characteristics on response to PPI therapy. METHODS: Japanese outpatients with symptomatic GERD scheduled to receive endoscopy and PPI therapy were enrolled in this multicenter prospective observational study. The patients' characteristics, including GERD and dyspeptic symptoms, anxiety, depression, and quality of life, were assessed using questionnaires before and 2 and 4 weeks after the start of PPI therapy. Factors affecting therapeutic response were examined by simple and multiple regression analyses using three patient-reported outcome measures as objective variables. RESULTS: Data from 182 patients were analyzed. In multiple regression analysis using the residual symptom rate as an objective variable, lower GERD symptom score (p < 0.05), absence of erosive esophagitis (p < 0.05), higher epigastric pain/burning symptom score (p < 0.05), and higher depression subscale score (p < 0.05) accompanied poorer therapeutic response. In analyses using the patient's impression of therapy, lower GERD symptom score (p < 0.05) and absence of erosive esophagitis (p < 0.05) accompanied poorer therapeutic response. In analyses using the relative GERD symptom intensity evaluated using a numeric rating scale, lower GERD symptom score (p < 0.05), higher epigastric pain/burning symptom score (p < 0.1), and lower body mass index (p < 0.05) accompanied poorer therapeutic response. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who complained of milder GERD symptoms before treatment were likely to have poorer response to PPI therapy. Association of absence of erosive esophagitis, severer epigastric pain/burning symptoms, lower body mass index, and severer depression with poorer therapeutic response was also suggested.

Open-label, randomized, comparative, phase III study on effects of reducing steroid use in combination with Palonosetron.

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of a single administration of dexamethasone (DEX) on day 1 against DEX administration on days 1-3 in combination with palonosetron (PALO), a second-generation 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in non-anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC) moderately-emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). This phase III trial was conducted with a multi-center, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority design. Patients who received non-AC MEC as an initial chemotherapy were randomly assigned to either a group administered PALO (0.75 mg, i.v.) and DEX (9.9 mg, i.v.) prior to chemotherapy (study treatment group), or a group administered additional DEX (8 mg, i.v. or p.o.) on days 2-3 (control group). The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate. The CR rate difference was estimated by logistic regression with allocation factors as covariates. The non-inferiority margin was set at -15% (study treatment group - control group). From April 2011 to March 2013, 305 patients who received non-AC MEC were randomly allocated to one of two study groups. Overall, the CR rate was 66.2% in the study treatment group (N = 151) and 63.6% in the control group (N = 154). PALO plus DEX day 1 was non-inferior to PALO plus DEX days 1-3 (difference, 2.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -7.8%-12.8%; P-value for non-inferiority test = 0.0004). There were no differences between the two groups in terms of complete control rate (64.9 vs 61.7%) and total control rate (49.7% vs 47.4%). Anti-emetic DEX administration on days 2-3 may be eliminated when used in combination with PALO in patients receiving non-AC MEC.

Serum granulysin levels as a predictor of serious telaprevir-induced dermatological reactions.

AIM: Telaprevir-based therapy for chronic hepatitis C patients is effective; however, the high prevalence of dermatological reactions is an outstanding issue. The mechanism and characteristics of such adverse reactions are unclear; moreover, predictive factors remain unknown. Granulysin was recently reported to be upregulated in the blisters of patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS). Therefore, we investigated the risk factors for severe telaprevir-induced dermatological reactions as well as the association between serum granulysin levels and the severity of such reactions. METHODS: A total of 89 patients who received telaprevir-based therapy and had complete clinical information were analyzed. We analyzed the associations between dermatological reactions and clinical factors. Next, we investigated the time-dependent changes in serum granulysin levels in five and 14 patients with grade 3 and non-grade 3 dermatological reactions, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 89 patients, 57 patients had dermatological reactions, including nine patients with grade 3. Univariate analysis revealed that grade 3 dermatological reactions were significantly associated with male sex. Moreover, serum granulysin levels were significantly associated with the severity of dermatological reactions. Three patients with grade 3 dermatological reaction had severe systemic manifestations including SJS, drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome, and systemic lymphoid swelling and high-grade fever; all were hospitalized. Importantly, among the three patients, two patients' serum granulysin levels exceeded 8 ng/mL at onset and symptoms deteriorated within 6 days. CONCLUSION: Male patients are at high risk for severe telaprevir-induced dermatological reactions. Moreover, serum granulysin levels are significantly associated with the severity of dermatological reactions and may be a predictive factor in patients treated with telaprevir-based therapy.

Multi-center randomized controlled study to establish the standard third-line regimen for Helicobacter pylori eradication in Japan.

BACKGROUNDS: The present study sought to establish a standard third-line eradication regimen for Helicobacter pylori in Japan. METHODS: Subjects were 204 patients with H. pylori infection in whom the standard Japanese first- and second-line eradication therapies had proven unsuccessful. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the following third-line eradication therapy groups: (1) LA group: lansoprazole (LPZ) 30 mg 4 times a day (qid) + amoxicillin (AMPC) 500 mg qid for two weeks; (2) LAL group: LPZ 30 mg twice a day (bid) + AMPC 750 mg bid + levofloxacin (LVFX) 300 mg bid for one week; (3) LAS group: LPZ 30 mg bid + AMPC 750 mg bid + sitafloxacin (STFX) 100 mg bid for one week. Patients for whom these therapies failed underwent a crossover fourth-line eradication regimen. Drug sensitivity was also tested for AMPC, clarithromycin (CAM), MNZ, LVFX, and STFX. RESULTS: Drug resistance rates prior to third-line eradication therapy were 86.4 % for CAM, 71.3 % for MNZ, 57.0 % for LVFX, 8.2 % for AMPC, and 7.7 % for STFX. Intention-to-treat analysis of third-line eradication therapy eradication rates showed a significantly higher rate in the LAS group (70.0 %) compared with the LA group (54.3 %; p < 0.05) and the LAL group (43.1 %; p < 0.001). The significantly lower rate in the LAL group than the LAS group was caused by bacterial resistance to LVFX. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that triple therapy with PPI, AMPC, and STFX for one week would be an effective standard third-line eradication regimen for H. pylori in Japan.

Phase II study of combined chemotherapy with irinotecan and S-1 (IRIS) plus bevacizumab in patients with inoperable recurrent or advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: In Japan, a study comparing the effectiveness and safety of irinotecan plus S-1 (IRIS) with those of a combination of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as second-line treatment in patients with advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer demonstrated that IRIS was non-inferior to FOLFIRI. We previously reported that IRIS is also effective as first-line treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility criteria included inoperable recurrent colorectal cancer with a confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma, age ≥20 years, and no history of prior chemotherapy. S-1 (40-60 mg twice daily) was given orally on Days 1 to 14, and irinotecan (100 mg/m(2)) and bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) were given intravenously on Days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was safety. The secondary endpoints included overall response (OR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 52 eligible patients were enrolled from October 2007 through March 2009. In safety analysis, the incidences of grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions were as follows: neutropenia, 27%; hypertension, 21%; and diarrhea, 17%. The overall response rate was 57.7%. Median progression-free survival was 16.7 months. CONCLUSION: IRIS plus bevacizumab is a well-tolerated, highly effective chemotherapeutic regimen that is easy to administer.

Optimal dose period for indisetron tablets for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting with modified FOLFOX6: a randomized pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Indisetron is a serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine type 3) receptor antagonist that also antagonizes 5-hydroxytryptamine type 4 receptors. We designed a pilot study in order to explore the optimal dosing period for indisetron during modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced colorectal cancer scheduled to receive mFOLFOX6 were randomly assigned to either a 1- or 3-day indisetron regimen arm. The primary endpoint was complete protection from vomiting. RESULTS: Proportions of patients with complete protection from vomiting were 85.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 63.7-97.0] with the 3-day regimen and 81.0% (95% CI 58.1-94.6) with the 1-day regimen. Proportions of patients with complete protection from nausea were 47.6% in each arm (95% CI 25.7-70.2). No rescue therapy rates were 66.7% (95% CI 43.0-85.4) versus 57.1% (95% CI 34.0-78.2). No severe adverse events were observed in either arm. CONCLUSION: Both 1- and 3-day indisetron regimens were feasible for preventing nausea and vomiting induced by mFOLFOX6.

A large-scale nationwide multicenter prospective observational study of triple therapy using rabeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin for Helicobacter pylori eradication in Japan.

BACKGROUND: In recent years in Japan, the rate of clarithromycin (CAM) resistance in Helicobacter pylori has risen to around 30%, and the eradication rate with triple therapy [proton pump inhibitor + amoxicillin (AMPC) + CAM] has been trending downward to around 70%. In 2007, rabeprazole (RPZ)-based triple therapy (RPZ + AMPC + CAM: RAC therapy) was approved in Japan, and a large-scale nationwide study was therefore initiated to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RAC therapy in clinical practice. METHODS: Patients with H. pylori-positive gastric/duodenal ulcer (including ulcer scars) were administered triple therapy comprising RPZ 10 mg, AMPC 750 mg, and CAM 200 mg (or 400 mg), twice daily for 7 days. RESULTS: The eradication rate was 80.7% (2,551/3,162). The results of multivariate analysis indicated the following as factors affecting the eradication rate: sex, treatment compliance, history of H. pylori treatment, presence of urologic disease, presence of respiratory disease, and year of starting treatment. The incidence of adverse drug reactions (such as diarrhea and dysgeusia) was 4.4% (166/3,789). The results of multivariate analysis indicated the following as factors affecting the incidence of adverse drug reactions: sex, daily CAM dose, and history of allergies. CONCLUSION: In a large-scale nationwide study of use in clinical practice, RAC therapy was confirmed to be effective and safe.

[Successful chemotherapy of carcinomatosis of the bone marrow with disseminated intravascular coagulation from a rectal carcinoma found by eosinophilia].

A 71-year-old man with eosinophilia was given a diagnosis of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Further examination showed that it had invaded the bone marrow. He had disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) from disseminated carcinomatosis of the bone marrow after colostomy. Chemotherapy (mFOLFOX6) was successful and his eosinophil count, DIC score and tumor markers normalized. We were able to continue chemotherapy after 5 months from the outbreak of disseminated carcinomatosis of the bone marrow. It is said that disseminated carcinomatosis of the bone marrow has a poor prognosis, but we were able to obtain a good response in this case by chemotherapy.

Phase II study of combined treatment with irinotecan and S-1 (IRIS) in patients with inoperable or recurrent advanced colorectal cancer (HGCSG0302).

OBJECTIVES: This phase II study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 plus irinotecan (IRIS regimen) in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: The response rate was the primary endpoint. Safety, progression-free survival time, and median survival time were secondary endpoints. The subjects were untreated patients with inoperable advanced colorectal cancer. Irinotecan was administered at a dose of 100 mg/m² (on days 1 and 15). S-1 (40 mg/m²) was administered for 2 weeks (on days 1 to 14) and followed by a 2-week rest. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled. Four patients had grade 4 neutropenia, and six patients had grade 3 diarrhea. No other serious hematologic or nonhematologic adverse reactions occurred, and all patients received IRIS safely on an outpatient basis. The response rate was 52.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36.1-68.5%). Median progression-free survival was 8.6 months (95% CI, 5.3-11.9), and median survival time was 23.4 months (95% CI, 15.9-30.8). CONCLUSIONS: IRIS produced a high response rate and could be given safely. IRIS may become a first-line treatment for inoperable or recurrent advanced colorectal cancer.

Phase 1/2 clinical study of irinotecan and oral S-1 (IRIS) in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan and S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine composed of tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil potassium, have demonstrated antitumor activity against advanced gastric cancer. We performed a phase 1/2 study to determine the recommended dose, antitumor activity, and safety of a combination of S-1 and irinotecan in patients with advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer were enrolled. Patients received irinotecan intravenously on days 1 and 15 plus oral S-1 twice daily on days 1-14 of a 28-day cycle. In the phase 1 part, the dose of irinotecan was escalated from 100 mg/m(2) to 125 mg/m(2) and then to 150 mg/m(2). RESULTS: A total of 24 patients were enrolled. Overall, the median number of treatment cycles per patient was 5.9, and 92% of the patients completed at least two cycles. The overall response rate was 54.2% (13 of 24). The response rates in differentiated and undifferentiated cancer were 56.3% (nine of 16) and 50.0% (four of eight), respectively. Median survival time was 581 days. The maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan was not reached at the highest level. However, grade 4 neutropenia occurred at 125 mg/m(2). We concluded that the recommended dose of irinotecan for the present regimen was 125 mg/m(2). CONCLUSION: Treatment with S-1+irinotecan is considered effective in patients with advanced gastric cancer who have not previously received chemotherapy. A combination of irinotecan and S-1 was well tolerated in patients with advanced gastric cancer and could be given on an outpatient basis.

Modified-irinotecan/fluorouracil/levoleucovorin therapy as ambulatory treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: results of phase I and II studies.

BACKGROUND: Combined therapy with irinotecan/fluorouracil/levoleucovorin (calcium levofolinate) [IFL] has lost its position as the standard regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer because its toxicity and effectiveness have become controversial. OBJECTIVE: To (i) identify the optimal regimen for IFL therapy in terms of irinotecan dosage, and (ii) determine the maximum tolerated dose and efficacy of the modified-IFL regimen in patients with histologically confirmed advanced colorectal cancer. METHODS: In a phase I study, nine patients with advanced colorectal cancer received IFL treatment modified such that irinotecan was administered every 2 weeks, as opposed to the more toxic once-weekly administration. The study evaluated three escalating dose levels of irinotecan (100, 125 and 150 mg/m(2)). Each treatment cycle consisted of irinotecan on days 1 and 15; fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15 and 22; and levoleucovorin 250 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15 and 22. Data from the phase I study were used to determine the recommended dose of irinotecan for the phase II study. The latter study evaluated the effectiveness (overall response rate, median time to disease progression and median survival time) and tolerability of this modified-IFL therapy as ambulatory treatment in 22 patients with advanced colorectal cancer. RESULTS: The dose-limiting toxicity of irinotecan was grade 3 neutropenia, which occurred in three patients at dose level 2 (125 mg/m(2)); furthermore, a fourth patient developed grade 4 neutropenia at this dose level. Therefore, 125 mg/m(2) was considered to be the maximum tolerated dose, and the dose of irinotecan for the phase II study was set at 100 mg/m(2). Fourteen patients achieved partial response using this modified-IFL regimen, and the overall response rate was 63.6% (95% CI 43.5, 83.7). The median time to progression was 197 days (range 111-283 days) and the median survival time was 414 days (95% CI 116, 712). Toxicities were acceptable and manageable. CONCLUSIONS: Modified-IFL therapy is a practical, effective and tolerable option for ambulatory treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

[A case of primary adenocarcinoma of small intestine with multiple liver metastases successfully treated with mFOLFOX6].

A 60-year-old man was referred to our hospital since his stool examination was positive for occult blood. Colonoscopy showed a tumor of Bauhin's valve and terminal ileum. Biopsy of the tumor was performed and pathological examination revealed adenocarcinoma. No other lesions were detected by gastroduodenoscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy. CT also showed multiple liver metastases. Ileocecal resection was performed because of severe stenosis of the terminal ileum. Histopathological examination revealed moderately-differentiated adenocarcinoma of Bauhin's valve and the terminal ileum, and no adenocarcinoma was found in the cecum and ascending colon. He was diagnosed with primary adenocarcinoma of the ileum with multiple liver metastases. Chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 was performed after surgical resection. After 5 courses of chemotherapy, abdominal CT showed marked regression of the liver metastases, and tumor marker (CA19-9) was normalized from 1,100 U/mL to 36 U/mL. Effectiveness of mFOLFOX6 for primary adenocarcinoma of small intestine is suggested.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with massive portal vein tumor thrombosis in a patient with alcoholic cirrhosis: a case report and literature review.

We describe a case of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with massive portal vein tumor thrombosis in a patient with alcoholic cirrhosis. The tumor was detected only in the intrahepatic portal vein and the spermatic cord by FDG-PET/CT. Percutaneous liver biopsy and orchiectomy were performed and histological examination revealed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The tumor showed complete response after six courses of the combination chemotherapy. Portal vein tumor thrombosis of malignant lymphoma is extremely rare; moreover, it is possible that this is the first case of malignant lymphoma originating from the spermatic cord producing portal vein tumor thrombosis.

[Irinotecan plus oral S-1 in patients with advanced colorectal cancer--biweekly IRIS regimen].

We planned to conduct a phase II clinical study of combination therapy with CPT-11 and S-1. The antitumor effect was the primary endpoint, while the safety, progression-free survival time, and median survival time were the secondary endpoints. The subjects were untreated patients with inoperable advanced colorectal cancer aged 20-75 years. Based on the results of our previous phase I/II study in patients with gastric cancer, the dosage was established in consideration of safety for outpatient therapy. CPT-11 was administered at a dose of 100 mg/m2 (on days 1 and 15) as an intravenous infusion over 90 minutes, and oral S-1 (40 mg/m2) was administered after breakfast and dinner and then withdrawn for 2 weeks. No other serious adverse reactions occurred (either hematological or non-hematological), and all patients could receive therapy safely on an outpatient basis. Interim analysis suggested excellent results, with a response rate of 50%. Combination therapy with CPT-11 and S-1 achieved a high response rate and could be given safely. These findings suggest that the therapy has potential as first-line treatment for inoperable advanced recurrent colorectal cancer.

Phase II study of oral S-1 plus irinotecan in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: Hokkaido Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group HGCSG0302.

We have previously reported on phase I/II studies of irinotecan plus S-1 therapy for advanced gastric cancer. Based on the safety and efficacy data that were obtained, this phase II study was planned to assess the efficacy of irinotecan plus S-1 for patients with advanced colorectral cancer. A total of 40 patients are enrolled at 13 medical institutions. The objective of this study was to establish a useful chemotherapy regimen for an out-patient setting.

Diffuse neonatal hemangiomatosis without cutaneous lesions in an adult--a case report.

Diffuse neonatal hemangiomatosis (DNH) is a rare disorder that first presents with multiple cutaneous and visceral hemangiomas during the neonatal period and has a high mortality rate. The authors report a long-term survivor of DNH who presented with multiple visceral hemangiomas without cutaneous lesions. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) may play an important role in tumor progression.