A phase I pharmacologic study of necitumumab (IMC-11F8), a fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody directed against EGFR in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose for disease-directed studies of necitumumab (IMC-11F8), a fully human IgG(1) monoclonal antibody directed at the epidermal growth factor receptor, and to characterize the safety profile, pharmacokinetics, preliminary antitumor activity, and immunogenicity of necitumumab. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with 100 to 1,000 mg (flat dosing) necitumumab followed by a 2-week pharmacokinetics sampling period, before beginning 6-week cycles of therapy. RESULTS: Sixty patients received necitumumab weekly (29 patients) or every other week (31 patients). Two patients receiving 1,000 mg every 2 weeks experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLT; grade 3 headache), accompanied by grade 3 nausea and vomiting in one patient. Occurring hours after the initial dose, these DLTs established 800 mg as the MTD. Mild dose-related skin toxicity was the most common drug-related toxicity (80%). One patient in each arm experienced grade 3 acneform rash, which responded to oral antibiotics and topical therapy. Toxicity was similar on both schedules. Necitumumab exhibited saturable elimination and nonlinear pharmacokinetics. At 800 mg (both arms), its half-life was approximately 7 days. All patients treated with >or=600 mg necitumumab achieved target trough concentrations (>or=40 microg/mL). Antibodies against necitumumab were not detected. Partial response and stable disease were experienced by 2 and 16 patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Well tolerated, necitumumab is associated with preliminary evidence of antitumor activity, and achieves biologically relevant concentrations throughout the dosing period. The recommended dose of necitumumab for further clinical development is 800 mg (flat dose) weekly or every 2 weeks based on the clinical setting.

Pharmacological aspects of the enzastaurin-pemetrexed combination in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Conventional regimens have limited impact against NSCLC. Current research is focusing on multiple pathways as potential targets, and this review describes pharmacological aspects underlying the combination of the PKCbeta-inhibitor enzastaurin with the multitargeted antifolate pemetrexed. Pemetrexed is commonly used, alone or combined with platinum compounds, in NSCLC treatment, and ongoing studies are evaluating its target, thymidylate synthase (TS), as predictor of drug activity. Enzastaurin is a biological targeted agent being actively investigated against different tumors as single agent or in combination. All the downstream events following PKCbeta inhibition by enzastaurin are not completely known, and assays to evaluate possible biomarkers, such as expression of PKC, VEGF and GSK3beta, in tissues and/or in blood samples, are being developed. Enzastaurin-pemetrexed combination was synergistic in preclinical models, including NSCLC cells, where enzastaurin reduced phosphoCdc25C, resulting in G2/M-checkpoint abrogation, and Akt and GSK3beta; phosphorylation, favoring apoptosis induction in pemetrexed-damaged cells. Enzastaurin also significantly reduced VEGF secretion and pemetrexed-induced upregulation of TS expression, possibly via E2F-1 reduction, while the combination decreased TS activity. Similarly, the accumulation of deoxyuridine (a marker of TS inhibition) and the reduction of GSK3beta phosphorylation were detectable in clinical samples from a phase-Ib trial of pemetrexed-enzastaurin combination. In conclusion, the favorable toxicity profile and the multiple effects of enzastaurin on signaling pathways involved in cell cycle control, apoptosis and angiogenesis, as well as on proteins involved in pemetrexed activity, provide experimental basis for future studies on enzastaurin-pemetrexed combination and their possible pharmacodynamic markers in NSCLC patients.

A phase I safety and pharmacologic study of a twice weekly dosing regimen of the oral taxane BMS-275183.

PURPOSE: BMS-275183, an orally administered C-4 methyl carbonate paclitaxel analogue, showed promising activity in a phase I trial investigating a weekly treatment regimen, but was associated with a relatively high incidence of neuropathic side effects. The current dose escalation phase I trial was initiated to investigate whether twice weekly administration of BMS-275183 would improve its safety and tolerability. Additionally, the pharmacokinetics and possible antitumor activity were studied. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A cycle consisted of 4 weeks (i.e., eight twice weekly oral doses). The starting dose was 60 mg/m(2) and the dose was increased by 20 mg/m(2) increments. Cohorts consisted of three patients and were expanded to at least six patients when toxicity was encountered. Plasma pharmacokinetics were done on days 1 and 15. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients were enrolled. The maximum tolerated dose was 100 mg/m(2) twice weekly. Seventeen patients were treated at the maximum tolerated dose; 3 of 17 patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity, consisting of a combination of neutropenia, neuropathy, and diarrhea. BMS-275183 seemed to have a considerably lower incidence of neuropathic side effects compared with the weekly treatment regimen. Confirmed partial responses were observed in two patients with non-small cell lung cancer, one patient with prostate cancer, and one patient with melanoma. In addition, a long-lasting prostate-specific antigen response was observed in a patient with prostate carcinoma with nonmeasurable disease. CONCLUSIONS: BMS-275183 is preferably given in a twice weekly regimen and has considerable antitumor activity. A phase II trial in non-small cell lung cancer using the twice weekly schedule has been initiated.

A parallel dose-escalation study of weekly and twice-weekly bortezomib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To establish maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and tolerability of two schedules of bortezomib in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine as first-line treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients were assigned to increasing doses of bortezomib days 1 and 8 (weekly schedule) or days 1, 4, 8, and 11 (twice-weekly schedule), in addition to gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) day 1, every 21 days. Maximum of six cycles. Plasma pharmacokinetics of cisplatin and gemcitabine were determined at MTD. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled of whom 27 had non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Diarrhea, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were dose-limiting toxicities leading to an MTD of bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) in the weekly schedule. Febrile neutropenia and thrombocytopenia with bleeding were dose-limiting toxicities in the twice-weekly schedule, leading to an MTD of bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) as well. Most common > or =grade 3 treatment-related toxicities were thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. No grade > or =3 treatment-related sensory neuropathy was reported. Of 34 evaluable patients, 13 achieved partial responses, 17 stable disease, and 4 progressive disease. Response and survival of NSCLC patients treated with twice weekly or weekly bortezomib were similar. However, increased dose intensity of bortezomib led to increased gastrointestinal toxicity as well as myelosuppression. Pharmacokinetic profiles of cisplatin and gemcitabine were not significantly different in patients receiving either schedule. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) is the recommended phase 2 schedule, constituting a safe combination, with activity in NSCLC.

Phase I trial with BMS-275183, a novel oral taxane with promising antitumor activity.

PURPOSE: BMS-275183 is an orally administered C-4 methyl carbonate analogue of paclitaxel. We did a dose-escalating phase I study to investigate its safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and possible antitumor activity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A cycle consisted of four weekly doses of BMS-275183. The starting dose was 5 mg, which was increased by 100% increments (i.e., 5, 10, 20 mg/m2, etc.) in each new cohort consisting of one patient. Cohorts were expanded when toxicity was encountered, and 20 patients were treated at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Plasma pharmacokinetics were done on days 1 and 15. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients were enrolled in this trial. Dose-limiting toxicities consisted of neuropathy, fatigue, diarrhea, and neutropenia. First cycle severe neuropathy was reported in four patients treated at 320 (n = 1), 240 (n = 2), and 160 mg/m2 (n = 1), whereas eight patients treated at dose levels ranging from 160 to 320 mg/m2 experienced grade 2 neuropathy in cycle one. The MTD was 200 mg/m2, as 3 of 20 patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicity in cycle one [fatigue (n = 2), and neutropenia/diarrhea (n = 1)]. BMS-275183 was rapidly absorbed with a mean plasma half-life of 22 hours. We observed a significant correlation between drug-exposure and toxicity. Tumor responses were observed in 9 of 38 evaluable patients with non-small cell lung cancer, prostate carcinoma, and other tumor types. CONCLUSIONS: BMS-275183 is generally well tolerated on a weekly schedule. The main toxicity is peripheral neuropathy, and the MTD is 200 mg/m2. Promising activity was observed in several tumor types, and a phase II trial in non-small cell lung cancer has been initiated.

Dose-finding study of the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor SU6668 in patients with advanced malignancies.

PURPOSE: SU6668 is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor which targets platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta, fibroblast growth factor receptor-1, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, and KIT. We did a phase I study to define the maximum tolerated dose and to assess the pharmacokinetics of SU6668 administered orally thrice daily with food. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically proven, advanced, and progressive solid tumors were included at a starting dose level of 400 mg/m2 thrice daily. The early onset of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) required dose reductions to 100 and 200 mg/m2 thrice daily. Pharmacokinetics was done on days 1, 28, and 56. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were included. Two of the first three patients developed DLTs, which consisted of grade 4 fatigue and grade 3 serositis-like pains. Six patients at dose level 100 mg/m2 thrice daily experienced no DLT. At dose level 200 mg/m2 thrice daily, two out of seven patients experienced DLTs consisting of grade 3 abdominal pain, grade 4 anorexia and grade 3 nausea/vomiting. Increasing doses resulted in a disproportional increase in area under the curve and C(max) (peak plasma concentration). Both variables, however, decreased significantly on days 28 and 56 compared with day 1 (P < 0.05). No objective responses were observed. Acute phase response, probably mediated by interleukin-6, was observed in serial blood samples. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose of SU6668 given orally, thrice daily under fed conditions, is 100 mg/m2. Because of the low plasma levels reached at this dose level, the efficacy of SU6668 as a single agent is not to be expected.

Efficacy and toxicity of the angiogenesis inhibitor SU5416 as a single agent in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma, melanoma, and soft tissue sarcoma.

INTRODUCTION: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a key regulator in angiogenesis. Preclinical and clinical data support the role of VEGF and angiogenesis in renal cell carcinoma (RCC), melanoma (M), and soft tissue sarcoma (STS). The tyrosine kinase inhibitor SU5416 is a potent inhibitor of the VEGF receptors 1 and 2. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We investigated 145 mg/m(2) SU5416 twice weekly in patients with advanced or metastatic RCC, M, and STS. The primary objectives were efficacy and safety. Disease assessments were performed after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment and every 2 months thereafter. Documented stable disease (SD) lasting for > or =3 months was considered an antitumor response. RESULTS: A group of 29 patients was entered in the RCC trial, 20 patients in the M trial, and 31 patients in the STS trial. Response was observed in 6 (1 minor response and 5 SDs) of 24 evaluable patients (25%) in the RCC group, 6 (1 minor response and 5 SDs) of 26 patients (23%) in the STS group, and none of the patients in the M group. Progression-free survival ranged from 7 to 252 days (median 59 days) in the RCC group, from 7 to 260 days (median 60 days) in the STS group, and from 14 to 139 days (median 41 days) in the M group. Toxicities observed were those reported previously for SU5416. CONCLUSION: SU5416 single agent is well tolerated. The antitumor response was low in patients with RCC and STS, whereas no responses were seen in patients with M.

Dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of cisplatin, gemcitabine, and SU5416 in patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility and pharmacokinetics of the combination cisplatin, gemcitabine, and SU5416. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 1, gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, repeated every 3 weeks, and SU5416 (85 and 145 mg/m(2)) intravenously twice weekly. Pharmacokinetics of all three agents, side effects, and antitumor response were investigated in patients with solid tumors amenable to therapy with cisplatin/gemcitabine. RESULTS: In the first cohort of three patients entered at the 85 mg/m(2) dose, no dose-limiting toxicities were observed. In the next cohort (145 mg/m(2)), three patients developed a thromboembolic event. After entry was restricted to patients with low thromboembolic risk, three additional patients enrolled at 145 mg/m(2) developed a thromboembolic event. The dose was then reduced to 85 mg/m(2) in all patients still on the study, and three additional patients were entered on this dose level. In 19 treated patients, eight patients developed nine thromboembolic events (three transient ischemic attacks, two cerebrovascular accidents, and four deep venous thromboses). The most common toxicities observed were those previously reported for SU5416 alone (headache and phlebitis) and for this chemotherapy regimen (nausea, thrombocytopenia, and leucopenia). No significant pharmacologic interaction among the three drugs was observed. Response rates were similar to those expected in the patient population selected for this study. Analysis of variables of the coagulation cascade and of vessel wall activation was performed in three patients and showed significant increases in thrombin generation and endothelial cell perturbation in a treatment cycle-dependent manner. CONCLUSION: The incidence of thromboembolic events, possibly related to the particular regimen tested in this study, discourages further investigation of this regimen.