Is grading of breast fibrosis with mammography feasible?

PURPOSE: To establish a grading system for mammographic fibrosis and correlate it with clinical fibrosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Analogous to the LENT/SOMA scale a four-tiered scoring scale of breast fibrosis in mammography (G0 = absent, G1 = barely increased density, G2 = definitely increased density to G3 = very marked density) was established by two observers in a group of 16 patients. Reference mammograms were selected. Independently and blinded to clinical results, three observers scored the fibrosis in mammograms of further 31 patients examined by one radiation oncologist in a cross-sectional follow-up study. Pretreatment parenchyma density was judged according to the American College of Radiology (ACR). Interobserver correlation of mammography scoring as well as correlation of mammography and clinical findings were calculated with Cohen's weighted kappa. All patients had breast-conserving surgery and axillary resection for breast carcinoma T1-2N0-1. The breast was irradiated to a median reference dose of 55 Gy (range 50-60 Gy) with 2 Gy five times weekly or 2.5 Gy four times weekly. Two patients received chemotherapy, 14 patients tamoxifen. Median age was 55 years, median follow-up 8 years (4-15 years). RESULTS: 14 of 31 patients had clinical fibrosis, twelve G1 and two G2. In mammography, mild fibrosis (G1) was seen in 12/12/18 patients (observer 1/2/3) and moderate fibrosis (G2) in 9/10/2 patients. Interobserver correlation for observers 1 and 2 who had developed the score was fair (Cohen's weighted kappa 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.4-0.88). However, it was weak for observer 3 (0.36 and 0.42, respectively) who relied on reference mammograms only. Independent interobserver correlation of pretreatment breast density was good for all observers (Cohen's weighted kappa 0.73-0.8). The correlation of fibrosis by mammography and palpation was weak (Cohen's weighted kappa 0.32-0.42). CONCLUSION: Grading fibrosis as depicted by mammography is possible, especially if observers prepare by jointly analyzing a training group. It may be useful to study treatment effects, e. g., of fractionation or drugs, because retrospective and repeated analysis is possible. The correlation of mammography with clinical grading should be further evaluated with more objective clinical reference tools.

Individual radiosensitivity measured with lymphocytes may be used to predict the risk of fibrosis after radiotherapy for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To analyse the relationship of individual cellular radiosensitivity and fibrosis after breast conserving therapy. A new model was used describing the percentage of patients developing fibrosis per year and per patient at risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study, 86 patients were included, who had undergone breast conserving surgery and irradiation of the breast with a median dose of 55 Gy (54-55 Gy) given at 2.5 Gy/fraction (n=57) or 2 Gy/fraction (n=29). Median age was 62 years (range 44-86) and median follow-up was 7.5 years (range 5-17). Patients were examined for fibrosis according to the LENT/SOMA score. For analysis, fibrosis was classified as grade 0 and grade 1 (G0-1) or present grade 2 and grade 3 (G2-3). The time to complete development of fibrosis was determined by analysis of yearly mammograms. Individual cellular radiosensitivity was determined by scoring lethal chromosomal aberrations in in vitro irradiated (6 Gy) lymphocytes using metaphase technique. Patients with low/intermediate cellular radiosensitivity were compared with patients with high cellular radiosensitivity using actuarial methods. RESULTS: Ten patients developed fibrosis at 1-8 years after radiotherapy. Individual cellular radiosensitivity was described by normal distribution of lethal chromosomal aberrations, the average was 5.47 lethal aberrations per cell (standard deviation (SD) 0.71). Cellular radiosensitivity was defined as low/intermediate (< or =6.18 lethal aberrations) in 73 patients and high (>6.18 lethal aberrations; mean+SD) in 13 patients. In both groups, the actuarial rate of fibrosis-free patients decreased exponentially with time after radiotherapy. Patients with high cellular radiosensitivity showed a 2.3-fold higher annual rate for fibrosis than patients with intermediate and low radiosensitivity (3.6 versus 1.6% per year). CONCLUSIONS: In breast cancer patients, high individual cellular radiosensitivity as determined by the number of lethal chromosome aberrations in in vitro irradiated lymphocytes might be associated with an enhanced annual rate of fibrosis.

Cosmesis from the patient's and the doctor's view.

PURPOSE: Long-term cosmesis from the patient's perspective is compared to the doctor's appraisal. Factors that determine judgment of cosmesis are analyzed. Also, a patient questionnaire was designed to screen for normal tissue reactions and is evaluated. METHODS AND PATIENTS: With structured questions, patients rated their satisfaction considering cosmesis, the difference in overall appearance, and specific changes of the breast. Two doctors rated cosmesis and radiation late effects (LENT/SOMA). Ratings were compared, and the relative impact of single items was studied. Two hundred eighty-seven patients with unilateral breast carcinoma were examined after a median follow-up of 8 years. They were treated between 1981 and 1995 with lumpectomy and radiotherapy of the breast with 1.8-2.5 Gy fractions with a median total dose of 55 Gy (range: 50-65 Gy). RESULTS: One hundred sixty-one patients rated cosmesis as satisfying, 73 patients rated it as acceptable, and 25 patients as poor. Eighty-nine patients noted severe changes of appearance. Severe firmness and extensive scars were the most frequent complaint; the most important single item for judging cosmesis as poor was highly visible scars. Generally, doctors rated cosmesis less favorably (satisfactory, 150 patients; poor, 43 patients). Severe fibrosis was more important than discoloration of the breast or scars. Correlation between patients' and doctors' rating of cosmesis was modest (Cohen's weighted kappa 0.29), whereas the doctor's rating correlated well (0.55). Specificity and sensitivity of the questionnaire item for severe fibrosis (using doctors' judgments as gold standard) was 0.8; Cohen's weighted kappa was 0.34 (95% confidence interval: 0.21-0.48). CONCLUSION: Rating of cosmesis is subjective. Patients' satisfaction with cosmesis is greater than the doctors' and is determined not only by radiation late effects, but also by factors unrelated to the appearance of the breast. Severe fibrosis may be detected by a patient questionnaire.

Long-term radiation sequelae after breast-conserving therapy in women with early-stage breast cancer: an observational study using the LENT-SOMA scoring system.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term toxicity after breast-conserving therapy in women with early-stage breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Late toxicity according to the late effects of normal tissue-subjective, objective, management, and analytic (LENT-SOMA) criteria and cosmetic outcome (graded by physicians) were evaluated in 590 of 2943 women with early-stage breast cancer who were irradiated between 1983 and 1995 using the following fractionation schedules: group A, 1983-1987, 2.5 Gy 4x/wk to 60 Gy; group B, 1988-1993, 2.5 Gy 4x/wk to 55 Gy, group C, 1994-1995, 2.0 Gy 5x/wk to 55 Gy. RESULTS: LENT-SOMA Grade 3-4 toxicity was observed as follows: group A (median follow-up 171 months; range 154-222 months), fibrosis 16% (7 of 45), telangiectasia 18% (8 of 45), and atrophy 4% (2 of 45); group B (median follow-up 113 months; range 78-164 months), pain 2% (8 of 345), fibrosis 10% (34 of 345), telangiectasia 10% (33 of 345), arm edema 1% (2 of 345), and atrophy 8% (27 of 345); and group C (median follow-up 75 months, range 51-96 months, n = 200), occurrence of Grade 3-4 late morbidity

Increasing the rate of late toxicity by changing the score? A comparison of RTOG/EORTC and LENT/SOMA scores.

PURPOSE: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force subjective, objective, management, and analytic (LENT/SOMA) scores were compared in a group of breast cancer patients. The impact of the classification system on grading late effects was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Telangiectasia, skin pigmentation, and fibrosis were scored according to both LENT/SOMA and RTOG criteria. The results were compared with respect to up- or downgrading and correlated (Spearman's rho). Other side effects were recorded using LENT/SOMA criteria. Interobserver variability was calculated with Cohen's kappa. Two hundred fifty-nine subsequent relapse-free patients who underwent breast-conserving therapy between 1981 and 1995 were examined. The median dose of radiotherapy to the breast was 55 Gy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 31 patients and tamoxifen to 52 patients. The median follow-up was 8 years. RTOG skin and s.c. tissue scales and LENT/SOMA breast and pigmentation scales were used. Two doctors examined 45 patients jointly. RESULTS: Of all patients, 20% had telangiectasia, 22% pigmentation, 43% fibrosis, 4% breast edema, 77% retraction/atrophy, and 54% pain. In comparison, when LENT/SOMA criteria were used, telangiectasia and pigmentation were upgraded in 34% and 36%, respectively, and telangiectasia was downgraded in 45%. Fibrosis correlated well (Spearman's rho 0.78, p = 0.01). An additional 356 side effects, mainly retraction/atrophy were observed in 226 patients using LENT/SOMA criteria. Interobserver variability was similar for both classification systems and ranged from Cohen's kappa 0.3 (retraction) to 0.91 (telangiectasia). CONCLUSIONS: LENT/SOMA criteria seem to be the better tool in grading and recording late radiation toxicity compared with the RTOG scale. There was some upgrading with the RTOG score when skin toxicity is evaluated. In contrast, fibrosis scores correlated very well. Adjustments of the LENT/SOMA scoring system should be considered to standardize reporting of late radiation morbidity.