RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare quality of life in patients undergoing proctocolectomy with ileal pouch procedure and ileostomy taking into account sexual function. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The comparative observational study included 138 patients with ulcerative colitis for the period 2013-2018. All patients underwent surgery with one- or two-stage formation of pelvic pouch (n=76) or ileostomy (n=62). Validated questionnaires SF-36, The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) were used in the study. RESULTS: Patients with pelvic pouch were significantly younger than patients with terminal ileostomy (33.7±10.9 and 44.6±14.9 years, respectively, p<0.0001). The majority of the parameters of SF-36 questionnaire were similar in both groups. Pain syndrome intensity was the only sign demonstrating the advantage of ileostomy over pelvic pouch. However, regression analysis did not confirm the effect of surgical technique on pain severity. Orgasmic function was significantly better in men with pelvic pouch compared to ileostomy. Other indicators of sexual function were similar. According to FSFI questionnaire, women with pelvic pouch also showed significantly better results than patients with permanent ileostomy. However, multivariate regression analysis revealed no significant effect of surgical technique on sexual function in men and women. At the same time, significant negative correlation between IIEF and FSFI scores and age was revealed. CONCLUSION: No significant influence of surgical technique on postoperative QOL was observed in patients with ulcerative colitis. Better sexual function in men and women with pelvic pouch are due to younger age rather type of surgery.
