Frequency of Automatic Stimulations in Responsive Vagal Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Refractory Epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: In vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy, the release of VNS model 106 (AspireSR) allowed for responsive VNS (rVNS). rVNS utilizes a cardiac-based seizure detection algorithm to detect seizure-induced tachycardia to trigger additional stimulation. There are some studies suggesting clinical benefits of rVNS over traditional VNS, but the performance and significance of autostimulation mode in clinical practice are poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of initiation of rVNS therapy and altered stimulation settings on the number of daily stimulations and energy consumption in VNS therapy and to compare autostimulation performance in different epilepsy types. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective follow-up of 30 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy treated with rVNS including 17 new implantations and 13 battery replaces at a single center in Finland. Our data consist of 208 different stimulation periods, that is, episodes with defined stimulation settings and both autostimulation and total stimulation performance-related data along with clinical follow-up. RESULTS: The variation in autostimulation frequency was highly dependent on the duration of the OFF-time and autostimulation threshold (p < 0.05). There was a large additional effect of autostimulation mode on therapy time and energy consumption with longer OFF-times, but a minor effect with shorter OFF-times. Significantly more autostimulations were triggered in the temporal lobe and multifocal epilepsies than in extratemporal lobe epilepsies. CONCLUSIONS: The initiation of autostimulation mode in VNS therapy increased the total number of stimulations. Shortening the OFF-time leads to a decreased number and share of automatic activations. Epilepsy type may affect autostimulation activity.

Circadian distribution of autostimulations in rVNS therapy in patients with refractory focal epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Responsive vagus nerve stimulation (rVNS) utilizes an electrocardiograph (ECG)-based algorithm to detect rapid sympathetic activations associated with the onset of a seizure. Abrupt sympathetic activation may also be associated with nocturnal arousals between sleep cycles or transitioning from sleep to wakefulness, a period in which many patients with epilepsy experience seizures. Because of circadian changes in autonomic function, we hypothesized that the autostimulation feature might also behave in a circadian fashion. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the circadian rhythmicity of autostimulations in rVNS treatment in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective follow-up study of 30 patients with DRE treated with rVNS including 17 new implantations and 13 battery replacements at a single center in Finland. After initiation of autostimulation mode, the exact rVNS stimulation parameters and the timestamps of all individual autostimulations delivered were registered. A clustered autostimulation was defined as any autostimulation that occurred within the duration of the therapeutic cycle during the therapy "OFF" time compared with both the previous autostimulation and the following autostimulation. RESULTS: Autostimulations and especially autostimulation clusters show a higher probability of occurring in the morning and less at night. This trend appeared to follow the circadian rhythm of cortisol concentration. CONCLUSIONS: Early morning peaks of autostimulations at low thresholds may reflect awakening-induced activation of the cardiovascular system, which is associated with a shift towards the dominance of the sympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system. Cortisol release occurs in parallel driven by wakening-induced activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, which is fine-tuned by direct sympathetic input to the adrenal gland. This is of interest considering the known sympathetic hyperactivity in patients with epilepsy.

Autostimulation in Vagus Nerve Stimulator Treatment: Modulating Neuromodulation.

OBJECTIVES: Until now, the vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) treatment in epilepsy has consisted of two different modes: normal and magnet stimulation. A new vagus nerve stimulator model (106 AspireSR®, LivaNova, Houston, TX, USA) also allows automatic stimulation (AutoStim). The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of autostimulation on seizure frequencies together with energy consumption. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study material consisted of 14 patients whose former stimulator model (102/103) was replaced with model 106. We calculated the theoretical charge (Q) in Coulombs for one day in both of those groups. We evaluated the follow-up data of the patients' seizure counts, with a mean follow-up time of 18.1 months (SD 8.1). RESULTS: The total charge, "VNS dose," was reduced with model 106 in comparison with models 102 or 103 (p = 0.001, Mann-Whitney test). The average charge (Qtotal ) for one day with AutoStim was 142.56 mC; without AutoStim, it was 321.09 mC. We were able to assess seizure diaries in 11 out of 14 patients. Four patients (36%) had >50% seizure reduction and two patients (18%) experienced a reduction in seizure severity with VNS with autostimulation. Five patients (46%) remained unchanged. In three out of four patients with improved seizure control, the duty cycle was maintained at the original level. The patients whose duty cycle was modified for a more prolonged OFF-time had unchanged seizure frequencies. CONCLUSION: VNS with AutoStim achieves maintenance of prior-established seizure control with markedly less energy consumption and can also improve seizure control as compared to former stimulator model.

Similarities between the responses to ANT-DBS and prior VNS in refractory epilepsy.

OBJECTIVES: Neurostimulation has offered new treatment options in refractory epilepsy, first with vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and more recently with deep brain stimulation (DBS). There is a lack of previous detailed data assessing the relationship between VNS and ANT-DBS. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential correlation between therapeutic responses to VNS and ANT-DBS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 11 patients with previous VNS therapy underwent ANT-DBS implantation. Monthly seizure counts starting from baseline before VNS extending to long-term DBS treatment were analyzed. The reasons for VNS discontinuation were assessed. RESULTS: Altogether in 10 of 11 patients, the response to VNS seemed to be similar to the response to DBS therapy. Progressive response to VNS was likely to correlate with a progressive response to DBS in three of three patients. Partial response to VNS was associated with a fluctuating response pattern to DBS in two patients. Five of six nonresponders to VNS were also nonresponders to DBS. One of the VNS nonresponders obtained progressive response to DBS. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate in detail the effect of both VNS and ANT-DBS in refractory epilepsy patients. There is a putative association between VNS and DBS responses suggesting the need for further studies.