Differential effects of vildagliptin and glimepiride on glucose fluctuations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus assessed using continuous glucose monitoring.

AIM: To assess whether there is a difference in the effects of vildagliptin and glimepiride on glucose fluctuation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). METHODS: This was an open-label, randomized cross-over study conducted in T2DM patients. A total of 24 patients (age: 58.3 ± 5.56 years, baseline HbA1c: 7.6 ± 0.50%) who were on stable metformin monotherapy (500-3000 mg) were enrolled, and all completed the study. Each patient received two 5-day treatments (vildagliptin 50 mg b.i.d. or glimepiride 2 mg q.d.) in a cross-over manner. Various biomarkers and blood glucose concentrations were measured following breakfast. The 24-h glucose profiles were also measured using the CGM device at baseline and after 5 days of treatment, and fluctuations in glucose levels were estimated from CGM data. RESULTS: Both vildagliptin and glimepiride reduced postprandial glucose levels, based on both CGM data (15% vs. 16%) and measured plasma glucose (13% vs.17%). Vildagliptin showed lower glucose fluctuations than glimepiride as measured by mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions (MAGE, p = 0.1076), standard deviation (s.d., p = 0.1346) of blood glucose rate of change, but did not reach statistical significance attributed to the small sample size. MAGE was reduced by ∼20% with vildagliptin versus glimepiride. Vildagliptin led to statistically significant lowering of the rate of change in the median curve (RCMC) and interquartile range (IQR) of glucose. Treatment with vildagliptin significantly increased the levels of active glucagon-like peptide-1 by 2.36-fold (p ≤ 0.0001) and suppressed glucagon by 8% (p = 0.01), whereas glimepiride significantly increased the levels of insulin and C-peptide by 21% (p = 0.012) and 12% (p = 0.003), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Vildagliptin treatment was associated with less fluctuation of glucose levels than glimepiride treatment as assessed by 24-h CGM device, suggesting vildagliptin may have the potential to offer long-term beneficial effects for patients with T2DM in preventing the development of complications of diabetes.

Disposition of loratadine in healthy volunteers.

The absorption, metabolism and excretion of carbon-14-labeled loratadine (LOR, SCH 29851, Claritin) administered orally to healthy male volunteers were evaluated. Following a single oral 10-mg dose of [(14)C]LOR ( approximately 102 microCi), concentrations of LOR and desloratadine (DL; a pharmacologically active descarboethoxy metabolite of LOR) were determined in plasma. Metabolites in plasma, urine and feces were characterized using a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry system (LC-MS) connected in line with a flow scintillation analyzer (FSA). Maximum plasma LOR and DL concentrations were achieved at 1.5 h and 1.6 h, respectively; thus, LOR was rapidly absorbed but also rapidly metabolized as indicated by these similar t(max) values. Metabolite profiles of plasma showed that LOR was extensively metabolized via descarboethoxylation, oxidation and glucuronidation. Major circulating metabolites included 3-hydroxy-desloratadine glucuonide (3-OH-DL-Glu), dihydroxy-DL-glucuronides, and several metabolites resulting from descarboethoxylation and oxidation of the piperidine ring. LOR was completely metabolized by 6 h post-dose. LOR-derived radiocarbon was excreted almost equally in the urine (41%) and feces (43%). About 13% of the dose was eliminated in the urine as 3-OH-DL-Glu. DL accounted for less than 2% of the dose recovered in the urine and only trace amounts of LOR were detected. 3-OH-DL was the major fecal metabolite ( approximately 17% of the dose). The combined amount of 5- and 6-hydroxy-DL contributed to an additional 10.7% of the dose in feces. Approximately 5.4% and 2.7% of the dose were excreted in the feces as unchanged drug and DL, respectively.

Drug-disease interactions: reduced beta-adrenergic and potassium channel antagonist activities of sotalol in the presence of acute and chronic inflammatory conditions in the rat.

Inflammation may influence response to pharmacotherapy. We investigated the effect of inflammation on response to sotalol, a beta-adrenergic receptor and potassium channel antagonist. Racemic sotalol (40 mg kg(-1)) was administered to healthy, acutely (interferonalpha 2a-induced) and chronically (Mycobacterium butyricum-induced adjuvant arthritis) inflamed male Sprague-Dawley rats (n=4 - 6/group). Another group of interferon-treated rats received 3 mg kg(-1) of anti-TNF antibody infliximab. Electrocardiogram (ECG) recorded and plasma sotalol concentration monitored for 6 h. The study was repeated in acutely inflamed rats following administration of stereochemically pure individual sotalol enantiomers [40 mg kg(-1) S (potassium channel blocker) or 20 mg kg(-1) R (beta-adrenergic/potassium channel blocker)]. Chronic arthritis was readily evident. Acute arthritis was associated with elevated segmented neutrophils and increased plasma nitrite and tumour necrosis factor (TNF) concentrations. Sotalol affected ECG in all rats. In both inflamed groups, however, response to sotalol in prolongation of QT interval (potassium channel sensitivity) was reduced. The effect of PR interval (beta-adrenergic activity) was also reduced following administration of the racemate and R-enantiomer. No significant differences in pharmacokinetics were observed between control and inflamed rats. Infliximab reduced nitrite and TNF concentrations and reversed the effect of acute inflammation on both PR and QT intervals. The reduced electrocardiographic responses to sotalol is likely due to the influence of inflammation on the action of the drug on both beta-adrenergic and potassium channel receptors secondary to over-expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and/or nitric oxide. Our observation may have therapeutic consequences in all conditions where inflammatory mediators are increased.

Therapeutic relevance of altered cytokine expression.

Cytokines and their receptors have numerous physiological functions. Altered concentrations of these mediators are associated with various afflictions. For example, over-expression of cytokines has been associated with altered drug concentrations and activity. Greater concentrations of cardiovascular drugs have been observed in humans and laboratory animals with various types of inflammatory disorders compared to healthy controls. Interestingly, the observed higher concentrations of drugs such as propranolol and verapamil have not been associated with increased effects. Indeed, reduced response to these cardiovascular drugs is observed, suggestive of cytokine-mediated downregulation of receptors. Increased cytokine concentrations have also been associated with decreased response to drugs used in treatment of other disorders such as AIDS, asthma and psychiatric diseases. This reduced response to drug in the presence of altered cytokine concentrations is especially relevant to the elderly population which has a greater incidence of multiple diseases and elevated concentrations of various cytokines compared to younger individuals. Furthermore, inflammatory conditions and their accompanied increased over-expression of cytokines are suggested to be the main determinants of therapeutic failure in myocardial infarction and angina. Therefore, altered cytokine concentrations may influence therapeutic outcomes of pharmacotherapy and result in treatment failure.

Grapefruit juice and orange juice effects on the bioavailability of nifedipine in the rat.

Previous studies with rats indicate that nifedipine undergoes both hepatic and extrahepatic presystemic metabolism after peroral (po) administration, and that its bioavailability is increased and absorption delayed by concomitant administration of grapefruit juice concentrate (GJC). Hence, the effects of GJC could be to delay stomach emptying and inhibit nifedipine metabolism in the small-intestinal wall and liver or, alternatively, to impede nifedipine absorption until reaching the large intestine where gut wall presystemic metabolism is not a factor. The mechanism(s) of action of GJC might be partially resolved by comparison with orange juice concentrate (OJC), which has a similar consistency but lacks inhibitory effects on nifedipine presystemic metabolism, and also by giving regular-strength solutions of the two juices, both on which should not significantly affect stomach emptying. This study compared the po bioavailability of nifedipine (6 mg kg-1) in male Sprague-Dawley rats coadministered GJC, OJC, grapefruit juice regular strength (GJRS), orange juice regular strength (OJRS), or (tap) water. Nifedipine plasma concentration-time profiles in the GJRS, OJRS, and (tap) water groups displayed a single peak. Both GJC and OJC groups have double-peak profiles (indicating delayed gastric emptying); however, the majority of the nifedipine dose in both cases was absorbed during the interval of the second peak, which occurred several hours postdosing. GJC significantly increased nifedipine bioavailability (relative bioavailability 2.02, compared with (tap) water), indicating that GJC may affect both extrahepatic and hepatic first-pass metabolism, although a reduction in systemic nifedipine clearance cannot be ruled out. Surprisingly, GJRS had no significant effect on nifedipine bioavailability. OJC did not increase nifedipine bioavailability, further suggesting that the delay in nifedipine absorption by GJC or OJC results from delayed gastric emptying.