RESUMO
Background: The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is quite high after laparoscopic surgeries. This study endeavors to compare the efficacy of the combination of palonosetron and dexamethasone with that of either drug alone in the prevention of PONV in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries. Methods: This randomized, parallel-group trial was done on ninety adults of American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade I and II patients aged 18-60 years undergoing laparoscopic surgeries under general anesthesia. The patients were randomly divided into three groups of thirty patients each. Group P (n = 30) received palonosetron 0.075 mg intravenously (iv), Group D (n = 30) received dexamethasone 8 mg iv and Group P + D (n = 30) received palonosetron 0.075 mg and dexamethasone 8 mg iv. The primary outcome was incidence of PONV in 24 h, and the secondary outcome was a number of rescue antiemetics required. To compare the proportions in the groups, unpaired t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, Chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test was applied. Results: We found that the overall incidence of PONV was 46.7% in Group P, 50% in Group D, and 43.3% in Group P + D during the first 24 h. Rescue antiemetic was required in 27% of the patients in Group P and Group D compared to 23% of the patients in Group P + D and twice in 3% of the patients in Group P, 7% of the patients in Group D, and none in Group P + D which were not significant. Conclusions: The combination therapy of palonosetron plus dexamethasone did not significantly reduce the incidence of PONV when compared with either drug alone.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: General anaesthesia (GA) is the conventional technique used for surgical treatment of breast lumps. However, various side effects and complications of GA, such as postoperative pain, nausea, vomiting, and increased hospital stay increase morbidity in patients. Regional anaesthesia using multiple injection paravertebral block is an ideal alternative to GA for breast surgeries. METHODS: Sixty female patients posted for unilateral breast surgery were randomly divided into two groups, Group P for paravertebral block and group G for GA, and compared on the basis of time taken for induction of anaesthesia, postoperative pain relief on basis of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and duration of hospital stay. RESULTS: Duration of surgery in group P was 64.75±18.07 and 67.32±17.64 in group G respectively (P>0.05). Time for inducing anaesthesia was significantly longer in group P (17.15±3.92min) compared to group G (5.90±1.75min) with P<0.05. Significant difference (P<0.001) was observed in the mean duration of postoperative analgesia of group P (298.34±67.02min) and group G (107.68±27.28min). The VAS scores in immediate postoperative period and after two and four hours in the postoperative period were significantly higher in group G (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was significantly higher in group G (13 out of 30 patients) than group P (four out of 28 patients) with P<0.05. CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety of paravertebral block for operative treatment of breast tumors, excellent analgesia in early postoperative period, requirement of significantly lesser amount of postoperative analgesics, decreased incidence of PONV and negligible complications along with early ambulation and hospital discharge makes it an afferent cost-effective block of choice for unilateral breast surgeries.
RESUMO
CONTEXT: Shivering is one of the most commonly recognized complications of the central neuraxial blockade. For optimal perioperative care, control of postspinal anesthesia shivering is essential. AIMS: The present study designed to compare the clinical efficacy, hemodynamic parameters, and side effects of nalbuphine and tramadol for control of postspinal anesthesia shivering. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted on 90 American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status I and II patients of either gender, aged between 18 and 60 years, who subsequently developed shivering grade 3 or 4, scheduled for different surgical procedures under spinal anesthesia. The patients were randomized into two groups of 45 patients each to receive either nalbuphine 0.06 mg.kg-1 (Group N) or tramadol 1 mg.kg-1 (Group T). Grade of shivering, onset of shivering, time interval for cessation of shivering, response rate at 5 and 30 min, rescue dose, hemodynamic parameters, and side effects were observed at scheduled intervals. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Independent t-test and Chi-square/Fisher's exact test were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The time taken for cessation of shivering was significantly less with nalbuphine in comparison with tramadol (P < 0.05). It was observed that the response time at 5 and 30 min and rescue dose requirement for control of shivering were not much difference (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both nalbuphine and tramadol are effective; however, the time taken for cessation of shivering is significantly less with nalbuphine when compared to tramadol. Furthermore, tramadol causes significantly more nausea and vomiting; however, nalbuphine causes significantly more sedation.
RESUMO
The presence of supernumerary teeth is not uncommon in the general population. They occur more frequently in patients with a family history of such teeth. It is rare to find multiple supernumeraries in individuals with no other associated disease or syndrome. There have been very few documented cases of bilateral maxillary and mandibular supernumeraries in the premolar region. An unusual case of a 35-year-old man with six para premolars and complete dentition is presented.
