Nurses' competency in electrocardiogram interpretation in acute care settings: A systematic review.

AIMS: Identify and synthesize evidence of nurses' competency in electrocardiogram interpretation in acute care settings. DESIGN: Systematic mixed studies review. DATA SOURCES: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Medline, Scopus and Cochrane were searched in April 2021. REVIEW METHODS: Data were selected using the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis framework. A data-based convergent synthesis design using qualitative content analysis was adopted. Quality appraisal was undertaken using validated tools appropriate to study designs of the included papers. RESULTS: Forty-three papers were included in this review. Skills and attitudes were not commonly assessed, as most studies referred to 'competency' in the context of nurses' knowledge in electrocardiogram interpretation. Nurses' knowledge levels in this important nursing role varied notably, which could be partly due to a range of assessment tools being used. Several factors were found to influence nurses' competency in electrocardiogram interpretation across the included studies from individual, professional and organizational perspectives. CONCLUSION: The definition of 'competency' was inconsistent, and nurses' competency in electrocardiogram interpretation varied from low to high. Nurses identified a lack of regular training and insufficient exposure in electrocardiogram interpretation. Hence, regular, standard training and education are recommended. Also, more research is needed to develop a standardized and comprehensive electrocardiogram interpretation tool, thereby allowing educators to safely assess nurses' competency. IMPACT: This review addressed questions related to nurses' competency in electrocardiogram interpretation. The findings highlight varying competency levels and assessment methods. Nurses reported a lack of knowledge and confidence in interpreting electrocardiograms. There is an urgent need to explore opportunities to promote and maintain nurses' competency in electrocardiogram interpretation.

Nursing students' perceptions of clinical relevance and engagement with bioscience education: A cross-sectional study of undergraduate and postgraduate nursing students.

BACKGROUND: Bioscience in nursing education covers a broad range of disciplinary areas (anatomy, physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology) and underpins clinical assessment and critical thinking in nursing practice. This is imperative for patient safety and favourable patient outcomes. In nursing programs for registration, most bioscience content is taught during the early phases of the program and little incorporated into postgraduate nursing programs. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore student's perceived relationship between clinical relevance and engagement (attention and time) with bioscience content, by surveying undergraduates and postgraduate nursing students. DESIGN: This sequential mixed methods study included two phases. METHODS: The first phase comprised of focus group interviews from one Australian University. Thematic analysis of these data, coupled with existing literature, informed the second study phase; a quantitative questionnaire. PARTICIPANTS: Focus group interviews included N = 30 students from one tertiary site; 10 from each year level. The questionnaire was administered to nursing students undertaking undergraduate nursing studies (1st, 2nd & 3rd years), and postgraduate nursing studies. RESULTS: Nursing students (n = 406) across three Australian universities (four programmes) completed the questionnaire. The clinical relevance of bioscience was widely appreciated; 91.6% of undergraduate nursing students and 98.5% of postgraduate nursing students indicated that every nurse must have a good understanding of bioscience. However, there was an inverse relationship between engagement with bioscience and timing in the curriculum, as 50% of undergraduate nursing students indicated that bioscience content took up too much of their time, compared to only 20% of postgraduate nurses (odds ratio 0.27 [0.16-0.46], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Nursing students' perceptions of the clinical relevance of bioscience for their career strongly corresponds with their progression through their studies. Unfortunately, as students progress to the later years of their nursing education, their engagement with formal bioscience education decreases. This poses the question 'Are we delivering bioscience content to nursing students at the appropriate time?'

Final-year nursing students' foundational knowledge and self-assessed confidence in interpreting cardiac arrhythmias: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Graduating nurses should possess knowledge and understanding of cardiac arrhythmia interpretation, so they can assess abnormal and life-threatening arrhythmias. However, literature around nursing students' foundational knowledge in cardiac arrhythmia interpretation remains scarce. OBJECTIVES: To examine final-year nursing students' foundational knowledge and self-assessed confidence in interpreting cardiac arrhythmias. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study design. SETTINGS: Two Australian universities (one regional and the other large metropolitan). PARTICIPANTS: Nursing students in the final year of a program of study leading to initial registration as a registered nurse. METHODS: An online survey was adopted to examine final-year nursing students' foundational knowledge and their self-assessed confidence when interpreting cardiac rhythms. RESULTS: A total of 114 participants completed surveys, representing a response rate of 22%. More than 70% of the participants were able to interpret asystole, sinus rhythm, and sinus bradycardia. Over 50% correctly identified ventricular tachycardia, atrial flutter, sinus tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, and ventricular fibrillation. Under 15% of the participants were able to interpret junctional rhythm, paced rhythm, and unifocal/multifocal premature ventricular contractions. Self-assessed confidence levels were generally lower than the accuracy rates of arrhythmia interpretation. Although many participants acknowledged that learning arrhythmia interpretation was difficult and challenging, most of them had positive perceptions and wanted to learn more. CONCLUSION: Nursing curricula need to be supported and strategies need to be implemented to standardise educational electrocardiogram interpretation programs, which are critical to improving final-year nursing students' foundational knowledge and confidence in interpreting cardiac arrhythmias and enhancing patient safety.

Using simulation to improve the capability of undergraduate nursing students in mental health care.

INTRODUCTION: Mental health care is an increasing component of acute patient care and yet mental health care education can be limited in undergraduate nursing programs. The aim of this study was to establish if simulation learning can be an effective method of improving undergraduate nurses' capability in mental health care in an acute care environment. INTERVENTION: Undergraduate nursing students at an Australian university were exposed to several high-fidelity high-technology simulation activities that incorporated elements of acute emergency nursing practice and acute mental health intervention, scaffolded by theories of learning. This approach provided a safe environment for students to experience clinical practice, and develop their skills for dealing with complex clinical challenges. METHODS: Using a mixed method approach, the primary domains of interest in this study were student confidence, knowledge and ability. These were self-reported and assessed before and after the simulation activities (intervention) using a pre-validated survey, to gauge the self-rated capacity of students to initiate and complete effective care episodes. Focus group interviews were subsequently held with students who attended placement in the emergency department to explore the impact of the intervention on student performance in this clinical setting. RESULTS: Students who participated in the simulation activity identified and reported significantly increased confidence, knowledge and ability in mental health care post-intervention. They identified key features of the intervention included the impact of its realism on the quality of learning. There is some evidence to suggest that the intervention had an impact on the performance and reflection of students in the clinical setting. DISCUSSION: This study provides evidence to support the use of simulation to enhance student nurses' clinical capabilities in providing mental health care in acute care environments. Nursing curriculum development should be based on best-evidence to ensure that future nursing graduates have the skills and capability to provide high-quality, holistic care.