Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 15 de 15
Filtrar
1.
JMIR Form Res ; 7: e44373, 2023 May 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37133912

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous studies on clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) for the management of renal anemia in patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis have previously focused solely on the effects of the CDSS. However, the role of physician compliance in the efficacy of the CDSS remains ill-defined. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate whether physician compliance was an intermediate variable between the CDSS and the management outcomes of renal anemia. METHODS: We extracted the electronic health records of patients with end-stage kidney disease on hemodialysis at the Far Eastern Memorial Hospital Hemodialysis Center (FEMHHC) from 2016 to 2020. FEMHHC implemented a rule-based CDSS for the management of renal anemia in 2019. We compared the clinical outcomes of renal anemia between the pre- and post-CDSS periods using random intercept models. Hemoglobin levels of 10 to 12 g/dL were defined as the on-target range. Physician compliance was defined as the concordance of adjustments of the erythropoietin-stimulating agent (ESA) between the CDSS recommendations and the actual physician prescriptions. RESULTS: We included 717 eligible patients on hemodialysis (mean age 62.9, SD 11.6 years; male n=430, 59.9%) with a total of 36,091 hemoglobin measurements (average hemoglobin and on-target rate were 11.1, SD 1.4, g/dL and 59.9%, respectively). The on-target rate decreased from 61.3% (pre-CDSS) to 56.2% (post-CDSS) owing to a high hemoglobin percentage of >12 g/dL (pre: 21.5%; post: 29%). The failure rate (hemoglobin <10 g/dL) decreased from 17.2% (pre-CDSS) to 14.8% (post-CDSS). The average weekly ESA use of 5848 (SD 4211) units per week did not differ between phases. The overall concordance between CDSS recommendations and physician prescriptions was 62.3%. The CDSS concordance increased from 56.2% to 78.6%. In the adjusted random intercept model, the post-CDSS phase showed increased hemoglobin by 0.17 (95% CI 0.14-0.21) g/dL, weekly ESA by 264 (95% CI 158-371) units per week, and 3.4-fold (95% CI 3.1-3.6) increased concordance rate. However, the on-target rate (29%; odds ratio 0.71, 95% CI 0.66-0.75) and failure rate (16%; odds ratio 0.84, 95% CI 0.76-0.92) were reduced. After additional adjustments for concordance in the full models, increased hemoglobin and decreased on-target rate tended toward attenuation (from 0.17 to 0.13 g/dL and 0.71 to 0.73 g/dL, respectively). Increased ESA and decreased failure rate were completely mediated by physician compliance (from 264 to 50 units and 0.84 to 0.97, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirmed that physician compliance was a complete intermediate factor accounting for the efficacy of the CDSS. The CDSS reduced failure rates of anemia management through physician compliance. Our study highlights the importance of optimizing physician compliance in the design and implementation of CDSSs to improve patient outcomes.

2.
Acta Cardiol Sin ; 38(5): 612-622, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36176366

RESUMO

Background: Home blood pressure telemonitoring (BPT) has been shown to improve blood pressure control. A community-based BPT program (the Health+ program) was launched in 2015 in an urban area around a medical center. Objectives: To examine the impact of the BPT program on the use of medical resources. Methods: We conducted a retrospective propensity-score (PS)-matched observational cohort study using the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) 2013-2016 in Taiwan. A total of 9,546 adults with a high risk of cardiovascular disease participated in the integrated BPT program, and 19,082 PS-matched controls were identified from the NHIRD. The primary and secondary outcome measures were changes in 1-year emergency department visit rate, hospitalization rate, duration of hospital stay, and healthcare costs. Results: The number of emergency department visits in the Health+ group significantly reduced (0.8 to 0.6 per year vs. 0.8 to 0.9 per year, p < 0.0001) along with a significant decrease in hospitalization rate (43.7% to 21.3% vs. 42.7% to 35.3%, p < 0.001). The duration of hospital stay was also lower in the Health+ group (4.3 to 3.3 days vs. 5.3 to 6.5 days, p < 0.0001). The annual healthcare costs decreased more in the Health+ group (USD 1642 to 1169 vs. 1466 to 1393 per year, p < 0.001), compared with the controls. Subgroup analysis of the Health+ group revealed that the improvements in outcomes were significantly greater among those who were younger and had fewer comorbidities, especially without diabetes or hypertension. Conclusions: A community-based integrated BPT program may improve patients' health outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.

3.
Metab Syndr Relat Disord ; 17(6): 334-340, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31188053

RESUMO

Background: We aimed to assess the effect of intraocular pressure (IOP) on incident metabolic syndrome (MetS) using a longitudinal follow-up of screening cohort in contrast to most of previous studies addressing the association between both. Methods: The empirical data were derived from a community-based integrated screening program in Matsu during the period 2003 to 2010. A total of 1347 participants older than 30 years were enrolled in this study. With the enrollment of 1056 participants with MetS free at baseline, the cohort with IOP measurement in 2003 were followed up over time to identify incident MetS to elucidate the temporal sequence of both. Results: The statistically significant effect noted was that elevated IOP (≥15 mmHg vs. <15 mmHg) had 1.46-fold risk for developing incident MetS (adjusted relative ratio [aRR]: 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-1.99) for both sex combined, particularly in men (aRR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.13-2.45) but not in women. The finding that elevated IOP occurred before the presence of high blood pressure was noted in both men and women, whereas men with elevated IOP may be concomitant with more individual components (severity) of MetS earlier than women with elevated IOP. Conclusions: Elevated IOP leading to the risk for incident or severe MetS was noted in men but not in women. Evidence on this temporal sequence revealed the possibility of showing signs of elevated IOP before the development of MetS, which indicates the necessity of monitoring IOP in routine health check-up for prevention of MetS-related chronic diseases.


Assuntos
Pressão Intraocular/fisiologia , Síndrome Metabólica/epidemiologia , Hipertensão Ocular/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Síndrome Metabólica/complicações , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hipertensão Ocular/etiologia , Prevalência , Características de Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Taiwan/epidemiologia
4.
BMJ Open ; 9(5): e025202, 2019 05 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31101695

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Exploring whether medical professionals, who are considered to be 'informed consumers' in the healthcare system, favour large providers for elective treatments. In this study, we compare the inclination of medical professionals and their relatives undergoing treatment for childbirth and cataract surgery at medical centres, against those of the general population. DESIGN: Retrospective study using a population-based matched cohort data. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who underwent childbirth or cataract surgery between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2013. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES MEASURES: We used multiple logistic regression to compare the ORs of medical professionals and their relatives undergoing treatment at medical centres, against those of the general population. We also compared the rate of 14-day re-admission (childbirth) and 14-day reoperation (cataract surgery) after discharge between these groups. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that physicians were more likely than patients with no familial connection to the medical profession to undergo childbirth at medical centres (OR 5.26, 95% CI 3.96 to 6.97, p<0.001), followed by physicians' relatives (OR 2.68, 95% CI 2.20 to 3.25, p<0.001). Similarly, physicians (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.19, p<0.01) and their relatives (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.81, p<0.01) were also more likely to undergo cataract surgery at medical centres. Physicians also tended to select healthcare providers who were at the same level or above the institution at which they worked. We observed no significant difference in 14-day re-admission rates after childbirth and no significant difference in 14-day reoperation rates after cataract surgery across patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: Medical professionals and their relatives are more likely than the general population to opt for service at medical centres. Understanding the reasons that medical professionals and general populations both have a preferential bias for larger medical institutions could help improve the efficiency of healthcare delivery.


Assuntos
Extração de Catarata , Comportamento do Consumidor/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Tamanho das Instituições de Saúde , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais , Parto , Adulto , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taiwan/epidemiologia
5.
PLoS One ; 12(6): e0179127, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28594876

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: One of the main objectives behind the expansion of insurance coverage is to eliminate disparities in health and healthcare. However, researchers have not yet fully elucidated the reasons for disparities in the use of high-cost treatments among patients of different occupations. Furthermore, it remains unknown whether discretionary decisions made at the hospital level have an impact on the administration of high-cost interventions in a universal healthcare system. This study investigated the adoption of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare metal-stents (BMS) among patients in different occupations and income levels, with the aim of gauging the degree to which the inclination of health providers toward treatment options could affect treatment choices at the patient-level within a universal healthcare system. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: We adopted a cross-sectional observational study design using hierarchical modeling in conjunction with the population-based National Health Insurance database of Taiwan. Patients who received either a BMS or a DES between 2007 and 2010 were included in the study. RESULTS: During the period of study, 42,124 patients received a BMS (65.3%) and 22,376 received DES (34.7%). Patients who were physicians or the family members of physicians were far more likely to receive DES (OR: 3.18, CI: 2.38-4.23) than were patients who were neither physicians nor in other high-status jobs (employers, other medical professions, or public service). Similarly, patients in the top 5% income bracket had a higher probability of receiving a DES (OR: 2.23, CI: 2.06-2.47, p < .001), than were patients in the lowest income bracket. After controlling for patient-level factors, the inclination of hospitals (proportion of DES>50% or between 25% and 50%) was shown to be strongly associated with the selection of DESs (OR: 3.64 CI: 3.24-4.09 and OR: 2.16, CI: 2.01-2.33, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Even under the universal healthcare system in Taiwan, socioeconomic disparities in the use of high-cost services remain widespread. Differences in the care received by patients of lower socioeconomic status may be due to the discretionary decisions of healthcare providers.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisões , Atenção à Saúde , Stents Farmacológicos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Probabilidade , Análise de Regressão , Fatores Socioeconômicos
6.
Gut ; 63(3): 506-14, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23676440

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Whether peginterferon α and ribavirin combination therapy reduces risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or improves survival in patients dual-infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) is unknown. Since it is ethically impossible to conduct a randomised trial to learn the long-term efficacy, we rely upon the large database to explore the effectiveness of combination therapy among dual-infected patients. DESIGN: Data for this population-based retrospective cohort study were obtained from the treatment programme, Cancer Registry, National Health Insurance and death certification. We examined the risk of HCC, mortality and adverse events in 1096 treated and 18 988 untreated HCV-HBV dually-infected patients. Outcomes were analysed using the bias corrected inverse probability weighting (IPW) by propensity scores. Outcomes of HCV-HBV dually-infected and HCV mono-infected patients receiving the same treatment were compared using new user design with IPW estimators to adjust for confounding. RESULTS: After adjustment, combination therapy significantly reduced the risk of HCC (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.97), liver-related mortality (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.6) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.52). Nevertheless, the underlying HBV infection was still a risk factor for HCC and mortality after treatment. Treatment was associated with an increase in the incidence of thyroid dysfunction (HR 1.9, p<0.001) and mood disorders (HR 1.81, p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first evidence showing that combination therapy decreased the risk of HCC and improved survival in HCV-HBV dually-infected patients despite a slight increase in the incidence of thyroid and mood disorders.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Coinfecção/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite B Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Interferon-alfa/uso terapêutico , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Ribavirina/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidade , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/prevenção & controle , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/virologia , Coinfecção/complicações , Coinfecção/mortalidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hepatite B Crônica/complicações , Hepatite B Crônica/mortalidade , Hepatite C Crônica/complicações , Hepatite C Crônica/mortalidade , Humanos , Interferon alfa-2 , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hepáticas/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Hepáticas/virologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pontuação de Propensão , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapêutico , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
7.
Int J Equity Health ; 12: 69, 2013 Aug 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23962201

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Multimorbidity has been linked to elevated healthcare utilization and previous studies have found that socioeconomic status is an important factor associated with multimorbidity. Nonetheless, little is known regarding the impact of multimorbidity and socioeconomic status on healthcare costs and whether inequities in healthcare exist between socioeconomic classes within a universal healthcare system. METHODS: This longitudinal study employed the claims database of the National Health Insurance of Taiwan (959 990 enrolees), adopting medication-based Rx-defined morbidity groups (Rx-MG) as a measurement of multimorbidity. Mixed linear models were used to estimate the effects of multimorbidity and socioeconomic characteristics on annual healthcare costs between 2005 and 2010. RESULTS: The distribution of Rx-MGs and total costs presented statistically significant differences among gender, age groups, occupation, and income class (p < .001). Nearly 80% of the enrolees were classified as multimorbid and low income earners presented the highest prevalence of multimorbidity. After controlling for age and gender, increases in the number of Rx-MG assignments were associated with higher total healthcare costs. After controlling for the effects of Rx-MG assignment and demographic characteristics, physicians, paramedical personnel, and public servant were found to generate higher total costs than typical employees/self-employed enrolees, while low-income earners generated lower costs. High income levels were also found to be associated with lower total costs. It was also revealed that occupation and multimorbidity have a moderating effect on healthcare cost. CONCLUSIONS: Increases in the prevalence of multimorbidity are associated with higher health care costs. This study determined that instances of multimorbidity varied according to socioeconomic class; likewise there were inequities in healthcare utilization among individuals of various occupations and income levels, even when demographic characteristics and multimorbidity were controlled for. This highlights the importance of socioeconomic status with regard to healthcare utilization. These results indicate that socioeconomic factors should not be discounted when discussing the utilization of healthcare by patients with multimorbidity.


Assuntos
Comorbidade , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Classe Social , Adulto , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Taiwan , Adulto Jovem
8.
Pharmacotherapy ; 33(2): 126-36, 2013 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23386595

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To develop the Pharmacy-Based Disease Indicator (PBDI), and to evaluate its performance versus the diagnosis-based Deyo version of the Charlson Index in predicting subsequent-year hospitalization in adults. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. DATA SOURCE: Longitudinal health insurance database derived from the national health insurance system in Taiwan. PATIENTS: Two adult populations were identified: 697,823 individuals who were at least 18 years of age on January 1, 2005 (dataset 2005), and 714,072 who were at least 18 years of age on January 1, 2006 (dataset 2006). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Based on the Chronic Disease Score framework and the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system, we developed the PBDI, a comorbidity measure that is a function of 37 drug categories that correspond to major diseases in Taiwan. The relationship between individuals' PBDI score and subsequent-year hospitalization was evaluated by use of logistic regression models. Covariates in the models included age group, sex, PBDI score, and Deyo score. Using the two overlapping adult populations, we calculated both the PBDI score and the Deyo score for each individual in each year. Using subsequent-year hospitalization as the outcome and each comorbidity measure as the predictor, we demonstrated that the c statistic of the PBDI versus the Deyo version of the Charlson Index was 0.72 versus 0.69 for both the 2005 and 2006 populations. The Akaike information criterion, Bayesian information criterion, model calibration, and reclassification measures also confirmed the utility of the PBDI. CONCLUSION: The PBDI demonstrated acceptable predictive performance for subsequent-year hospitalization. It can be used as a general comorbidity measure to describe the health status of populations based on data derived from population-based automated health care databases.


Assuntos
Bases de Dados Factuais/normas , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Farmácia/normas , Vigilância da População , Desenvolvimento de Programas/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Atenção à Saúde/tendências , Feminino , Hospitalização/tendências , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/normas , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/tendências , Farmácia/métodos , Farmácia/tendências , Vigilância da População/métodos , Desenvolvimento de Programas/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taiwan , Adulto Jovem
9.
Health Serv Res ; 48(1): 26-46, 2013 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22670835

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study explored the association of surgical volume versus process quality with breast cancer survival and recurrence. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Population-based cancer registration data and National Health Insurance claim data. STUDY DESIGN: This population-based study linked Taiwan's Cancer Database with Taiwan's National Health Insurance Database to collect data on all patients diagnosed with breast cancer in 2003-2004 who received surgical treatment. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: This study included 6,396 female breast cancer patients, reported by 26 hospitals. After controlling for patient and provider characteristics, Cox's regression models did not reveal any association between a physician's surgical volume and breast cancer recurrence or survival, although hospital volume was marginally associated with positive 5-year recurrence (HR: 1.001, 95%CI: 1.000, 1.001). After controlling for hospital or physician volume of surgery, we found a significant association between quality of care and both 5-year survival and recurrence. Random effects were also identified between patients and providers based on 5-year survival and 5-year recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Process quality of care was significantly more related to survival or recurrence than to surgical volume. The random effects found within hospital-patient clustered data indicated that the effect of the clustered feature of this data should be considered when performing volume-outcome related studies.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Administração Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Análise de Sobrevida , Taiwan/epidemiologia
10.
Cancer ; 119(6): 1210-6, 2013 Mar 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23212657

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hospital volume for several major operations is associated with treatment outcomes. In this study, the authors explored the influence of hospital radiofrequency ablation (RFA) volume on the prognosis of patients who received RFA for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: The authors searched for all patients who were diagnosed with stage I or stage II HCC from 2004 to 2006 and who received RFA as first-line therapy in a population-based cohort. Overall survival (OS) and liver cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared according to hospital volume. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: In total, 661 patients received first-line RFA for stage I and II HCC in 28 hospitals. Among these, there were 480 patients (72.6%) in the high-volume group (those who received RFA at hospitals that treated >10 first-line patients per year), and there were 181 patients (27.4%) in the low-volume group (those who received RFA at hospitals that treated ≤ 10 first-line patients per year). The sex, age, stage, tumor size, and year of diagnosis for patients in the 2 groups did not differ significantly. Patients in the high-volume group demonstrated significantly longer OS and CSS than those in the low-volume group (5-year OS rate, 58.7% vs 47.2%; P = .001; 5-year CSS rate, 67.1% vs 57.1%; P = .009). After adjusting for covariates, high-volume hospitals remained an independent predictor of longer OS (hazard ratio, 0.57; P < .001) and CSS (hazard ratio, 0.57; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received first-line RFA for HCC in high-volume hospitals demonstrated better survival outcomes.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirurgia , Ablação por Cateter/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Centro Cirúrgico Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Oncologist ; 17(4): 485-91, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22467665

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) has been implicated in influencing the survival duration of patients with breast cancer. However, less is known about the impact of DM and other comorbidities on the breast cancer-specific survival (BCS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes of Asian patients with early-stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The characteristics of female patients with newly diagnosed, early-stage breast cancer were collected from the Taiwan Cancer Registry database for 2003-2004. DM status and other comorbidities were retrieved from Taiwan's National Health Insurance database. The BCS and OS times of patients according to DM status were estimated via the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox's proportional hazard model was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for the effects of DM, comorbidities, and other risk factors on mortality. RESULTS: In total, 4,390 patients were identified and 341 (7.7%) presented with DM. The 5-year BCS and OS rates were significantly greater in DM patients than in non-DM patients (BCS, 85% versus 91%; OS, 79% versus 90%). Furthermore, after adjusting for clinicopathologic variables and comorbidities, DM remained an independent predictor of shorter BCS (adjusted HR, 1.53) and OS (adjusted HR, 1.71) times. Subgroup analyses also demonstrated a consistent prognostic influence of DM across different groups. CONCLUSION: In Asian patients with early-stage breast cancer, DM is an independent predictor of lower BCS and OS rates, even after adjusting for other comorbidities. The integration of DM care as part of the continuum of care for early-stage breast cancer should be emphasized.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Complicações do Diabetes/complicações , Complicações do Diabetes/mortalidade , Diabetes Mellitus/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Ásia/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida
12.
Oncology ; 82(1): 19-24, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22269348

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most aggressive form of lung cancer. The prognosis for SCLC patients remains unsatisfactory despite advances in chemotherapy. In this study, we sought to clarify the prognosis and treatment patterns of patients with SCLC. METHODS: A cohort comprising all patients diagnosed with SCLC between January 2004 and December 2006 was assembled from the Taiwan Cancer Database. Patients were followed up until December 31, 2009, to determine overall survival. Patient survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox's proportional hazard model was used to determine the relationship between prognostic factors and median survival time. RESULTS: Among the 1,684 patients diagnosed with SCLC, 1,215 (72%) were diagnosed with extensive-stage disease and 469 (28%) with limited-stage disease. Most of the patients were male (90%). The median survival duration of patients with limited-stage and extensive-stage SCLC was 10.3 months and 5.6 months, respectively. For limited-stage patients, surgery, chemotherapy, and combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy resulted in better survival than best supportive care (HR 0.20, p < 0.001; HR 0.61, p < 0.001, and HR 0.37, p < 0.001, respectively). For extensive-stage patients, male gender was significantly associated with a poor prognosis (HR 1.45, p < 0.001) and chemotherapy was shown to improve overall survival more effectively than best supportive care (HR 0.37, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: For limited-stage SCLC patients, surgery, chemotherapy, and combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy improved survival compared to best supportive care. Extensive-stage SCLC patients benefited more from chemotherapy treatment than from best supportive care.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/métodos , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/radioterapia , Taiwan , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Med Care ; 49(11): 1031-9, 2011 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21945973

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Automated pharmacy claim data have been used for risk adjustment on health care utilization. However, most published pharmacy-based morbidity measures incorporate a coding algorithm that requires the medication data to be coded using the US National Drug Codes or the American Hospital Formulary Service drug codes, making studies conducted outside the US operationally cumbersome. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to verify that the pharmacy-based metric with the World Health Organization (WHO) Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) algorithm can be used to explain the variations in health care utilization. RESEARCH DESIGN: The Longitudinal Health Insurance Database of Taiwan's National Health Insurance enrollees was used in this study. We chose 2006 as the baseline year to predict the total cost, medication cost, and the number of outpatient visits in 2007. The pharmacy-based metric with 32 classes of chronic conditions was modified from a revised version of the Chronic Disease Score. RESULTS: The ordinary least squares (OLS) model and log-transformed OLS model adjusted for the pharmacy-based metric had a better R in concurrently predicting total cost compared with the model adjusted for Deyo's Charlson Comorbidity Index and Elixhauser's Index. The pharmacy-based metric models also provided a superior performance in predicting medication cost and number of outpatient visits. For prospectively predicting health care utilization, the pharmacy-based metric models also performed better than the models adjusted by the diagnosis-based indices. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacy-based metric with the WHO ATC algorithm and the matching ATC codes were tested and found to be valid for explaining the variation in health care utilization.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Tratamento Farmacológico/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Algoritmos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Análise dos Mínimos Quadrados , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Estatísticos , Farmácia/estatística & dados numéricos , Taiwan/epidemiologia , Organização Mundial da Saúde , Adulto Jovem
14.
J Oncol Pract ; 7(3 Suppl): e8s-e15s, 2011 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21886513

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of the nationwide pay-for-performance (P4P) program for breast cancer care (BC-P4P) in Taiwan on care quality, patient survival, and recurrence. STUDY DESIGN: A population-based observational study with cross-sectional design. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of population-based cancer registration and claims data was used in this study. A total of 4,528 patients with stage I or II breast cancer diagnosed in 2002 or 2003 who received curative surgery were observed until the end of 2008. This study applied multivariate linear regression to explore the association between BC-P4P enrollment and quality of care. Cox regression was applied to examine the effect of BC-P4P enrollment on 5-year recurrence and overall survival among patients with breast cancer. RESULTS: After controlling for age, stage, type of surgery, and other factors, BC-P4P enrollees were found to have received better quality care than nonenrollees (P = .001). Cox regression models also indicated that after controlling for patient characteristics, quality of care was related to better 5-year overall survival (odds ratio [OR], 0.212; P = .001) and recurrence (OR, 0.289; P < .001). Even when controlled by quality of care provided to patients and its interaction with status of BC-P4P enrollment, BC-P4P enrollment remained statistically significant regarding 5-year overall survival (OR, 0.167; P < .001) and recurrence (OR, 0.370; P = .002). CONCLUSION: Patients with breast cancer enrolled in the BC-P4P program received better quality care and had better outcome than nonenrolled patients. Evidence from this study indicates that financial incentives in the payment design had a positive impact on outcome of breast cancer care.

15.
Am J Manag Care ; 17(5 Spec No): e203-11, 2011 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21711072

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the nationwide pay-for-performance (P4P) program for breast cancer care (BC-P4P) in Taiwan on care quality, patient survival, and recurrence. STUDY DESIGN: A population-based observational study with cross-sectional design. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of population based cancer registration and claims data was used in this study. A total of 4528 patients with stage I or II breast cancer diagnosed in 2002 or 2003 who received curative surgery were observed until the end of 2008. This study applied multivariate linear regression to explore the association between BC-P4P enrollment and quality of care. Cox regression was applied to examine the effect of BC-P4P enrollment on 5-year recurrence and overall survival among patients with breast cancer. RESULTS: After controlling for age, stage, type of surgery, and other factors, BC-P4P enrollees were found to have received better quality care than nonenrollees (P = .001). Cox regression models also indicated that after controlling for patient characteristics, quality of care was related to better 5-year overall survival (odds ratio [OR], 0.212; P = .001) and recurrence (OR, 0.289; P <.001). Even when controlled by quality of care provided to patients and its interaction with status of BC-P4P enrollment, BC-P4P enrollment remained statistically significant regarding 5-year overall survival (OR, 0.167; P <.001) and recurrence (OR, 0.370; P = .002). CONCLUSION: Patients with breast cancer enrolled in the BC-P4P program received better quality care and had better outcome than nonenrolled patients. Evidence from this study indicates that financial incentives in the payment design had a positive impact on outcome of breast cancer care.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Reembolso de Incentivo , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taiwan
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...