Nationwide confidential enquiries into maternal deaths because of obstetric hemorrhage in the Netherlands between 2006 and 2019.

INTRODUCTION: Obstetric hemorrhage-related deaths are rare in high income countries. Yet, with increasing incidences of obstetric hemorrhage in these countries, it is of utmost importance to learn lessons from each obstetric hemorrhage-related death to improve maternity care. Our objective was to calculate the obstetric hemorrhage-related maternal mortality ratio (MMR), assess causes of obstetric hemorrhage-related deaths, and identify lessons learned. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Nationwide mixed-methods prospective case-series with confidential enquiries into maternal deaths due to obstetric hemorrhage in the Netherlands from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2019. RESULTS: The obstetric hemorrhage-related MMR in the Netherlands in 2006-2019 was 0.7 per 100 000 livebirths and was not statistically significantly different compared with the previous MMR of 1.0 per 100 000 livebirths in 1993-2005 (odds ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.38-1.30). Leading underlying cause of hemorrhage was retained placenta. Early recognition of persistent bleeding, prompt involvement of a senior clinician and timely management tailored to the cause of hemorrhage with attention to coagulopathy were prominent lessons learned. Also, timely recourse to surgical interventions, including hysterectomy, in case other management options fail to stop bleeding came up as an important lesson in several obstetric hemorrhage-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The obstetric hemorrhage-related MMR in the Netherlands in 2006-2019 has not substantially changed compared to the MMR of the previous enquiry in 1993-2005. Although obstetric hemorrhage is commonly encountered by maternity care professionals, it is important to remain vigilant for possible adverse maternal outcomes and act upon an ongoing bleeding following birth in a more timely and adequate manner. Our confidential enquiries still led to important lessons learned with clinical advice to professionals as how to improve maternity care and avoid maternal deaths. Drawing lessons from maternal deaths should remain a qualitative and moral imperative.

External validation of a prediction model on vaginal birth after caesarean in a The Netherlands: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Discussing the individual probability of a successful vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) can support decision making. The aim of this study is to externally validate a prediction model for the probability of a VBAC in a Dutch population. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study in 12 Dutch hospitals, 586 women intending VBAC were included. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancies with a cephalic foetal presentation, delivery after 37 weeks and one previous caesarean section (CS) and preference for intending VBAC. The studied prediction model included six predictors: pre-pregnancy body mass index, previous vaginal delivery, previous CS because of non-progressive labour, Caucasian ethnicity, induction of current labour, and estimated foetal weight ≥90th percentile. The discriminative and predictive performance of the model was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and calibration plots. RESULTS: The area under the curve was 0.73 (CI 0.69-0.78). The average predicted probability of a VBAC according to the prediction model was 70.3% (range 33-92%). The actual VBAC rate was 71.7%. The calibration plot shows some overestimation for low probabilities of VBAC and an underestimation of high probabilities. CONCLUSIONS: The prediction model showed good performance and was externally validated in a Dutch population. Hence it can be implemented as part of counselling for mode of delivery in women choosing between intended VBAC or planned CS after previous CS.

SUGAR-DIP trial: oral medication strategy versus insulin for diabetes in pregnancy, study protocol for a multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: In women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) requiring pharmacotherapy, insulin was the established first-line treatment. More recently, oral glucose lowering drugs (OGLDs) have gained popularity as a patient-friendly, less expensive and safe alternative. Monotherapy with metformin or glibenclamide (glyburide) is incorporated in several international guidelines. In women who do not reach sufficient glucose control with OGLD monotherapy, usually insulin is added, either with or without continuation of OGLDs. No reliable data from clinical trials, however, are available on the effectiveness of a treatment strategy using all three agents, metformin, glibenclamide and insulin, in a stepwise approach, compared with insulin-only therapy for improving pregnancy outcomes. In this trial, we aim to assess the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and patient experience of a stepwise combined OGLD treatment protocol, compared with conventional insulin-based therapy for GDM. METHODS: The SUGAR-DIP trial is an open-label, multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Participants are women with GDM who do not reach target glycaemic control with modification of diet, between 16 and 34 weeks of gestation. Participants will be randomised to either treatment with OGLDs, starting with metformin and supplemented as needed with glibenclamide, or randomised to treatment with insulin. In women who do not reach target glycaemic control with combined metformin and glibenclamide, glibenclamide will be substituted with insulin, while continuing metformin. The primary outcome will be the incidence of large-for-gestational-age infants (birth weight >90th percentile). Secondary outcome measures are maternal diabetes-related endpoints, obstetric complications, neonatal complications and cost-effectiveness analysis. Outcomes will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Utrecht University Medical Centre. Approval by the boards of management for all participating hospitals will be obtained. Trial results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR6134; Pre-results.

Practice variation of vaginal birth after cesarean and the influence of risk factors at patient level: a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Large practice variation exists in mode of delivery after cesarean section, suggesting variation in implementation of contemporary guidelines. We aim to evaluate this practice variation and to what extent this can be explained by risk factors at patient level. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was performed among 17 Dutch hospitals in 2010. Women with one prior cesarean section without a contraindication for a trial of labor were included. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis to develop models for risk factor adjustments. One model was derived to adjust the elective repeat cesarean section rates; a second model to adjust vaginal birth after cesarean rates. Standardized rates of elective repeat cesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean per hospital were compared. Pseudo-R2 measures were calculated to estimate the percentage of practice variation explained by the models. Secondary outcomes were differences in practice variation between hospital types and the correlation between standardized elective repeat cesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean rates. RESULTS: In all, 1068 women had a history of cesarean section, of whom 71% were eligible for inclusion. A total of 515 women (67%) had a trial of labor, of whom 72% delivered vaginally. The elective repeat cesarean section rate at hospital level ranged from 6 to 54% (mean 29.8, standard deviation 11.8%). Vaginal birth after cesarean rates ranged from 50 to 90% (mean 71.8%, standard deviation 11.1%). More than 85% of this practice variation could not be explained by risk factors at patient level. CONCLUSION: A large practice variation exists in elective repeat cesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean rates that can only partially be explained by risk factors at patient level.

The HAPPY study (Holistic Approach to Pregnancy and the first Postpartum Year): design of a large prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The HAPPY study is a large prospective longitudinal cohort study in which pregnant women (N ≈ 2,500) are followed during the entire pregnancy and the whole first year postpartum. The study collects a substantial amount of psychological and physiological data investigating all kinds of determinants that might interfere with general well-being during pregnancy and postpartum, with special attention to the effect of maternal mood, pregnancy-related somatic symptoms (including nausea and vomiting (NVP) and carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) symptoms), thyroid function, and human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) on pregnancy outcome of mother and foetus. METHODS/DESIGN: During pregnancy, participants receive questionnaires at 12, 22 and 32 weeks of gestation. Apart from a previous obstetric history, demographic features, distress symptoms, and pregnancy-related somatic symptoms are assessed. Furthermore, obstetrical data of the obstetric record form and ultrasound data are collected during pregnancy. At 12 and 30 weeks, thyroid function is assessed by blood analysis of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (FT4) and thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPO-Ab), as well as HCG. Also, depression is assessed with special focus on the two key symptoms: depressed mood and anhedonia. After childbirth, cord blood, neonatal heel screening results and all obstetrical data with regard to start of labour, mode of delivery and complications are collected. Moreover, mothers receive questionnaires at one week, six weeks, four, eight, and twelve months postpartum, to investigate recovery after pregnancy and delivery, including postpartum mood changes, emotional distress, feeding and development of the newborn. DISCUSSION: The key strength of this large prospective cohort study is the holistic (multifactorial) approach on perinatal well-being combined with a longitudinal design with measurements during all trimesters of pregnancy and the whole first year postpartum, taking into account two physiological possible markers of complaints and symptoms throughout gestation: thyroid function and HCG. The HAPPY study is among the first to investigate within one design physiological and psychological aspects of NVP and CTS symptoms during pregnancy. Finally, the concept of anhedonia and depressed mood as two distinct aspects of depression and its possible relation on obstetric outcome, breastfeeding, and postpartum well-being will be studied.

Prediction of postpartum hemorrhage in women with gestational hypertension or mild preeclampsia at term.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether postpartum hemorrhage can be predicted in women with gestational hypertension or mild preeclampsia at term. DESIGN: A cohort study in which we used data from our multicentre randomized controlled trial (HYPITAT trial). SETTING: The study was conducted in 38 hospitals in the Netherlands between 2005 and 2008. POPULATION: Women with gestational hypertension or mild preeclampsia at term (n = 1132). METHODS: An antepartum model (model A) and an antepartum/intrapartum model (model B) were created using logistic regression. The predictive capacity of the models was assessed with receiver operating characteristic analysis and calibration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Postpartum hemorrhage, defined as blood loss >1000 mL within 24 h after delivery. RESULTS: Postpartum hemorrhage occurred in 118 (10.4%) women. Maternal age (odds ratio 1.03), prepregnancy body mass index (odds ratio 0.96), and women with preeclampsia (odds ratio 1.5) were independent antepartum prognostic variables of postpartum hemorrhage. Intrapartum variables incorporated in the model were gestational age at delivery (odds ratio 1.2), duration of dilatation stage (odds ratio 1.1), and episiotomy (odds ratio 1.5). Model A and model B showed moderate discrimination, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.59 (95% confidence interval 0.53-0.64) and 0.64 (95% confidence interval 0.59-0.70), respectively. Calibration was moderate for model A (Hosmer-Lemeshow p = 0.26) but better for model B (Hosmer-Lemeshow p = 0.36). The rates of postpartum hemorrhage ranged from 4% (lowest 10%) to 22% (highest 10%). CONCLUSION: In the assessment of performance of a prediction model, calibration is more important than discriminative capacity. Our prediction model shows that for women with gestational hypertension or mild preeclampsia at term, distinction between low and high risk of developing postpartum hemorrhage is possible when antepartum and intrapartum variables are combined.

Determinants of pain perception after external cephalic version in pregnant women.

OBJECTIVE: A considerable proportion of pregnant women with a fetus in breech position refuses external cephalic version (ECV), with fear of pain as important barrier. As a consequence, they are at high risk for caesarean section at term. The current study investigated determinants of pain perception during ECV, with special attention to maternal mental state such as depression and fear of ECV. DESIGN: Prospective study of 249 third-trimester pregnant women with breech position with a request for an ECV attempt. SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in a large teaching hospital in the Netherlands. METHODS: Prior to the ECV attempts, obstetric factors were registered, participants fulfilled the Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS) and reported fear of ECV on a 10-point visual analog scale. Perception of pain intensity was measured with a 10-point visual analog scale, immediately after ECV. FINDINGS: Multivariate linear regression analyses showed success of ECV to be the strongest predictor of pain perception. Furthermore, scores on the depression questionnaire and degree of fear of ECV independently explained pain perception, which was not the case for obstetrical or ECV related factors. CONCLUSION: Apart from ECV outcome, psychological factors like depression and fear of ECV were independently related to pain perception of an ECV attempt. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: Maternal mood state should be taken into account when offering an ECV attempt to women with a fetus in breech position. Due to the painful experience and the importance of successful outcome, ECV should only be attempted in institutions with experienced practitioners and with careful attention to maternal mood and the way a woman is coping with the ECV attempt.

Mode of delivery following successful external cephalic version: comparison with spontaneous cephalic presentations at delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the obstetric outcomes of pregnant women after successful external cephalic version (ECV) (cases) with a large group of pregnant women with a spontaneously occurring cephalic fetal position at delivery (controls). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective matched cohort study in a teaching hospital in the Netherlands. Delivery outcomes of women with a successful ECV were compared with those of women with spontaneously occurring cephalic presentations, controlling for maternal age, parity, gestational age at delivery, and onset of labour (spontaneous or induced). Exclusion criteria were a history of Caesarean section, delivery at < 35 weeks, and elective Caesarean section. The primary outcome was the prevalence of Caesarean section and instrumental delivery in both groups; secondary outcomes were the characteristics of cases requiring intervention such as Caesarean section or instrumental delivery. RESULTS: Women who had a successful ECV had a significantly higher Caesarean section rate than the women in the control group (33/220 [15%] vs. 62/1030 [6.0 %]; P < 0.001). There was no difference in the incidence of instrumental delivery (20/220 [9.1%] vs. 103/1030 [10%]). Comparison of characteristics of women in the cases group showed that nulliparity, induction of labour, and occiput posterior presentation were associated with Caesarean section and instrumental deliveries. CONCLUSION: Compared with delivery of spontaneous cephalic presenta-tions, delivery of cephalic presenting babies following successful ECV is associated with an increased rate of Caesarean section, especially in nulliparous women and women whose labour is induced.

Objectif : Comparer les issues obstétricales que connaissent des femmes enceintes à la suite de la réussite d'une version céphalique par manœuvres externes (VCE) (cas) à celles que connaissent un important groupe de femmes enceintes qui présentent un fœtus se trouvant spontanément en position céphalique au moment de l'accouchement (témoins). Méthodes : Nous avons mené une étude de cohorte appariée rétrospective au sein d'un hôpital universitaire des Pays-Bas. Nous avons comparé les issues de l'accouchement chez des femmes ayant subi une VCE réussie à celles de femmes ayant connu une présentation céphalique spontanée, tout en nous assurant de neutraliser les effets de l'âge maternel, de la parité, de l'âge gestationnel au moment de l'accouchement et de la nature de l'apparition du travail (spontané ou déclenchement). Parmi les critères d'exclusion, on trouvait les antécédents de césarienne, l'accouchement à < 35 semaines et la césarienne de convenance. Le critère d'évaluation principal était la prévalence de la césarienne et de l'accouchement instrumental dans les deux groupes; les critères d'évaluation secondaires étaient les caractéristiques des cas nécessitant une intervention (comme une césarienne ou un accouchement instrumental). Résultats : Les femmes ayant subi une VCE réussie ont présenté un taux de césarienne considérément plus élevé que celui des femmes du groupe « témoins ¼ (33/220 [15 %] vs 62/1 030 [6,0 %]; P < 0,001). Aucune différence n'a été constatée en ce qui concerne l'incidence de l'accouchement instrumental (20/220 [9,1 %] vs 103/1 030 [10 %]). La comparaison des caractéristiques des femmes du groupe « cas ¼ a révélé que la nulliparité, le déclenchement du travail et la présentation occipito-postérieure étaient associés aux accouchements par césarienne et instrumentaux. Conclusion : Par comparaison avec l'accouchement de fœtus en présentation céphalique spontanée, l'accouchement de fœtus adoptant une position céphalique à la suite d'une VCE réussie est associé à une hausse du taux de césarienne, particulièrement chez les nullipares et les femmes qui subissent un déclenchement du travail.

The effect of change in a labour management protocol on caesarean section rate in nulliparous women.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact on obstetric outcome in nulliparous women of changing labour management from an expectant approach to proactive support of labour. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in a teaching hospital in the Netherlands among 858 women ≥ 37 weeks' gestation with a singleton fetus in cephalic position and spontaneous labour who planned to have a vaginal birth in the hospital under the care of an obstetrician. Exclusion criteria were gestational age < 37 weeks, induction of labour, primary Caesarean section, non-cephalic position, and non-Caucasian ethnicity. Labour outcomes in the period 1999 to 2002 (using an expectant approach) were compared with labour outcomes in the period 2008 to 2010 (using proactive support of labour). The primary outcome measure was the relationship between the CS rate and the form of labour management (expectant approach vs. proactive support). The secondary outcome measure was to identify risk factors for repeat CS. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of CS in the study population was 12.2%. The CS rate increased significantly from 9.7% between 1999 and 2002, to 15.4% between 2008 and 2010 (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, the assisted vaginal delivery rate decreased from 22.7% to 16.7% (P = 0.03). Multiple logistic regression showed that epidural analgesia (OR 4.6; 95% CI 2.6 to 8.4), occiput posterior position (OR 7.4; 95% CI 4.3 to 12.8), and advanced maternal age (OR 1.91; 95% 1.31 to 2.76) were risk factors for CS. CONCLUSION: Changing labour management from an expectant approach to proactive support of labour did not decrease the Caesarean section rate.

Objectif : Explorer les effets de la modification de la prise en charge du travail (soit le passage d'une approche non interventionniste au soutien anticipé du travail) sur les issues obstétricales que connaissent les femmes nullipares. Méthodes : Nous avons mené, au sein d'un hôpital universitaire des Pays-Bas, une étude de cohorte rétrospective auprès de 858 femmes qui connaissaient une grossesse monofœtale à ≥ 37 semaines de gestation, qui présentaient un fœtus en position céphalique et un travail spontané, et qui planifiaient vivre un accouchement vaginal à l'hôpital sous la supervision d'un obstétricien. Parmi les critères d'exclusion, on trouvait l'âge gestationnel < 37 semaines, le déclenchement du travail, une césarienne primaire, une position non céphalique et une ethnicité non caucasienne. Les issues de travail connues au cours de la période 1999 - 2002 (approche non interventionniste) ont été comparées aux issues de travail connues au cours de la période 2008 - 2010 (soutien anticipé du travail). La relation entre le taux de CS et la forme de prise en charge du travail (approche non interventionniste vs soutien anticipé) constituait le principal critère d'évaluation. Le critère d'évaluation secondaire consistait en l'identification des facteurs de risque de césarienne itérative. Résultats : La prévalence globale de la CS au sein de la population à l'étude était de 12,2 %. Le taux de CS a connu une hausse significative en passant de 9,7 %, pour la période 1999 - 2002, à 15,4 %, pour la période 2008 - 2010 (P < 0,001). Pendant ce temps, le taux d'accouchement vaginal assisté est passé de 22,7 % à 16,7 % (P = 0,03). Une régression logistique multiple a indiqué que l'analgésie péridurale (RC, 4,6; IC à 95 %, 2,6 - 8,4), la présentation occipito-postérieure (RC, 7,4; IC à 95 %, 4,3 - 12,8) et l'âge maternel avancé (RC, 1,91; IC à 95 %, 1,31 - 2,76) constituaient des facteurs de risque de CS. Conclusion : La modification de la prise en charge du travail (par le passage d'une approche non interventionniste au soutien anticipé du travail) ne s'est pas traduite en une baisse du taux de césarienne.

SIMPLE: implementation of recommendations from international evidence-based guidelines on caesarean sections in the Netherlands. Protocol for a controlled before and after study.

BACKGROUND: Caesarean section (CS) rates are rising worldwide. In the Netherlands, the most significant rise is observed in healthy women with a singleton in vertex position between 37 and 42 weeks gestation, whereas it is doubtful whether an improved outcome for the mother or her child was obtained. It can be hypothesized that evidence-based guidelines on CS are not implemented sufficiently. Therefore, the present study has the following objectives: to develop quality indicators on the decision to perform a CS based on key recommendations from national and international guidelines; to use the quality indicators in order to gain insight into actual adherence of Dutch gynaecologists to guideline recommendations on the performance of a CS; to explore barriers and facilitators that have a direct effect on guideline application regarding CS; and to develop, execute, and evaluate a strategy in order to reduce the CS incidence for a similar neonatal outcome (based on the information gathered in the second and third objectives). METHODS: An independent expert panel of Dutch gynaecologists and midwives will develop a set of quality indicators on the decision to perform a CS. These indicators will be used to measure current care in 20 hospitals with a population of 1,000 women who delivered by CS, and a random selection of 1,000 women who delivered vaginally in the same period. Furthermore, by interviewing healthcare professionals and patients, the barriers and facilitators that may influence the decision to perform a CS will be measured. Based on the results, a tailor-made implementation strategy will be developed and tested in a controlled before-and-after study in 12 hospitals (six intervention, six control hospitals) with regard to effectiveness, experiences, and costs. DISCUSSION: This study will offer insight into the current CS care and into the hindering and facilitating factors influencing obstetrical policy on CS. Furthermore, it will allow definition of patient categories or situations in which a tailor-made implementation strategy will most likely be meaningful and cost effective, without negatively affecting the outcome for mother and child. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01261676.

The relation between umbilical cord characteristics and the outcome of external cephalic version.

BACKGROUND: Umbilical cords of fetuses in breech presentation differ in length and coiling from their cephalic counterparts and it might be hypothesised that these cord characteristics may in turn affect ECV outcome. AIM: To investigate the relation between umbilical cord characteristics and the outcome of external cephalic version (ECV). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: Women (>35 weeks gestation) with a singleton fetus in breech presentation, suitable for external cephalic version. Demographic, lifestyle and obstetrical parameters were assessed at intake. ECV success was based on cephalic presentation on ultrasound post-ECV. Umbilical cord length (UCL) and umbilical coiling index (UCI) were measured after birth. OUTCOME MEASURE: The relation between umbilical cord characteristics (cord length and coiling) and the success of external cephalic version. RESULTS: ECV success rate was overall 79/146 (54%), for multiparas 37/46(80%) and for nulliparas 42/100 (42%). Multiple logistic regression showed that UCL (OR: 1.04, CI: 1.01-1.07), nulliparity (OR: 0.20, CI: 0.08-0.51), frank breech (OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.15-0.90), body mass index (OR: 0.85, CI: 0.76-0.95), placenta anterior (OR: 0.27, CI: 0.12-0.63) and birth weight (OR: 1.002, CI: 1.001-1.003) were all independently related to ECV success. CONCLUSIONS: Umbilical cord length is independently related to the outcome of ECV, whereas umbilical coiling index is not.

Implementation of the external cephalic version in breech delivery. Dutch national implementation study of external cephalic version.

BACKGROUND: Breech presentation occurs in 3 to 4% of all term pregnancies. External cephalic version (ECV) is proven effective to prevent vaginal breech deliveries and therefore it is recommended by clinical guidelines of the Royal Dutch Organisation for Midwives (KNOV) and the Dutch Society for Obstetrics and Gynaecology (NVOG). Implementation of ECV does not exceed 50 to 60% and probably less.We aim to improve the implementation of ECV to decrease maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality due to breech presentations. This will be done by defining barriers and facilitators of implementation of ECV in the Netherlands. An innovative implementation strategy will be developed based on improved patient counselling and thorough instructions of health care providers for counselling. METHOD/DESIGN: The ultimate purpose of this implementation study is to improve counselling of pregnant women and information of clinicians to realize a better implementation of ECV.The first phase of the project is to detect the barriers and facilitators of ECV. The next step is to develop an implementation strategy to inform and counsel pregnant women with a breech presentation, and to inform and educate care providers. In the third phase, the effectiveness of the developed implementation strategy will be evaluated in a randomised trial. The study population is a random selection of midwives and gynaecologists from 60 to 100 hospitals and practices. Primary endpoints are number of counselled women. Secondary endpoints are process indicators, the amount of fetes in cephalic presentation at birth, complications due to ECV, the number of caesarean sections and perinatal condition of mother and child. Cost effectiveness of the implementation strategy will be measured. DISCUSSION: This study will provide evidence for the cost effectiveness of a structural implementation of external cephalic versions to reduce the number of breech presentations at term. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register (NTR): 1878.

[Fewer breech deliveries after implementation of a modified cephalic version protocol]. / Minder stuitbevallingen na invoering van beleidsprotocol voor versie.

AIM: To investigate the effect of implementation of a number of process policy guidelines (protocol), on the success rate of external cephalic version (ECV) for breech presentation. DESIGN: Prospective study. METHODS: During a 3-year period (2004-2006) a standardized protocol for an ECV consultation was developed, evaluated and adapted. After implementing this modified protocol as 'process policy guidelines', the effect on the rate of successful ECV was prospectively evaluated during the period 1 January 2007-31 July 2008. Success was defined as cephalic presentation (ultrasound) immediately after ECV. A secondary outcome measure was the elective caesarean section rate for breech presentation. RESULTS: The rate of successful ECV increased significantly from 47% (110/236 pregnant women) in the period January 2004-December 2006 to 61% (85/139, p = 0.006) in the period January 2007-July 2008. Patient characteristics were similar in both groups, with the exception of 2 subgroups of term of version. The increase was preferentially found in nulliparous and multiparous women with frank breech. Nulliparity, frank breech, anterior placenta and low birth weight were associated with a lower success rate of ECV. The term of pregnancy at which ECV was performed did not seem to affect the success rate. Implementing the process policy guidelines increased the number of cephalic presentations at delivery and decreased the rate of elective caesarean sections for breech presentation from 39% to 27% (p = 0.03). The number needed to treat to prevent 1 elective caesarean section by ECV according to the process policy guidelines was 8. CONCLUSION: After implementation of the process policy guidelines, the success rate of ECV increased considerably. The rate of elective caesarean section for breech presentation declined. These findings are in favour of establishing specialized ECV centres in the Netherlands.

Pregnancy in classic galactosemia despite undetectable anti-Müllerian hormone.

OBJECTIVE: To report a pregnancy in a patient with classic galactosemia despite signs of no ovarian reserve to draw attention to the limited predictive value of ovarian reserve tests in these patients. DESIGN: Case report. SETTING: Secondary and tertiary care center. PATIENT(S): A patient with classic galactosemia with premature ovarian failure and two previous pregnancies. INTERVENTION(S): Exogenous FSH ovarian reserve test and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) measurement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): 17beta-Estradiol response, AMH level. RESULT(S): Pregnancy despite undetectable AMH (<0.1 microg/L) and no E(2) response (exogenous FSH ovarian reserve test). CONCLUSION(S): Fluctuating premature ovarian failure makes fertility counseling of patients with classic galactosemia difficult. Commonly used ovarian function and reserve tests seem to have no significance.