Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Turk J Gastroenterol ; 23(4): 353-8, 2012 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22965506

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of AST-platelet ratio index in the prediction of significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis B patients by comparison with liver biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our computerized data of chronic hepatitis B patients who attended the Gastroenterology Clinic from 2004-2009. Treatment-naive chronic hepatitis B patients who had undergone liver biopsy were included in this study. The degree of fibrosis was scored according to the Ishak staging system. Significant fibrosis was defined as F3-6 and cirrhosis as F5-6. AST-platelet ratio index was calculated based on the original studies. Tests results were compared between the groups F0-2 versus F3-6 and F0-4 versus F5-6. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty consecutive patients with chronic hepatitis B were included in this study. The area under the ROC curves of AST-platelet ratio index to predict significant fibrosis and cirrhosis were 0.779 and 0.781, respectively. Using cut-off values ≤0.5 and >1.5, significant fibrosis was excluded with a negative predictive value of 91.30% and sensitivity of 87.69% and predicted with a positive predictive value of 59.52% and specificity of 90.81% in 53.60% of patients. Using cut-off values ≤1 and >2, cirrhosis was excluded with a negative predictive value of 92.09% and sensitivity of 64.10% and predicted with a positive predictive value of 33.33% and specificity of 91.47% in 81.60% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: AST-platelet ratio index may be a useful noninvasive marker in the exclusion of both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B. However, it is not accurate in the prediction of either significant fibrosis or cirrhosis.


Assuntos
Aspartato Aminotransferases/sangue , Hepatite B Crônica/complicações , Cirrose Hepática/sangue , Cirrose Hepática/patologia , Fígado/patologia , Adulto , Área Sob a Curva , Biomarcadores/sangue , Biópsia , Feminino , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/virologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Contagem de Plaquetas , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
2.
Gut Liver ; 5(4): 460-7, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22195244

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Studies concerning red cell distribution width (RDW) for use in the assessment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) activity are limited. We investigated whether RDW is a marker of active disease in patients with IBD. METHODS: In total, 61 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 56 patients with Crohn's disease (CD) were enrolled in the study group, and 44 age- and-sex-matched healthy volunteers were included as the control group. A CD activity index >150 in patients with CD indicated active disease. Patients with moderate and severe disease based on the Truelove-Witts criteria were considered to have active UC. In addition to RDW, serum C-reactive protein levels, erythrocyte sedimentation rates, and platelet counts were measured. RESULTS: Twenty-nine (51.7%) patients with CD and 35 (57.4%) patients with UC had active disease. The RDW was significantly higher in patients with CD and UC than in controls (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). A subgroup analysis indicated that for a RDW cut-off of 14%, the sensitivity for detecting active CD was 79%, and the specicity was 93% (area under curve [AUC], 0.935; p<0.001). RDW was the most sensitive and specific marker for active CD. However, it was not valid for UC, as the ESR at a cutoff of 15.5 mm/hr showed a sensitivity of 83% and a specicity of 76% (AUC, 0.817; p<0.001), whereas the RDW at a cutoff of 14% showed 17% sensitivity and 84% specicity for detecting active UC. CONCLUSIONS: RDW was elevated in IBD in comparison with healthy controls and increased markedly in active disease. RDW may be a sensitive and specific marker for determining active CD, whereas ESR is an important marker of active UC.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...