Three-dimensional Simulation on Patient-reported Outcomes Following Oncoplastic and Reconstructive Surgery of the Breast: A Randomized Trial.

Background: Three-dimensional (3D) imaging using computer simulations is an evolving technology. There is a lack of strong data on the use of this technology for oncoplastic (OP) and reconstructive surgery. Methods: A prospective, randomized, single-center trial including breast cancer patients undergoing OP or mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction with implant (IBR) enrolled from November 2019 to October 2021 at the Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças, Breast Unit in Curitiba, Brazil. Both patients undergoing OP and those in the IBR group were randomized to undergo 3D imaging and simulation of postoperative results (intervention group) or 3D imaging without simulation (control group). All patients were invited to complete a patient-reported outcome (BREAST-Q) expectations module and breast reconstruction or reduction/mastopexy module before and 6 months after surgery. Results: A total of 96 patients were enrolled. Sixty-nine patients (45 OP and 24 IBR) completed the pre- and postoperative questionnaires and were randomized for the simulation. Women in the OP group had higher expectations for breast appearance when clothed than those in the IBR implant group (93.4 ± 16.3 versus 82.9 ± 26.5; P = 0.03). The intervention group was more satisfied with information than the control group (P = 0.021). Both patients who underwent OP and IBR believed that the 3D simulation helped them understand the surgical process (86.6% and 75%, respectively). Conclusions: Preoperative 3D simulation significantly improved patient's satisfaction with information and did not decrease postoperative satisfaction with the outcomes. The incorporation of preoperative 3D simulation may be a valuable tool in breast reconstruction.

Prospective study: Impact of breast magnetic resonance imaging on oncoplastic surgery and on indications of mastectomy in patients who were previously candidates to breast conserving surgery.

Background: Routine use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the staging of patients with early breast cancer is still controversial. Oncoplastic surgery (OP) allows for wider resections without compromising the aesthetic results. This study aimed to assess the impact of preoperative MRI on surgical planning and on indications of mastectomy. Methods: Prospective study including T1-T2 breast cancer patients treated between January 2019 and December 2020 in the Breast Unit of the Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças in Curitiba, Brazil. All patients had indication for breast conserving surgery (BCS) with OP and did a breast MRI after conventional imaging. Results: 131 patients were selected. Indication for BCS was based on clinical examination and conventional imaging (mammography and ultrasound) findings. After undergoing breast MRI, 110 patients (84.0%) underwent BCS with OP and 21 (16.0%) had their surgical procedure changed to mastectomy. Breast MRI revealed additional findings in 52 of 131 patients (38%). Of these additional findings, 47 (90.4%) were confirmed as invasive carcinoma. Of the 21 patients who underwent mastectomies, the mean tumor size was 2.9 cm (± 1,7cm), with all having additional findings on breast MRI (100% of the mastectomies group vs 28.2% of the OP, p<0.01). Of the 110 patients submitted to OP, the mean tumor size was 1,6cm (± 0,8cm), with only 6 (5.4%) presenting positive margins at the final pathology assessment. Conclusion: Preoperative breast MRI has an impact on the OP scenario, bringing additional information that may help surgical planning. It allowed selecting the group with additional tumor foci or greater extension to convert to mastectomy, with a consequent low reoperation rate of 5.4% in the BCS group. This is the first study to assess the impact of breast MRI in the preoperative planning of patients undergoing OP for the treatment of breast cancer.

Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction without Placement of Acellular Dermal Matrix or Mesh after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to report the results of prepectoral direct-to-implant reconstruction in nipple-sparing mastectomy without acellular dermal matrices or mesh. METHODS: A multicenter cohort of patients undergoing prophylactic or therapeutic nipple-sparing mastectomy was included from 2013 to 2020. All sizes and types of breasts were included, except those with previously failed reconstruction, previous radiotherapy with severe skin damage, locally advanced breast cancer, gigantomasty, severe degree of ptosis, tumors close to the nipple-areola complex (<1 cm on magnetic resonance imaging), or combined autologous-based reconstruction. RESULTS: A total of 280 immediate breast reconstructions were performed in 195 patients. The mean age was 45 years and 32.8 percent of patients were postmenopausal. The mean follow-up period was 16.5 (±17.43) months. Eighty-five patients (43.6 percent) underwent bilateral mastectomy; 116 mastectomies (41.4 percent) were prophylactic and 164 (58.6 percent) were therapeutic. Sixty-eight reconstructions (24 percent) had at least one acute complication, the most common being implant explantation (9.2 percent), which was more frequent in smokers. Late complications included rippling (grades 3 and 4) in seven cases (3.8 percent) and capsular contracture (Baker II through IV) in 29 cases (15.7 percent) [22 Baker II (11.9 percent), six Baker III (3.3 percent), and one Baker IV (0.5 percent)]. One implant rotation was observed. No deformity animation was observed. Cosmetic results were considered good or excellent in 87.3 percent of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Overall complications were similar to those reported in acellular dermal matrices, mesh, or subpectoral series, except for a higher explantation rate. This technique is safe and economically advantageous, as it is a one-stage technique without acellular dermal matrices and mesh. These are preliminary data and larger and comparative studies are needed. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Intraoperative Assessment of Endogenous Microbiota in the Breast.

OBJECTIVE: Breast surgery is considered a clean surgery; however, the rates of infection range between 3 and 15%. The objective of the present study was to intraoperatively investigate the presence of autochthonous microbiota in the breast. METHODS: Pieces of breast tissue collected from 49 patients who underwent elective breast surgery (reconstructive, diagnostic, or oncologic) were cultured. The pieces of breast tissue were approximately 1 cm in diameter and were removed from the retroareolar area, medial quadrant, and lateral quadrant. Each piece of tissue was incubated in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth for 7 days at 37°C, and in cases in which the medium became turbid due to microorganism growth, the samples were placed in Petri dishes for culturing and isolating strains and for identifying species using an automated counter. RESULTS: Microorganism growth was observed in the samples of 10 of the 49 patients (20.4%) and in 11 of the 218 pieces of tissue (5%). The detected species were Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Staphylococcus hominis, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Sphingomonas paucimobilis, and Aeromonas salmonicida. No patient with positive samples had clinical infection postoperatively. CONCLUSION: The presence of these bacteria in breast tissue in approximately 20% of the patients in this series suggests that breast surgery should be considered a potential source of contamination that may have implications for adverse reactions to breast implants and should be studied in the near future for their oncological implications in breast implant-associated large-cell lymphoma etiology.

OBJETIVO: A cirurgia de mama é considerada uma cirurgia limpa; entretanto, as taxas de infecção variam entre 3 e 15%. O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar no intraoperatório a presença de microbiota autóctone na mama. MéTODOS: : Pedaços de tecido mamário coletados de 49 pacientes submetidas à cirurgia eletiva da mama (reconstrutiva, diagnóstica ou oncológica) foram cultivados. Os pedaços de tecido mamário tinham aproximadamente 1 cm de diâmetro e foram removidos da área retroareolar e dos quadrantes medial e lateral. Cada pedaço de tecido foi incubado em caldo BHI (brain heart infusion) por 7 dias a 37 ° C, e nos casos em que o meio ficou turvo devido ao crescimento de microrganismos, as amostras foram colocadas em placas de Petri para cultivo e isolamento de cepas e para identificação de espécies usando um contador automatizado. RESULTADOS: O crescimento do microrganismo foi observado nas amostras de 10 das 49 pacientes (20,4%) e em 11 dos 218 pedaços de tecido (5%). As espécies detectadas foram Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Staphylococcus hominis, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Sphingomonas paucimobilis e Aeromonas salmonicida. Nenhum paciente com amostras positivas apresentou infecção clínica no pós-operatório. CONCLUSãO: : A presença dessas bactérias no tecido mamário em aproximadamente 20% das pacientes desta série sugere que a cirurgia mamária deve ser considerada uma fonte potencial de contaminação que pode ter implicações nas reações adversas aos implantes mamários e deve ser estudada em um futuro próximo por suas implicações oncológicas na etiologia do linfoma de células grandes associado ao implante de mama.

Exposed Implant after Immediate Breast Reconstruction - Presentation and Analysis of a Clinical Management Protocol.

OBJECTIVE: Infection and exposure of the implant are some of the most common and concerning complications after implant-based breast reconstruction. Currently, there is no consensus on the management of these complications. The aim of the present study was to review our cases and to present a clinical protocol. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of consecutive patients submitted to implant-based breast reconstruction between 2014 and 2016. All patients were managed according to a specific and structured protocol. RESULTS: Implant exposure occurred in 33 out of 277 (11.9%) implant-based reconstructions. Among these, two patients had history of radiotherapy and had their implant removed; Delayed reconstruction with a myocutaneous flap was performed in both cases. Signs of severe local infection were observed in 12 patients, and another 5 presented with extensive tissue necrosis, and they were all submitted to implant removal; of them, 8 underwent reconstruction with a tissue expander, and 2, with a myocutaneous flap. The remaining 14 patients had no signs of severe infection, previous irradiation or extensive tissue necrosis, and were submitted to primary suture as an attempt to salvage the implant. Of these, 8 cases (57.1%) managed to keep the original implant. CONCLUSION: Our clinical protocol is based on three key points: history of radiotherapy, severe infection, and extensive tissue necrosis. It is a practical and potentially-reproducible method of managing one of the most common complications of implant-based breast reconstruction.

OBJECTIVO: Infecção e exposição da prótese são algumas das complicações mais comuns e preocupantes após reconstrução da mama com implantes. Atualmente, ainda não há consenso quanto ao manejo destas complicações. O objetivo deste estudo foi o de revisar os casos da nossa instituição e apresentar um protocolo clínico. MéTODOS: Realizou-se uma revisão retrospectiva de todos os casos consecutivos submetidos a reconstrução mamária imediata com prótese entre 2014 e 2016. Todos os casos foram conduzidos de acordo com um protocolo específico e estruturado. RESULTADOS: A exposição do implante ocorreu em 33 de 227 reconstruções (11,9%). Dentre estas, duas pacientes tinham histórico de radioterapia, e foram submetidas a remoção da prótese e posterior reconstrução com retalho miocutâneo. Sinais de infecção local grave foram observados em 12 pacientes, e, em 5, necrose extensa de tecido, e todas foram submetidas a remoção dos implantes; destas, 8 foram reconstruídas com expansor, e 2, com retalho miocutâneo. As 14 pacientes remanecentes não haviam sido submetidas previamente à radioterapia, não tinham sinais de infecção, nem necrose extensa; portanto, foram submetidas a sutura primária em uma tentativa de salvar a prótese. Dessas, 8 pacientes (57,1%) conseguiram manter os implantes originais. CONCLUSãO: Nosso protocolo clínico é baseado em três pontos principais: histórico de radioterapia, infecção grave, e necrose extensa de tecido. Ele constitui um método prático e potencialmente reprodutível de manejo de uma das complicações mais comuns da reconstrução mamária com implantes.

Intraoperative Assessment of Endogenous Microbiota in the Breast / Avaliação intraoperatória da microbiota endógena da mama

Abstract Objective: Breast surgery is considered a clean surgery; however, the rates of infection range between 3 and 15%. The objective of the present study was to intraoperatively investigate the presence of autochthonous microbiota in the breast. Methods: Pieces of breast tissue collected from 49 patients who underwent elective breast surgery (reconstructive, diagnostic, or oncologic) were cultured. The pieces of breast tissue were approximately 1 cm in diameter and were removed from the retroareolar area, medial quadrant, and lateral quadrant. Each piece of tissue was incubated in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth for 7 days at 37°C, and in cases in which the medium became turbid due to microorganism growth, the samples were placed in Petri dishes for culturing and isolating strains and for identifying species using an automated counter. Results: Microorganism growth was observed in the samples of 10 of the 49 patients (20.4%) and in 11 of the 218 pieces of tissue (5%). The detected species were Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Staphylococcus hominis, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Sphingomonas paucimobilis, and Aeromonas salmonicida. No patient with positive samples had clinical infection postoperatively. Conclusion: The presence of these bacteria in breast tissue in approximately 20% of the patients in this series suggests that breast surgery should be considered a potential source of contamination that may have implications for adverse reactions to breast implants and should be studied in the near future for their oncological implications in breast implant-associated large-cell lymphoma etiology.

Resumo Objetivo: A cirurgia de mama é considerada uma cirurgia limpa; entretanto, as taxas de infecção variam entre 3 e 15%. O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar no intraoperatório a presença de microbiota autóctone na mama. Métodos: Pedaços de tecido mamário coletados de 49 pacientes submetidas à cirurgia eletiva da mama (reconstrutiva, diagnóstica ou oncológica) foram cultivados. Os pedaços de tecido mamário tinham aproximadamente 1 cm de diâmetro e foram removidos da área retroareolar e dos quadrantes medial e lateral. Cada pedaço de tecido foi incubado em caldo BHI (brain heart infusion) por 7 dias a 37 ° C, e nos casos em que o meio ficou turvo devido ao crescimento de microrganismos, as amostras foram colocadas em placas de Petri para cultivo e isolamento de cepas e para identificação de espécies usando um contador automatizado. Resultados: O crescimento do microrganismo foi observado nas amostras de 10 das 49 pacientes (20,4%) e em 11 dos 218 pedaços de tecido (5%). As espécies detectadas foram Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Staphylococcus hominis, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Sphingomonas paucimobilis e Aeromonas salmonicida. Nenhum paciente com amostras positivas apresentou infecção clínica no pós-operatório. Conclusão: A presença dessas bactérias no tecido mamário em aproximadamente 20% das pacientes desta série sugere que a cirurgia mamária deve ser considerada uma fonte potencial de contaminação que pode ter implicações nas reações adversas aos implantes mamários e deve ser estudada em um futuro próximo por suas implicações oncológicas na etiologia do linfoma de células grandes associado ao implante de mama.

Exposed Implant after Immediate Breast Reconstruction - Presentation and Analysis of a Clinical Management Protocol / Exposição de prótese após reconstrução imediata da mama: apresentação e análise de protocolo clínico

Abstract Objective Infection and exposure of the implant are some of the most common and concerning complications after implant-based breast reconstruction. Currently, there is no consensus on the management of these complications. The aim of the present study was to review our cases and to present a clinical protocol. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of consecutive patients submitted to implant-based breast reconstruction between 2014 and 2016. All patients were managed according to a specific and structured protocol. Results Implant exposure occurred in 33 out of 277 (11.9%) implant-based reconstructions. Among these, two patients had history of radiotherapy and had their implant removed; Delayed reconstruction with a myocutaneous flap was performed in both cases. Signs of severe local infection were observed in 12 patients, and another 5 presented with extensive tissue necrosis, and they were all submitted to implant removal; of them, 8 underwent reconstruction with a tissue expander, and 2, with a myocutaneous flap. The remaining 14 patients had no signs of severe infection, previous irradiation or extensive tissue necrosis, and were submitted to primary suture as an attempt to salvage the implant. Of these, 8 cases (57.1%) managed to keep the Conclusion Our clinical protocol is based on three key points: history of radiotherapy, severe infection, and extensive tissue necrosis. It is a practical and potentially-reproducible method of managing one of the most common complications of implant-based breast reconstruction.

Resumo Objectivo Infecção e exposição da prótese são algumas das complicações mais comuns e preocupantes após reconstrução da mama com implantes. Atualmente, ainda não há consenso quanto ao manejo destas complicações. O objetivo deste estudo foi o de revisar os casos da nossa instituição e apresentar um protocolo clínico. Métodos Realizou-se uma revisão retrospectiva de todos os casos consecutivos submetidos a reconstrução mamária imediata com prótese entre 2014 e 2016. Todos os casos foram conduzidos de acordo com um protocolo específico e estruturado. Resultados A exposição do implante ocorreu em 33 de 227 reconstruções (11,9%). Dentre estas, duas pacientes tinham histórico de radioterapia, e foram submetidas a remoção da prótese e posterior reconstrução com retalho miocutâneo. Sinais de infecção local grave foram observados em 12 pacientes, e, em 5, necrose extensa de tecido, e todas foram submetidas a remoção dos implantes; destas, 8 foram recons truídas com expansor, e 2, com retalho miocutâneo. As 14 pacientes remanecentes não haviam sido submetidas previamente à radioterapia, não tinham sinais de infecção, nem necrose extensa; portanto, foram submetidas a sutura primária em uma tentativa de salvar a prótese. Dessas, 8 pacientes (57,1%) conseguiram manter os implantes originais. Conclusão Nosso protocolo clínico é baseado em três pontos principais: histórico de radioterapia, infecção grave, e necrose extensa de tecido. Ele constitui um método prático e potencialmente reprodutível de manejo de uma das complicações mais comuns da reconstrução mamária com implantes.

Association between SNP rs527616 in lncRNA AQP4-AS1 and susceptibility to breast cancer in a southern Brazilian population.

Breast cancer (BC) is the leading cause of death by this disease in women worldwide. Among the factors involved in tumorigenesis, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and their differential expression have been associated. Differences in gene expression may be triggered by variations in DNA sequence, including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). In the present study, we analyzed the rs527616 (C>G), located in the lncRNA AQP4-AS1, using PCR-SSP in 306 BC patients and 312 controls, from a Brazilian population. In the BC group, the frequency found for CG heterozygotes was above the expected and the overdominant model is the best one to explain our results (OR: 1.70, IC 95%: 1.23-2.34, P<0.001). Furthermore, the SNP were associated with age at BC diagnosis and the risk genotype more frequent in the older age group. According to TCGA data, AQP4-AS1 is down-regulated in BC tissue, and the overexpression is associated with better prognoses, including Luminal A, HER2-, stage 1 of disease and smaller tumor. In conclusion, the CG genotype is associated with increased susceptibility in the southern Brazilian population. This SNP is mapped in the lncRNA AQP4-AS1, showing differential expression in BC samples. Based on these results, we emphasize the potential of the role of AQP4-AS1 in cancer.

So alike yet so different. Differential expression of the long non-coding RNAs NORAD and HCG11 in breast cancer subtypes.

Breast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous disease, and it is the leading cause of death among women. NORAD and HCG11 are highly similar lncRNAs that present binding sites for PUMILIO proteins. PUMILIO acts on hundreds of mRNA targets, contributing to the modulation of gene expression. We analyzed the expression levels of NORAD and HCG11 in the BC subtypes luminal A (LA) and basal-like (BL), and the regulatory networks associated with these lncRNAs. In the analysis of TCGA cohort (n=329) and Brazilian BC samples (n=44), NORAD was up-regulated in LA while HCG11 was up-regulated in BL subtype. An increased expression of NORAD is associated with reduced disease-free survival in basal-like patients (p = 0.002), which suggests that its prognostic value could be different in specific subtypes. The biological pathways observed for the HCG11 network are linked to the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition; while NORAD associated pathways appear to be related to luminal epithelial cell transformation. NORAD and HCG11 regulons respectively present 36% and 21.5% of PUMILIO targets, which suggests that these lncRNAs act as a decoy for PUMILIO. These lncRNAs seem to work as players in the differentiation process that drives breast cells to acquire distinct phenotypes related to a specific BC subtype.

A genetic variant in microRNA-146a is associated with sporadic breast cancer in a Southern Brazilian Population.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play an essential role in gene expression and affect the development of tumours, including breast cancer (BC). Polymorphisms in miRNA genes can affect the interaction of miRNAs with their target messenger RNA by interfering, creating or disrupting target sites. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs2910164, located in the seed region of miR146a, was shown to be associated with BC among different populations. In the present study, we investigated whether rs2910164 is associated with BC in 326 patients and 411 controls from a Brazilian population of predominantly European ancestry. The presence of the allele rs2910164*C was associated with an increased risk of BC (OR=1.4, 95% CI=1.03-1.85, p = 0.03). We also analysed publicly available RNA-seq data to evaluate if miR146a is differentially expressed in different subtypes of BC. Genotyping was performed by polymerase chain reaction with sequence-specific primers (PCR-SSP). By leveraging public data from TCGA database, we analysed 461 patients and found that miR146a is significantly more expressed in BC than in non-tumor tissue (1.47 fold, p = 0.02) and is expressed to a greater degree in aggressive BC subtypes.

Identification of miRNAs Enriched in Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Serum Samples of Breast Cancer Patients.

MicroRNAs derived from extracellular vesicles (EV-miRNAs) are circulating miRNAs considered as potential new diagnostic markers for cancer that can be easily detected in liquid biopsies. In this study, we performed RNA sequencing analysis as a screening strategy to identify EV-miRNAs derived from serum of clinically well-annotated breast cancer (BC) patients from the south of Brazil. EVs from three groups of samples (healthy controls (CT), luminal A (LA), and triple-negative (TNBC)) were isolated from serum using a precipitation method and analyzed by RNA-seq (screening phase). Subsequently, four EV-miRNAs (miR-142-5p, miR-150-5p, miR-320a, and miR-4433b-5p) were selected to be quantified by quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) in individual samples (test phase). A panel composed of miR-142-5p, miR-320a, and miR-4433b-5p distinguished BC patients from CT with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8387 (93.33% sensitivity, 68.75% specificity). The combination of miR-142-5p and miR-320a distinguished LA patients from CT with an AUC of 0.9410 (100% sensitivity, 93.80% specificity). Interestingly, decreased expression of miR-142-5p and miR-150-5p were significantly associated with more advanced tumor grades (grade III), while the decreased expression of miR-142-5p and miR-320a was associated with a larger tumor size. These results provide insights into the potential application of EVs-miRNAs from serum as novel specific markers for early diagnosis of BC.

Breast cancer and pyoderma gangrenosum: a complication after conservative surgery and radiotherapy

Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare, ulcerative, and painful neutrophilic dermatosis of unknown cause associated with systemic diseases and/or pathergy phenomenon in 30% of cases. We report the case of a breast cancer patient submitted to oncoplastic conservative surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy, with long-term progression to PG. It's rare and challeng ing nature reinforces the need for early diagnosis to increase treatment effectiveness and reduce morbidity.

IMPACT OF PREOPERATORY MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN ONCOPLASTIC SURGERY / Impacto da ressonância magnética pré-operatória na cirurgia oncoplástica

Objective: There is no data about magnetic resonance image (MRI) impact in oncoplastic surgery (OP). The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of MRI on the surgical planning and the changes of conduct in patients with initial breast cancer and candidates to perform the OP. Methods: This is a prospective cohort of 60 patients who were candidates to OP between January 2013 and July 2014. All of them underwent to a preoperative MRI, in addition to mammography (MG) and ultrasound (US). Any additional tumor in the MRI classified as BIRADS 4-5 were biopsied or marked with carbon and radiotracer in order to be localized during the surgery. Surgical impact of additional MRI findings were evaluated as to changes of approach to mastectomy or to wider resection. Results: Of the patients, 29/60 (48.3%) had additional findings on MRI, 16/29 (55%) were multifocal tumors, 1/29 (3.4%) was multicentric, 5/29 (17%) were contralateral tumors, and 9/29 (31%) presented tumor size larger than 10 mm in the MRI. Of 22 patients who showed additional lesions on MRI, 15 (68.2%) had invasive carcinomas in the definitive anatomopathological exam. Sensibility of MRI was higher in the estimation of the tumor size. Of the patients, 12/60 (20%) underwent to mastectomy, and 17/60 (28.3%) to wider resections. Only 5% of patients had positive margins in the entire group, and in the group of patients that had additional findings on MRI only 3.4% had positive margins. Conclusions: MRI is better than MG and US in evaluating the extension of the tumor, and in the detection of multicentricity, multifocality and bilaterality. In consequence, it contributed in this series for a better surgical planning in OP with a low rate of compromised margins and re-operations.

Objetivo: Não há dados sobre o impacto da imagem de ressonância magnética (RM) na cirurgia oncoplástica. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o impacto da RM no planejamento cirúrgico e nas mudanças de conduta em pacientes com câncer de mama inicial e candidatas a realizar a cirurgia oncoplástica. Métodos: Trata-se de uma coorte prospectiva de 60 pacientes que foram candidatas à cirurgia oncoplástica entre janeiro de 2013 e julho de 2014. Todos elas foram submetidas a uma RM pré-operatória, além de mamografia (MG) e ultrassom (US). Qualquer tumor adicional na RM classificada como BIRADS 4-5 foi biopsiado ou marcado com carvão e ROLL para serem localizados durante a cirurgia. O impacto cirúrgico dos achados adicionais da RM foi avaliado quanto a mudanças para mastectomia ou ressecção mais ampla. Resultados: Das pacientes, 29/60 (48,3%) apresentaram achados adicionais na ressonância magnética, 16/29 (55%) foram tumores multifocais, 1/29 (3,4%) foi multicêntrico, 5/29 (17%) foram tumores contralaterais e 9/29 (31%) apresentaram tamanho de tumor maior que 10 mm na RM. Das 22 pacientes que apresentaram lesões adicionais na RM, 15 (68,2%) apresentaram carcinomas invasivos no exame anatomopatológico definitivo. A sensibilidade da RM foi maior na estimativa do tamanho do tumor. Das pacientes, 12/60 (20%) foram submetidas à mastectomia e 17/60 (28,3%) a ressecções mais amplas. Apenas 5% das pacientes apresentaram margens positivas em todo o grupo. No grupo de pacientes que apresentaram resultados adicionais na RM, apenas 3,4% tiveram margens positivas. Conclusões: A RM é melhor que a MG e o US na avaliação da extensão do tumor e na detecção de tumores multicêntricos, multifocais e bilaterais. Em consequência, contribuiu nesta série para um melhor planejamento cirúrgico na cirurgia oncoplástica com baixa taxa de margens comprometidas e reexcisão.

Copy number and expression analysis of FOSL1, GSTP1, NTSR1, FADD and CCND1 genes in primary breast tumors with axillary lymph node metastasis.

In breast cancer, lymph node (LN) metastasis is one of the strongest prognostic factors at diagnosis. Therefore the identification of molecular markers with metastatic potential that promote the development of LN metastasis is of critical clinical relevance. In this study, we evaluated the copy number status of the FOSL1, GSTP1, NTSR1, FADD and CCND1 genes by TaqMan assays in 137 breast cancer patients, 84 with LN metastasis (LN+) and 53 with no LN metastasis (LN-). The copy number data for four of these genes (FOSL1, GSTP1, FADD and CCND1) were integrated with their mRNA expression levels in 31 patients. In both groups of patients, gains were the most frequent copy number alteration (CNA) observed, involving mainly the CCND1, NTSR1 and FADD genes; mRNA overexpression was more commonly observed for the CCND1 and FADD genes. For the FADD gene in the LN+ group, gene expression was shown to be dependent on CNAs; for the other genes no association was found. In conclusion, increase copy number and mRNA overexpression of FOSL1, GSTP1, FADD, NTSR1 and CCND1 genes are frequently observed in primary breast tumors, and except for the FADD gene, they occur independently and irrespectively of the patients' LN axillary metastatic status.

Resultados do exame intraoperatório do linfonodo sentinela na Unidade de Mama do Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças em Curitiba / Intraoperatory sentinel node exam at the Hospital NossaSenhora das Graças Breast Unit in Curitiba

A biópsia do linfonodo sentinela (LS) é o procedimento padrão para as pacientes com axila clinicamente negativa. O seu exame intraoperatório ainda gera dificuldades na sua abordagem. Assim, o objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a eficácia desse exame no câncer de mama. Foram avaliadas 342 pacientes que foram operadas na Unidade de Mama do Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças em Curitiba (PR), no período de 2000 a 2012. No exame intraoperatrório eram rea lizados cortes longitudinais, ao longo do maior eixo, a cada 2 ou 3mm. Em seguida eram feitos imprints em cada face de cada fatia e, então, realizavam se cortes histológicos em criostato em três níveis. Tanto os imprints quanto os cortes eram corados com azul de toluidina. Em sua maio ria eram tumores T1c (n=151), e 60 (17,5%) delas apresentaram axila comprometida no exame definitivo. A acurácia foi de 92%, o valor preditivo negativo, de 91% e a taxa de falso negativo, de 8%. Não foram encontrados fatores de risco significativos para falência da técnica dentro dos parâmetros estudados.

Sentinel node (SN) biopsy is the standard of care for patients with clinically negative axilla. However, in traoperatory pathological exam remains as a controversial issue. So, the aim of this study was to evaluate its efficacy in 342 breast cancer patients operated at the Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças Breast Unit in Curitiba (PR), in the period between 2000 2012. In the intraoperatory evaluation, all SNs were cutted in the major axis, in three levels, combining frozen sections with imprints, using toluidin blue. The majority of patients were T1c (n=151), and 60 (17.5%) had positive axila in the definitive pathology evaluation. Accuracy was 92%, predictive negative value was 91%, and false negative rate was 8%. We did not find any significant risk factor for false negative SN in this series.

Evaluation of Aesthetic and Quality-of-Life Results after Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Definitive Form-Stable Anatomical Implants.

BACKGROUND: Although there are many reports on different techniques in breast reconstruction, there are few data regarding immediate breast reconstruction with definitive form-stable anatomical implants in terms of aesthetics and quality-of-life outcomes. METHODS: Ninety-four patients underwent mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction using anatomical implants and contralateral symmetrization. Aesthetic results were evaluated by three different methods: the patient's self-report, the assessment of four independent specialists (two breast surgeons and two plastic surgeons from different institutions), and the BCCT.core software. Quality of life was evaluated by means of the BREAST-Q instrument. RESULTS: Average age ± SD was 52.1 ± 11.6 years. Most of patients had medium size breasts and T1 tumors. Patients had evaluated their aesthetic results better than did software and specialists. There was no significant difference in the comparison between software and specialist's evaluation. Multifactorial analysis showed that age older than 70 years and radiotherapy were significant risk factors for poor aesthetic outcomes after immediate breast reconstruction with implants. Considering quality of life, most of the patients were satisfied with their outcome and psychosocial and sexual well-being. CONCLUSION: Immediate breast reconstruction with implants and contralateral symmetrization had a positive impact on the quality of life and showed satisfactory outcomes when evaluated by subjective and objective methods.

Long-Term Comparison of Aesthetical Outcomes After Oncoplastic Surgery and Lumpectomy in Breast Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Lumpectomy may result in major deformities and asymmetries in approximately one-third of patients. Although oncoplastic surgery (OP) could be a useful alternative to avoid them, lack of strong data is causing some debate. The purpose of this study was to compare aesthetic outcomes in patients undergoing OP versus lumpectomy using three different assessment methods. METHODS: A total of 122 patients were included in this cross-sectional multicentric study; 57 underwent OP (46.7 %), and 65 underwent lumpectomy (53.3 %). Two breast surgeons and two plastic surgeons from different institutions using the Garbay scale independently evaluated aesthetic outcomes. BCCT.core software was applied in both groups, and the patients evaluated their aesthetic outcomes answering a questionnaire about their satisfaction rate. RESULTS: OP group had a higher proportion of excellent aesthetic results according to the BCCT.core software analysis (p = 0.028) and the specialists (p = 0.002). Multifactorial analyses showed that age ≥70 years (RP = 6.02; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.73-21.0; p = 0.005), tumors in the medial, inferior, and central quadrants (RP = 4.21; 95 % CI 1.88-9.44; p < 0.001), and large breasts (RP = 7.55; 95 % CI 2.48-23.0; p < 0.001) were significant risk factors for poor aesthetic outcomes after lumpectomy. The patients classified their results as better than those by the specialists and by the software, with no statistical difference between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent aesthetic results were more frequent in the OP group according to BCCT.core software analysis and specialists. In addition, some clinical conditions and tumor locations in the breast can be considered risky factors for poor aesthetic outcomes in lumpectomy.

Avaliação dos resultados estéticos e de qualidade de vida após tratamento cirúrgico do câncer de mama / Evaluation of the aesthetical and quality of life results after breast cancer surgery

Nos últimos anos, observamos tratamentos cada vez mais conservadores, tanto na mama, como na axila, com uma ampliação nos critérios de cirurgias conservadoras, associação das técnicas de oncoplástica, tratamentos radioterápicos mais direcionados e tratamentos quimioterápicos e hormonais menos agressivos. Todos esses esforços têm como objetivo central melhorar os resultados estéticos e a qualidade de vida das pacientes com câncer de mama. Portanto, tanto a avaliação dos resultados estéticos como da qualidade de vida podem auxiliar os profissionais de saúde e as pacientes nas tomadas de decisões e na abordagem de problemas específicos. Entretanto ainda existem limitações importantes nos métodos existentes de avaliação e o objetivo desta revisão foi apresentar os mesmos, bem como trazer suas principais vantagens e dificuldades para sua aplicação.

In the past years, it is observed that breast cancer treatment is becoming more conservative in the breast and in the axilla, and with the addition of oncoplastic techniques, the indications for breast conserving treatment are enlarged. In addition to that, there are advances in radiotherapy and less agressive adjuvant treatments too. All these efforts have a central aim: to improve the aesthetical results and quality of life of breast cancer patients. Soo, both the evaluation of aesthetical results and quality of life can help doctors and patients in their decisions. However, remains important limitations in current methods of evaluation and the aim of this review was to present them, and to show their advantages and difficulties in their aplicattion.

[Different inhaler devices in acute asthma attacks: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study]. / Diferentes dispositivos inalatórios na crise aguda de asma: um estudo randomizado, duplo-cego e controlado com placebo.

OBJECTIVE: To verify the efficacy, side effects, and cost of treatment of acute asthma attacks, using different inhaler devices. METHODS: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Salbutamol was administered via a nebulizer, a metered-dose inhaler (attached to a commercially available spacer device), a homemade non-valved spacer device, or a dry powder inhaler. Assessments were made at zero, 20, 40 and 60 minutes, followed by the application of salbutamol and placebo with another device. Forty children (mean age of 11+/-3.5 years) with acute asthma attacks, were evaluated. Clinical score, forced expiratory volume in one second and side effects were analyzed. The costs for medication and spacer devices were calculated. RESULTS: There is no difference between groups regarding clinical score and variation of forced expiratory volume in one second. There was a major variation in the heart rate response to the nebulizer (35%) compared to the commercially available spacer and dry powder inhaler (15 and 17%) and between the homemade spacer and the commercially available spacer (28 and 15%) (p = 0.004). The nebulizer and homemade spacer caused more tremor (p = 0.02). The cost of treatment was higher for the nebulizer and commercially available spacer (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The nebulizer was more expensive and used more medicine, showing the same efficiency. The homemade spacer was cheaper, but presented more side effects. The commercially available spacer was as expensive as the nebulizer, although safer. The dry powder inhaler was cheaper, but, just as the homemade spacer, it also caused tachycardia.

Diferentes dispositivos inalatórios na crise aguda de asma: um estudo randomizado, duplo-cego e controlado com placebo / Different inhaler devices in acute asthma attacks: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJETIVO: Verificar a eficácia, eventos adversos e custo do tratamento da crise aguda de asma, utilizando diferentes dispositivos inalatórios. MÉTODOS: Estudo randomizado, duplo-cego e controlado com placebo. Foi utilizado salbutamol em nebulizador, inalador dosimetrado com espaçadores industrial e artesanal e inalador em pó. As avaliações foram feitas em 0, 20, 40 e 60 minutos, seguidas da aplicação de salbutamol e placebo em outro dispositivo. Foram avaliadas 40 crianças em crise aguda de asma, com média de idade = 11±3,5 anos. Utilizou-se escore clínico e função pulmonar, e foram verificados eventos adversos. Foram calculados gastos com o medicamento e o dispositivo inalatório. RESULTADOS: O escore clínico e a variação no volume expiratório forçado no primeiro segundo foram semelhantes entre os grupos ao final do estudo. Foi encontrada uma variação maior na freqüência cardíaca com o uso de nebulizador (35 por cento) do que nos grupos que fizeram uso do espaçador industrial (15 por cento) e do inalador em pó (17 por cento), e também entre os espaçadores artesanal e industrial, 28 e 15 por cento, respectivamente (p = 0,004). O nebulizador e o espaçador artesanal provocaram mais tremores (p = 0,02). O custo do tratamento por paciente foi maior nos grupos nebulizador e espaçador industrial, R$ 22,31 e R$ 16,58, respectivamente (p = 0,0001). CONCLUSÕES: O nebulizador foi o mais caro e consumiu mais droga para apresentar a mesma eficácia. O espaçador artesanal foi o mais barato. No entanto, apresentou mais eventos adversos do que o espaçador industrial e o inalador em pó. O espaçador industrial foi tão caro quanto o nebulizador, porém mais seguro. O inalador em pó foi mais barato e apresentou menos tremores, mas taquicardia semelhante ao espaçador artesanal.