Lopinavir/ritonavir pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety in HIV and hepatitis B or C coinfected adults without symptoms of hepatic impairment.

OBJECTIVE: Lopinavir/ritonavir plus nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors is one standard antiretroviral therapy regimen, both in patients with HIV alone and coinfected with hepatitis B or C. Our objective was to investigate whether hepatitis coinfection without clinical signs of hepatic impairment is a cofactor altering lopinavir pharmacokinetics and influencing therapy outcome. METHODS: Steady-state 12-hour pharmacokinetic profiles of lopinavir/ritonavir were assessed in patients with (group 1, n = 20) or without (group 2, n = 36) hepatitis coinfection, taking lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg twice a day plus nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, measured by means of high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Demographic (sex, age, weight), pharmacological (formulation, comedication), clinical, and virological/immunologic parameters (HIV-RNA PCR, CD4(+) cell count) were compared between the groups and included in regression analyses for correlations with lopinavir pharmacokinetic parameters (C(min), C(max), AUC, CL, and t(1/2)) and viral load evolution over 48 weeks on therapy. Patient pairs were matched 1:2 for the parameters sex, age, weight, ethnicity, and drug formulation. RESULTS: None of the hepatitis-related cofactors (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, γGT, HBe Ag, HBsAg, HCV-RNA PCR, HCV-therapy) had an influence on lopinavir pharmacokinetics in this group of patients. Lopinavir C(min) (P = 0.039) and area under the curve (P = 0.038) and ritonavir C(max) (P = 0.049) were significantly enhanced in hepatitis-coinfected patients, but correlated only with drug formulation (ie, soft gel capsule or Meltrex tablet formulation, multivariate regression analysis, P = 0.001), not hepatitis coinfection. CONCLUSIONS: Despite moderately enhanced lopinavir/ritonavir plasma concentrations, regular therapeutic drug monitoring is not to be considered in hepatitis-coinfected patients without hepatic impairment. Antiviral efficacy is comparable between both groups, a less-pronounced CD4(+) cell increase in hepatitis-coinfected patients is in line with previously published data.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of etravirine 400 mg once daily in treatment-naïve patients.

BACKGROUND: Etravirine is currently approved for HIV treatment-experienced patients at a dose of 200 mg twice daily. The long terminal elimination half-life of etravirine should support once-daily dosing. METHODS: In the double-blind 48-week SENSE trial, 157 antiretroviral treatment-naïve patients were randomly assigned to receive etravirine 400 mg once daily (n = 79) or efavirenz 600 mg once daily (n = 78), plus 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). Sparse sampling for etravirine plasma concentrations was conducted during the 48-week trial. Area under the curve over the dosing interval (AUC24h) and trough concentration (C0h) were estimated using a population pharmacokinetic model and compared with previous results using the 200-mg twice-daily dosage. The relationship between etravirine AUC24h and C0h with efficacy and safety was also assessed. RESULTS: By week 48, the percentage of patients in the etravirine arm with HIV RNA <50 copies/ mL was 75.9% in the intent-to-treat switch equals failure analysis and 92.3% in the on-treatment analysis; no patient developed genotypic or phenotypic resistance to NRTIs or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) after virologic failure. Seventy-one subjects had evaluable etravirine pharmacokinetics. The median (interquartile range) of etravirine AUC24h and C0h were 12,447 (8,261-15,652) ng•h/mL and 330 (188-472) ng/mL, respectively. There was no correlation between etravirine exposure and virologic response or adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In the SENSE trial, etravirine 400 mg once daily achieved similar exposures to historical reference data on etravirine when dosed at 200 mg twice daily. There was no apparent relationship between the pharmacokinetics of etravirine and virologic response or adverse events.

Daily dosing of tacrolimus in patients treated with HIV-1 therapy containing a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor or raltegravir.

OBJECTIVES: The number of HIV-infected patients receiving orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTX) is increasing. One major challenge is the severe drug-drug interactions between immunosuppressive drugs such as tacrolimus and ritonavir-boosted HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PIs). The introduction of raltegravir, which is not metabolized by the cytochrome system, may allow concomitant treatment without dose adaptation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of HIV-1-infected patients receiving tacrolimus concomitantly with different HIV therapies, including 12 h pharmacokinetic assessment of drug levels. RESULTS: Three OLTX patients received a ritonavir-boosted PI therapy when tacrolimus was added at very low doses of 0.06, 0.03 and 0.08 mg daily. Median tacrolimus blood levels were 6.6, 3.0 and 7.9 ng/mL over a follow-up period of 8, 22 and 33 months, respectively. In two other patients (one after OLTX and one with Crohn's disease), a raltegravir-based HIV therapy was started while patients received 1 or 2 mg of tacrolimus twice daily. No tacrolimus dose adjustment was necessary and drug levels remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Decreasing the dose of tacrolimus to 0.03-0.08 mg daily in patients with concomitant boosted PI therapy resulted in stable tacrolimus blood levels without alteration of PI drug levels. Concomitant use of raltegravir and tacrolimus revealed no clinically relevant drug interaction.

Atazanavir plasma concentrations are impaired in HIV-1-infected adults simultaneously taking a methadone oral solution in a once-daily observed therapy setting.

OBJECTIVE: The human immundeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitor atazanavir is often used in once-daily observed therapy of methadone substituted former opiate drug users. We performed a matched-pairs analysis on 24 patients (12 men/women) taking atazanavir/ritonavir 300/100 mg daily plus reverse transcriptase inhibitors, with (n = 12) or without (n = 12) methadone co-administration. METHODS: Twenty-four-hour pharmacokinetic profiles of atazanavir/ritonavir were assessed at steady-state and measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The geometric mean (GM, t test) minimum and maximum plasma drug concentrations (C(min), C(max)), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), and total clearance (CL(total)) were compared between the groups of pairs, which were matched for age, sex, weight, and ethnicity. RESULTS: The GM [90% confidence interval (CI)] of the atazanavir C(min), C(max), and AUC of patients taking the methadone oral solution at doses of 20-175 mg/day simultaneously with antiretroviral therapy were impaired compared to patients not taking methadone oral solution: C(min) = 315 (range 197-448) vs. 519 (279-793) ng/mL [GM ratio (GMR) = 0.61, p = 0.229]; C(max) = 1714 (1238-2262) vs. 3190 (2412-4076) ng/mL (GMR = 0.54, p = 0.018); AUC = 21,987 (15,870-29,327) vs. 35,572 (26,211-46,728) ng h/mL (GMR = 0.62, p = 0.074). Methadone dose, which is proportional to the amount of methadone oral solution (10 mg/mL), was significantly correlated to atazanavir C(max) (r (2) = 0.40, p = 0.001) and AUC (r (2) = 0.32, p = 0.006). Ritonavir pharmacokinetics was similar between the groups with C(min), C(max), and AUC GMR of 1.01, 0.80, and 0.96, respectively. CONCLUSION: The partial decrease in atazanavir plasma concentrations in patients concomitantly taking racemic methadone oral solution in this daily observed therapy setting deserves further attention, and therapeutic drug monitoring should be considered.

Persistence of nevirapine in breast milk and plasma of mothers and their children after single-dose administration.

OBJECTIVES: Nevirapine is widely used in the developing world for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV. A single mutation in the HIV genome is sufficient to lead to significant nevirapine resistance. Persistence of low-level drug concentrations in body compartments can foster resistance formation. In this study, concentration-time courses of nevirapine after single-dose administration were analysed over an extended post-partum period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Breast milk and plasma samples of 62 HIV-positive Ugandan mother-child pairs who had received single-dose nevirapine were collected at delivery and 1, 2 and 6 weeks post-partum. Nevirapine concentrations were quantified by LC/tandem-mass-spectrometry using a quantification limit of 15 ng/mL, and a population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was performed. RESULTS: Concentration-time profiles in breast milk, maternal plasma and child plasma showed similar shapes. At week 1, median nevirapine concentrations were 164 ng/mL in maternal plasma, 114 ng/mL in breast milk and 183 ng/mL in child plasma. The population PK model predicted nevirapine concentrations>10 ng/mL (IC50 for nevirapine) for 13 days in breast milk, 14 days in maternal plasma and 18 days in child plasma in 80% of the samples. CONCLUSIONS: Nevirapine concentrations were present for 2-3 weeks in the three compartments. The concentrations are probably sufficiently high to protect most breastfed children from HIV transmission during the first 2 weeks. The long presence of slowly decreasing levels of nevirapine is likely to induce resistance formation. Post-natal addition of antiretrovirals for 1 week only, as recommended in the current PMTCT guidelines, will not suffice to avoid nevirapine resistance formation.

Pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of saquinavir/ ritonavir 1,000/100 mg twice daily as HIV type-1 therapy and transmission prophylaxis in pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: A saquinavir/ritonavir-containing regimen is one option for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV during pregnancy. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of saquinavir/ritonavir 1,000/100 mg twice daily plus nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in 13 women during late pregnancy and compared the results to those of 15 non-pregnant women. METHODS: Protease inhibitor plasma concentration profiles were assessed at 12 h using a standardized therapeutic drug monitoring procedure and measured by LC-MS/MS. Minimum and maximum concentrations (C(min) and C(max)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-12 h)), and total clearance (CL(total)) were compared between the groups and correlated to demographic, physiological and clinical cofactors. Antiviral and immunological efficacy and safety were investigated. RESULTS: The geometric means (90% confidence interval [CI]) for saquinavir C(min), C(max) and AUC(0-2 h) of pregnant versus non-pregnant women were 572 (437-717) versus 765 (485-1,052, P = 0.064) ng/ml, 2,168 (1,594-2,807) versus 3,344 (2,429-4,350; P = 0.045) ng/ml and 15,512 (11,657-19,943) versus 24,027 (17,454-31,548, P = 0.029) ng x h/ml. The geometric means (90% CI) for ritonavir C(min), C(max) and AUC(0+12 h) were 190 (148-234) versus 310 (240-381, P = 0.011) ng/ml, 781 (580-999) versus 1,552 (1,127-2,007, P = 0.004) ng/ml and 5,576 (4,303-7,006) versus 10,528 (8,131-13,177, P = 0.003) ng x h/ml. Age, weight, saquinavir dose per weight and body mass index differed significantly; saquinavir C(min) and AUC(0-12 h) were correlated with ritonavir C(min) and saquinavir dose per weight. After a mean of 11 weeks treatment, 12 of 13 pregnant women had a viral load < 400 copies/ml, which was similar to the results of non-pregnant women. CONCLUSIONS: Although saquinavir plasma concentrations were significantly lower in pregnant women compared with non-pregnant women, all pregnant women displayed a saquinavir AUC(0-12 h) > 10,000 ng x h/ml, 92.3% had a viral load < 400 copies/ml at birth. Saquinavir was well tolerated by the mothers and all newborn children were HIV type-1 negative at 18 months of age.

Fosamprenavir/ritonavir plus tenofovir does not affect amprenavir pharmacokinetics: no effect of tenofovir.

The effect of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in combination with two boosted fosamprenavir regimens on amprenavir pharmacokinetic parameters was assessed in this prospective phase I crossover study with 30 healthy volunteers. The co-administration of TDF 300 mg once a day with fosamprenavir/ritonavir 1400/200 mg or 1400/100 mg once a day has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of amprenavir and results in non-significant increases of ritonavir pharmacokinetic parameters, suggesting that no dose modification is necessary when combining fosamprenavir/ritonavir with TDF.

Pharmacokinetics of saquinavir, atazanavir, and ritonavir in a twice-daily boosted double-protease inhibitor regimen.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of atazanavir (ATV), saquinavir (SQV), and ritonavir (RTV) in a boosted double-protease inhibitor (PI) therapy regimen without reverse transcriptase inhibitors (RTIs). The study design was as follows. Patients with limited RTI options received a PI combination of 300/100 mg ATV/RTV once daily and 1,000 mg SQV twice daily (group 1; n=49) without RTI comedication. The results were compared to the plasma concentrations of PIs of patients taking either 300 mg ATV/100 mg RTV once daily plus RTIs (group 2; n=72) or patients taking 1,000 mg SQV/100 mg RTV plus RTIs (group 3; n=90). The study methods were as follows. Patients were given a 12/24-h pharmacokinetic assessment at steady state. Drug concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The minimum and maximum concentrations (Cmin and Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve under steady-state conditions (AUCss), elimination half-life, time of maximum concentration and lag time were subject to statistical analysis. The results show that patients treated with ATV/SQV/RTV exhibited significantly high SQV concentrations and moderate enhancement of the AUCss of ATV in comparison to those of patients of the control groups: for SQV in groups 1 and 3, the geometric mean (GM) of the AUCss was 22,794 versus 15,759 ng.h/ml (GM ratio [GMR]=1.45; P<0.05), the GM of the Cmax was 3,257 versus 2,331 ng/ml (GMR=1.40; P<0.05), and the GM of the Cmin was 438 versus 437 ng/ml (GMR=1.00); for ATV in groups 1 and 2, the GM of the AUCss was 39,154 versus 33,626 ng.h/ml (GMR=1.16), the GM of the Cmax was 3,488 versus 2,924 ng/ml (GMR=1.20), and the GM of the Cmin was 515 versus 428 ng/ml (GMR=1.21). RTV levels were comparable for all groups. A subgroup analysis detected only marginal differences in ATV plasma exposure if combined with tenofovir-disoproxilfumarate and without it. We conclude that our pharmacokinetic results support the use of a boosted double-PI regimen of ATV/SQV/RTV as a treatment option for patients who need antiretroviral therapy without RTIs.

Saquinavir, nelfinavir and M8 pharmacokinetics following combined saquinavir, ritonavir and nelfinavir administration.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the steady-state pharmacokinetic interaction between ritonavir-boosted saquinavir and nelfinavir. METHODS: Open label, multiple-dose, two parallel-groups, single crossover study conducted in 24 HIV-infected patients (12 in each group). Patients in the nelfinavir group added saquinavir/ritonavir, 1000/100 mg twice daily to their ongoing stable treatment regimen consisting of nelfinavir, 1250 mg twice daily and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). Patients in the saquinavir group added nelfinavir, 1250 mg twice daily to their ongoing stable treatment regimen consisting of saquinavir/ritonavir, 1000/100 mg twice daily and two NRTIs. Pharmacokinetic assessments were performed before and 7 days after the start of combined treatment with nelfinavir/saquinavir/ritonavir. Blood samples were collected before and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h after dosing for measurement of nelfinavir, the nelfinavir metabolite M8 and saquinavir using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). RESULTS: The addition of saquinavir/ritonavir to the nelfinavir-containing regimen resulted in significant increases in the M8 pharmacokinetic parameters AUC(0-12), Cmax and C12; geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of 2.25 ng.h/mL (1.47-3.44), 1.74 ng/mL (1.25-2.40) and 4.21 ng/mL (2.10-8.47), respectively. The intra-individual changes in nelfinavir and saquinavir concentrations were highly variable. Statistical analysis could not discard a relevant interaction but includes the possibility that some parameters may be halved, others more than doubled. At the same time the analysis failed to show any directed change. CONCLUSIONS: The co-administration of nelfinavir and saquinavir/ritonavir leads to unpredictable changes in concentrations of both drugs. It is unclear whether the increased concentrations of M8 are associated with a clinical benefit.

Intrapartum transmission after mucosal exposure to HIV was not observed with single-dose nevirapine for mother and child.

BACKGROUND: Intrapartum transmission of HIV has been reported to be associated with HIV in oropharyngeal secretions (OPSs) of the child. In this study, we analyze the frequency of intrapartum transmission after mucosal exposure to HIV after administration of single-dose nevirapine. METHODS: Eighty mothers and their children participating in a prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV program in Uganda who took a single dose of nevirapine according to the HIVNET012 protocol participated in the study. HIV-1 was quantified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the mothers' and children's plasma, in cervicovaginal secretions (CVSs), and in the children's OPSs. Intrapartum transmission was defined as a positive HIV-1 RNA PCR result at week 1 or 2 after birth and a previously negative PCR result. RESULTS: Ninety-seven percent of children had detectable nevirapine in their OPS (median = 592 ng/mL). Fifty-seven (81%) children had HIV-negative OPSs, and 13 (19%) had HIV-positive OPSs. All children of mothers with HIV-negative CVSs had HIV-negative OPSs. HIV-1 levels of OPSs and CVSs correlated (r = 0.33, P = 0.027). None of the babies with detectable HIV-1 in the OPSs became infected by means of intrapartum transmission. CONCLUSION: Intrapartum HIV infection was not observed after mucosal exposure to HIV-1 after administration of a single dose of nevirapine to the mother and child.

A comparison of the steady-state pharmacokinetics of nevirapine in men, nonpregnant women and women in late pregnancy.

AIMS: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of nevirapine and any possible influencing factors in pregnant women (n = 16), nonpregnant women (n = 13) and men (n = 14), who received nevirapine 200 mg twice daily together with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. METHODS: Blood samples were taken for 12 h at steady state. Nevirapine concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The influence of gender, age, body weight and comedication on minimum and maximum concentrations (C(min), C(max)), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), total clearance (CL(tot)), half-life (t(1/2)) and volume of distribution (V(d)) was analysed by multivariate techniques. RESULTS: Mean [95% confidence interval (CI)]C(max), AUC(ss) and clearance were 5221 ng ml(-1) (4267, 6175), 50 789 ng (-1)h ml(-1) (43 453, 58 125) and 69.9 ml min(-1) for men, 5871 ng ml(-1) (4848, 6895), 57 045 ng h(-1) ml(-1) (45 997, 68 093) and 65.6 ml min(-1) for nonpregnant women and 4505 ng ml(-1) (3644, 5366), 44 579 ng h(-1) ml(-1) (36 564, 52 594) and 82.1 ml min(-1) for pregnant women. The differences between pregnant and nonpregnant women (% difference, 95% CI) in C(max) (-30.3; -28.5, -33.0), AUC(ss) (-28.0; - 25.8, - 29.5) and clearance (20.2; 26.6, 15.6) reached statistical significance (P = 0.010, P = 0.028 and P = 0.028, respectively). The multivariate analysis underscored the influence of bodyweight on the plasma exposure to nevirapine. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women exhibited an increased nevirapine clearance and comparably low plasma concentrations, whereas women with a low bodyweight achieved high plasma nevirapine concentrations. The large variability in nevirapine concentrations in women may lead to loss of efficacy and viral resistance, or drug toxicity, and therefore these patients should be monitored frequently.

Placental transfer and pharmacokinetics of lopinavir and other protease inhibitors in combination with nevirapine at delivery.

BACKGROUND: Antiretroviral combination therapies, including nevirapine (NVP) and protease inhibitors (PI), are increasingly used in the treatment and for the prophylaxis of vertical HIV-1 transmission in HIV-1 infected pregnant women. OBJECTIVE: To determine pharmacokinetics and placental transfer of NVP and different PI in pregnancy we measured drug levels in maternal and foetal compartments at the day of delivery. DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in 40 eligible HIV-1 infected pregnant women who gave birth in our hospital. A pre-dose to 6 h post-dose steady-state pharmacokinetic analysis (n = 35) of the drugs on the day of the scheduled Caesarean section was performed. In addition cord blood and amniotic fluid drug levels were measured (n = 40). RESULTS: In all women NVP plasma concentrations (n = 20) were below the recommended level. PI plasma concentrations (nelfinavir, n = 5; saquinavir, n = 3; lopinavir, n = 10; ritonavir, n = 13) were extremely variable. Cord blood and amniotic fluid drug levels suggested that NVP passes the placenta unrestricted whereas PI were detected in smaller concentrations in the foetal compartment. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the changed pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral drugs in pregnancy therapeutic drug monitoring could be important and dose adjustment should be considered. The minimal placental transfer of PI is desirable from the perspective that the foetus is protected from potentially teratogenic agents. However, it is not known if antiretroviral compounds in the foetal compartment contribute to the risk reduction of vertical HIV-1 transmission, and whether the property of missing placental transfer is in fact beneficial for the newborn.

Pharmacokinetics of enfuvirtide in patients treated in typical routine clinical settings.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is gaining importance for improving the success of antiretroviral treatment in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. However, enfuvirtide (ENF) concentrations are not regularly determined. The objective of this work was to study the pharmacokinetics (PK) of ENF in patients treated in routine clinical settings, to develop a population PK model describing the concentration-time profile, and to establish PK reference values. A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was developed and applied to serum samples submitted for TDM. A two-compartment model with linear absorption and elimination was fitted to 329 concentrations from 131 patients. The PK model was used for simulations resulting in percentile curves for ENF levels for the full dosing interval. The model predicted that a median concentration of 1,968 ng/ml would be reached 12 h after administration of 90 mg of ENF, and 23% and 58% of patients are expected to have concentrations below 1,000 ng/ml and 2,200 ng/ml, respectively. Both values have been proposed as cutoffs for virological efficacy. The median maximum concentration of drug in serum (Cmax) of 3,943 ng/ml, predicted for 3 h after drug administration, is lower than the Cmax reported previously. We found an enormous interpatient variability at every time point, with concentration spectrums covering >1 log and 52% and 123% interindividual variabilities in the typical clearance and volume of distribution, respectively, in contrast to preexisting PK data. In summary, ENF levels are lower and more variable than expected. Many patients may achieve insufficient concentrations. Further covariate analysis in the population PK model might help to identify factors influencing the variability in ENF concentrations.

Therapeutic drug monitoring and drug-drug interactions involving antiretroviral drugs.

The consensus of current international guidelines for the treatment of HIV infection is that data on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) and protease inhibitors (Pls) provide a framework for the implementation of TDM in certain defined scenarios in clinical practice. However, the utility of TDM is considered to be on an individual basis until more data are obtained from large clinical trials showing the benefit of TDM. In April 2004, a panel of experts met for the second time in Rome, Italy. This was following the inaugural meeting in Perugia, Italy, in October 2000, which resulted in the manuscript published in AIDS 2002, 16(Suppl 1):S5-S37. The objectives of this second meeting were to review and update the numerous questions surrounding TDM of antiretroviral drugs and discuss the clinical utility, current concerns and future prospects of drug concentration monitoring in the care of HIV-1-infected individuals. A major focus of the meeting was to discuss and critically analyse recent and precedent clinical drug-drug interaction data to provide a clear framework of the pharmacological basis of how one drug may impact the disposition of another. This report, which has been updated to include material published or presented at international conferences up to the end of December 2004, reviews recent pivotal pharmacokinetic interaction data and provides advice to clinical care providers on how some drug-drug interactions may be prevented, avoided or managed, and, when data are available, on what dose adjustments and interventions should be performed.

Severe CNS side-effect and persistent high efavirenz plasma levels in a patient with HIV/HCV coinfection and liver cirrhosis.

We describe an HIV/HCV coinfected patient with liver cirrhosis, who experienced severe CNS side-effects during efavirenz-based HIV therapy. Plasma levels of efavirenz were 10 times the upper limit and remained elevated (at twice the upper limit) 4 weeks after cessation of therapy. Efavirenz resistance (K103N) developed and was probably due to 'functional' monotherapy.

The steady-state pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir in combination with tenofovir in HIV-infected patients.

BACKGROUND: The nucleotide analogue, tenofovir, has been shown to lower plasma atazanavir levels in pharmacokinetic trials, an interaction that may be partly reversed by the addition of ritonavir, whereas plasma tenofovir levels are themselves raised when the drug is combined with lopinavir/ritonavir. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of tenofovir coadministration on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir in HIV-infected patients. METHODS: Eighteen patients received nelfinavir 1250 mg twice daily plus prescribed nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors for at least 14 days, with pharmacokinetic measurements performed on day 15. Treatment with nelfinavir was continued for another 7 days with the addition of 300 mg tenofovir once daily. Pharmacokinetic measurements were repeated on day 22. Plasma samples were analysed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for nelfinavir, its primary metabolite, M8, and tenofovir. The parameters AUC0-12, C0, Cmax and Tmax were compared for nelfinavir with and without tenofovir by calculating geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of the pharmacokinetic parameters with associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Safety was assessed throughout the study. RESULTS: The addition of tenofovir to the nelfinavir-based regimen had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir. The GMR of the nelfinavir AUC0-12 values was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.80-1.17). There was a slight decrease in M8 metabolite (AUC0-12 ratio, 0.87; 95% CI: 0.68-1.11) but this was not significant. No serious adverse events occurred through the study period. CONCLUSION: Nelfinavir does not require dose adjustment when coadministered with tenofovir and appears to be well-tolerated by HIV-infected patients.

Current status and future prospects of therapeutic drug monitoring and applied clinical pharmacology in antiretroviral therapy.

The consensus of current international guidelines for the treatment of HIV infection is that data on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors provide a framework for the implementation of TDM in certain defined scenarios in clinical practice. However, the utility of TDM is considered to be on an individual basis until more data are obtained from large clinical trials showing the benefit of TDM. In April 2004, a panel of experts met in Rome, Italy. This followed an inaugural meeting in Perugia, Italy, in October 2000, which resulted in the article published in AIDS 2002, 16(Suppl 1):S5-S37. The objectives of this second meeting were to review the questions surrounding TDM of antiretroviral drugs and discuss the clinical utility, current concerns and future prospects of drug concentration monitoring in the care of HIV-1-infected individuals. This report, which has been updated to include material published or presented at international conferences up to the end of September 2004, reviews pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data and reports the issues discussed by the panel, offering advice to clinical care providers who may be currently, or are considering incorporating TDM into the routine care of their patients. In addition, the panel formulated a series of position statements that are relevant to the interpretation of current data and can aid the design of future clinical trials.

Atovaquone maintenance therapy prevents reactivation of toxoplasmic encephalitis in a murine model of reactivated toxoplasmosis.

Acute therapy with pyrimethamine plus sulfadiazine is the treatment of choice for reactivated toxoplasmic encephalitis (TE). Acute therapy is followed by lifelong maintenance therapy (secondary prophylaxis) with the same drugs at lower dosages. The use of pyrimethamine plus sulfadiazine is hampered by severe side effects including allergic reactions and hematotoxicity. Alternative treatment regimens with pyrimethamine plus clindamycin or other antiparasitic drugs are less efficacious. Atovaquone nanosuspensions show excellent therapeutic effects for "acute" intravenous (i.v.) treatment of reactivated TE in a murine model. In the present study, the therapeutic efficacy of atovaquone for oral "maintenance" therapy was investigated. Mice with a targeted mutation in the interferon regulatory factor 8 gene were latently infected with Toxoplasma gondii, developed reactivated TE, and received acute i.v. therapy with atovaquone nanosuspensions. Mice were then treated orally with atovaquone suspension or other antiparasitic drugs to prevent relapse of TE. Maintenance therapy with atovaquone at daily doses of 50 or 100 mg/kg (body weight) protected mice against reactivated TE and death. This maintenance treatment was superior to standard therapy with pyrimethamine plus sulfadiazine. The latter combination was superior to the combination of pyrimethamine plus clindamycin. Inflammatory changes in the brain parenchyma and meninges, as well as parasite numbers, in the brains of mice confirmed the therapeutic efficacy of atovaquone for maintenance therapy. Atovaquone was detectable in sera, brains, livers, and lungs of infected mice by high-performance liquid chromatography and/or mass spectrometry. In conclusion, atovaquone appears to be superior to the standard maintenance therapy regimens in a murine model of reactivated TE. The therapeutic efficacy of atovaquone for maintenance therapy against TE should be further investigated in clinical trials.

Nevirapine significantly reduces the levels of racemic methadone and (R)-methadone in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients.

Methadone is metabolized by various isoforms of the cytochrome P450 family, which can be induced by many drugs, including nevirapine. The objective of the present study was to determine the effects of coadministration of nevirapine and methadone on the dose-adjusted areas under the concentration-time curves (AUCs) of racemic and (R)-methadone. Twenty-five human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects taking stable single daily doses of racemic methadone or (R)-methadone were included in this prospective, single-crossover trial. At the baseline, nevirapine was either started as part of a new regimen containing two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) or added to an ongoing NRTI regimen. Patients could increase their methadone doses if withdrawal symptoms developed. Twelve-hour pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained before and 28 days after the start of nevirapine treatment. The total concentrations of methadone and its inactive metabolite, 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP), in serum were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Among the 20 evaluable patients, coadministration of nevirapine significantly decreased the mean dose-adjusted AUC of methadone by 41%. AUC reductions were similar for patients taking racemic methadone (37%; n = 11) and (R)-methadone (44%; n = 9). AUC changes ranged from mild increases in three patients to decreases of up to 70%. Fourteen of 20 patients required additional methadone due to withdrawal symptoms. However, the median dose increase was only 15%, which was less than that which would have been expected from the pharmacokinetic data. The AUC of EDDP increased significantly, by 35%. Methadone dose adjustments are justified when methadone is coadministered with nevirapine. Due to extensive variability, the adjustments must be tailored to the individual patient's needs.