The necessity of electrodiagnostic studies and ultrasound in ulnar nerve entrapment according to surgeons in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow (UNE) is the second most prevalent entrapment neuropathy after carpal tunnel syndrome. The objective of this study was to evaluate the expert opinion of different surgical disciplines regarding the need for electrodiagnostic or ultrasound confirmation of UNE and, if so, which test was preferred for confirmation. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all neurosurgeons and plastic or hand surgeons in the Netherlands to evaluate the current practice in planning surgical treatment of UNE. RESULTS: The response rate was 36.4 % (134 out of 368). 94 % of surgeons reported that > 95 % of their patients had EDX or ultrasound studies before surgery. 80.6 % of all surgeons who responded reported that they seldom operated on UNE without electrodiagnostic confirmation. Hand surgeons (25.9 %) were more willing to operate on clinically diagnosed UNE without EDX than neurosurgeons (9.4 %) CONCLUSIONS: Dutch surgeons prefer diagnostic confirmation of UNE either by ultrasound or EDX, with a preference for EDX and the vast majority of operated patients do have either EDX or ultrasound or both before surgery. Compared to neurosurgeons, hand surgeons are more willing to operate on patients with clinically defined UNE but normal electrodiagnostic studies.

The Diagnostic Sensitivity for Ulnar Neuropathy at the Elbow Is Not Increased by Addition of Needle EMG of ADM and FDI When Nerve Conduction Studies Are Normal.

Introduction: The main objective of this study was to investigate whether electromyography (EMG) has additional value in the confirmation of the clinical diagnosis of ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow (UNE) if nerve conduction studies (NCS) are normal. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional cohort observational study was conducted among patients with the clinical suspicion of UNE. A total of 199 arms were included, who were examined according to a standard neurophysiological protocol, i.e., NCS and EMG relevant to the ulnar nerve. Results: NCS were normal in 76 (38.2%) arms. No abnormal spontaneous muscle fiber activity was found with EMG in any of these cases. In 9 arms with normal NCS (11.8%), isolated abnormal MUAP configurations were found with EMG. Of these nine arms one UNE was diagnosed clinically, in which additional ultrasound and repeated NCS/EMG were negative. One had already been diagnosed with neuralgic amyotrophy and one with CTS. The other 6 arms had additional diagnostics which did not reveal an UNE. Conclusion: EMG as part of the standard neurophysiological protocol exclusively in the confirmation of the clinical diagnosis of UNE has limited added value if NCS are normal in a high prior-odds setting. However, removing EMG may prevent detecting concomitant and/or additional differential diagnoses.