[Prospective feasibility study of chest X-ray vs. thoracic MRI in breath-hold technique at an open low-field scanner]. / Prospektive Machbarkeitsstudie zum Vergleich von Röntgenübersichtsaufnahme und Thorax-MRT in Atemanhaltetechnik am offenen Niederfeldgerät.

PURPOSE: MR investigations using a breath-hold sequence at an open low-field MR had to be compared to chest X-rays in patients with a wide spectrum of cardio-thoracic pathologies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 114 patients and three volunteers who actually received a chest X-ray due to different indications underwent triplanar breath-hold (17 - 20 s) True-FISP sequence using a 0.2 T low-field MR (Siemens Magnetom Open, TR/TE/alpha: 7.3/3.5/80 degrees, SD: 10 mm, Pixel: 2.81 x 1.41 mm) a mean of 5.1 (+/- 8.2) days later. RESULTS: Signal-to-noise ratio as basics for pattern recognition was 3.2 in nodule, 5.0 in infiltration, and 12.0 in effusion, and therefore True-FISP is usable for the detection of these findings. MRI demonstrated nodules (89 % vs. 57 %), infiltration (81 % vs. 71 %), pleural effusions (86 % vs. 75 %), pericardial effusions (100 % vs. 21 %) and pulmonary congestion (90 % vs. 80 %) clearly more frequently compared to chest X-ray. DISCUSSION: MRI of the lung has been implemented successfully at an open low-field MR system. Diagnostic safety and accuracy are at least comparable to those of chest X-ray. The lack of superimposition led to a major improvement in the detection of pericardial effusions and nodules, and an increase in identification of infiltration, pleural effusion, and pulmonary congestion.

A fast magnetic resonance imaging technique for children with mediastinal lymphoma: work in progress.

BACKGROUND: Mediastinal lymphoma often presents as a large tumor at the time of diagnosis. Usually chest X-ray filming is the first imaging modality and it is used for routine follow-up during the course of the disease. A new and very fast MRI technique has been developed at our center as an alternative. Results in three patients with mediastinal lymphoma during a pilot study are promising. PROCEDURE: After diagnosis the above patients were additionally investigated in a 0.2 T low-field MR-scanner by a modified true FISP sequence (see text) with an acquisition time of 3.6-4.6 sec. Follow-up was performed by both, X-ray filming and MRI. After diagnosis the patients, again, had both X-ray filming and MRI investigation for follow-up: one patient 2, one patient 3, and one patient 5 times. Images were evaluated and compared by two pediatric radiologists. RESULTS: Total investigation times for radiography and MRI were comparable. The tumor was better visualized by MRI on seven of nine images and gave additional information about the structure and the localization of the tumor as well as concomitant problems such as pericardial effusion. CONCLUSIONS: True FISP MRI may prove to be a good alternative to X-ray filming in the diagnosis and follow-up of mediastinal lymphoma.

Low field thoracic MRI--a fast and radiation free routine imaging modality in children.

Radiography of the chest is the most frequently performed radiological examination in pediatric imaging. However, it is associated with the application of ionizing radiation. In order to avoid ionizing radiation in children a new and very fast MRI technique has been developed at our center as an alternative to the pediatric chest X-ray. 100 patients who had received a chest X-ray were additionally investigated in a 0.2 T low-field MR-scanner by a modified true FISP sequence with an acquisition time of 3.6-4.6 s for a coronal triple-slice scan. X-ray and MR images were independently evaluated and later compared by two pediatric radiologists. Total investigation times (door-to-door time) for X-ray and MRI were comparable. The signal-to-noise ratio for lung parenchyma was 4.6-7.3. Of 189 pathologic findings 165 were depicted on MR images as well as radiographs, 18 were noted on MRIs only, 6 on X-rays only. Overall kappa was 0.87. True FISP MRI may be a good alternative to conventional chest X-ray. The main advantages are: fast imaging free of ionizing radiation, easy performance, no need for special equipment, optional imaging in all 3 planes, good image quality, and a high diagnostic value.

Sedation and monitoring of paediatric patients undergoing open low-field MRI.

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to determine the need, effectiveness and safety of sedation and monitoring in infants and children in a paediatric open low-field MRI system. Of 274 patients (median age 9 y) examined, only 74 children (median age 25 mo) needed sedation. Sedation was achieved by intravenous administration of midazolam (0.2 mg/kg) and etomidate (0.2 mg/kg). Mean total doses required were 0.28 and 0.27 mgl/kg, respectively. With the exception of eight primarily ventilated patients, all children breathed spontaneously. O2 saturation, arterial blood pressure and ECG were monitored. The low resonance frequency of the MRI system required a specially designed high frequency (HF) shielding of the monitor system to avoid HF artifacts. The overall sedation rate was markedly lower (74/274 = 27%) compared to a control group previously examined in a closed high-field MRI system (52/111 = 47%). This was due to a significant lower need for sedation in patients aged up to 10 y (p < or = 0.0001) in the open MRI unit. General anaesthesia could be avoided in all patients. No significant movement artifacts occurred in any of the MRI examinations and no serious side effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: MRI of children is easier in an open MRI system and with fewer sedations, as in closed high-field systems. Sedation by a combination of midazolam and etomidate is highly effective and safe. Monitoring devices for high-field systems may have to be modified for low-field systems. An in-house paediatric MRI unit with an open and special paediatric design is of major advantage for imaging paediatric patients.

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging with the magnetom open scanner: concepts, neurosurgical indications, and procedures: a preliminary report.

OBJECTIVE: Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is now available with the General Electric MRI system for dedicated intraoperative use. Alternatively, non-dedicated MRI systems require fewer specific adaptations of instrumentation and surgical techniques. In this report, clinical experiences with such a system are presented. METHODS: All patients were surgically treated in a "twin operating theater," consisting of a conventional operating theater with complete neuronavigation equipment (StealthStation and MKM), which allowed surgery with magnetically incompatible instruments, conventional instrumentation and operating microscope, and a radiofrequency-shielded operating room designed for use with an intraoperative MRI scanner (Magnetom Open; Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany). The Magnetom Open is a 0.2-T MRI scanner with a resistive magnet and specific adaptations that are necessary to integrate the scanner into the surgical environment. The operating theaters lie close together, and patients can be intraoperatively transported from one room to the other. This retrospective analysis includes 55 patients with cerebral lesions, all of whom were surgically treated between March 1996 and September 1997. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients with supratentorial tumors were surgically treated (with navigational guidance) in the conventional operating room, with intraoperative MRI for resection control. For 5 of these 31 patients, intraoperative resection control revealed significant tumor remnants, which led to further tumor resection guided by the information provided by intraoperative MRI. Intraoperative MRI resection control was performed in 18 transsphenoidal operations. In cases with suspected tumor remnants, the surgeon reexplored the sellar region; additional tumor tissue was removed in three of five cases. Follow-up scans were obtained for all patients 1 week and 2 to 3 months after surgery. For 14 of the 18 patients, the images obtained intraoperatively were comparable to those obtained after 2 to 3 months. Intraoperative MRI was also used for six patients undergoing temporal lobe resections for treatment of pharmacoresistant seizures. For these patients, the extent of neocortical and mesial resection was tailored to fit the preoperative findings of morphological and electrophysiological alterations, as well as intraoperative electrocorticographic findings. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative MRI with the Magnetom Open provides considerable additional information to optimize resection during surgical treatment of supratentorial tumors, pituitary adenomas, and epilepsy. The twin operating theater is a true alternative to a dedicated MRI system. Additional efforts are necessary to improve patient transportation time and instrument guidance within the scanner.

Intraoperative diagnostic and interventional magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgery.

OBJECTIVE: The benefits of intraoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for diagnostic and therapeutic measures are as follows: 1) intraoperative update of data sets for navigational systems, 2) intraoperative resection control of brain tumors, and 3) frameless and frame-based on-line MR-guided interventions. The concept of an intraoperative MR scanner in the sterile environment of operating theater is presented, and its advantages, disadvantages, and limitations are discussed. METHODS: A 0.2-tesla magnet (Magnetom Open; Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany) inside a radiofrequency cabin with a radiofrequency-shielded sliding door was installed adjacent to one of the operating theaters. A specially designed patient transport system carried the patient in a fixed position on an air cushion to the scanner and back to the surgeon. RESULTS: In a series of 27 patients, intraoperative resection control was performed in 13 cases, with intraoperative reregistration in 4 cases. Biopsies, cyst aspirations, and catheter placements (mainly frameless) were performed under direct MR visualization with fast image sequences. The MR-compatible equipment and the patient transport system are safe and reliable. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative MR imaging is a safe and successful tool for surgical resection control and is clearly superior to computed tomography. Intraoperative acquisition of data sets eliminates the problem of brain shift in conventional navigational systems. Finally, on-line MR-guided interventional procedures can be performed easily with this setting. As with all MR systems, individual testing with phantoms, application of correction programs, and determination of the optimal amount of contrast media are absolute prerequisites to guarantee patient safety and surgical success.