[Side effects of medicinal products: assessment and registration of causality]. / Bijwerkingen van geneesmiddelen.

The Farmacotherapeutisch Kompas (FK) and the KNMP Kennisbank report on side effects of medicinal products, in order of frequency. However, data regarding causality and its assessment are lacking, while this information is crucial when the discontinuation of a drug due to putative side effects is considered. In this article, we describe the role of pharmaceutical companies, the agencies in charge of the evaluation and supervision of medicinal products and Lareb. We also describe how this information is included in the FK and the Kennisbank. Only side effects with a probable causal relation to the drug are registered. However, to err on the side of caution, side effects with a questionable causal relation to the drug are sometimes also registered. It would be helpful for the physician if the FK and the Kennisbank also reported the degree of assessed causality, next to the frequency.

Fatal outcomes following immunization errors as reported to the EudraVigilance: A case series.

BACKGROUND: Serious adverse reactions after immunization are rare but do occur. In very rare instances, cases with fatal outcome have been reported. These reports can have a huge impact and even more so when due to an immunization error. The aim of this study is to systematically review immunization errors with fatal outcomes in EudraVigilance. METHODS: This was a case-series analysis of Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) reporting immunization errors and a fatal outcome. To determine the level of certainty of a causal association between the immunization errors and fatal outcomes two independent reviewers assessed all ICSRs using the WHO tool "Causality assessment of an Adverse Event Following Immunization (AEFI)". In accordance with the tool, the ICSRs were classified as consistent, indeterminate, inconsistent/coincidental, or unclassifiable. In addition, we estimated the contribution of reported errors to the fatal outcomes as large, moderate, small, none, or unclassifiable using a classification developed for this study. RESULTS: A total of 154 ICSRs met the inclusion criteria. Vaccines reported most frequently were pneumococcal (33), rabies (27) and influenza vaccines (24). Most frequently reported errors were non-compliance with recommended schedules of immunization (63). The most frequently reported vaccine-error combination was rabies vaccines and non-compliance with a recommended schedule of immunization (23). Twelve cases were classified as consistent with causal association and had a large error contribution. These cases concerned a cluster of six cases reporting incorrect handling of multi-dose vials containing measles vaccine and six cases reporting administration of live-attenuated vaccines to immunocompromised patients. DISCUSSION: In this study, we showed that fatal outcomes following immunization errors are very rare. Four key issues were the importance of: (1) quality control of multi-dose vaccines, (2) screening patients for immunocompromising factors, (3) education on the importance of adherence, and (4) measures to improve distinction between vaccines and medicines.

Drug Registries and Approval of Drugs: Promises, Placebo, or a Real Success?

PURPOSE: As part of the approval process, regulatory authorities often require postauthorization studies that involve patient registries; it is unknown, however, whether such registry studies are adequately completed. We investigated whether registry studies for new drugs were performed as agreed at time of approval. METHODS: This study reviewed protocols and follow-up reports for 73 registry studies that were proposed for 43 drugs approved by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use in Europe in the period 2007 to 2010. RESULTS: The data lock point of January 1, 2016, was taken to allow a 5-year follow-up period for each drug after approval. At that time, 2 studies (3%) in registries had been finalized, 19 registries (26%) had not enrolled any patients, and 52 studies (71%) were ongoing. The median enrollment was 31% (interquartile range [IQR], 6-104) of the required number of patients for 41 registry studies that had a predefined sample size, 30% (IQR, 2-101) for nonimposed registries, and 61% (IQR, 18-144) for imposed registries. IMPLICATIONS: Enrollment of patients into postapproval registries is poor, although the results for imposed registries seem better. Currently, registries only have a limited impact on resolving gaps in the knowledge of a drug's benefits and risks at time of marketing authorization.

Registries supporting new drug applications.

PURPOSE: Knowledge of the benefits and risks of new drugs is incomplete at the time of marketing approval. Registries offer the possibility for additional, post-approval, data collection. For all new drugs, which were approved in the European Union between 2007 and 2010, we reviewed the frequency, the type, and the reason for requiring a registry. METHODS: The European Public Assessment Reports, published on the website of the European Medicine Agency, were reviewed for drugs approved by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. We searched for key characteristics of these drugs, including therapeutic area (ATC1 level), level of innovation (the score is an algorithm based on availability of treatment and therapeutic effect), and procedural characteristics. In addition, we identified if these registries were defined by disease (disease registry) or exposure to a single drug (drug registry). RESULTS: Out of 116 new drugs approved in the predefined period, for 43 (37%), 1 to 6 registry studies were identified, with a total of 73 registries. Of these 46 were disease registries and 27 (single) drug registries. For 9 drugs, the registry was a specific obligation imposed by the regulators. The level of innovation and the orphan status of the drugs were determinants positively predicting post-approval registries (OR 10.3 [95% CI 1.0-103.9] and OR 2.8 [95% CI 1.0-7.5], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of registries required by regulators are existing disease registries. Registries are an important and frequently used tool for post-approval data collection for orphan and innovative drugs.

Risk factors in the development of stem cell therapy.

Stem cell therapy holds the promise to treat degenerative diseases, cancer and repair of damaged tissues for which there are currently no or limited therapeutic options. The potential of stem cell therapies has long been recognised and the creation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) has boosted the stem cell field leading to increasing development and scientific knowledge. Despite the clinical potential of stem cell based medicinal products there are also potential and unanticipated risks. These risks deserve a thorough discussion within the perspective of current scientific knowledge and experience. Evaluation of potential risks should be a prerequisite step before clinical use of stem cell based medicinal products.The risk profile of stem cell based medicinal products depends on many risk factors, which include the type of stem cells, their differentiation status and proliferation capacity, the route of administration, the intended location, in vitro culture and/or other manipulation steps, irreversibility of treatment, need/possibility for concurrent tissue regeneration in case of irreversible tissue loss, and long-term survival of engrafted cells. Together these factors determine the risk profile associated with a stem cell based medicinal product. The identified risks (i.e. risks identified in clinical experience) or potential/theoretical risks (i.e. risks observed in animal studies) include tumour formation, unwanted immune responses and the transmission of adventitious agents.Currently, there is no clinical experience with pluripotent stem cells (i.e. embryonal stem cells and iPSC). Based on their characteristics of unlimited self-renewal and high proliferation rate the risks associated with a product containing these cells (e.g. risk on tumour formation) are considered high, if not perceived to be unacceptable. In contrast, the vast majority of small-sized clinical trials conducted with mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC) in regenerative medicine applications has not reported major health concerns, suggesting that MSC therapies could be relatively safe. However, in some clinical trials serious adverse events have been reported, which emphasizes the need for additional knowledge, particularly with regard to biological mechanisms and long term safety.

Transcriptional profile of the human peripheral nervous system by serial analysis of gene expression.

The peripheral nerve contains both nonmyelinating and myelinating Schwann cells. The interactions between axons, surrounding myelin, and Schwann cells are thought to be important for the correct functioning of the nervous system. To get insight into the genes involved in human myelination and maintenance of the myelin sheath and nerve, we performed a serial analysis of gene expression of human sciatic nerve and cultured Schwann cells. In the sciatic nerve library, we found high expression of genes encoding proteins related to lipid metabolism, the complement system, and the cell cycle, while cultured Schwann cells showed mainly high expression of genes encoding extracellular matrix proteins. The results of our study will assist in the identification of genes involved in maintenance of myelin and peripheral nerve and of genes involved in inherited peripheral neuropathies.

Autoimmunoreactivity to Schwann cells in patients with inflammatory neuropathies.

Inflammatory demyelinating neuropathies are characterized by a loss of peripheral nerve myelin. Myelin breakdown is thought to result from an autoimmune reaction towards nerve components. Schwann cells play a crucial role in the synthesis and maintenance of peripheral nerve myelin. An immune attack targeting Schwann cells could therefore affect myelin integrity, leading to disease. We studied the reactivity of sera from patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) towards Schwann cells using immunofluorescence microscopy. We found 24% of the GBS (56 out of 233) and 26% of the CIDP (12 out of 46) patients to have circulating immunoglobulin G autoantibodies against proliferating, non-myelinating human Schwann cells. In contrast, healthy donors showed positive staining in only two out of 34 sera. No reaction was found with sera from patients with non-inflammatory neurological disorders. Immunofluorescence was localized at the distal tips (leading lamella) of the Schwann cell processes. Distal tips of neurites (nerve-growth-cones) of in vitro differentiated non-myelinated hNT2 neurons also stained strongly. GBS and CIDP serum immunoreactivity was also observed in teased nerve fibre preparations. These data suggest that, at least part of the immunoreactivity is not directed against myelin, but towards non-myelin proteins and epitopes possibly involved in Schwann cell-axon interaction.