Long-term toxicities after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with or without total body irradiation: a population-based study in Korea.

PURPOSE: To compare long-term toxicity incidences, including secondary cancer (SC) with or without total body irradiation (TBI), in Asian patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using a nationwide database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 4,554 patients receiving HSCT for leukemic disease from 2009 to 2016 using the healthcare bigdata system of Korea. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for SC, cataracts, hypothyroidism, chronic kidney disease (CKD), myocardial infarction, or strokes were compared, and standardized incidence ratios (SIR) of SC was also estimated. RESULTS: TBI was conducted on 1,409 patients (30.9%). No overall survival differences based on TBI were observed. With a median follow-up duration of 58.2 months, 143 patients were diagnosed with subsequent SC (3.4%). Incidence rates per 1,000 person-year were 6.56 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8-8.8) and 7.23 (95% CI, 5.9-8.8) in the TBI and no-TBI groups, respectively (p = 0.594). Also, the SIR (95% CI) was not significantly increased by TBI (1.32 [0.86-1.94] vs. 1.39 [1.08-1.77] in the no-TBI group). In the young age group (0-19 years), SIRs were increased in both groups regardless of TBI (8.60 vs. 11.96). The IRRs of cataracts (1.60; 95% CI, 1.3-2.0), CKD (1.85; 95% CI, 1.3-2.6), and hypothyroidism (1.50; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1) were significantly increased after TBI. However, there were no significant differences in the occurrence of myocardial infarction and stroke according to TBI. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that modern TBI may not additionally increase the risk of SC after allogeneic HSCT, although increased risks of other diseases were noted. Physicians should carefully consider individualized risks and benefits of TBI, with a particular focus by age group.

Risk of clinically significant cardiovascular disease associated with postoperative radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy: A Korean nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There are no large-scale datasets that analyze the relationship between postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) and various cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, we aimed to investigate the incidences of CVDs with PORT using a national population-based database. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with NSCLC who underwent curative surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy were included from 2007 to 2017. Patients with a prior diagnosis of heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation (AFib), or heart surgery were excluded. A total of 11,141 patients were included in the final analysis. PORT was used in 1334 patients. Most patients received lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection. RESULTS: Major adverse cardiac events mostly occurred within 3-4 years from the diagnosis. After the median follow-up duration of 70.6 months, HF was the most diagnosed disease (5.3 %), followed by AFib (4.5 %), stroke (4.1 %), and pulmonary embolism (3.5 %). All the incidences of clinically significant CVDs did not differ by PORT. This result remained unchanged after the propensity score matching comparison. Age ≥ 65, underlying hypertension, and history of ischemic heart disease were the most related factors to the occurrence of HF and AFib. No significant difference in CVD-free survivals according to PORT status was observed. When stratified by proposed scoring, there were no subgroups showed increased incidence by PORT. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that PORT had no significant impact on various CVD occurrences in NSCLC patients without underlying heart disease.

Assessment of deep learning-based auto-contouring on interobserver consistency in target volume and organs-at-risk delineation for breast cancer: Implications for RTQA program in a multi-institutional study.

PURPOSE: To quantify interobserver variation (IOV) in target volume and organs-at-risk (OAR) contouring across 31 institutions in breast cancer cases and to explore the clinical utility of deep learning (DL)-based auto-contouring in reducing potential IOV. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In phase 1, two breast cancer cases were randomly selected and distributed to multiple institutions for contouring six clinical target volumes (CTVs) and eight OAR. In Phase 2, auto-contour sets were generated using a previously published DL Breast segmentation model and were made available for all participants. The difference in IOV of submitted contours in phases 1 and 2 was investigated quantitatively using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). The qualitative analysis involved using contour heat maps to visualize the extent and location of these variations and the required modification. RESULTS: Over 800 pairwise comparisons were analysed for each structure in each case. Quantitative phase 2 metrics showed significant improvement in the mean DSC (from 0.69 to 0.77) and HD (from 34.9 to 17.9 mm). Quantitative analysis showed increased interobserver agreement in phase 2, specifically for CTV structures (5-19 %), leading to fewer manual adjustments. Underlying IOV differences causes were reported using a questionnaire and hierarchical clustering analysis based on the volume of CTVs. CONCLUSION: DL-based auto-contours improved the contour agreement for OARs and CTVs significantly, both qualitatively and quantitatively, suggesting its potential role in minimizing radiation therapy protocol deviation.

Comparison of initial and sequential salvage brain-directed treatment in patients with 1-4 vs. 5-10 brain metastases from breast cancer (KROG 16-12).

PURPOSE: We aimed to compare the initial and salvage brain-directed treatment and overall survival (OS) between patients with 1-4 brain metastases (BMs) and those with 5-10 from breast cancer (BC). We also organized a decision tree to select the initial whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for these patients. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2014, 471 patients were diagnosed with 1-10 BMs. They were divided into two groups based on the number of BM: 1-4 BMs (n = 337) and 5-10 BMs (n = 134). Median follow-up duration was 14.0 months. RESULTS: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)/fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) was the most common treatment modality (n = 120, 36%) in the 1-4 BMs group. In contrast, 80% (n = 107) of patients with 5-10 BMs were treated with WBRT. The median OS of the entire cohort, 1-4 BMs, and 5-10 BMs was 18.0, 20.9, and 13.9 months, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the number of BM and WBRT were not associated with OS, whereas triple-negative BC and extracranial metastasis decreased OS. Physicians determined the initial WBRT based on four variables in the following order: number and location of BM, primary tumor control, and performance status. Salvage brain-directed treatment (n = 184), mainly SRS/FSRT (n = 109, 59%), prolonged OS by a median of 14.3 months. CONCLUSION: The initial brain-directed treatment differed notably according to the number of BM, which was chosen based on four clinical factors. In patients with ≤ 10 BMs, the number of BM and WBRT did not affect OS. The major salvage brain-directed treatment modality was SRS/FSRT and increased OS.

Novel scoring system guiding the incorporation of adjuvant RT for neuroendocrine neoplasms treated with surgical resection followed by chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the role of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in neuroendocrine tumors (NET) treated with primary resection and systemic chemotherapy and guide to incorporate adjuvant RT based on individualized prediction. METHODS: We identified 4324 eligible patients using the SEER database. The most common histology was small cell carcinoma (SCC), followed by neuroendocrine carcinoma and carcinoid tumor. As the patients treated with RT were not randomly assigned, we performed propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: RT was administered to 1693 (39.2%) patients who had more unfavorable features [higher proportion of SCC, N2/3 stage, and poorly/undifferentiated (PD) tumors]. After PSM, old age, male sex, SCC, advanced T or N stage, PD tumors, large tumor size, and no use of RT were all significantly associated with a poor prognosis. After multivariate analysis, the survival benefit of RT was preserved (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73‒0.91, p < 0.001). Exploratory analysis suggested that primary site, PD tumors, SCC, tumor size < 2 cm, or LN negativity were the factors for which adjuvant RT appeared desirable. Further, we proposed a novel scoring system using aforementioned factors; site-thorax/genitourinary, PD tumor, tumor size < 2 cm, LN negativity. Based on individually calculated scores, we found that RT significantly increased survival in patients with scores of 2-4 but not in those with scores of 0-1. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the necessity of guiding adjuvant RT for these rare types of cancer. We proposed a novel scoring system to carefully recommend RT in selected patients.

Low-dose irradiation could mitigate osteoarthritis progression via anti-inflammatory action that modulates mitochondrial function.

PURPOSE: The use of low-dose radiation therapy (LDRT) for osteoarthritis (OA) are rarely implemented, except in some European regions. Its clinical effects are controversial but little is known about how LDRT affects actual disease progression. We conducted a preclinical study to reveal the potential underlying mechanisms related to its disease modifying abilities. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using primary cultured human chondrocytes and synovium-derived cells obtained from OA patients, the effects of LDRT were measured by quantitative real-time PCR, western blotting, and mRNA sequencing. For in vivo validation, a surgically-induced isolated OA model was used after anterior cruciate ligament transection or surgical destabilization of the medial meniscus. RESULTS: LDRT decreased the expression of pro-inflammatory factor matrix metalloproteinase 13 (MMP13) in chondrocytes. By contrast, collagen type 2 (COL2) protein expression was increased. LDRT induced large transcriptomic changes in both chondrocytes/synoviocytes, especially in mitochondrial activities. Gene set variation analysis demonstrated inverted U-shaped response in several categories, such as mitochondrial unfolded protein responses and extracellular matrix interactions. Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), which is a mitohormetic signaling factor, was increased after LDRT and mediated the anti-inflammatory effects. Aggrecan was increased in synoviocyte's medium and TNF-α was decreased in chondrocyte's medium after LDRT. Conversely, knockdown of GDF15 did not result in decreased MMP13 expression by LDRT. Next, OA rats treated with LDRT exhibited a decreased OA severity when compared with the no-irradiation group at 10 weeks post-surgery (mean OARSI score 3.7 in 0 Gy, 2.8 in 0.5 Gy, and 1.8 in 1 Gy; p = 0.003). Osteoclast activity was significantly reduced in the LDRT group. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these data show that LDRT could mitigate osteoarthritis progression by exerting its anti-inflammatory effects via mitochondrial function modulation.

The Pattern of Care for Brain Metastasis from Breast Cancer over the Past 10 Years in Korea: A Multicenter Retrospective Study (KROG 16-12).

PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate manifestations and patterns of care for patients with brain metastasis (BM) from breast cancer (BC) and compared their overall survival (OS) from 2005 through 2014 in Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 600 BC patients with BM diagnosed between 2005 and 2014. The median follow-up duration was 12.5 months. We categorized the patients into three groups according to the year when BM was initially diagnosed (group I [2005-2008], 98 patients; group II [2009-2011], 200 patients; and group III [2012-2014], 302 patients). RESULTS: Over time, the median age at BM diagnosis increased by 2.2 years (group I, 49.0 years; group II, 48.3 years; and group III, 51.2 years; p=0.008). The percentage of patients with extracranial metastasis was 73.5%, 83.5%, and 86.4% for group I, II, and III, respectively (p=0.011). The time interval between BC and BM was prolonged in patients with stage III primary BC (median, 2.4 to 3 years; p=0.029). As an initial brain-directed treatment, whole-brain radiotherapy alone decreased from 80.0% in 2005 to 41.1% in 2014. Meanwhile, stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy alone increased from 13.3% to 34.7% during the same period (p=0.005). The median OS for group I, II, and III was 15.6, 17.9, and 15.0 months, respectively, with no statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The manifestations of BM from BC and the pattern of care have changed from 2005 to 2014 in Korea. However, the OS has remained relatively unchanged over the 10 years.

Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy for Node-Negative Breast Cancer of 5 cm or Larger Tumors: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis (KROG 20-03).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) in patients with node-negative breast cancer of 5cm or larger tumors undergoing mastectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of 274 patients from 18 institutions treated with mastectomy between January 2000 and December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Among these, 202 patients underwent PMRT, while 72 did not. Two hundred and forty-one patients (88.0%) received systemic chemotherapy, and 172 (62.8%) received hormonal therapy. Patients receiving PMRT were younger, more likely to have progesterone receptor-positive tumors, and received adjuvant chemotherapy more frequently compared with those without PMRT (p <0.001, 0.018, and <0.001, respectively). Other characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 95 months (range, 1-249), there were 9 locoregional recurrences, and 20 distant metastases. The 8-year locoregional recurrence-free survival rates were 98.0% with PMRT and 91.3% without PMRT (p=0.133), and the 8-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 91.8% with PMRT and 73.9% without PMRT (p=0.008). On multivariate analysis incorporating age, histologic grade, lymphovascular invasion, hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, and PMRT, the absence of lymphovascular invasion and the receipt of PMRT were associated with improved DFS (p=0.025 and 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSION: Locoregional recurrence rate was very low in node-negative breast cancer of 5cm or larger tumors treated with mastectomy regardless of the receipt of PMRT. However, PMRT was significantly associated with improved DFS. Further investigation is needed to confirm these findings.

Effect of Postoperative Radiotherapy after Primary Tumor Resection in De Novo Stage IV Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study (KROG 19-02).

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the impact of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) patients undergoing planned primary tumor resection (PTR) and to identify the subgroup of patients who would most benefit from PORT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study enrolled 426 patients with dnMBC administered PTR alone or with PORT. The primary and secondary outcomes were overall and progression-free survival (OS and PFS), respectively. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 53.7 months (range, 3.1 to 194.4). The 5-year OS and PFS rates were 73.2% and 32.0%, respectively. For OS, clinical T3/4 category, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), postoperative chemotherapy alone were significantly poor prognostic factors, and administration of PORT failed to show its significance. Regarding PFS, PORT was a favorable prognostic factor (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.50 to 0.82; p < 0.001), in addition to T1/2 category, ≤ 5 metastases, and non-TNBC. According to the multivariate analyses of OS in the PORT group, we divided the patients into three groups (group 1, T1/2 and non-TNBC [n=193]; group 2, T3/4 and non-TNBC [n=171]; and group 3, TNBC [n=49]), and evaluated the effect of PORT. Although PORT had no significance for OS in all subgroups, it was a significant factor for good prognosis regarding PFS in groups 1 and 2, not in group 3. CONCLUSION: PORT was associated with a significantly better PFS in patients with dnMBC who underwent PTR. Patients with clinical T1/2 category and non-TNBC benefited most from PORT, while those with TNBC showed little benefit.

Novel prognostic classification predicts overall survival of patients receiving salvage whole-brain radiotherapy for recurrent brain metastasis from breast cancer: A recursive partitioning analysis (KROG 16-12).

BACKGROUND: To investigate outcomes of salvage whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for recurrent brain metastases (BM) from breast cancer (BC), to identify prognostic factors of overall survival (OS), and to propose a novel prognostic classification for OS in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 54 patients who had received salvage WBRT as the second brain-focused treatment for recurrent BM from BC (2000-2014). The median follow-up duration was 4.9 months. A recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was conducted to develop a model to predict OS at the time of salvage WBRT. RESULTS: The median OS was 6.8 months. OS according to BC-specific graded prognostic assessment (breast-GPA), modified breast-GPA, and updated breast-GPA did not represent our cohort. In the multivariate analysis, a long time before salvage WBRT (≥16 months), control of primary BC or extracranial metastases, systemic treatment after salvage WBRT, and administration of a biologically effective dose for an α/ß of 10 Gy (BED10) of salvage WBRT >37.5 Gy showed superior OS. We proposed three RPA classes based on the control of both primary BC and extracranial metastasis and BED10 of salvage WBRT: class I, class II, and class III. In this model, patients with class I experienced the best OS (34.6 months; class II, 5.0 months; class III, 2.4 months; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In our RPA classification according to the control of both primary BC and extracranial metastasis and the dose of salvage WBRT, significant differences in OS were observed. The subsequent use of a systemic treatment showed better OS.

Potential intrinsic subtype dependence on the association between metformin use and survival in surgically resected breast cancer: a Korean national population-based study.

PURPOSE: Numerous studies have suggested that metformin treatment can increase breast cancer survival; however, it is unclear whether its effects interact with intrinsic subtype or diabetic status. Therefore, we conducted a large nationwide study to assess this in women with surgically resected invasive breast cancer. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer between 2007 and 2016 were identified using the national health insurance claims database of South Korea. Metformin or other drug exposures was defined as medication for ≥ 90 days. Breast cancer subtypes were classified into four groups based on hormonal therapy and anti-HER2 treatments. RESULTS: A total of 117,333 patients were included (median follow-up duration, 90 months). Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) affected significantly overall survival (OS, 7 years, 89.7% vs. 92.4%, p < 0.001). A significant interaction was found between the use of metformin and insulin in patients with T2DM (p = 0.018). Thus, the subsequent analysis was limited to these patients and propensity score matching was performed. We found significantly increased OS in patients treated with metformin (7-year OS, 88.3% vs. 85.6%, p < 0.001). Interestingly, a significant effect was observed in the hormonal therapy (HT)+/HER2-targeted therapy (Tx)- group (p < 0.001), whereas no specific association was observed in the HT-/HER2 Tx- group (p = 0.220). CONCLUSIONS: Metformin administration may be associated with reduced mortality in patients with surgically resected breast cancer, particularly in the HT+/HER2 Tx- group. Clinical trials investigating metformin as a combination agent in breast cancer should stratify patients by curative resection, intrinsic subtype, the presence of T2DM, and the use of insulin.

Inter-institutional Variation in Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer in Korea (KROG 19-01).

BACKGROUND/AIM: To present the variations in the target delineation and the planning results of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for breast cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We requested the target volumes and organs at risk delineation for two cases of left breast cancers, and evaluated the IMRT plans including the supraclavicular and internal mammary node irradiation. RESULTS: Twenty-one institutions participated in this study. Differences in the planning target volume among institutions reached up to three-times for breast-conserving surgery (BCS) case and five-times for mastectomy case. Mean heart doses ranged from 3.3 to 24.1 Gy for BCS case and from 5.0 to 26.5 Gy for mastectomy case. Ipsilateral lung volumes receiving more than 20 Gy ranged from 4.7 to 57.4% for BCS case and from 16.4 to 55.5% for mastectomy case. CONCLUSION: There were large variations in the target delineation and planning results of IMRT for breast cancers among institutions. Considering the increased use of breast IMRT, more standardized protocols are needed.

Is There a Role for Perioperative Pelvic Radiotherapy in Surgically Resected Stage IV Rectal Cancer?: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine whether perioperative pelvic radiotherapy (RT) improves outcomes in stage IV rectal cancer patients treated with primary surgical resection and systemic chemotherapy and to identify predictive factors for selection of patients for these approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 with stage IV rectal cancer, but without brain or bone metastases. After applying the exclusion criteria, a total of 26,132 patients were included in the analysis; propensity score matching was used to balance their individual characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, 3283 (12.6%) patients received perioperative RT; the 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 43.6% in the surgery group and 50.5% in the surgery with RT group (P<0.001). The survival benefit of RT was maintained after propensity score matching and multivariate adjustment (hazard ratio: 0.70; 95% confidence interval: 0.66-0.81; P<0.001). Interaction testing of the prognostic variables showed a significant interaction between RT and the presence of lung metastasis (P<0.001): the benefit of RT was observed only in patients without lung metastases (3 y OS 52.1% vs. 44.1%, P<0.001), but it was observed regardless of liver metastases. In addition, we developed a web-based calculator (http://bit.do/mRC_surv) to provide individualized estimates of OS benefit based on the receipt of perioperative pelvic RT. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative pelvic RT significantly improved OS rates, especially in patients without lung metastases. We successfully developed a nomogram and web-based calculator that could predict survival benefit with the addition of RT for these patients.

New brain metastases after whole-brain radiotherapy of initial brain metastases in breast cancer patients: the significance of molecular subtypes (KROG 16-12).

PURPOSE: To identify the risk factors leading to new brain metastases (BM) following brain-directed treatment for initial BM resulting from breast cancer (BC). METHODS: In this multi-institutional study, 538 BC patients with available follow-up imaging after brain-directed treatment for initial BM were analyzed. Tumor molecular subtypes were classified as follows: hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-, n = 136), HER2-positive (HER2+, n = 253), or triple-negative BC (TNBC, n = 149). RESULTS: In 37.4% of patients, new BM emerged at a median of 10.5 months after brain-directed treatment for initial BM. The 1-year actuarial rate of new BM for HR+/HER2-, HER2+, and TNBC were 51.9%, 44.0%, and 69.6%, respectively (p = 0.008). Initial whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) reduced new BM rates (22.5% reduction at 1 year, p < 0.001) according to molecular subtype (HR+/HER2-, 42% reduction at 1 year, p < 0.001; HER2+, 18.5%, p = 0.004; TNBC, 16.9%, p = 0.071). Multivariate analysis revealed an increased risk of new BM for the following factors: shorter intervals between primary BC diagnoses and BM (p = 0.031); TNBC (relative to HR+/HER2-) (p = 0.016); presence of extracranial metastases (p = 0.019); number of BM (>4) (p < 0.001); and BM in both tentorial regions (p = 0.045). Anti-HER2 therapy in HER2+ patients (p = 0.013) and initial use of WBRT (p < 0.001) significantly lowered new BM development. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor molecular subtypes were associated with both rates of new BM development and the effectiveness of initial WBRT. Anti-HER2 therapy in HER2+ patients significantly lowered new BM occurrence.

Comparison of Dose Distribution in Regional Lymph Nodes in Whole-Breast Radiotherapy vs. Whole-Breast Plus Regional Lymph Node Irradiation: An In Silico Planning Study in Participating Institutions of the Phase III Randomized Trial (KROG 1701).

The purpose of the current in silico planning study is to compare radiation doses of whole-breast irradiation (WBI) and whole-breast plus regional lymph node irradiation (WBI+RNI) administered to the regional lymph nodes (RLN) in pN1 breast cancer. Twenty-four participating institutions were asked to create plans of WBI and WBI+RNI for two dummy cases. To compare target coverage between the participants, an isodose line equal to 90% of the prescribed dose was converted to an isodose contour (contour90% iso). The relative nodal dose (RND) was obtained using the ratio of RLN dose to the target dose. The Fleiss's kappa values which represent inter-observer agreement of contour90% iso were over 0.68. For RNI, 6 institutions included axillary lymph node (ALN), supraclavicular lymph node (SCN), and internal mammary lymph node (IMN), while 18 hospitals included only ALN and SCN. The median RND between the WBI and WBI+RNI were as follows: 0.64 vs. 1.05 (ALN level I), 0.27 vs. 1.08 (ALN level II), 0.02 vs. 1.12 (ALN level III), 0.01 vs. 1.12 (SCN), and 0.54 vs. 0.82 (IMN). In all nodal regions, the RND was significantly lower in WBI than in WBI+RNI (p < 0.01). In this study, we could identify the nodal dose difference between WBI and WBI+RNI.

Development of an Individualized Prediction Calculator for the Benefit of Postoperative Radiotherapy in Patients with Surgically Resected De Novo Stage IV Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: Locoregional treatment has been increasingly adopted for metastatic breast cancer at presentation. This study aims to develop an individualized calculator to predict the benefit of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for patients with surgically resected de novo stage IV breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We searched the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for patients diagnosed with stage IV breast cancer between 2010 and 2014. After applying exclusion criteria, a total of 4473 patients were included in the analysis. Propensity score matching was used to balance the individual characteristics of the patients. After identifying the significant prognosticators, a nomogram was developed using multivariate regression models and internally validated. A web-based calculator was then constructed using a fitted survival prediction model. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 34 months, the three-year overall survival (OS) rates were 54.1% in the surgery alone group and 63.5% in the surgery + PORT group (p < 0.001). The survival benefit of PORT was maintained after propensity score matching (p < 0.001). Interaction testing of the prognostic variables found significant interactions between PORT and the presence of brain metastasis (p = 0.001), and between PORT and hormonal receptor expression (p = 0.018). After reviewing the performance of various models, a log-normal distributed survival model was adopted, with a C-index of 0.695. A calibration plot verified that the predicted survival rates were strongly correlated with the actual OS rates. A web-based survival calculator was constructed to provide individualized estimates of survival according to PORT. CONCLUSION: PORT significantly improved OS rates, though the individual benefit was affected by a number of factors. We successfully developed a nomogram and web-based calculator that predicted the prognosis according to PORT in patients with surgically resected de novo stage IV breast cancer. These tools are expected to be useful in clinical practice and in the design of related trials.

Survival outcomes of breast cancer patients with brain metastases: A multicenter retrospective study in Korea (KROG 16-12).

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the influence of prognostic factors and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) on overall survival (OS) of breast cancer (BC) patients with brain metastases (BM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Medical records of 730 BC patients diagnosed with BM from 2000 to 2014 at 17 institutions were retrospectively reviewed. OS was calculated from BM diagnosis. Median follow-up duration was 11.9 months (range, 0.1-126.2). RESULTS: Median OS was 15.0 months (95% CI: 14.0-16.9). Patients with different BC-specific graded prognostic assessment (GPA) scores showed significant differences (p < 0.001) in OS. In multivariate analysis, histologic grade 3 (p = 0.014), presence of extracranial metastasis (p < 0.001), the number of BM (>4; p = 0.002), hormone receptor negativity (p = 0.005), HER2-negativity (p = 0.003), and shorter time interval (<30 months) between BC and BM diagnosis (p = 0.007) were associated with inferior OS. By summing the ß-coefficients of variables that were prognostic in multivariate analyses, we developed a prognostic model that stratified patients into low-risk (≤0.673) and high-risk (>0.673) subgroups; the high-risk subgroup had poorer median OS (10.1 months, 95% CI: 7.9-11.9 vs. 21.9 months, 95% CI: 19.5-27.1, p < 0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses of propensity score-matched patients diagnosed with BM ≥ 30 months after BC diagnosis (n = 389, "late BM") revealed that WBRT-treated patients showed superior OS compared to non-WBRT-treated patients (p = 0.070 and 0.030, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our prognostic model identified high-risk BC patients with BM who might benefit from increased surveillance; if validated, our model could guide treatment selection for such patients. Patients with late BM might benefit from WBRT as initial local treatment.

The Benefit of Post-Mastectomy Radiotherapy in ypN0 Patients after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy According to Molecular Subtypes.

PURPOSE: The benefit of post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) in patients with breast cancer who achieve ypN0 following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has not yet been established. This study aimed to identify the role of PMRT in patients who achieve ypN0 according to molecular subtype. METHODS: We identified patients initially suspected with axillary disease who achieved ypN0 following NAC. From 13 institutions of the Korean Radiation Oncology Group between 2005 and 2011, a total of 189 patients were included in the analysis. Effects of PMRT on loco-regional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated for different molecular subtypes. RESULTS: In all patients, the prognostic effect of PMRT on LRC, DFS, or OS was not significant. Subgroups analysis showed that the effect of PMRT on LRC was different according to molecular subtype (p for interaction = 0.019). PMRT was associated with greater LRC in the luminal subtype (p = 0.046), but not in other subtypes. CONCLUSION: In patients who achieve ypN0 following NAC and mastectomy, PMRT shows no additional survival benefits for any molecular subtype.

Clinical Outcomes of Isolated Regional Lymph Node Recurrence in Patients With Malignant Cutaneous Melanoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Regional lymph node recurrence (RLNR) is the most common pattern of recurrence within 2 years from the diagnosis of patients with non-metastatic malignant cutaneous melanoma. However, isolated RLNR without distant metastasis has been rarely studied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients with isolated RLNR as a first recurrence were analyzed retrospectively. The clinical outcomes and prognostic impact of clinicopathologic parameters were analyzed. Immunostaining for FOXP3, VEGF, pAKT, and pS6 was also performed. RESULTS: The median disease-free interval from first diagnosis to isolated RLNR and post-recurrence recurrence-free survival (pRFS) were 12 months and 7.2 months, respectively. Distant failure was the most common pattern of failure after isolated RLNR (67.5%). The number of initially harvested lymph nodes (LN) >7 and LN ratio >22.2% at the time of recurrence were prognosticators for pRFS in multivariate analysis. None of the tested biomarkers were significantly related to prognosis. The 5-year post-recurrence overall survival rate was 84.9%. CONCLUSION: Most patients with isolated RLNR will experience a second failure within months, especially distantly. The number of initially harvested LNs and LN ratio at the time of recurrence could predict pRFS.