Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Acta Orthop Belg ; 82(2): 358-364, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27682300

RESUMO

We compare clinical outcomes of two different supplementary tibial fixation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using free tendon Achilles allograft. Eighty subjects underwent ACL reconstruction using Endobutton CL for femoral fixation and Bio-interference screw for tibial fixation. Supplementary tibial fixation was performed as direct -cortical fixation using spiked washer screw (group I) or as post-tie using washer screw (group II). -Lachman test, pivot shift test, IKDC classification, Lysholm score, and side-to-side difference (SSD) were evaluated. Thirty six in group I and thirty five in group II could follow up for at least 2 years. At the last follow-up, 7 in group I and 1 in group II showed 2+ or 3+ in Lachman test (p = 0.027). Mean SSD was 2.4mm in group I and 1.4mm in group II (p = 0.048). Post-tie using washer screw was more effective than direct cortical fixation using spiked washer screw to restore stability. Level of evidence : Therapeutic Level I ; Randomized controlled clinical trial.


Assuntos
Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirurgia , Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/instrumentação , Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/métodos , Parafusos Ósseos , Tíbia/cirurgia , Tendão do Calcâneo/transplante , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Transplante Homólogo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA