RESUMO
Objectives: SENSE was an international, non-interventional cross-sectional study that assessed treatment satisfaction in patients with suboptimally controlled active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were under treatment with any approved agent exposed to ≤ 2 biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) at the time of enrolment. The current publication concerns the subanalysis of the results from the Greek cohort. Methods: Treatment satisfaction was assessed with Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), with good treatment satisfaction defined as TSQM global ≥80. Adherence to therapy was recorded on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and treatment expectations were assessed on a 7-point numerical rating scale. Results: Of 121 patients, 82.6% were women, of mean age 64.8 years and mean time from diagnosis 8.4 years. Patients had active disease (mean DAS28-ESR 4.5) and compromised functional status (mean [SD] HAQ-DI 1.1 [0.7]) while on treatment (43.8% on biologics and 5% on steroids). The mean TSQM global was 66.9. Treatment expectations were "general improvement of arthritis" and "less joint pain" (mean score [SD], 4.9 [1.8] each), "more joint flexibility" (4.8 [1.9]), and "lasting relief of RA symptoms" (4.8 [2.1]). Oral administration was preferred by 65.3% of patients. Good self-reported adherence (≥80%) was recorded in 93.4% of the patients. Treatment switch to another DMARD was planned by treating rheumatologist for only 49.6% of the participants, despite suboptimal RA control. Conclusion: Patients with suboptimally controlled RA in Greece have low treatment satisfaction and poor self-reported outcomes, albeit high self-reported treatment adherence. Similarly to the global SENSE study results, the need for patient-centric treatment approaches in order to improve disease outcomes is emphasised.
RESUMO
Background: Data on the effectiveness of anti-tumor necrosis factor medications in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) with poor prognostic factors (PPFs) are scarce. This study aimed to generate real-world evidence on the effect of early (≤24 months after diagnosis) vs delayed (>24 months) initiation of adalimumab (ADL) on the 26-week remission rate (Harvey-Bradshaw Index ≤4) in these patients. Methods: This multicentre, retrospective, chart review study performed in 10 Greek hospitals enrolled adult patients with moderate to severe CD (Harvey-Bradshaw Index ≥8) with ≥3 PPFs who were initiated on ADL ≥12 months before enrollment. A sample size of 164 patients (early:delayed cohort allocation ratio, 30:70) was required to address the primary endpoint. Results: Eligible patients (n = 171) were consecutively enrolled. In the early vs delayed cohorts, the 26-week remission rates (off-steroids) using the last-observation-carried-forward imputation method were 60.7% (37/61) vs 47.2% (50/106), respectively (Δ = 13.5%, P = .044). The respective remission rates were 61.2% vs 42.4% among anti-tumor necrosis factor-naive patients (P = .023) and 58.3% vs 53.2% among anti-tumor necrosis factor-experienced patients (P = .374). The 52-week remission rates using as-observed data were 78.8% and 60.3%, and the intestinal resection rates were 6.5% and 11.9% in the early vs delayed ADL cohorts, respectively. Conclusions: Patients with CD with PPFs who received early vs delayed treatment with ADL achieved higher clinical response and remission rates. This effect was more pronounced in those patients who were bio-naive and steroid-dependent/refractory with concurrent extraintestinal manifestations than those who were not.
