Predictors and risk factors for admission to critical care in cervicofacial infections: a Maxillofacial Trainee Research Collaborative (MTReC) study.

Cervicofacial infections carry significant morbidity. Patients present on a broad spectrum of severity, with some requiring outpatient management and others admission to higher level care. Recognition of risk factors is helpful in decision making regarding the need for admission to higher level care. Prospective data were captured on 1002 patients in 25 centres across 17 regions of the United Kingdom (UK) by the Maxillofacial Trainee Research Collaborative (MTReC). Patients admitted to critical care were compared with those who received ward-level care. Multivariate and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were used to identify predictors for critical care admission. Our results show that the best predictor for critical care admission is the presence of three or more features of airway compromise (AUC 0.779), followed by C-reactive protein (CRP) >100 mg/L (OR 2.70; 95% CI 1.59 to 4.58; p < 0.005), submandibular space involvement (OR 3.82; 95% CI 1.870 to 7.81; p = 0.003), white cell count (WCC) >12 × 109/ dl (1.05; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.10; p = 0.03), and positive systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria (OR 2.78; CI 1.35 to 5.80; p = 0.006). Admission to critical care is multifactorial, however, the presence of three or more features of airway compromise is the best predictor. Awareness of this alongside other key clinical findings in cervicofacial infections may allow for the early recognition of patients who may require escalation to critical care.

Emergency versus semi-elective management of mandible fractures: a Maxillofacial Trainee Research Collaborative (MTReC) study.

INTRODUCTION: Recent evidence suggests that acute emergency management of mandible fractures does not improve surgical outcomes yet is associated with increased financial burden. Current NHS policy advocating for increased adoption of day-case and semi-elective surgical procedures to reduce bed strain must be balanced with providing timely, effective treatment. Our research aims to determine patient groups currently managed via semi-elective admission and whether this can be extended to other groups to provide safe and effective management of mandible fractures. METHODS: A multi-national trainee-led audit of mandibular fractures across 49 units was completed by the Maxillofacial Trainee Research Collaborative (MTReC). Each unit prospectively collected data on fractures on admission and at follow-up. Data collected included patient demographics, behaviour, health, injury, timing to intervention and surgical complications. RESULTS: Data were collected on 947 mandibular fractures. Of the surgically managed patients, 649 (90%) were managed via acute emergency admission at the time of presentation, while 68 (10%) were managed semi-electively. Patient demographics, injury pattern and mechanism appeared to significantly affect timing of management, whereas patient behaviour, health status, timing of injury and presentation did not. Semi-elective management was associated with a significantly shorter inpatient duration (0.9 versus 1.9 days, p=0.000) with no differences in readmission, antibiotic usage or surgical complications (p=1.000, RR 1.030). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the efficacy of planned admissions and semi-elective management of mandibular fractures. Simple mandibular fractures in compliant patients are suitable for semi-elective treatment. Holistic patient assessment and tailored surgical planning is crucial in determining admission modality to effectively manage mandibular trauma.

Risk factors associated with short-term complications in mandibular fractures: the MANTRA study-a Maxillofacial Trainee Research Collaborative (MTReC).

INTRODUCTION: Complications following mandibular fractures occur in 9-23% of patients. Identifying those at risk is key to prevention. Previous studies highlighted smoking, age and time from injury to presentation as risk factors but rarely recorded other possible confounders. In this paper, we use a collaborative snapshot audit to document novel risk factors and confirm established risks for complications following the treatment of mandibular fractures. METHODS: The audit was carried out by 122 OMFS trainees across the UK and Ireland (49 centres) over 6 months, coordinated by the Maxillofacial Surgery Trainees Research Collaborative. Variables recorded included basic demography, medical and social history, injury mechanism and type, management and 30-day outcome. RESULTS: Nine hundred and forty-seven (947) patients with fractured mandibles were recorded. Surgical management was carried out in 76.3%. Complications at 30 days occurred 65 (9%) of those who were managed surgically. Risk factors for complications included male sex, increasing age, any medical history, increasing number of cigarettes smoked per week, increasing alcohol use per week, worse oral hygiene and increased time from injury to presentation. DISCUSSION: We have used a large prospective snapshot audit to confirm established risk factors and identify novel risk factors. We demonstrate that time from injury to presentation is confounded by other indicators of poor health behaviour. These results are important in designing trial protocols for management of mandibular fractures and in targeting health interventions to patients at highest risk of complications.

Does anticoagulation improve outcomes of microvascular free flap reconstruction following head and neck surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The commonest cause of microvascular free flap failure is thrombosis at the anastomosis. Pharmacological antithrombotic therapies have been used to mitigate this risk, but they carry the risk of bleeding and haematoma formation. To justify any intervention, it is necessary to evaluate the benefits and balance of risks. This meta-analysis aims to quantify the value of systemic anticoagulation during head and neck free tissue reconstruction. We performed a systematic review on the impact of additional prophylactic antithrombotic therapy on head and neck (H&N) free tissue transfer (on top and above the use of low molecular weight heparin to prevent deep vein thrombosis). We carried a PRISMA-guided literature review, following registration with PROSPERO. All studies analysing the possible impact of prophylactic anticoagulants on free flap surgery in the head and neck were eligible. The primary outcome was perioperative free flap complications (perioperative thrombosis, partial or total free flap failure, thrombo-embolic events, or re-exploration of anastomosis). Secondary outcomes included haematoma formation or bleeding complications requiring further intervention. We identified eight eligible studies out of 454. These included 3531 free flaps for H&N reconstruction. None of the assessed interventions demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in free flap outcomes. Accumulative analysis of all anti-coagulated groups demonstrated an increased relative risk of free flap complications [RR 1.54 (0.73-3.23)] compared to control albeit not statistically significant (p = 0.25). Pooled analysis from the included studies showed that the prophylactic use of therapeutic doses of anticoagulants significantly (p = 0.003) increased the risk of haematoma and bleeding requiring intervention [RR 2.98 (1.47-6.07)], without reducing the risk of free flap failure. Additional anticoagulation does not reduce the incidence of free flap thrombosis and failure. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) consistently increased the risk of free flap complications. The use of additional anticoagulation as 'prophylaxis' in the perioperative setting, increases the risk of haematoma and bleeding.

Antibiotic practices in non-condylar mandibular fractures: a Maxillofacial Trainee Research Collaborative (MTReC) UK-wide survey.

Non-condylar mandibular fractures are consdered 'open' fractures and as such are thought to require prophylactic antibiotics. There is no overall consensus on the optimal regimen or choice of antibiotic in the preoperative and postoperative periods due to a lack of high-quality evidence. We therefore set out to ascertain the current UK-wide practice of antibiotic prescribing for non-condylar mandibular fractures. We used a web-based online survey (Google Forms) that was disseminated via email and social media platforms to oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) consultants and trainees of all grades. The questions focused on usual antibiotic practices and typical clinical management of non-condylar mandibular fractures. We gathered information on preoperative antibiotics, and on perioperative and postoperative periods. We collected data from 50 different UK OMFS units representing a broad snapshot of national practice. The majority of responders were speciality trainees (36%) followed by dental core trainees (34%). A total of 45/50 centres routinely admitted patients, and preoperative intravenous antibiotics were commenced on admission by 77/89 respondents, intravenous being the chosen route in all cases. In the preoperative period 81% prescribe co-amoxiclav. In 91% of cases, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) was on general emergency (CEPOD) operating lists, whilst dedicated OMFS trauma lists accounted for 9%. With respect to timing, 49% aimed to carry out ORIF within 24 hours from the time of admission, 44% aimed for surgery within 24 - 48 hours, and 6% aimed for surgery on a semielective basis (48 hours or more). Postoperative antibiotics were prescribed routinely by 88% of responders. Preoperative intravenous prophylactic antibiotics are commonplace in non-condylar mandibular fractures. This UK-wide survey demonstrated significant variability in antibiotic prescribing practices, especially in the postoperative period. Most units still rely on CEPOD emergency theatres to provide the capacity for ORIF in this patient group.

Use of antibiotics in traumatic mandibular fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The treatment of traumatic mandibular fractures constitutes a significant part of the oral and maxillofacial trauma service's workload. There are potential variations in how they are managed. Patients are often admitted and given intravenous antibiotics prior to their definitive treatment. The evidence behind this is inconclusive. We performed a systematic review as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidance/ PROSPERO Registered (CRD:42020201398) on the use of antibiotics in the management of mandibular fractures. We identified studies using a search algorithm within the OVID Gateway (including MEDLINE, PubMed, and Cochrane Collaborative). Studies analysing the possible impact of prophylactic antibiotics on traumatic mandibular fractures were eligible. The primary outcome was surgical site infection requiring any treatment beyond the normal postoperative protocol. Secondary outcomes included any complication requiring further intervention. From the 16 studies identified (3,285 patients), seven were randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs) and nine were retrospective observational studies. We have identified significant between-study variation in choice of antibiotic regimen (timing, dosage, duration) and in reporting both primary and secondary outcomes. There was significant between-study heterogeneity (p = 0.02, I2 = 69%) and none of the assessed interventions was found to be superior. The evidence behind the use of prophylactic antibiotics in mandibular fractures is weak. A properly designed and powered RCT is needed, in order to standardise practice for the benefit of patients and healthcare systems.

Microvascular anastomotic coupler devices versus hand-sewn technique for arterial anastomosis: a systematic review.

The use of microvascular anastomotic coupling devices (MACD) is an established technique for venous anastomosis. However, literature on arterial MACD is conflicting. We report, to our knowledge, the first registered systematic review of its kind to evaluate the safety and efficiency of arterial MACD in free flaps. We performed a PRISMA-guided systematic review (PROSPERO-registered) and identified reports using a search algorithm in MEDLINE/EMBASE. The rate of arterial thrombosis was set as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included flap survival, failure rates, and comparison of MACD and the conventional hand-sewn technique. From the 17 studies identified, 2672 free flap reconstructions were performed and 640 arterial anastomoses with MACD attempted (622 completed, 97.2%). The pooled incidence of arterial thrombosis was 2.1% (13/622), and overall flap failure rate 4.34% (116/2672). The total number of arterial MACD procedures performed first time, with no perioperative complications, revisions, or thrombosis, was 88.9% (569/640). Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) quality analysis revealed low quality and significant heterogeneity. The use of arterial MACD is a safe and efficient alternative to hand-sewn anastomosis, with more recent literature showing excellent results. However, further evaluation is required with controlled trials.

Clinical features and presentation of cervicofacial infection: a Maxillofacial Trainee Research Collaborative (MTReC) study.

Cervicofacial infection (CFI) is a common presentation to the Oral and Maxillofacial (OMFS) department and accounts for significant emergency activity. The current study aims to understand the aetiology, management, and clinical features of patients hospitalised with CFI. Our study included all patients admitted for management of CFI from May to October 2017 at 25 OMFS units across 17 UK regions. Data were collected prospectively and included age, comorbidities, prior treatment received, markers of sepsis, and presenting clinical features. One thousand and two (1002) admissions were recorded; 546 (54.5%) were male. Median (range) age was 34 (1-94) years. The most common presenting complaints were trismus (46%) and dysphagia (27%). Airway compromise was present in 1.7% of cases. Odontogenic infection accounted for 822/1002 (82%) admissions. Of those with an infection of odontogenic origin, 453/822 (55.1%) had received previous treatment. Two-thirds of those who had received treatment were managed by antibiotics alone (300/453, 66.2%). Patients met criteria for sepsis in 437/1002 (43.6%) of CFI, and in 374/822 (45.5%) of odontogenic infections. This is the largest study worldwide of patients requiring inpatient management for CFI. Infection due to odontogenic origin is the most frequent reason for admission and nearly half do not seek treatment before presentation. Patients with CFI often present late in their disease and frequently meet criteria for sepsis, requiring timely and aggressive treatment to ensure optimum outcomes. Trismus is an emerging dominant feature with all the implications related to the anaesthetic management of these patients. Knowledge of these factors has implications for the referrer, triage, the emergency department, the anaesthetic team, and members of the OMFS team.

Adjuvant management of locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma - real-world challenges and opportunities.

Patients with locally advanced oral squamous cell cancer (LAOSCC) are treated with adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) following surgical ablation. This depends on the pathological risk factors and aims to reduce the risk of local recurrence and improve survival. Delivery of these aggressive treatments is, however, challenging particularly following major surgery. To inform the adaptations necessary to deliver gold-standard therapy, we aimed to describe real-world delivery of multimodality treatment in LAOSCC, in a UK population with high levels of disease incidence and low socioeconomic status. Patients with LAOSCC (T1-4 N1-3/T3-4 N0) who were treated between October 2014 and October 2016 and had a minimum follow up of 24 months were included. They were identified using the Somerset Cancer Register and data were collected through retrospective case note review. Approval was obtained from the audit departments at the relevant NHS institutions, and data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows version 24 (IBM Corp). The analysis included 129 patients with 82% having an initial performance status (PS) of 0-1. The most frequent change in PS was a one point drop (46%). Twenty of the 93 eligible patients (22%) underwent adjuvant CRT. A total of 37 (40%) began adjuvant CRT/RT within 42 days, and 79 (85%) within 56 days. A delay in initiating adjuvant therapy was associated with higher rates of complications and a longer postoperative hospital stay. Concordance between imaging and pathological nodal staging was poor (cK 0.223). PS frequently declines after complex surgical procedures and long postoperative recovery periods, leading to difficulties providing adjuvant treatments within the national guidance of 42 days. Frequent deviation from planned adjuvant therapies highlights the need for improved treatment strategies.

Use of the subclavian vessels for microvascular reconstruction in the vessel-depleted neck.

The previously treated neck is a serious problem if further free tissue transfer reconstruction is required. Vessel depletion is often a terrifying finding that creates the need for novel approaches to access vessels that lie outside the anatomical region of the head and neck. We present what is, to our knowledge, the first case of utilising the subclavian artery and vein in head and neck reconstruction. We describe the anatomical details and a step-by-step access approach, together with tips on how to perform safe and effective microvascular anastomoses. The quality of the subclavian vessels is excellent, and access to the area is straightforward provided it is carefully planned. The technique could be considered more often in the vessel-depleted neck.

Difficult airways: a 3D printing study with virtual fibreoptic endoscopy.

Head and neck cancer patients present unique airway challenges, and oropharyngeal, laryngeal, and hypopharyngeal tumours considerably distort and narrow the anatomy of the airway. We describe the use of 3D augmented reality software combined with 3D printed models to assess the anatomy of difficult airways and to assist in the formulation of the most optimal airway management strategy in such patients. The reported patients had computed tomograms (CT) of the neck prior to their anaesthetic and surgical management. DICOM files of the respective scans were imported to 3D rendering software (OsiriX, Pixmeo). We constructed volume rendered models for initial assessment of the airway then generated serial surface rendered models to create a virtual endoscopic path of the airway to simulate the fibreoptic approach. To further facilitate the study of difficult airways we have subsequently printed 3D models of those that were most difficult using rapid prototyping. Head and neck tumours significantly distort the airway. Thorough study of the relevant anatomy prior to airway management for operating reasons enhances communication between the surgeon and anaesthetist, and aids selection of the most appropriate intubation approach. In conclusion, this paper highlights a useful and novel pre-assessment strategy that allows a virtual, visual, 3-dimensional assessment of the airway anatomy combined with 3D modelling and 3D printing. This enables the airway specialist, anaesthetist, and head and neck surgeon to anticipate any critical steps and adjust the plan accordingly.

Operative tactics in floor of mouth and tongue cancer resection - the importance of imaging and planning.

Complete tumour resection (R0 margin) is an axiom of surgical oncology. Oral cancer ablation is challenging, due to anatomical, functional, and aesthetic considerations. R0 margin is strongly linked to better survival outcomes with great variation in the R0 % across units. This is commonly attributed to disease biology. Without disputing the importance of biological characteristics, we contend that image-based anatomical surgical planning has an important role to play in achieving complete resection. Here, we present our approach utilising cross-sectional imaging, anatomical characteristics and spatial awareness in planning resections for floor of mouth (FOM) and oral tongue cancers. We highlight the challenge of controlling the deep tumour margin lingual to mandible due to anterior vector constraints and emphasise the importance of resecting the genial muscles in a planned fashion and that any rim resection should be obliquely sagittal. In resecting lateral FOM tumours, assessing extension to the parapharyngeal fat is crucial; and mandibular rim resection at a sagittal plane below the mylohyoid line is often required. Assessing the proximity of the contralateral neurovascular pedicle, pre-epiglottic space and hyoid bone are crucial parameters to determine the extent of tongue tumour resection. Our cohort included 173 patients with FOM SCC and 299 patients with tongue SCC. Six patients (3.5%) from the FOM group and eight patients (3%) from the tongue group had involved (R1) margins following surgery. This was associated with local relapse (p<0.05). In conclusion, we demonstrate that image-based planning can aid achieving R0 resections and reduce disease relapse.

Nurse-led oral and maxillofacial oncology clinics: a review.

The "nurse-led" oral and maxillofacial (OMFS) head and neck (H&N) clinic has been introduced and developed over the last decade, and we are now close to a point that this endeavour can potentially be implemented nationwide. This paper is a systematic review of the proposed OMFS H&N nurse-led clinic model. Literature on the topic is limited: only eight eligible papers were identified and reviewed. These were appraised focusing on four domains: requirement/necessity, true cost, patient safety and outcomes, and education and training. Most of the advantages/proposed benefits of these clinics have previously been discussed. This current review has revealed that the available published evidence on the concept of OMFS H&N nurse-led clinics demonstrates that they might not be necessary. The alleged cost savings have not been described in detail and might not be as significant as expected, more intense collaboration is required to establish watertight quality assurance processes concerning patient safety, and the clinics might have an impact on the education and training of OMFS trainees. The nurse-led clinic concept is interesting and exciting, but more discussion and planning is needed prior to it being launched nationwide.

Patient-specific soft tissue reconstruction: an IDEAL stage I report of hemiglossectomy reconstruction and introduction of the PANSOFOS flap.

The standard of care for head and neck reconstruction is microvascular free-tissue transfer. Various techniques of soft tissue, free-flap design have previously been described. Patient-specific planning and 3D printing have changed practice in bony reconstruction, but are not currently used in soft tissue head and neck reconstruction. We present the first report of Personalised pAtient-specific plaNning of SOFt tissue recOnStruction, the "PANSOFOS" flap, and aim to prove that the technique has a place in soft tissue reconstruction of the head and neck. Using the IDEAL framework for the reporting of surgical innovations (IDEAL stage 1, proof of concept report), we describe the case of a patient with oral cancer who had reconstruction of the tongue after hemiglossectomy. The staging scans, 3D printer and software were used to create a soft silicon resection guide and flap harvesting guide. The 3D guide was then used to design a 2D outline of the perimeter of the flap, and a negative silicone mould used to control its bulk. The procedure was successful and the postoperative period uneventful. The oncological, cosmetic, and functional outcomes were excellent. The patient followed the local enhanced recovery pathway and was discharged home with safe swallowing. This report confirms that patient-specific 3D planning can be used in the reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the head and neck. We aim to develop the technique using the next stages of the IDEAL framework, and anticipate that the PANSOFOS flap will become a standard of care.

Systematic review of the role of corticosteroids in cervicofacial infections.

The role of corticosteroids in the management of cervicofacial infections continues to cause controversy. Systemic anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects that reduce swelling and improve symptoms in the head and neck may make these agents an effective addition to the antibiotics used and to surgical management, although this same effect may dull the physiological response to infection, and allow infections to progress. We have systematically reviewed the evidence for the use of corticosteroids in common cervicofacial infections following the PRISMA guidelines. MeSH terms included "head", "neck", "infection", and "glucocorticoid". In total, 31 papers were identified. Eight reported the use of corticosteroids for peritonsillar abscess (PTA), 10 for pharyngitis, four for deep neck space infection (DNSI), four for periorbital cellulitis, and five for supraglottitis. Whilst there is an established evidence base for their use in the treatment of PTA and pharyngitis, other indications need further study, and we highlight the potential pitfalls. The evidence suggests that the use of adjunctive, short-term, high-dose corticosteroids in cervicofacial infections may be safe and effective.

Outcome of salvage procedures for recurrent oral and oropharyngeal cancer.

Despite advances in the primary treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancer, many patients develop local or regional recurrence, or both, and when radiotherapy has already been used, operation provides the best chance of salvage for these patients. We have looked at the outcomes of salvage procedures in a single unit, including improved survival, morbidity, and treatment-related quality of life. Patients treated with salvage procedures were identified from a prospectively-completed database. Overall and disease-free survival were analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves and logrank tests. Functional, social, and emotional outcomes were assessed using the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaires. Twenty-nine patients were identified, of whom 24 had free flap reconstructions, and their estimated mean overall survival was 25 months (95% CI 20.4 to 29.2). Disease-free survival was significantly worse in patients with stage IV recurrences or in whom resection margins were close or invaded. Permanent gastrostomy was required in 15/29 patients, and four/29 needed a permanent tracheostomy. Answers to questionnaires showed that a large proportion of patients had considerable problems with speech, chewing, swallowing, and appearance. The decision on whether to treat recurrent head and neck cancer is a balance between improving survival and poor functional outcomes. The extent of disease and whether clear surgical margins can be achieved should be considered when treatment is recommended.

Management of cervicofacial infections: a survey of current practice in maxillofacial units in the UK.

Cervicofacial infections are common emergency presentations to maxillofacial departments in the UK, there is no consensus about their management and, in particular, the role of corticosteroids is not clear. Our aim was to find out the current practice of UK maxillofacial surgeons in managing these infections using a multicentre questionnaire study. The questionnaire was designed, piloted, and revised before distribution, and questions were asked to assess preoperative, operative, and postoperative management. It was distributed to maxillofacial surgeons throughout the UK through the Maxillofacial Research Trainee Collaborative (MTReC) network, and at the 2016 British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (BAOMS) Junior Trainees Group conference. A total of 350 questionnaires were distributed to 17 maxillofacial units. Eighty-six questionnaires were distributed at the BAOMS Junior Trainee conference. An overall response rate of 92% (n=324) was achieved. The results showed that there were important differences in reported practice between and within maxillofacial units in the UK in managing these infections. The antibiotic regimens and use of steroids varied widely. Twenty-three per cent of respondents had to wait over 24hours for access to emergency theatres. However, these results provide no hard evidence for or against the use of corticosteroids in cervicofacial infections.