Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 114(13): 493-5, 2000 Apr 08.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10846654

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To know from two different criteria, CDC's and Spanish national consensus (NC), the tuberculin conversion rate and the factors associated to this phenomenon. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was designed over 475 health care workers. Risk factors were identified by using a Cox's proportional hazards model for each criteria. RESULTS: Not being vaccinated with BCG appears to be a risk factor in NC model 5.37 (CI 95%: 2.21-13.00) and does not in CDC. There was a difference of 45% between both incidence density rates. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find a total concordance between the results from the two models.


Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Tuberculose/epidemiologia , Adulto , Vacina BCG/farmacologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolamento & purificação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Tuberculose/microbiologia , Tuberculose/prevenção & controle , Vacinação
3.
Clin Perform Qual Health Care ; 7(2): 88-91, 1999.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10747572

RESUMO

The study's objectives were to determine the frequency of biological-risk accidents involving percutaneous exposure and to identify factors associated with underreporting. Two hundred fifty healthcare professionals from inpatient services at high risk for exposure at the Puerta del Mar University Hospital of Cádiz, Spain, participated in the study. A questionnaire was used to measure personal and work variables, the number of accidents suffered and reported in the last year, and the circumstances motivating the reporting or nonreporting. Two hundred thirty-two persons (92.8%) completed the questionnaire. The accident rate was 12 per 100,000 hours worked. Physicians were the most frequent accident victims (rate 22/100,000 hours). The general surgery and emergency services had higher rates than other services (rates 19.82 and 14.17, respectively). Sixty-six percent of the accidents were not reported to the register. The main predictors of the underreporting were length of professional service greater than 19 years, working in the surgery service, and the perception that the accidents did not involve health risk. The true accident rate was higher than that reflected in the Accident Register. Underreporting was high. The main variables associated with underreporting were length of professional service, work area or department, and perception of risk from the accident.


Assuntos
Hospitais de Ensino , Ferimentos Penetrantes Produzidos por Agulha/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos Humanos em Hospital , Gestão de Riscos/estatística & dados numéricos , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Análise Multivariada , Espanha/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
Rev Sanid Hig Publica (Madr) ; 67(6): 455-64, 1993.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7732312

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of hospital units efficiency is a major matter of health services management. Among the techniques to measure efficiency. The Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) can be used in multiple resources units (inputs) obtaining multiple products (outputs). The objective of this study is the evaluation of Hospital Preventive Medicine Services in Andalucia, using the technique DEA. METHODS: The Preventive Medicine Services from seven hospitals of Andalucia were selected. DEA is technique, based on a linear programming, which finds the weights, which make a Service efficient in relation with the rest. The relative efficiency of seven units was calculated. The unit with the best practice was found by means of cross efficiency matrixes. With regard to the inefficient services, their necessity of increasing activities to achieve efficiency was identified. RESULTS: Two efficiency assumptions were elaborated. In the first one, 4 services were efficient (Efficiency = 1) in relation with the rest. In the second one, the Service S.1 was inefficient. Among the efficient units, S.2 shown the highest average efficiency in both assumptions and appeared as the reference unit for all the inefficient ones. CONCLUSIONS: In the evaluation of Preventive Medicine Services efficiency, at least, three of them shown some kind of inefficiency. The Service S.2 was the point of reference for inputs and outputs selected.


Assuntos
Eficiência Organizacional , Unidades Hospitalares , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde , Programação Linear , Espanha
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...