Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
RMD Open ; 9(3)2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37775112

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the trajectories of Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28), patient global assessment (PGA) and physician global assessment (PhGA) and to assess their predictive capabilities on difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2TRA) classification. METHODS: Longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from 2020 to 2022. Based on the D2TRA EULAR (European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology) definition, patients were classified as D2TRA according to biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) failure due to inefficacy (D2TRA-inefficacy) or other reasons (D2TRA-other). Patients who did not fulfil the D2TRA criteria were classified as NoD2TRA. DAS28, PGA and PhGA scores collected every 6 months during the first 24 months of b/tsDMARD treatment were used to identify different trajectories using latent class mixed models (LCMM). RESULTS: The study population comprised 255 patients with RA, of whom 167 were NoD2TRA, 58 D2TRA-inefficacy and 30 D2TRA-other. LCMM stratified patients into two different trajectories for DAS28 and PhGA and three for PGA according to the most stable model. The most notable variation occurred during the first 6 months of treatment, thereafter remaining stable during the follow-up period. Most D2TRA-inefficacy patients fitted the trajectory, showing higher values of the studied parameters. NoD2TRA followed the trajectory with lower values, and D2TRA-other were distributed more homogeneously across all trajectories. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of disease activity, together with patients' and physicians' perceptions, form a key element in the correct discrimination of patients who are going to develop D2TRA-inefficacy. However, identifying those patients who will be D2TRA-other remains challenging, whether by subjective or objective parameters.


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos , Artrite Reumatoide , Médicos , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Artrite Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Reumatoide/epidemiologia , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Percepção
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34535220

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of temporal bone fractures (TBF) is based on radiological imaging. The most widely used classification divides fractures into longitudinal, transverse, and mixed. In recent years, other classifications have emerged to better predict clinical manifestations. OBJECTIVES: To review computed tomography (CT) images of TBF, define their radiological pattern, and study the concordance of the observed findings with those described in the radiological report. To analyse the association between fracture types and clinical findings. To study the impact of mastoid pneumatization on fracture characteristics. METHODS: Retrospective study of 110 TBF diagnosed with CT between January 2016 and May 2019. RESULTS: Fifty-two transverse (47%), 34 longitudinal (30%), and 19 mixed fractures (17%) were identified with good interobserver agreement (k = .637). Longitudinal fractures were associated with conductive hearing loss (P < .001) and transverse fractures with sensorineural hearing loss (P = .005). Of the fractures, 8.2% showed involvement of the otic capsule, and were associated with sensorineural hearing loss (P < .001), facial paralysis (P = .019) and vertigo (P= .035). Fractures were more frequent in cases of greater pneumatization, and the involvement of the otic capsule in cases of very good pneumatization (P = .024). CONCLUSIONS: The traditional classification of TBF is reproducible. Its association with clinical findings improves when the involvement of the otic capsule is also analysed. Mastoid pneumatization is not a protective factor for TBF or for involvement of the otic capsule.


Assuntos
Orelha Interna , Fratura da Base do Crânio , Fraturas Cranianas , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Osso Temporal/diagnóstico por imagem
3.
Acta otorrinolaringol. esp ; 72(5): 295-304, septiembre 2021. ilus, tab, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-207617

RESUMO

Introducción: El diagnóstico de las fracturas del hueso temporal (FHT) se basa en la imagen radiológica. La clasificación más utilizada divide las fracturas en longitudinales, transversales y mixtas. En los últimos años han surgido otras clasificaciones con el objeto de predecir mejor las manifestaciones clínicas.ObjetivosRevisar las imágenes de tomografía computarizada (TC) del hueso temporal, definir su patrón radiológico según la clasificación tradicional y estudiar la concordancia interobservador de los hallazgos encontrados con los descritos en el informe radiológico. Analizar la asociación entre los tipos de fractura y los hallazgos clínicos. Estudiar el impacto de la neumatización mastoidea en las características de la fractura.Materiales y métodosEstudio retrospectivo de 110 FHT diagnosticadas mediante TC entre enero de 2016 y mayo 2019.ResultadosSe identificaron 52 fracturas transversales (47%), 34 longitudinales (30%) y 19 mixtas (17%) con buena concordancia interobservador (k = 0,637). Las fracturas longitudinales se asociaron con hipoacusia de transmisión (p < 0,001) y las transversales con hipoacusia neurosensorial (p = 0,005). El 8,2% de las fracturas presentaron afectación de cápsula ótica y se asociaron con hipoacusia neurosensorial (p < 0,001), parálisis facial (p = 0,019) y vértigo (p = 0,035). Las fracturas fueron más frecuentes en los casos de mayor neumatización, y la afectación de cápsula ótica en casos de muy buena neumatización (p = 0,024). (AU)


Introduction: The diagnosis of temporal bone fractures (TBF) is based on radiological imaging. The most widely used classification divides fractures into longitudinal, transverse, and mixed. In recent years, other classifications have emerged to better predict clinical manifestations.ObjectivesTo review computed tomography (CT) images of TBF, define their radiological pattern, and study the concordance of the observed findings with those described in the radiological report. To analyse the association between fracture types and clinical findings. To study the impact of mastoid pneumatization on fracture characteristics.MethodsRetrospective study of 110 TBF diagnosed with CT between January 2016 and May 2019.ResultsFifty-two transverse (47%), 34 longitudinal (30%), and 19 mixed fractures (17%) were identified with good interobserver agreement (k = .637). Longitudinal fractures were associated with conductive hearing loss (p < .001) and transverse fractures with sensorineural hearing loss (p = .005). Of the fractures, 8.2% showed involvement of the otic capsule, and were associated with sensorineural hearing loss (p < .001), facial paralysis (p = .019) and vertigo (p = .035). Fractures were more frequent in cases of greater pneumatization, and the involvement of the otic capsule in cases of very good pneumatization (p = .024). (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Orelha Interna , Osso Temporal/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pacientes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...