[Meningitis/Encephalitis diagnosis in ICU using Multiplex PCR system: Is it time of change?] / Diagnóstico de meningitis/encefalitis en UCI con sistema de PCR múltiple. ¿Es tiempo de cambio?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical impact of Meningitis/Encephalitis FilmArray® panel for the diagnosis of cerebral nervous system infection and to compare the results (including time for diagnosis) with those obtained by conventional microbiological techniques. METHODS: A prospective observational study in an Intensive Care Unit of adults from a tertiary hospital was carried out. Cerebrospinal fluid from all patients was taken by lumbar puncture and assessed by the meningitis/encephalitis FilmArray® panel ME, cytochemical study, Gram, and conventional microbiological cultures. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients admitted with suspicion of Meningitis/Encephalitis. Median age of patients was 58.4 years (RIQ 38.1-67.3), median APACHE II 18 (RIQ 12-24). Median stay in ICU and median hospital stay was 4 (RIQ 2-6) and 17 days (RIQ 14-28), respectively. The overall mortality was 14.3%. A final clinical diagnosis of meningitis or encephalitis was established in 16 patients, obtaining the etiological diagnosis in 12 of them (75%). The most frequent etiology was Streptococcus pneumoniae (8 cases). FilmArray® allowed etiological diagnosis in 3 cases in which the culture had been negative, and the results led to changes in the empirical antimicrobial therapy in 7 of 16 cases (43.8%). FilmArray® yielded a global sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 90%, respectively. The median time to obtain results from the latter and conventional culture (including antibiogram) was 2.9 hours (RIQ 2.1-3.8) and 45.1 hours (RIQ 38.9-58.7), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Meningitis/Encephalitis FilmArray® panel was able to establish the etiologic diagnosis faster than conventional methods. Also, it achieved a better sensitivity and led to prompt targeted antimicrobial therapy.

En respuesta a «Trombectomía mecánica en el ictus isquémico agudo, conociendo nuestros resultados» / In reply to "Mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke, knowing our results"

No disponible

Resultados y evolución funcional de pacientes críticos con ictus isquémico sometidos a trombectomía mecánica / Results and functional outcomes of acute ischemic stroke patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy admitted to intensive care unit

OBJETIVO: Estudiar los resultados y las complicaciones del tratamiento endovascular (TEV) en pacientes con ictus isquémico agudo ingresados en una unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI). Analizar los factores que podrían influir en la mortalidad y en el grado de discapacidad al alta y un año después del ictus. DISEÑO: Estudio prospectivo observacional. Ámbito: UCI polivalente. Hospital de tercer nivel. PACIENTES: Sesenta pacientes adultos. Muestra consecutiva. INTERVENCIONES: Ninguna. Variables de interés: Datos epidemiológicos, tiempo desde la clínica inicial hasta el TEV, resultado angiográfico, tiempo de estancia en UCI, días de ventilación mecánica, complicaciones neurológicas, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) al ingreso y al alta de UCI, escala de Rankin modificada (mRS) al año de evolución. RESULTADOS: Edad media 68,90±8,84años. Mediana de tiempo hasta el TEV: 180min. Mediana NIHSS al ingreso: 17,5; al alta: 3. Flujo distal en el 90% de los casos. Mediana estancia en UCI: 3días. Ventilación mecánica: 81,7%. Independencia funcional (mRS≤2) 50% al año del ictus. Fallecimientos: 22 (36,6%); 8 (13,3%) en la UCI y el resto durante el primer año. CONCLUSIONES: Las variables asociadas a un peor estado funcional fueron la transformación hemorrágica sintomática, la ausencia de recanalización y las complicaciones durante el procedimiento. La transformación hemorrágica y la hidrocefalia se asociaron a mayor mortalidad. Se consiguió flujo distal en la mayoría de los casos, con una baja tasa de complicaciones. La mitad de los pacientes alcanza independencia funcional al año del ictus

PURPOSE: To study the results and complications of endovascular treatment (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke patients admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU). To analyse the possible factors related to mortality and level of disability at ICU discharge and one year after stroke. DESIGN: Observational prospective study. SETTING: Mixed ICU. Third level hospital. PATIENTS: Sixty adult patients. Consecutive sample. INTERVENTIONS: None. Variables of interest: Epidemiological data, time from symptom onset to EVT, angiographic result, length of stay, days on mechanical ventilation, neurological complications, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at ICU admission and discharge, modified Rankin scale score (mRS) at one year. RESULTS: Mean age 68,90±8,84years. Median time from symptom onset to EVT: 180minutes. Median NIHSS at admission: 17,5; at discharge: 3. Distal flow was achieved in 90% of cases. Median ICU stay: 3 days. Mechanical ventilation: 81,7.%. Functional independence (mRS≤2) 50% at one year. Deaths: 22 (36,6%) of which 8 (13,3%) died during UCI stay and the rest during the first year. CONCLUSIONS: The factors relating to a worse functional outcome were symptomatic hemorrhage transformation, lack of recanalization and complications during EVT. The factors relating to mortality were symptomatic hemorrhage and hydrocephalus. Distal flow was achieve in most cases with a low complication rate. Half of the patients presented functional independence one year after the stroke

Nosocomial ventriculitis caused by a meticillin- and linezolid-resistant clone of Staphylococcus epidermidis in neurosurgical patients.

BACKGROUND: Postneurosurgical ventriculitis is mainly caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci. The rate of linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (LRSE) is increasing worldwide. AIMS: To report clinical, epidemiological and microbiological data from a series of ventriculitis cases caused by LRSE in a Spanish hospital between 2013 and 2016. METHODS: Cases of LRSE ventriculitis were reviewed retrospectively in a Spanish hospital over a four-year period. Clinical/epidemiological data of the infected patients were reviewed, the isolates involved were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multi-locus sequence typing, and the molecular bases of linezolid resistance were determined. FINDINGS: Five cases of LRSE ventriculitis were detected. The patients suffered from cerebral haemorrhage or head trauma that required the placement of an external ventricular drain; spent a relatively long time in the intensive care unit (ICU) (10-26 days); and three out of the five patients had previously been treated with linezolid. All LRSE had the same PFGE pattern, belonged to ST2, and shared an identical mechanism of linezolid resistance. Specifically, all had the G2576T mutation in the V domain of each of the six copies of the 23S rRNA gene, together with the Q136L and M156T mutations and the 71GGR72 insertion in the L3 and L4 ribosomal proteins, respectively. CONCLUSION: The high ratio of linezolid consumption in the ICU (7.72-8.10 defined daily dose/100 patient-days) could have selected this resistant clone, which has probably become endemic in the ICU where it could have colonized admitted patients. Infection control and antimicrobial stewardship interventions are essential to prevent the dissemination of this difficult-to-treat pathogen, and to preserve the therapeutic efficacy of linezolid.

Tratamiento con carfilzomib. ¿Deberían estos pacientes ingresar en la unidad de cuidados intensivos? / Treatment with carfilzomib. Should these patients be admitted in the Intensive Care Unit?

No disponible

Results and functional outcomes of acute ischemic stroke patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy admitted to intensive care unit. / Resultados y evolución funcional de pacientes críticos con ictus isquémico sometidos a trombectomía mecánica.

PURPOSE: To study the results and complications of endovascular treatment (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke patients admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU). To analyse the possible factors related to mortality and level of disability at ICU discharge and one year after stroke. DESIGN: Observational prospective study. SETTING: Mixed ICU. Third level hospital. PATIENTS: Sixty adult patients. Consecutive sample. INTERVENTIONS: None. VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Epidemiological data, time from symptom onset to EVT, angiographic result, length of stay, days on mechanical ventilation, neurological complications, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at ICU admission and discharge, modified Rankin scale score (mRS) at one year. RESULTS: Mean age 68,90±8,84years. Median time from symptom onset to EVT: 180minutes. Median NIHSS at admission: 17,5; at discharge: 3. Distal flow was achieved in 90% of cases. Median ICU stay: 3 days. Mechanical ventilation: 81,7.%. Functional independence (mRS≤2) 50% at one year. Deaths: 22 (36,6%) of which 8 (13,3%) died during UCI stay and the rest during the first year. CONCLUSIONS: The factors relating to a worse functional outcome were symptomatic hemorrhage transformation, lack of recanalization and complications during EVT. The factors relating to mortality were symptomatic hemorrhage and hydrocephalus. Distal flow was achieve in most cases with a low complication rate. Half of the patients presented functional independence one year after the stroke.

Infectious complications related to external ventricular shunt. Incidence and risk factors. / Complicaciones infecciosas relacionadas con el drenaje ventricular externo. Incidencia y factores de riesgo.

OBJECTIVE: Infectious complications related to external ventricular shunt (ICREVS) are a main problem in neurocritical intensive care units (ICU). The aim of the review is to assess the incidence of ICREVS and to analyse factors involved. METHODS: Retrospective analysis, adult polyvalent ICU in a third level reference hospital. Patients carrying external ventricular shunt (DVE) were included. Those patients with central nervous system infection diagnosed prior DVE placement were excluded. RESULTS: 87 patients were included with 106 DVE. Most common admittance diagnosis was subarachnoid haemorrhage (49.4%). 31 patients with 32 DVE developed an ICREVS. Infection rate is 19.5 per 1000 days of shunt for ICREVS and 14 per 1000 days for ventriculitis. 31.6% of the patients developed ICREVS and 25.3% ventriculitis. Patients who developed ICREVS presented higher shunt manipulations (2.0 ± 0.6 vs. 3.26 ± 1.02, p=0.02), shunt repositioning (0.1 ± 0.1 vs. 0.2 ± 0.1) and ICU and hospital stay (29.8 ± 4.9 vs 49.8 ± 5.2, p<0.01 y 67.4 ± 18.8 vs. 108.9 ± 30.2, p=0.02. Those DVE with ICREVS were placed for longer not only at infection diagnosis but also at removal (12.6 ± 2.1 vs. 18.3 ± 3.6 and 12.6 ± 2.1 vs. 30.4 ± 7.3 days, p<0.01). No difference in mortality was found. CONCLUSIONS: One out of three patients with a DVE develops an infection. The risk factors are the number of manipulations, repositioning and the permanency days. Patients with ICREVS had a longer ICU and hospital average stay without an increase in mortality.

Abrir las puertas de la UCI. Una necesidad inexcusable / Open de doors on the ICU. An unavoidable necessity

No disponible

Política de visitas, diseño y confortabilidad en las unidades de cuidados intensivos españolas / Visitation policy, design and comfort in Spanish intensive care units

Objetivo. Conocer el diseño y confortabilidad de las unidades de cuidados intensivos (UCI). Analizar el horario de visitas, la información y la participación familiar en los cuidados del paciente. Diseño. Estudio multicéntrico, descriptivo. Ámbito. Unidades de cuidados intensivos de España. Método. Cuestionario enviado por correo electrónico a los socios de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva, Crítica y Unidades Coronarias (SEMICYUC), suscriptores de la Revista Electrónica de Medicina Intensiva y difundido por el blog Proyecto HU-CI. Resultados. Se analizaron 135 encuestas pertenecientes a 131 hospitales. Horario de visitas: 3,8% tienen horario abierto 24 h, 9,8% horario abierto diurno y 67,7% tienen 2 visitas/día. Información: la realiza solamente el médico en el 75,2%, médico y enfermera juntos 4,5% con una frecuencia de una vez/día en el 79,7%. Los fines de semana se informa en el 95,5%. Información telefónica 74,4%. Participación familiar en los cuidados del paciente: higiene 11%, administración de comida 80,5% y fisioterapia 17%. Objetos personales permitidos: teléfono móvil 41%, ordenador 55%, equipo de música 77%, televisión 30%. Arquitectura y confortabilidad: todos los boxes individuales 60,2%, luz natural 54,9%, televisión 7,5%, música ambiental 12%, reloj en el box 15,8%, medidor de ruido ambiental 3,8% y sala de espera cercana a UCI 68,4%. Conclusiones. La política de visitas es restrictiva, predominando una cultura de UCI cerrada. Generalmente no se permiten medios de comunicación tecnológicos. Hay poca incorporación de la familia en los cuidados del paciente. El diseño de la UCI no garantiza la privacidad ni proporciona la confortabilidad deseable (AU)

Objective. To determine the design and comfort in the Intensive Care Units (ICUs), by analysing visiting hours, information, and family participation in patient care. Design. Descriptive, multicentre study. Setting. Spanish ICUs. Methods. A questionnaire e-mailed to members of the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine, Critical and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC), subscribers of the Electronic Journal Intensive Care Medicine, and disseminated through the blog Proyecto HU-CI. Results. A total of 135 questionnaires from 131 hospitals were analysed. Visiting hours: 3.8% open 24 h, 9.8% open daytime, and 67.7% have 2 visits a day. Information: given only by the doctor in 75.2% of the cases, doctor and nurse together in 4.5%, with a frequency of once a day in 79.7%. During weekends, information is given in 95.5% of the cases. Information given over the phone 74.4%. Family participation in patient care: hygiene 11%, feeding 80.5%, physiotherapy 17%. Personal objects allowed: mobile phone 41%, computer 55%, sound system 77%, and television 30%. Architecture and comfort: all individual cubicles 60.2%, natural light 54.9%, television 7.5%, ambient music 12%, clock in the cubicle 15.8%, environmental noise meter 3.8%, and a waiting room near the ICU 68.4%. Conclusions. Visiting policy is restrictive, with a closed ICU being the predominating culture. On average, technological communication devices are not allowed. Family participation in patient care is low. The ICU design does not guarantee privacy or provide a desirable level of comfort (AU)

[Visitation policy, design and comfort in Spanish intensive care units]. / Política de visitas, diseño y confortabilidad en las unidades de cuidados intensivos españolas.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the design and comfort in the Intensive Care Units (ICUs), by analysing visiting hours, information, and family participation in patient care. DESIGN: Descriptive, multicentre study. SETTING: Spanish ICUs. METHODS: A questionnaire e-mailed to members of the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine, Critical and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC), subscribers of the Electronic Journal Intensive Care Medicine, and disseminated through the blog Proyecto HU-CI. RESULTS: A total of 135 questionnaires from 131 hospitals were analysed. Visiting hours: 3.8% open 24h, 9.8% open daytime, and 67.7% have 2 visits a day. Information: given only by the doctor in 75.2% of the cases, doctor and nurse together in 4.5%, with a frequency of once a day in 79.7%. During weekends, information is given in 95.5% of the cases. Information given over the phone 74.4%. Family participation in patient care: hygiene 11%, feeding 80.5%, physiotherapy 17%. Personal objects allowed: mobile phone 41%, computer 55%, sound system 77%, and television 30%. Architecture and comfort: all individual cubicles 60.2%, natural light 54.9%, television 7.5%, ambient music 12%, clock in the cubicle 15.8%, environmental noise meter 3.8%, and a waiting room near the ICU 68.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Visiting policy is restrictive, with a closed ICU being the predominating culture. On average, technological communication devices are not allowed. Family participation in patient care is low. The ICU design does not guarantee privacy or provide a desirable level of comfort.