Knowledge, attitudes and practices in HIV-related chronic inflammation and cardiovascular risk in Spain.

BACKGROUND: People with HIV (PWH) in suppressive antiretroviral treatment suffer from chronic inflammation-related comorbidities, mainly cardiovascular diseases. However, given the lack of specific evidence about inflammation in PWH, clinical guidelines do not provide recommendations for the management of this issue. To date, physician awareness of inflammation in PWH remains unclear. We analyzed the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) related to inflammation, particularly in the clinical management of PWH, of infectious disease specialists (IDS)/internists compared to other specialists treating inflammation directly (rheumatologists) or its cardiovascular consequences (cardiologists). METHODS: A committee of IDS/internists treating PWH, cardiologists, and rheumatologists designed the KAP questionnaire. The survey was completed by 405 participants (135 physicians per specialty) stratified by Spanish geography, hospital size, and number of PWH under care (IDS/internists only). RESULTS: IDS/internists treating PWH scored higher than cardiologists and rheumatologists on knowledge of inflammation (5.5±1.4 out of 8 points vs. 5.2±1.3 and 4.6±1.4 points, respectively; p<0.05). Nevertheless, rheumatologists showed the most proactive attitude toward inflammation (i.e., biomarkers monitoring, anti-inflammatory drug prescription and cardiologist referral), followed by cardiologists and IDS/internists (13±3 of a total of 16 points vs. 11±3 and 10±3.3 points, respectively; p<0.05), irrespective of hospital size and years of experience. Most IDS/internists (59%) include inflammation in their therapeutic recommendations. However, in IDS/internists treating PWH, we observed a negative correlation between years of experience and concern about the clinical consequences of inflammation. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that, compared to other specialists, infectious disease specialists/internists have high knowledge about inflammation in HIV infection, but, in the absence of scientific evidence to base their decisions on inflammatory markers, the therapeutic implications are scarce. The results support the need for more evidence on the monitoring and treatment of inflammation in PWH.

Real-world discontinuations due to neuropsychiatric symptoms in people living with HIV treated with second-generation integrase inhibitors: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Second-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitors such as bictegravir (BIC) and dolutegravir (DTG) are the standard of care for starting therapy in people living with HIV (PLHIV). However, their use has been associated with neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPSs) that may lead to treatment discontinuation. We aim to describe and synthesize information on safety and discontinuation rates and to summarize potential risk factors associated with the development of NPSs in PLHIV treated with these regimens. AREAS COVERED: A systematic review of the literature was carried out in the international databases PubMed/Medline, Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library from 2013 to June 2022. Ninety observational studies reporting data on treatment discontinuation due to drug-related adverse events and NPSs were identified. EXPERT OPINION: Discontinuation rates due to NPSs increase with treatment time and, in light of the reviewed studies, are higher in PLHIV treated with DTG-based regimens compared with those treated with BIC/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (BIC/FTC/TAF). This information could be useful for clinicians during treatment decision-making, reducing discontinuation rates and thereby promoting treatment success and durability. Additionally, the identification of potential risk factors in PLHIV prior to starting therapy could also help make the best therapy choices based on the characteristics of each individual.

Herpesvirus active replication in multiple sclerosis: a genetic control?

Although the etiology of multiple sclerosis (MS) is unknown, it is generally believed that genetic, immunologic, and environmental factors are involved. The objectives of this study were: 1. to analyze if a genetic control could explain why HHV-6 would be able to actively replicate in a subset of MS patients but not in controls; 2. to study if MS patients with HHV-6 active replication are clinically different from those without HHV-6 active replication. A total of 195 MS patients and 195 controls were analyzed for two SNPs at the MHC2TA locus and two SNPs at the CD46 locus. Furthermore, the MS cohort was analyzed by PCR for the detection of HHV-6 genomes in five serum samples collected every six months along two-year follow-up. We found that 59/195 (30.2%) MS patients had at least one HHV-6 positive serum sample. No statistical significant difference was found for the two genes when the comparison was made between MS patients and controls; however, a statistical significance was found for the two polymorphisms of MHC2TA when we compared MS patients with active replication and controls (p=0.0000004 for rs4774C and p=0.011 for rs3087456G). Furthermore, increased significant differences were found for MHC2TA and CD46 when we compared interferon beta responders and non-responders within MS patients. In conclusion, we describe a gene-environment interaction in MS patients between HHV-6 and MHC2TA and CD46 that should be further studied to clarify if that interaction could be a genetic control. The results show that MS patients without HHV-6 active replication are better responders to interferon beta treatment than those with HHV-6 active replication.