Assessing the efficacy of renal denervation in patients with resistant arterial hypertension : Systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Renal denervation (RDN) is an innovative procedure designed to regulate the renal sympathetic nervous system for the control of arterial hypertension (HTN). RDN has emerged as an alternative for patients with resistant HTN. However, the clinical efficacy of RDN remains incompletely elucidated. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of RDN with sham procedure or pharmacological treatment in patients with resistant HTN. Statistical analyses were performed using R Studio 4.3.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Heterogeneity was examined with the Cochran Q test I2 statistics. Mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled across trials. P values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant. The primary outcomes of interest were changes from baseline in systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and serum creatinine. RESULTS: Twenty-one RCTs comprising 3345 patients were included in this meta-analysis, whereby 2004 (59.91%) received renal denervation and 1341 (40.09%) received pharmacological treatment or sham procedure. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 48 months. Compared to control group, RDN significantly reduced SBP (MD -3.53 mm Hg; 95% CI -5.94 to -1.12; p = 0.004; I2 = 74%) and DBP (MD -1.48 mm Hg; 95% CI -2.56 to -0.40; p = 0.007; I2 = 51%). Regarding serum creatinine (MD -2.51; 95% CI -7.90 to 2.87; p = 0.36; I2 = 40%), there was no significant difference between RDN and control groups. CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis of RCTs of patients with resistant HTN, RDN was associated with a reduction in SBP and DBP compared to sham procedure or pharmacological treatment.

Omitting Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Is Associated With an Increased Risk of Regional Recurrence in Early Stage Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Breast cancer (BC) is a global problem, however, despite ALND is considered the standard treatment for early stage BC with node-positive, there is no sufficient data to determine which of these patients should undergo it. Thus, the aim of this systematic review was to clarify if there is any difference between NALND and ALND in terms of safety and prognosis of the patients. A shearch was carried in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for studies that compared NALND and ALND. The statistics was performed in R software, in which fixed and random effect models were employed for outcomes with, respectively, I² < 25% and I² > 25%, to compute risk ratios and hazard ratios with 95% CI. Heterogeneity was accessed with I2 statistics. There was 9 included studies, involving 11,543patients, of whom 5831 were randomized to omission of ALND. The follow-up period ranged from 5 to 15 years, with participant ages varying from 53.4 to 70.1 years. The analysis revealed significant increase in regional recurrence at the end of the follow-up (RR 1.73; 95% CI, 1.13 to 2.66) and a significant decrease in lymphedema (RR 0.35; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.52), however no significant result was found for OS (HR 1.01; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.15). Our data suggest that while the NALND offers benefits in terms of preventing lymphedema, it was associated with a higher risk of of regional recurrences. Thus, further studies are necessary to fully assess the role of these techniques in BC management.

The decreased left ventricular ejection fraction in patients using trastuzumab deruxtecan for her2-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Breast Cancer (BC) is one of the most common cancers diagnosed in population femmale and it has several subtypes, one of them being theexpressing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2 +), one of the treatments for HER2+ breast cancer consists of chemotherapy plus trastuzumab deruxtecan. Several clinical trials have shown the effectiveness and safety of trastuzumabe deruxtecano in cancer patients, however, several Adverse Events (AEs) have been described and the decrease in left ventricular ejection has been singled out for more prominent analysis. Objective: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the cardiovascular effects of Trastuzumab Deruxtecano and whether it can influence the appearance of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.. METHODS: We performed a systematic search in Embase, PubMed and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction in patients using trastuzumab deruxtecan against Her-2-positive breast cancer compared to patients to used another's treatments against this disease. Mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random effects model. The heterogeneity was examined in the I2 statistic. P-values > 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The statistical analysis was carried out using R software version 4.2.3. RESULTS: A total of 3 RCTs were included, with a total of 1656 patients evaluated, 928 patients randomized to the use of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan and 728 patients to the use of other treatments according to medical choice, follow-up ranged from 10 to 38 months. There was a visible in the decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction, with a higher incidence in the group that used trastuzumab compared to the placebo group (RR: 5.73%; 95% CI 1.51 - 21.78; I2 33% ; P= 0.010466). Another important point is the discontinuation of treatment due to grade 2 adverse events, classified as reduced LVEF, where a higher incidence is seen in the group that used Trastuzumab Deruxtecan compared to the placebo group (RR 2.11%; 95% CI 1.54 - 2.89; P = 0.000003),7. CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, Trastuzumab Deruxtecan showed a relationship with a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction, displaying the need for more studies to evaluate the cardiotoxicity of trastuzumab and its effects as a whole on the cardiovascular system.

Cardio-protective effects of statins in patients with breast cancer undergoing anthracycline-based chemotherapy: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Contemporary understanding characterizes cardiotoxicity as a reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by at least 10%, resulting in a final value below 53% in successive assessments. Nevertheless, breast cancer therapy can impact the cardiovascular system through various avenues. Cardiotoxicity is a known side effect of anthracycline chemotherapy, and the effectiveness of concomitant statin use in mitigating this risk is still unclear. PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the potential cardioprotective effects of statin exposure during anthracycline treatment. Our hypothesis posited that patients receiving statins during their treatment would experience a lesser decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), lower levels of cholesterol and a reduced occurrence of cardiotoxicity compared to those not exposed to statins. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing statin versus placebo in patients undergoing anthracycline therapy. We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane for eligible trials. Mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was examined with I2 statistics. P values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis were performed using R software version 4.2.3. RESULTS: A total of 4 RCTs comprising 580 patients were included, of whom 281 were randomized to statins and 299 to placebo. The follow up period ranged from 2.5 to 24 months, with participant ages varying between 36 to 68.9 in the intervention group and 37.9 to 72 in the control group. Compared with placebo, statins were significantly associated with a higher left ventricular ejection fraction (MD 2.57%; 95% CI 1.05-4.08; p<0.001; I2=0%), reduction in left ventricular systolic end-volume (MD -4.5 mL; 95% CI -7.57 to -1.44; p<0.004; I2=0%) and diastolic end-volume (MD -6.08 mL; 95% CI -11.27 to -0.9; p<0.021; I2=0%), with a low heterogeneity value. Statins also showed important reduction of total cholesterol (MD -46.28 mg/dL; 95% CI -71.3 to -21.25; p<0.001; I2=89%) and LDL-C (MD -39.45 mg/dL; 95% CI -52.27 to -26.64; p<0.001; I2=84%). CONCLUSIONS: In this metaanalysis of RCTs, the use of statins showed a correlation with improved cardiovascular parameters, indicating their effectiveness in minimizing cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients undergoing anthracycline chemotherapy

Safety and efficacy of moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe versus high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), affects approximately 18.6 million individuals worldwide and poses a significant healthcare related challenge. Despite the established efficacy of both high-intensity statin monotherapy (HIS) and moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe (MIS+EZT) in ASCVD management, the optimal treatment strategy remains unclear. METHODS A thorough literature study was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane databases, focusing on studies that compared the effects of moderate-intensity statins plus ezetimibe with high-intensity statin monotherapy in ASCVD patients. RESULTS In the 13 included studies, involving 8,592 patients, 4,525 (52.67%) of which received moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe treatment. The follow-up period ranged from 4 to 156 weeks, with participant ages varying LDL-C from 55.2 to 71 years old. Analysis revealed significant MIS+EZT-associated with greater percentages of patients achieved the goal in Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL-C) < 70 (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.76; 95% CI [1.26; 2.45]; p=0.001; I²=73%), LDL-C reduction (Mean Difference (MD) -5.05 mg/dL; 95% CI [-9.02;-1.07]; p<0.013; I²=56%;); Total Cholesterol reduction (MD -7.91 mg/ dL; 95% CI [-14.90; -0.91]; p<0.027; I²=60%); Triglycerides reduction (MD -8.20 mg/ dL; 95% CI [-13.05; -3.35]; p<0.001; I²=2%;); There was no statistical difference between groups in Drug Adverse reaction (Risk Ratio (RR) 1.19; 95% CI [0.79; 1.78]; p=0.404; I²=0%); and Drug intolerance (RR 0.78; 95% CI [0.32; 1.92]; p=0.584; I²=35%). CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis highlights the effectiveness of MIS+EZT in improving significant lipid profile components for ASCVD patients, as can been seen through the greater percentage of patients achieving the LDL-C <70 mg/dL target and lower LDL-C, total cholesterol and triglycerides levels. Importantly, there were no significant differences in the occurrence of overall adverse events and adverse drug reactions between the two groups.

Efficacy and Safety of Radiofrequency-Based Renal Denervation on Resistant Hypertensive Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: New therapies for resistant hypertension (RH), including renal denervation (RDN), have been studied. AIM: Access the safety and effectiveness of radiofrequency-based RDN vs pharmacological treatment for RH. METHODS: A thorough literature search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases, focusing on studies that compared the effects of radiofrequency-based RDN versus pharmacological treatment for RH. Treatment effects for binary and continuous endpoints were pooled and used, respectively, odds-ratio (OR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to analyze continuous outcomes. RESULTS: In the 10 included studies, involving 1.182 patients, 682 received radiofrequency-based RDN. The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 84 months. Analysis revealed that the RDN group had a significant reduction in office systolic blood pressure (BP) (MD - 9.5 mmHg; 95% CI - 16.81 to - 2.29; P = 0.01), office diastolic BP (MD - 5.1 mmHg; 95% CI - 8.42 to - 2.80; P < 0.001), 24 h systolic BP (MD - 4.8 mmHg; 95% CI - 7.26 to - 2.42; P < 0.001). For 24 h diastolic BP RDN did not have a significant reduction (MD - 2.3 mmHg; 95% CI - 4.19 to - 0.52; P = 0.012). The heterogeneity between the studies was high, visible in the funnel and Baujat plots. The OR was non-significant for non-serious adverse events, but also clinically significant for hypertensive crises and strokes for the RDN group. CONCLUSIONS: While the pharmacological regimen of 3 or more anti-hypertensive, including a diuretic, still be the first-line option for RH treatment, our results support that radiofrequency-based RDN is superior in reducing global BP and is safe.

Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency-based renal denervation on resistant hypertensive patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: New therapies for resistant hypertension (RH), including renal denervation (RDN), have been studied. AIM: Access the safety and effectiveness of radiofrequency-based RDN vs pharmacological treatment for RH. METHODS: A thorough literature search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases, focusing on studies that compared the effects of radiofrequency-based RDN versus pharmacological treatment for RH. Treatment effects for binary and continuous endpoints were pooled and used, respectively, odds-ratio (OR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to analyze continuous outcomes. RESULTS: In the 10 included studies, involving 1.182 patients, 682 received radiofrequency-based RDN. The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 84 months. Analysis revealed that the RDN group had a significant reduction in office systolic blood pressure (BP) (MD − 9.5 mmHg; 95% CI − 16.81 to − 2.29; P = 0.01), office diastolic BP (MD − 5.1 mmHg; 95% CI − 8.42 to − 2.80; P < 0.001), 24 h systolic BP (MD − 4.8 mmHg; 95% CI − 7.26 to − 2.42; P < 0.001). For 24 h diastolic BP RDN did not have a significant reduction (MD − 2.3 mmHg; 95% CI − 4.19 to − 0.52; P = 0.012). The heterogeneity between the studies was high, visible in the funnel and Baujat plots. The OR was non-significant for non-serious adverse events, but also clinically significant for hypertensive crises and strokes for the RDN group. CONCLUSIONS: While the pharmacological regimen of 3 or more anti-hypertensive, including a diuretic, still be the first-line option for RH treatment, our results support that radiofrequency-based RDN is superior in reducing global BP and is safe.

Effect of coenzyme Q10 supplementation on statin-related myopathic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION: Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) has shown promising results as an adjuvant therapy to statins. However, the efficacy of this agent is still unclear. Hypothesis: The use of CoQ10 mitigates statin-related myopathic pain. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CoQ10 supplementation with placebo in patients taking statins. A random-effects model was employed to compute the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Statistical analysis was performed using R software 4.3.1. RESULTS: A total of 5 studies and 227 patients were included, of whom 48% were randomized to CoQ10 supplementation. Compared with placebo, CoQ10 had no effects on pain severity score (MD -0.94; 95% CI -3.80 to 1.91; p=0.5), and pain intensity score (MD -1.51; 95% CI -4.09 to 1.06; p = 0.2). Moreover, no association was found with low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (MD -0.07; 95% CI -0.47 to 0.34; p = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis of 5 RCTs, supplementation with CoQ10 did not yield statistically significant results. These findings suggest that CoQ10 has no impact on statin-related myopathic pain.

Telemonitoring use for uncontrolled hypertension management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Within the context of uncontrolled blood pressure telemonitoring, the remote tracking of blood pressure and patient data, offers a transformative avenue. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis of the strategic redesign of healthcare services, harnessing information and communication technology (ICT) to enhance hypertension management and blood pressure control in primary care, providing timely interventions, and improving patient outcomes. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for RCTs comparing ICT with usual care in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. A random-effects model was used to calculate the risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of twenty-eight studies and 13,111 patients were included, of whom 7,312 were randomized to ICT and 5,799 to usual care. Compared with standard care, ICT significantly reduced systolic blood pressure (MD -4.44 mmHg; 95% CI -5.55,-3.33; p<0.01) and diastolic blood pressure (MD -1.08 mmHg; 95% CI -1.71,-0.45; p<0.01). There was no significant difference between groups for adherence (RR 1.16; 95%CI 0.89-1.50; p=0.27). CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis of RCTs of patients with uncontrolled hypertension, ICT was associated with a reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressures, compared with usual care.

Efficacy and Safety of Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibodies in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

The benefit of associating anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies to proteasome inhibitor (PI)/immunomodulatory agent (IA) and dexamethasone in the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) remains unclear. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomized controlled trials that investigated the addition of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies to a therapy composed of PI/IA and dexamethasone versus PI/IA and dexamethasone alone for treating relapsed or refractory MM. Hazard ratios (HRs) or risk ratios (RRs) were computed for binary endpoints, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Six studies comprising 2191 patients were included. Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody significantly improved progression-free survival (HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.43-0.61; p < 0.001) and overall survival (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.63-0.83; p < 0.001). There was a significant increase in hematological adverse events, such as neutropenia (RR 1.41; 95% CI 1.26-1.58; p < 0.01) and thrombocytopenia (RR 1.14; 95% CI 1.02-1.27; p = 0.02), in the group treated with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. Also, there was a significant increase in non-hematological adverse events, such as dyspnea (RR 1.72; 95% CI 1.38-2.13; p < 0.01) and pneumonia (RR 1.34; 95% CI 1.13-1.59; p < 0.01), in the group treated with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. In conclusion, the incorporation of an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody demonstrated a promising prospect for reshaping the established MM treatment paradigms.

Efficacy and safety of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

The benefit of associating anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies to proteasome inhibitor (PI)/immunomodulatory agent (IA) and dexamethasone in the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) remains unclear. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomized controlled trials that investigated the addition of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies to a therapy composed of PI/IA and dexamethasone versus PI/IA and dexamethasone alone for treating relapsed or refractory MM. Hazard ratios (HRs) or risk ratios (RRs) were computed for binary endpoints, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Six studies comprising 2191 patients were included. Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody significantly improved progressionfree survival (HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.43­0.61; p < 0.001) and overall survival (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.63­0.83; p < 0.001). There was a significant increase in hematological adverse events, such as neutropenia (RR 1.41; 95% CI 1.26­1.58; p < 0.01) and thrombocytopenia (RR 1.14; 95% CI 1.02­1.27; p = 0.02), in the group treated with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. Also, there was a significant increase in non-hematological adverse events, such as dyspnea (RR 1.72; 95% CI 1.38­2.13; p < 0.01) and pneumonia (RR 1.34; 95% CI 1.13­1.59; p < 0.01), in the group treated with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. In conclusion, the incorporation of an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody demonstrated a promising prospect for reshaping the established MM treatment paradigms.

Diagnóstico por imagem das lesões selares e parasselares / Diagnostic imaging of sellar and juxtasellar lesions

Os autores apresentam estudo a respeito das massas localizadas nas regiões selar e parasselar, enfatizando os principais aspectos pertinentes ao diagnóstico por imagem.