Short-Term Outcome after Repeated Less Invasive Surfactant Administration: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) to preterm infants is associated with decreased risk for death or BPD. After LISA, a considerable proportion requires a second dose of surfactant because of ongoing respiratory distress syndrome, raising a clinical dilemma between intubation or performing a repeated LISA (re-LISA) procedure. We aim to assess efficacy of re-LISA in avoiding subsequent nasal continuous positive airway pressure failure (need for intubation in the first 72 h of life; CPAP-F), to identify factors associated with subsequent CPAP-F, and to compare short-term outcomes following re-LISA to surfactant retreatment by endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. METHODS: This was an observational retrospective study in two Dutch NICUs. Inclusion criterion was infants with gestational age <32 0/7 weeks requiring a second surfactant dose. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: Of 209 infants requiring second surfactant dose, 132 received re-LISA. Subsequent CPAP-F was observed in 56 (42%) infants and was associated with extreme prematurity (OR 2.6, 95% CI: 1.2-5.8) and FiO2>0.5 (OR 5.4, 95% CI: 2.0-14.7). Infants receiving re-LISA had a lower risk of death or BPD compared to infants intubated for the second surfactant dose (OR 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2-0.9). Infants with CPAP-F after re-LISA had similar outcomes compared to those intubated for second surfactant dose. CONCLUSION: Re-LISA is effective in reducing CPAP-F and is associated with lower risk of death or BPD compared to retreatment via an endotracheal tube. Infants failing CPAP after re-LISA have similar outcomes compared to intubated infants. These findings support the use of re-LISA in preterm infants with ongoing RDS.

The relationship between antenatal indomethacin as a tocolytic drug and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Preterm birth is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Tocolytic drugs, such as indomethacin, are often used to postpone preterm delivery. Indomethacin has been proven to be more effective than other tocolytic agents in terms of delaying birth but is often prescribed with caution because of its potential association with adverse neonatal outcomes. We aim to study the effects of antenatal indomethacin on neonatal outcomes after controlling for potential confounders, as compared to nifedipine and/or atosiban. METHODS: In this cohort study, we performed a retrospective analysis of maternal and neonatal data. Women were included if they received indomethacin, nifedipine or atosiban as a tocolytic drug for imminent preterm labor and gave birth at a gestational age (GA) between 235/7 and 320/7 weeks, between 2010 and 2015. Main outcome measures were: neonatal death, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and its treatment. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy-four women, delivering 610 infants were investigated. The incidence of the following adverse neonatal outcomes were significantly higher after indomethacin use: neonatal death (p = .017), NEC (p = .026), SIP (p = .008), PDA (p = .000) and PDA ligation (p = .000). However, these associations showed to be nonsignificant after adjusting for confounders (adjusted odds ratio neonatal mortality 1.6 (0.7-3.8)), NEC 1.6 (0.6-4.4), SIP 2.8 (0.3-30.0), PDA 1.1 (0.6-2.2) and PDA ligation 2.2 (0.7-6.5). CONCLUSIONS: The presumed association between antenatal indomethacin exposure and several adverse neonatal outcomes may be based upon indication bias. Taking important confounding factors, such as GA at birth and neonatal birth weight into account, antenatal indomethacin exposure does not result in a higher incidence of adverse neonatal outcomes. However, there may be a higher risk for spontaneous intestinal perforation.

Adenovirus Receptor Expression in Cancer and Its Multifaceted Role in Oncolytic Adenovirus Therapy.

Oncolytic adenovirus therapy is believed to be a promising way to treat cancer patients. To be able to target tumor cells with an oncolytic adenovirus, expression of the adenovirus receptor on the tumor cell is essential. Different adenovirus types bind to different receptors on the cell, of which the expression can vary between tumor types. Pre-existing neutralizing immunity to human adenovirus species C type 5 (HAdV-C5) has hampered its therapeutic efficacy in clinical trials, hence several adenoviral vectors from different species are currently being developed as a means to evade pre-existing immunity. Therefore, knowledge on the expression of appropriate adenovirus receptors on tumor cells is important. This could aid in determining which tumor types would benefit most from treatment with a certain oncolytic adenovirus type. This review provides an overview of the known receptors for human adenoviruses and how their expression on tumor cells might be differentially regulated compared to healthy tissue, before and after standardized anticancer treatments. Mechanisms behind the up- or downregulation of adenovirus receptor expression are discussed, which could be used to find new targets for combination therapy to enhance the efficacy of oncolytic adenovirus therapy. Additionally, the utility of the adenovirus receptors in oncolytic virotherapy is examined, including their role in viral spread, which might even surpass their function as primary entry receptors. Finally, future directions are offered regarding the selection of adenovirus types to be used in oncolytic adenovirus therapy in the fight against cancer.

[Multilayer analysis of signal transduction and cell cycle control in GIST. Identifying new interaction partners with differential regulation]. / Multilayer-Analyse der Signaltransduktion und Zellzykluskontrolle in GIST. Identifizierung neuer Interaktionspartner mit differenzieller Regulation.

To identify new interactions as well as diagnostically, prognostically and therapeutically relevant differences in the regulation of gene expression in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), we analyzed the methylation status, mRNA expression, microRNA expression, protein expression and protein phosphorylation in parallel in identical tumor tissue samples. The data were analyzed in a multilayer approach and were correlated to each other and to clinico-pathological parameters. Differentially regulated genes were mapped to signal transduction pathways which are already known to play a major role in GISTs. A functionally orientated overview of the different data layers was constructed, which enabled new insights into gene regulation in GISTs.

Increased KIT signalling with up-regulation of cyclin D correlates to accelerated proliferation and shorter disease-free survival in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) with KIT exon 11 deletions.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) with deletions in KIT exon 11 are characterized by higher proliferation rates and shorter disease-free survival times, compared to GISTs with KIT exon 11 point mutations. Up-regulation of cyclin D is a crucial event for entry into the G1 phase of the cell cycle, and links mitogenic signalling to cell proliferation. Signalling from activated KIT to cyclin D is directed through the RAS/RAF/ERK, PI3K/AKT/mTOR/EIF4E, and JAK/STATs cascades. ERK and STATs initiate mRNA transcription of cyclin D, whereas EIF4E activation leads to increased translation efficiency and reduced degradation of cyclin D protein. The aim of the current study was to analyse the mRNA and protein expression as well as protein phosphorylation of central hubs of these signalling cascades in primary GISTs, to evaluate whether tumours with KIT exon 11 deletions and point mutations differently utilize these pathways. GISTs with KIT exon 11 deletions had significantly higher mitotic counts, higher proliferation rates, and shorter disease-free survival times. In line with this, they had significantly higher expression of cyclin D on the mRNA and protein level. Furthermore, there was a significantly higher amount of phosphorylated ERK1/2, and a higher protein amount of STAT3, mTOR, and EIF4E. PI3K and phosphorylated AKT were also up-regulated, but this was not significant. Ultimately, GISTs with KIT exon 11 deletions had significantly higher phosphorylation of the central negative cell-cycle regulator RB. Phosphorylation of RB is accomplished by activated cyclin D/CDK4/6 complex, and marks a central event in the release of the cell cycle. Altogether, these observations suggest increased KIT signalling with up-regulation of cyclin D as the basis for the unfavourable clinical course in GISTs with KIT exon 11 deletions.

Loss of 9p leads to p16INK4A down-regulation and enables RB/E2F1-dependent cell cycle promotion in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs).

Loss of chromosome 9p is a reliable predictor of malignant behaviour in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). p16INK4A located at 9p21 inhibits the CDK4/6/cyclin D complex from phosphorylating RB. Phosphorylation of RB through CDK4/6/cyclin D in early G(1) phase frees the transcription factor E2F1 from RB and enables mRNA transcription of genes essential for G(1)/S phase transition. This study aims to determine the impact of 9p loss on mRNA and protein expression of p16INK4A and further key cell cycle regulators in the different phases of the cell cycle. Sixty primary GISTs previously characterized for 9p loss by comparative genomic hybridization were analysed for mRNA expression of p16INK4A, p15INK4B, CDK4, CDK6, cyclin D, p21CIP1p27KIP1, CDK2, cyclin E, cyclin B, RB and E2F1, using quantitative RT-PCR. The protein expression of CDK6, CDK2, p21CIP1, p27KIP1 and phosphorylated RB (S807/S811) was evaluated using protein arrays as a novel and highly sensitive platform for profiling of protein abundance and protein phosphorylation. In parallel, the nuclear percentages of immunohistochemical staining for p16INK4A, cyclin D, E2F1 and RB were quantified on a tissue microarray. GISTs with 9p loss had significantly higher proliferation rates, higher metastatic behaviour and shorter disease-free survival. On the molecular level, GISTs with 9p loss had a significantly reduced mRNA as well as nuclear protein expression of p16INK4A. RB was significantly more phosphorylated in these tumours, together with increased mRNA expression and nuclear staining for E2F1. Furthermore, GISTs with 9p loss had up-regulation of the late G1/S phase promoters CDK2 and cyclin E. We conclude that loss of 9p accompanied by early G1 phase inhibitor p16(INK4A) down-regulation in GISTs facilitates phosphorylation of RB, enabling E2F1-dependent transcription of genes essential for late G1/S phase transition. This study provides a possible basis for the accelerated proliferation and particularly malignant behaviour in GISTs with 9p loss.