Interprofessional Post-Graduate Training Model for Nurse Practitioners and Physician Trainees.

CONTEXT: People living with serious illness and their care partners rely on team-based specialty hospice and palliative care (HPC) in order to achieve high quality end of life outcomes. In HPC, physician and nurse practitioner (NP) scope of practice has significant overlap so training together may offer benefits to clinicians and patients. OBJECTIVES: Assessment of clinical competencies in a post-graduate training program consisting of NPs and physicians training and learning side-by-side. METHODS: A crosswalk assured NP and physician HPC clinical competencies were captured in evaluation questions used by interprofessional program faculty to observe and assess trainees. Six clinical competencies were calculated based on aggregated evaluations for each physician and NP HPC post-graduate trainee at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months annually for 3 years. For NPs and physicians, the mean slopes of the best fit lines, the final numeric score, and the mean net change between 12 and three month competencies were compared. Learner experience was captured qualitatively. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the change of competency scores, the final competency scores, or the trajectory of improvement in the six competencies between physician to NP trainees. Adding NP trainees was considered by post-graduate trainees as a strength of the program, and did not detract from physician competence achievement. CONCLUSION: Assessing an IPE post-graduate training program in HPC was possible using a shared clinical competency framework, and revealed similar clinical gains for NPs and physicians enrolled in the program.

Patient-centered evaluation of outcomes from rehabilitation for chronic disabling spinal disorders: the impact of personal goal achievement on patient satisfaction.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The multiplicity of biopsychosocial and economic facets of chronic disabling back and/or neck pain complicates the treatment outcomes measurement. Our previous work showed that personal functional goal achievement contributed more toward patient satisfaction with the outcome than did traditional self-reports of pain and physical function or measured strength, flexibility, and endurance among functional restoration program (FRP) graduates with chronic disabling back and/or neck pain. PURPOSE: The primary goal was to compare the impact on patient satisfaction of pain and functional goal achievement versus self-reports of pain and physical function. STUDY DESIGN: This was an observational study of all patients with chronic disabling back and/or neck pain completing an FRP between June 2008 and May 2009. OUTCOME MEASURES: Before the treatment, participants recorded personal 3-month goals for pain, work, recreation, and activities of daily living. At least 3 months later, all graduates were sent a follow-up survey displaying the patient's pretreatment functional goals and eliciting the patient's assessment of functional goal achievement; current pain magnitude, "satisfaction with the overall results for your pain problem;" and responses to the Short Form-36v2 Physical Functioning subscale (PF-10). METHODS: Pain goal achievement was calculated as the difference between the pretreatment pain goal and follow-up pain magnitude. Linear regression was used to evaluate the association between satisfaction and four variables (follow-up pain; PF-10; pain goal achievement; functional goal achievement), individually and then together in a full model. RESULTS: Of the 82 patients surveyed, 62 responded completely. Mean age was 44 years, with 48% female and 35% on worker's compensation. The model R(2) combining all four variables explained 0.6033 of the variance in satisfaction. Each variable by itself was significantly related to patient satisfaction at p<.001, but the overlap in association was large. The unique contributions (R(2)) to the variation in satisfaction were the following: functional goal achievement: 0.0471; PF-10 score: 0.0229; pain magnitude: 0.0178; and pain goal achievement: 0.0020. CONCLUSIONS: At least 3 months after the treatment, functional goal achievement had by far the greatest impact on patient satisfaction, followed by PF-10 score, pain magnitude, and, finally, pain goal achievement. Functional goal achievement has great potential as a tool for patient-centered treatment decision-making and outcomes measurement for people with chronic disabling back and/or neck pain and their health care providers.