Turning Community Feedback into a Culturally Responsive Program for American Indian/Alaska Native Commercial Tobacco Users.

BACKGROUND: American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) cigarette smoking prevalence is disproportionately high, especially in the northern United States. Tailored quitlines are needed to support AI/AN commercial tobacco users with quitting. OBJECTIVES: Obtain community feedback by working with trusted AI/AN partners; genuinely incorporate feedback into program design; collaboratively develop and implement culturally relevant quitline services for Minnesota's AI/AN community. METHODS: Working in partnership, AI/AN community input was gathered, and community partners were engaged to inform the development, training, implementation and monitoring of a tailored program within the existing state quitline. RESULTS: Findings suggest focusing on the commercial tobacco user/coach relationship, increased cultural understanding and program content adaptations could make quitlines more acceptable for AI/AN commercial tobacco users. CONCLUSIONS: The development and launch of the AI Quitline demonstrated the feasibility of collaboration among AI/AN organizations and community members, funders and providers to create a culturally relevant cessation service for AI/AN commercial tobacco users.

Utilizing Reach Ratios to Assess Menthol Cigarette Smoker Enrollment in Quitline Services.

INTRODUCTION: Increasing the reach of evidence-based cessation services is a longstanding public health priority, especially for subgroups who may be most at risk. Little research has examined whether quitlines are reaching menthol cigarette smokers who may have increased difficulty quitting compared with nonmenthol cigarette smokers. This study aims to understand whether quitline services are reaching menthol cigarette smokers. METHODS: The study sample included adult smokers enrolled in Minnesota's quitline program, QUITPLAN Services, between May 2017 and April 2018 (N=10,999). Cigarette smokers were asked about the usual cigarette type (menthol versus nonmenthol). Reach ratios were calculated by dividing the percentage of program enrollees who are menthol smokers by the percentage of Minnesota smokers who are menthol smokers. Differences in demographic, tobacco use, and utilization characteristics between menthol and nonmenthol smokers were assessed using chi-square and t-tests. Analyses were conducted in March 2019. RESULTS: Among QUITPLAN Services enrollees, 30.7% of smokers reported using menthol cigarettes. The reach ratio was 1.12 (95% CI=0.99, 1.25). Menthol smokers were more likely to be younger, be female, be Black/African American, be Hispanic, and live in an urban area than nonmenthol smokers. Although menthol smokers were more likely than nonmenthol smokers to enroll in text messaging, no other significant differences in service utilization were found. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that menthol smokers are proportionately represented among quitline enrollees. State quitlines should assess menthol smoking status at intake and allocate resources to reach and better serve menthol smokers.

Online Versus Telephone Registration: Differences in Quitline Participant Characteristics.

INTRODUCTION: Although 72% of Internet users have searched for health information, online quitline registration is not universally available. In 2014, QUITPLAN Services (Minnesota's quitline) added options (Individual Services: 2-week nicotine-replacement therapy starter kit, text messaging, e-mail messaging, quit guide) to the existing Helpline (telephone counseling, nicotine-replacement therapy, integrated e-mails and texts, quit guide) and online registration for all programs. Demographic and quit outcome differences by registration mode (online versus telephone) and program type (Individual Services versus Helpline) were examined. METHODS: A total of 4 years (March 2014-February 2018) of participants' registration and utilization data (N=55,817) were examined. Data were also studied from subsets of participants who completed the outcome evaluations conducted in 2014 (n=1,127) and 2017 (n=872). Select demographic and program use characteristics and quit outcomes were analyzed by registration method and stratified by program type. Associations between registration mode and quit outcomes were examined within program and adjusted for available covariates using 2017 outcome study data. Data were analyzed in 2019. RESULTS: Overall, 65.8% of participants enrolled online, and 34.2% enrolled by telephone. Helpline participants were more likely to enroll by telephone than Individual Services participants (85.8% vs 25.3%). Younger adults were more likely to enroll online for either program type than older adults (p<0.001). No differences were found in 30-day point prevalence abstinence by registration mode within program after adjusting for covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Online quitline registration has multiple benefits, including engaging younger tobacco users. Moreover, abstinence rates do not differ. Online registration may be particularly appropriate for nontelephone quitline services. Quitlines may wish to add online registration to capitalize on Internet use.

Replicating state Quitline innovations to increase reach: findings from three states.

BACKGROUND: Reaching tobacco users is a persistent challenge for quitlines. In 2014, ClearWay MinnesotaSM changed its quitline services and media campaign, and observed substantial increases in reach and strong quit outcomes. Oklahoma and Florida implemented the same changes in 2015 and 2016. We examined whether the strategies used in Minnesota could be replicated with similar results. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study of Minnesota's QUITPLAN® Services, the Oklahoma Tobacco Helpline, and Florida's Quit Your Way program. Each program offers free quitline services to their state's residents. For each state, data were compared for 1 year prior to service changes to 1 year after services changed and promotions began. Registration and program utilization data from 21,918 (Minnesota); 64,584 (Oklahoma); and 141,209 (Florida) program enrollees were analyzed. Additionally, outcome study data from 1542 (Minnesota); 3377 (Oklahoma); and 3444 (Florida) program enrollees were analyzed. We examined treatment reach, satisfaction, 24-h quit attempts, 30-day point prevalence abstinence rates, select demographic characteristics, registration mode (post period only), and estimated number of quitters. Data were analyzed using χ2 analyses and t-tests. RESULTS: Treatment reach rates increased by 50.62% in Oklahoma, 66.88% in Florida, and 480.56% in Minnesota. Significant increases in the estimated number of quitters were seen, ranging from + 42.75% to + 435.90%. Statistically significant changes in other variables (satisfaction, 24-h quit attempts, 30-day point prevalence abstinence rates, gender, and race) varied by state. During the post period, participants' method of registration differed. Online enrollment percentages ranged from 19.44% (Oklahoma), to 54.34% (Florida), to 70.80% (Minnesota). In Oklahoma, 71.63% of participants enrolled by phone, while 40.71% of Florida participants and 26.98% of Minnesota participants enrolled by phone. Fax or electronic referrals comprised 8.92% (Oklahoma), 4.95% (Florida), and 2.22% (Minnesota) of program enrollees, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Changing quitline services and implementing a new media campaign increased treatment reach and the estimated number of participants who quit smoking in three states. Quitline funders and tobacco control program managers may wish to consider approaches such as these to increase quitline utilization and population health impact.

Financial incentives and proactive calling for reducing barriers to tobacco treatment among socioeconomically disadvantaged women: A factorial randomized trial.

Improved strategies and scalable interventions to engage low-socioeconomic status (SES) smokers in tobacco treatment are needed. We tested an intervention designed to connect low-SES smokers to treatment services, implemented through Minnesota's National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (Sage) in 2017; the trial was designed to last 3 months (July through October). Participants were female smokers who were 250% below the federal poverty level (randomized N = 3723; analyzed N = 3365). Using a factorial design, participants were randomized to six intervention groups consisting of a proactive call (no call vs call) and/or a financial incentive offered for being connected to treatment services ($0 vs $10 vs $20). Simple randomization was conducted using Stata v.13. All individuals received direct mail. Participants and staff were blinded to allocation. The outcome was connection via phone to QUITPLAN Services®, Minnesota's population-based cessation services. Groups that received $10 or $20 incentives had higher odds of treatment engagement compared to the no incentive group [respectively, OR = 1.94; 95% CI (1.19-3.14); OR = 2.18; 95% CI (1.36-3.51)]. Individuals that received proactive calls had higher odds of treatment engagement compared to individuals not called [OR = 1.59; 95% CI (1.11-2.29)]. Economic evaluation revealed that the $10 incentive, no call group had the best cost-benefit ratio compared to the no incentive, no call group. Direct mail with moderate incentives or proactive calling can successfully encourage connections to population-based tobacco treatment services among low-SES smokers. The intervention could be disseminated to similar programs serving low-SES populations. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03760107).

Impact and Effectiveness of a Stand-Alone NRT Starter Kit in a Statewide Tobacco Cessation Program.

PURPOSE: To examine 2-week nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) starter kit quit outcomes and predictors and the impact of adding this new service on treatment reach. DESIGN: Observational study of a 1-year cohort of QUITPLAN Services enrollees using registration and utilization data and follow-up outcome survey data of a subset of enrollees who received NRT starter kits. SETTING: ClearWay Minnesota's QUITPLAN Services provides a quit line that is available to uninsured and underinsured Minnesotans and NRT starter kits (a free 2-week supply of patches, gum, or lozenges) that are available to all Minnesota tobacco users. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 15 536 adult QUITPLAN Services enrollees and 818 seven-month follow-up survey NRT starter kit respondents. MEASURES: Treatment reach for all services and tobacco quit outcomes and predictors for starter kit recipients. ANALYSIS: Descriptive analyses, χ2 analyses, and logistic regression. RESULTS: Treatment reach increased 3-fold after adding the 2-week NRT starter kit service option to QUITPLAN Services compared to the prior year (1.86% vs 0.59%). Among all participants enrolling in QUITPLAN services during a 1-year period, 83.8% (13 026/15 536) registered for a starter kit. Among starter kit respondents, 25.6% reported being quit for 30 days at the 7-month follow-up. After controlling for other factors, using all NRT and selecting more cessation services predicted quitting. CONCLUSION: An NRT starter kit brought more tobacco users to QUITPLAN services, demonstrating interest in cessation services separate from phone counseling. The starter kit produced high quit rates, comparable to the quit line in the same time period. Cessation service providers may want to consider introducing starter kits to reach more tobacco users and ultimately improve population health.

Never Quit Trying: Reengaging Tobacco Users in Statewide Cessation Services.

CONTEXT: Tobacco dependence is well established as a chronic condition typically requiring numerous quit attempts. Tobacco users are unlikely to return to the same cessation program on their own. OBJECTIVE: This program evaluation examined the effectiveness of using multiple outreach methods to reengage tobacco users in a statewide cessation program at varying time points after their initial program enrollment. DESIGN: Participants were randomized to receive or not receive reengagement outreach. We conducted outreach via phone, e-mail, and/or text (based on methods participants agreed to receive) at 1, 2, or 3 months post-initial engagement. Participants were offered the opportunity to reenroll in QUITPLAN Services. SETTING: Minnesota's QUITPLAN Services PARTICIPANTS:: A total of 3020 tobacco users who enrolled in Minnesota's QUITPLAN Services and either received a 2-week starter kit of nicotine replacement therapy or completed 0-1 QUITPLAN Helpline calls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We explored group differences in the odds of reengagement (defined as enrolling in a phone cessation program or selecting 2 or more of nicotine replacement therapy starter kit, text messaging, e-mail program, or print materials), contributors to reengagement, and costs. RESULTS: 14.7% in the Reengagement Outreach (RO) group and 3.4% in the Comparison (no outreach) group reengaged. The majority (71%) reengaged during phone outreach. There were no significant differences in reengagement rates by follow-up time period (1, 2, or 3 months). Cost per reengagement was $546, mostly due to one-time setup costs; scaling to 10 000 tobacco users would cost approximately $101 per reengagement. CONCLUSIONS: Conducting proactive outreach through state-funded quitlines is an effective approach to reengaging tobacco users, yielding a 5-fold greater odds of reengagement compared with no outreach. Since most costs were for initial setup, the cost per reengagement would decrease as the outreach population size increases. Such outreach has the potential to foster treatment utilization and quit attempts.

Increasing reach by offering choices: Results from an innovative model for statewide services for smoking cessation.

Although state quitlines provide free telephone counseling and often include nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), reach remains limited (1-2% in most states). More needs to be done to engage all smokers in the quitting process. A possible strategy is to offer choices of cessation services through quitlines and to reduce registration barriers. In March 2014, ClearWay MinnesotaSM implemented a new model for QUITPLAN® Services, the state's population-wide cessation services. Tobacco users could choose the QUITPLAN® Helpline or one or more Individual QUITPLAN® Services (NRT starter kit, text messaging, email program, or quit guide). The program website was redesigned, online enrollment was added, and a new advertising campaign was created and launched. In 2014-2015, we evaluated whether these changes increased reach. We also assessed quit attempts, quit outcomes, predictors of 30-day abstinence, and average cost per quit via a seven-month follow-up survey. Between March 2014-February 2015, 15,861 unique tobacco users registered, which was a 169% increase over calendar year 2013. The majority of participants made a quit attempt (83.7%). Thirty-day point prevalence abstinence rates (responder rates) were 26.1% for QUITPLAN Services overall, 29.6% for the QUITPLAN Helpline, and 25.5% for Individual QUITPLAN Services. Several variables predicted quit outcomes, including receiving only one call from the Helpline and using both the Helpline and the NRT starter kit. Providing greater choice of cessation services and reducing registration barriers have the potential to engage more tobacco users, foster more quit attempts, and ultimately lead to long-term cessation and reductions in prevalence.

Facilitators of health systems change for tobacco dependence treatment: a qualitative study of stakeholders' perceptions.

BACKGROUND: Health systems play key roles in identifying tobacco users and providing evidence-based care to help them quit. Health systems change - changes to health care processes, policies and financing - has potential to build capacity within these systems to address tobacco use. In 2010, ClearWay MinnesotaSM piloted a health systems change funding initiative, providing resources and technical assistance to four health care systems. This paper presents findings from a process evaluation, describing key stakeholders' views on whether changes to how health systems treat tobacco use resulted from this initiative and what may have facilitated those changes. METHODS: A process evaluation was conducted by an independent evaluation firm. A qualitative case study approach provided understanding of systems change efforts. Interviews were conducted with key informants representing the health systems, funder and technical assistance providers. Core documents were reviewed and compared to thematic analysis from the interviews. Results were triangulated with existing literature to check for convergence or divergence. A cross-case analysis of the findings was conducted in which themes were compared and contrasted. RESULTS: All systems created and implemented well-defined written tobacco use screening, documentation and treatment referral protocols for every patient at every visit. Three implemented systematic follow-up procedures for patients referred to treatment, and three also implemented changes to electronic health records systems to facilitate screening, referral and reporting. Fax referral to quitline services was implemented or enhanced by two systems. Elements that facilitated successful systems changes included capitalizing on environmental changes, ensuring participation and support at all organizational levels, using technology, establishing ongoing training and continuous quality improvement mechanisms and leveraging external funding and technical assistance. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation demonstrates that health systems can implement substantial changes to facilitate routine treatment of tobacco dependence in a relatively short timeframe. Implementing best practices like these, including increased emphasis on the implementation and use of electronic health record systems and healthcare quality measures, is increasingly important given the changing health care environment. Lessons learned from this project can be resources for states and health systems likely to implement similar systems changes.

Expanding access to nicotine replacement therapy through Minnesota's QUITLINE partnership.

BACKGROUND: Partnerships can expand the reach and effectiveness of quitlines while conserving limited tobacco control dollars. OBJECTIVE: To describe how the addition of free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to the "QUITPLAN Helpline" in Minnesota influenced triage and transfer to health plan quitlines and how efforts taken to re-establish balance in the partnership expanded population based access to NRT. METHODS: NRT provision began in September 2002. Call volumes, transfer rates and ClearWay Minnesota dollars spent serving health plan members were examined from May 2001 through November 2005. The process by which health plan quitlines began providing NRT as a result of the addition of NRT to the QUITPLAN Helpline in September 2002 was explored through interviews with health plan representatives. RESULTS: Following the addition of NRT to the QUITPLAN Helpline, the percentage of health plan members transferred to their health plans decreased because callers were resisting transfer to their health plans for telephone counselling that did not include NRT. Transfer rates eventually returned to pre-NRT levels following sequential implementation of scripting changes, transfer requirements and collection of health plan identification numbers. These changes reduced ClearWay Minnesota dollars spent on providing services to insured Minnesotans. Through the partnership, all Minnesotans currently have access to both telephone counselling and NRT either at no or low cost. CONCLUSIONS: Minnesota's partnership has effectively expanded access to NRT through quitlines. The increased use of partnerships for providing quitline services may be effective in broadening population access while conserving limited tobacco control dollars for those without cessation benefits.

Increased reach and effectiveness of a statewide tobacco quitline after the addition of access to free nicotine replacement therapy.

BACKGROUND: Tobacco users receiving behavioural and pharmacological assistance are more likely to quit. Although telephone quitlines provide population access to counselling, few offer pharmacotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To assess change in cessation rates and programme impact after the addition of free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to statewide quitline services. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: An observational study of cohorts of callers to the Minnesota QUITPLAN(SM) Helpline before (n = 380) and after (n = 373) the addition of access to free NRT. INTERVENTION: Mailing of NRT (patch or gum) to callers enrolling in multi-session counselling. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Thirty-day abstinence six months after programme registration. RESULTS: The number of callers increased from 155 (SD 75) to 679 (180) per month pre-NRT to post-NRT (difference 524, 95% confidence interval (CI) 323 to 725). Post-NRT, the proportion of callers enrolling in multi-session counselling (23.4% v 90.1%, difference 66.6%, 95% CI 60.8% to 71.6%) and using pharmacotherapy (46.8% v 86.8%, difference 40.0%, 95% CI 31.3% to 47.9%) increased. Thirty-day abstinence at six months increased from 10.0% pre-NRT to 18.2% post-NRT (difference 8.2%, 95% CI 3.1% to 13.4%). Post-NRT the average number of new ex-smokers per month among registrants increased from 15.5 to 123.6 (difference 108.1, 95% CI 61.1 to 155.0). The cost per quit pre-NRT was 1362 dollars (SD 207 dollars). The cost per quit post-NRT was 1934 dollars (215 dollars) suggesting a possible increase in cost per quit (difference 572 dollars, 95% CI -12 dollars to 1157 dollars). CONCLUSION: The addition of free NRT to a state quitline is followed by increases in participation and abstinence rates resulting in an eightfold increase in programme impact. These findings support the addition of access to pharmacological therapy as part of state quitline services.