Short-term postoperative outcomes of gastric adenocarcinoma patients treated with curative intent in low-volume centers.

BACKGROUND: Quality standards in postoperative outcomes have not yet been defined for gastric cancer surgery. Also, the effect of centralization of gastric cancer surgery on the improvement of postoperative outcomes continues to be debated. Short-term postoperative outcomes in gastric carcinoma patients in centers with low-volume of annual gastrectomies were assessed. The effect of age on major postoperative morbidity and mortality was also analyzed. METHODS: Patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction Siewert III type carcinomas who underwent surgical treatment with curative intent between January 2013 and December 2016 were included. Data were obtained from the population-based surgical registry Esophagogastric Carcinoma Registry of the Comunitat Valenciana (RECEG-CV). The RECEG-CV gathers information on demographic characteristics and comorbidity, preoperative study and neoadjuvant treatment, surgical procedure, pathological study, postoperative outcomes, and follow-up. Seventeen hospitals belonging to the public network participated in this registry. RESULTS: Data from 591 patients were analyzed. Postoperative major morbidity occurred in 154 (26.1%) patients. Overall 30-day or in-hospital mortality, and 90-day postoperative mortality rates were 8.6% and 10.1% respectively. Failure-to-rescue was 39% and it was significantly higher in patients aged 75 years or older in comparison with younger patients (55.3% vs 23.1% p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, age ≥ 75 years (p = 0.029), laparoscopic approach (p = 0.005), and total gastrectomy (p = 0.005) were associated with major postoperative morbidity. Age ≥ 75 years (p = 0.027), pulmonary complications (p = 0.001), cardiac complications (p = 0.001), leakage (p = 0.003), and hemorrhage (p = 0.013) were associated with postoperative mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Centralization of gastric adenocarcinoma treatment in centers with higher annual caseload should be considered to improve the short-term postoperative outcomes in low-volume centers. Patients aged 75 or older had a significantly increased risk of major postoperative morbidity and mortality, and higher failure-to-rescue.

Effect of Preoperative Immunonutrition on Postoperative Major Morbidity after Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC in Patients with Peritoneal Metastasis.

The effect of preoperative immunonutrition intake on postoperative major complications in patients following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was assessed. The accuracy of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) for detecting postoperative complications was also analyzed. Patients treated within a peritoneal carcinomatosis program in which a complete or optimal cytoreduction was achieved were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into two groups based on whether preoperative immunonutrition (IMN) or not (non-IMN) were administered. Clinical and surgical variables and postoperative complications were gathered. Predictive values of major morbidity of CRP during the first 3 postoperative days (POD) were also evaluated. A total of 107 patients were included, 48 belonging to the IMN group and 59 to the non-IMN group. In multivariate analysis immunonutrition (OR 0.247; 95%CI 0.071-0.859; p = 0.028), and the number of visceral resections (OR 1.947; 95%CI 1.086-3.488; p = 0.025) emerged as independent factors associated with postoperative major morbidity. CRP values above 103 mg/L yielded a negative predictive value of 84%. Preoperative intake of immunonutrition was associated with a decrease of postoperative major morbidity and might be recommended to patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis following CRS. Measuring CRP levels during the 3 first postoperative days is useful to rule out major morbidity.

Risk of Cancer in Family Members of Patients with Lynch-Like Syndrome.

Lynch syndrome (LS) is a common cause of hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC). Some CRC patients develop mismatch repair deficiency without germline pathogenic mutation, known as Lynch-like syndrome (LLS). We compared the risk of CRC in first-degree relatives (FDRs) in LLS and LS patients. LLS was diagnosed when tumors showed immunohistochemical loss of MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2; or loss of MLH1 with BRAF wild type; and/or no MLH1 methylation and absence of pathogenic mutation in these genes. CRC and other LS-related neoplasms were followed in patients diagnosed with LS and LLS and among their FDRs. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated for CRC and other neoplasms associated with LS among FDRs of LS and LLS patients. In total, 205 LS (1205 FDRs) and 131 LLS families (698 FDRs) had complete pedigrees. FDRs of patients with LLS had a high incidence of CRC (SIR, 2.08; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.56-2.71), which was significantly lower than that in FDRs of patients with LS (SIR, 4.25; 95% CI, 3.67-4.90; p < 0.001). The risk of developing other neoplasms associated with LS also increased among FDR of LLS patients (SIR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.44-2.80) but was lower than that among FDR of patients with LS (SIR, 5.01, 95% CI, 4.26-5.84; p < 0.001). FDRs with LLS have an increased risk of developing CRC as well as LS-related neoplasms, although this risk is lower than that of families with LS. Thus, their management should take into account this increased risk.

Tolerance to Specific Foods After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

PURPOSE: We assessed the degree of tolerance to different types of food after LSG to provide specific useful advice concerning food intake to these patients during the first postoperative year. METHODS: A specific questionnaire measuring tolerance to 59 types of food was completed in postoperative months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 in a prospective consecutive cohort of patients who underwent LSG. An ordinal score of tolerance based on the median (Me) and a cumulative link ordinal model (CLOM) analyzing temporal variability in oral tolerance to each type of food were used. Foods with Me values of 3 points or higher and CLOM values of approximately 80% or higher were considered well tolerated. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were included in the study. The questionnaire was completed in the first, third, sixth, ninth, and twelfth months by 42 (64%), 44 (67%), 41 (63%), 41 (63%), and 39 (60%) patients, respectively. All kinds of fish were very well tolerated. Regarding meat intake, chicken, turkey, rabbit, and minced meat were well tolerated, whereas lamb, veal, and pork were not. Except for noodles and toasted bread, a poor degree of tolerance during follow-up was found for most carbohydrates. Yogurt, skimmed milk, and cottage cheese were well tolerated. A heterogeneous degree of tolerance was observed for vegetables, with cooked vegetables being well tolerated, and raw vegetables not. CONCLUSION: Our study provides individual information on specific foods regarding their degree of tolerance. This information may be useful for advising patients during the first postoperative year after LSG.

The Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire (CSSQP) for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Development and Validation Study.

Colonoscopy services working in colorectal cancer screening programs must perform periodic controls to improve the quality based on patients' experiences. However, there are no validated instruments in this setting that include the two core dimensions for optimal care: satisfaction and safety. The aim of this study was to design and validate a specific questionnaire for patients undergoing screening colonoscopy after a positive fecal occult blood test, the Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire based on patients' experience (CSSQP). The design included a review of available evidence and used focus groups to identify the relevant dimensions to produce the instrument (content validity). Face validity was analyzed involving 15 patients. Reliability and construct and empirical validity were calculated. Validation involved patients from the colorectal cancer screening program at two referral hospitals in Spain. The CSSQP version 1 consisted of 15 items. The principal components analysis of the satisfaction items isolated three factors with saturation of elements above 0.52 and with high internal consistency and split-half readability: Information, Care, and Service and Facilities features. The analysis of the safety items isolated two factors with element saturations above 0.58: Information Gaps and Safety Incidents. The CSSQP is a new valid and reliable tool for measuring patient' experiences, including satisfaction and safety perception, after a colorectal cancer screening colonoscopy.

Resultados iniciales del registro de carcinomas esófago-gástricos de la Comunidad Valenciana / Initial results of the oesophageal and gastric cancer registry from the Comunidad Valenciana

Objetivos: Evaluar los resultados iniciales del registro de tumores esófago-gástricos desarrollado conjuntamente por la Sociedad Valenciana de Cirugía y la Consellería de Sanitat de la Comunidad Valenciana. Métodos: Participaron 14 de los 24 hospitales públicos de la Comunidad Valenciana. Se evaluaron todos los pacientes con diagnóstico de carcinoma de esófago y de estómago operados desde enero 2013 hasta diciembre 2014. Se analizaron variables demográficas, clínicas e histopatológicas. Resultados: Se incluyeron 434 pacientes, 120 con carcinoma de esófago y 314 con carcinoma gástrico. Solo en 2 centros se operaron a más de 10 pacientes con cáncer de esófago/año. La esofaguectomía transtorácica fue el abordaje más frecuente (84,2%) en los tumores de localización esofágica. En el 50,9% de los carcinomas de la unión esófago-gástrica (UEG) se realizó una gastrectomía total. La mortalidad postoperatoria a los 30 y 90 días fue del 8 y 11,6% en el carcinoma de esófago y del 5,9 y 8,6% en el carcinoma gástrico. Antes de la cirugía, los tumores esofágicos del tercio medio fueron tratados mayoritariamente (76,5%) con quimiorradioterapia. Por el contrario, los de tercio inferior y los de la UEG fueron tratados preferentemente solo con quimioterapia (45,5 y 53,4%). El 73,6% de los pacientes con carcinoma gástrico no recibió tratamiento neoadyuvante. La mitad de los pacientes con carcinoma esofágico o gástrico no recibió ningún tratamiento adyuvante. Conclusiones: Este registro muestra que en la Comunidad Valenciana, la mitad de los pacientes con cáncer de esófago son operados en hospitales con una casuística menor de 10 casos/año. Asimismo, ha detectado posibilidades de mejora relevantes en indicadores de resultado de los carcinomas esófago-gástricos (AU)

Aims: To evaluate the initial results of the oesophagogastric cancer registry developed for the Sociedad Valenciana de Cirugía and the Health Department of the Comunidad Valenciana (Spain). Methods: Fourteen of the 24 public hospitals belonging to the Comunidad Valenciana participated. All patients with diagnosis of oesophageal or gastric carcinomas operated from January 2013 to December 2014 were evaluated. Demographic, clinical and pathological data were analysed. Results: Four hundred and thirty-four patients (120 oesophageal carcinomas and 314 gastric carcinomas) were included. Only two hospitals operated more than 10 patients with oesophageal cancer per year. Transthoracic oesophaguectomy was the most frequent approach (84.2%) in tumours localized within the oesophagus. A total gastrectomy was performed in 50.9% patients with gastroesophageal junction (GOJ) carcinomas. Postoperative 30-day and 90-day mortality were 8% and 11.6% in oesophageal carcinoma and 5.9 and 8.6% in gastric carcinoma. Before surgery, middle oesophagus carcinomas were treated mostly (76,5%) with chemoradiotherapy. On the contrary, lower oesophagus and GOJ carcinomas were treated preferably with chemotherapy alone (45.5 and 53.4%). Any neoadjuvant treatment was administered to 73.6% of gastric cancer patients. Half patients with oesophageal carcinoma or gastric carcinoma received no adjuvant treatment. Conclusions: This registry revealed that half patients with oesophageal cancer were operated in hospitals with less than 10 cases per year at the Comunidad Valenciana. Also, it detected capacity improvement for some clinical outcomes of oesophageal and gastric carcinomas (AU)

Initial results of the oesophageal and gastric cancer registry from the Comunidad Valenciana. / Resultados iniciales del registro de carcinomas esófago-gástricos de la Comunidad Valenciana.

AIMS: To evaluate the initial results of the oesophagogastric cancer registry developed for the Sociedad Valenciana de Cirugía and the Health Department of the Comunidad Valenciana (Spain). METHODS: Fourteen of the 24 public hospitals belonging to the Comunidad Valenciana participated. All patients with diagnosis of oesophageal or gastric carcinomas operated from January 2013 to December 2014 were evaluated. Demographic, clinical and pathological data were analysed. RESULTS: Four hundred and thirty-four patients (120 oesophageal carcinomas and 314 gastric carcinomas) were included. Only two hospitals operated more than 10 patients with oesophageal cancer per year. Transthoracic oesophaguectomy was the most frequent approach (84.2%) in tumours localized within the oesophagus. A total gastrectomy was performed in 50.9% patients with gastroesophageal junction (GOJ) carcinomas. Postoperative 30-day and 90-day mortality were 8% and 11.6% in oesophageal carcinoma and 5.9 and 8.6% in gastric carcinoma. Before surgery, middle oesophagus carcinomas were treated mostly (76,5%) with chemoradiotherapy. On the contrary, lower oesophagus and GOJ carcinomas were treated preferably with chemotherapy alone (45.5 and 53.4%). Any neoadjuvant treatment was administered to 73.6% of gastric cancer patients. Half patients with oesophageal carcinoma or gastric carcinoma received no adjuvant treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This registry revealed that half patients with oesophageal cancer were operated in hospitals with less than 10 cases per year at the Comunidad Valenciana. Also, it detected capacity improvement for some clinical outcomes of oesophageal and gastric carcinomas.

Tumor regression and survival after perioperative MAGIC-style chemotherapy in carcinoma of the stomach and gastroesophageal junction.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the effectiveness of perioperative MAGIC-style chemotherapy in our series focused on the tumor regression grade and survival rate. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 53 patients following a perioperative regimen of epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil or capecitabine (ECF/X). Forty-four (83 %) neoplasias were located in the stomach and 9 (17 %) were located at the esophagogastric junction. Perioperative chemotherapy completion, resection, TNM staging, the tumor regression grade (Becker's classification) and survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-five patients (85 %) completed the 3 preoperative cycles. R0 resection was achieved in 42 (79 %) patients. Thirty-five (66 %) patients completed the 3 postoperative cycles. Nine carcinomas (17 %) were considered major responders after preoperative chemotherapy. With multivariate analysis, only completion of perioperative chemotherapy (HR: 0.25; 95%CI: 0.08 - 0.79; p = 0.019) was identified as an independent prognostic factor for disease-specific survival. However, the protective effect of perioperative therapy was lost in patients with ypT3-4 and more than 4 positive lymph nodes (HR: 1.16; 95%CI: 1.02 - 1.32; p = 0.029). The tumor regression grade (major vs minor responders) was at the limit of significance only with univariate analysis. The 5-year overall and disease-specific survival rates were 18 % and 22 % respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of major responder tumors after preoperative chemotherapy was low. Completion of perioperative ECF/X chemotherapy may benefit patients with gastric carcinomas that do not invade the subserosa with few positive lymph nodes.

Long-term clinical results of double-pursestring stapled hemorrhoidopexy in a selected group of patients for the treatment of chronic hemorrhoids.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective controlled trial was to evaluate the long-term clinical and manometric results of stapled hemorrhoidopexy performed by expert surgeons in a selected group of patients for the treatment of chronic hemorrhoids. SETTINGS: This study took place in the outpatient clinic and at the Day Surgery Unit attached to the University Hospital of Elche. PATIENTS: From March 2003 to May 2005, 200 consecutive patients with third-degree hemorrhoids and treated with double-pursestring stapled hemorrhoidopexy with a PPH33-03 stapler were included in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic, manometric, and clinical features were analyzed, as well as the variables related to surgery, postoperative course, and follow-up. Manometry was repeated at the 6-month, 1-year, and 5-year follow-up. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 110 months. Four patients (2%) reported daily rectal bleeding. One patient with active rectal bleeding was taken for reoperation within the first 12 postoperative hours. Seventy percent of patients reported pain ≤ 2 on the first postoperative day, 85% on the fourth postoperative day, and 95% on the seventh postoperative day. Pain was measured with a linear analog scale from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain; 10 = unbearable pain). Seventeen patients (8.5%) reported tenesmus during the first week. Eight patients (4%) reported persistent pain: in 5 patients, the pain resolved within the next 6 months; 2 patients presented with anal fissure; and 1 patient required the removal of the staples. Two patients (1%) reported residual soiling at the 5-year revision. Fourteen patients (7%) experienced recurrence with symptomatic prolapse. Six (3%) underwent further surgery: stapled hemorrhoidopexy was indicated again in 2 patients, and 4 patients underwent a Milligan-Morgan open hemorrhoidectomy, because they did not have a uniform prolapse. Six patients required treatment with rubber band ligation. There were no statistically significant differences between preoperative and postoperative manometric values. CONCLUSIONS: The new PPH33-03 stapler, the learning process of the modified surgical procedure, and the correct selection of patients will overcome the main objections to stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

Estado actual del tratamiento multidisciplinario del cáncer gástrico avanzado / Current status of multidisciplinary treatment of advanced gastric cancer

La cirugía continúa siendo el único tratamiento curativo para los enfermos con carcinoma gástrico avanzado. Sin embargo, la recidiva es muy frecuente en estos enfermos. Durante los últimos 15 años, el debate se ha focalizado en la efectividad de la cirugía radical, fundamentalmente en lo concerniente a la realización de linfadenectomías ampliadas, y en la búsqueda de tratamientos locorregionales y sistémicos, sobre todo la quimioterapia, atendiendo al patrón de recidiva de esta neoplasia. En esta revisión hemos analizado los resultados obtenidos por estos tratamientos basándonos en los estudios que parecían aportar una mayor evidencia científica. Las principales conclusiones son: a) continúa sin demostrarse la efectividad de la linfadenectomía ampliada al segundo nivel y, en el caso más favorable, se limitaría a los estadios II y IIIa; b) el incremento de la morbimortalidad asociada a este tipo de cirugía podría minimizarse evitando la resección de la cola de páncreas y restringiendo la realización de esplenectomías a pacientes seleccionados; c) los estudios de metaanálisis muestran que la quimioterapia ofrece resultados insuficientes, aunque existen estudios recientes que deben ser contrastados; d) parece interesante tener en cuenta el patrón de quimiorresistencia de estas neoplasias para seleccionar a los enfermos que van a ser tratados con quimioterapia y elegir la asociación de fármacos en función del mismo; e) la información extraída del lavado peritoneal puede ser un factor predictor de recidiva muy útil si mejora su sensibilidad y el valor predictivo negativo, y f) el seguimiento exhaustivo de estos enfermos no puede recomendarse de forma sistemática debido a la baja sensibilidad de los métodos disponibles para detectar la carcinomatosis peritoneal precoz, así como a la ausencia de un tratamiento efectivo de la recidiva (AU)