Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Epidemiology ; 31(5): 628-635, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32618711

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The United States is currently experiencing the largest hepatitis A virus (HAV) outbreak since the introduction of a vaccine in 1996. More than 31,000 cases have been reported since 2016. Although HAV had largely been considered a foodborne pathogen in recent years, this outbreak has been spread primarily through person-to-person transmission in urban settings and has been associated with homelessness and substance use. Michigan was one of the first states to report an outbreak, with 910 reported cases between August 2016 and December 2018. METHODS: We analyzed surveillance and vaccination data from Michigan using a disease transmission model to investigate how vaccine timing and coverage influenced the spatiotemporal patterns of the outbreak, distinguishing between Southeast Michigan, where the outbreak began, and the rest of the state. RESULTS: We estimated that vaccination had little impact in Southeast Michigan (3% cases averted [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1%, 8%]) but had a substantial impact in the rest of the state, preventing a larger outbreak (91% cases averted [95% CI = 85%, 97%]) lasting several more years. CONCLUSIONS: Our results emphasize the value of targeting populations where local transmission is not yet sustained rather than populations where transmission is already waning. Simulation modeling can aid in proactive rather than reactive decision-making and may help direct the response to outbreaks emerging in other states. See video abstract: http://links.lww.com/EDE/B704.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças , Vacinas contra Hepatite A , Hepatite A , Vacinação , Adulto , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Hepatite A/epidemiologia , Hepatite A/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Hepatite A/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Masculino , Michigan/epidemiologia , Análise Espaço-Temporal
2.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc ; 8(6): 539-549, 2019 Dec 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30358877

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Existing data on the clinical features and outcomes of immunocompromised children with influenza are limited. METHODS: Data from the 2011-2012 through 2014-2015 influenza seasons were collected as part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Influenza Hospitalization Surveillance Network (FluSurv-NET). We compared clinical features and outcomes between immunocompromised and nonimmunocompromised children (<18 years old) hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed community-acquired influenza. Immunocompromised children were defined as those for whom ≥1 of the following applies: human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, cancer, stem cell or solid organ transplantation, nonsteroidal immunosuppressive therapy, immunoglobulin deficiency, complement deficiency, asplenia, and/or another rare condition. The primary outcomes were intensive care admission, duration of hospitalization, and in-hospital death. RESULTS: Among 5262 hospitalized children, 242 (4.6%) were immunocompromised; receipt of nonsteroidal immunosuppressive therapy (60%), cancer (39%), and solid organ transplantation (14%) were most common. Immunocompromised children were older than the nonimmunocompromised children (median, 8.8 vs 2.8 years, respectively; P < .001), more likely to have another comorbidity (58% vs 49%, respectively; P = .007), and more likely to have received an influenza vaccination (58% vs 39%, respectively; P < .001) and early antiviral treatment (35% vs 27%, respectively; P = .013). In multivariable analyses, immunocompromised children were less likely to receive intensive care (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.31 [0.20-0.49]) and had a slightly longer duration of hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio of hospital discharge [95% confidence interval], 0.89 [0.80-0.99]). Death was uncommon in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Immunocompromised children hospitalized with influenza received intensive care less frequently but had a longer hospitalization duration than nonimmunocompromised children. Vaccination and early antiviral use could be improved substantially. Data are needed to determine whether immunocompromised children are more commonly admitted with milder influenza severity than are nonimmunocompromised children.


Assuntos
Criança Hospitalizada , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Vacinas contra Influenza , Influenza Humana/imunologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Imunossupressores , Lactente , Influenza Humana/terapia , Masculino , Neoplasias , Razão de Chances , Transplante de Órgãos , Estados Unidos , Vacinação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA