Multiple staging investigations may not change management in patients with high-grade dysplasia or early esophageal adenocarcinoma.

The clinical value of multiple staging investigations for high-grade dysplasia or early adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is unclear. A single-center prospective cohort of patients treated for early esophageal cancer between 2000 and 2019 was analyzed. This coincided with a transition period from esophagectomy to endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) as the treatment of choice. Patients were staged with computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography(PET)/CT. The aim of this study was to assess their accuracy and impact on clinical management. 297 patients with high-grade dysplasia or early adenocarcinoma were included (endoscopic therapy/EMR n = 184; esophagectomy n = 113 [of which a 'combined' group had surgery preceded by endoscopic therapy n = 23]). Staging accuracy was low (accurate staging EMR: CT 40.1%, EUS 29.6%, FDG-PET/CT 11.0%; Esophagectomy: CT 43.3%, EUS 59.7%, FDG-PET/CT 29.6%; Combined: CT 28.6%, EUS46.2%, FDG-PET/CT 30.0%). Staging inaccuracies across all groups that could have changed management by missing T2 disease were CT 12%, EUS 12% and FDG-PET/CT 1.6%. The sensitivity of all techniques for detecting nodal disease was low (CT 12.5%, EUS 12.5%, FDG-PET/CT0.0%). Overall, FDG-PET/CT and EUS changed decision-making in only 3.2% of patients with an early cancer on CT and low-risk histology. The accuracy of staging with EUS, CT and FDG-PET/CT in patients with high-grade dysplasia or early adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is low. EUS and FDG-PET/CT added relevant staging information over standard CT in very few cases, and therefore, these investigations should be used selectively. Factors predicting the need for esophagectomy are predominantly obtained from EMR histology rather than staging investigations.

Capsular inflammation after immediate breast reconstruction - Gene expression patterns and inflammatory cell infiltration in irradiated and non-irradiated breasts.

BACKGROUND: Capsular contracture following post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) is commonly seen in patients undergoing implant-based immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). Further understanding of the underlying biology is needed for the development of preventive or therapeutic strategies. Therefore, we conducted a comparative study of gene expression patterns in capsular tissue from breast cancer patients who had received versus those who had not received PMRT after implant-based IBR. METHODS: Biopsies from irradiated and healthy non-irradiated capsular tissue were harvested during implant exchange following IBR. Biopsies from irradiated (n = 13) and non-irradiated (n = 12) capsules were compared using Affymetrix microarrays to identify the most differentially regulated genes. Further analysis using immunohistochemistry was performed in a subset of materials to compare the presence of T cells, B cells, and macrophages. RESULTS: Enrichment testing using Gene Ontology (GO) analysis revealed that the 227 most differentially expressed genes were mainly involved in an inflammatory response. Twenty-one GO biological processes were identified [p < 0.05, false discovery rate (FDR) < 5%], several with B-cell-associated inflammation. Cell-type Identification by Estimating Relative Subsets of RNA Transcripts (CIBERSORT) analysis identified macrophages as the most common inflammatory cell type in both groups, further supported by immunostaining of CD68. Radiation remarkably increased B-cell infiltration in the capsular region of biopsies, as quantified by immunostaining of CD20 (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Transcript analysis and immunohistochemistry revealed inflammatory responses in capsular biopsies regardless of radiotherapy. However, the radiation response specifically involved B-cell-associated inflammatory responses.

Clinical Relevance of the Tumor Location-Modified Laurén Classification System for Gastric Cancer in a Western Population.

BACKGROUND: The Tumor Location-Modified Laurén Classification (MLC) system combines Laurén histologic subtype and anatomic tumor location. It divides gastric tumors into proximal non-diffuse (PND), distal non-diffuse (DND), and diffuse (D) types. The optimum classification of patients with Laurén mixed tumors in this system is not clear due to its grouping with both diffuse and non-diffuse types in previous studies. The clinical relevance of the MLC in a Western population has not been examined. METHODS: A cohort study investigated 404 patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma between 2005 and 2020. The classification of Laurén mixed tumors was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics (chi-square). Survival analysis was performed using multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: The ROC curve analysis demonstrated a slightly higher area under the curve value for predicting survival when Laurén mixed tumors were grouped with intestinal-type rather than diffuse-type tumors (0.58 vs 0.57). Survival, tumor recurrence, and resection margin positivity in mixed tumors also was more similar to intestinal type. Distal non-diffuse tumors had the best 5-year survival (DND 64.7 % vs PND 56.1 % vs diffuse 45.1 %; p = 0.006) and were least likely to have recurrence (DND 27.0 % vs PND 34.3 % vs diffuse 48.3 %; p = 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that MLC was an independent prognostic factor for survival (PND: hazard ratio [HR], 1.64; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.16-2.32 vs diffuse: HR, 2.20; 95 % CI, 1.56-3.09) CONCLUSIONS: The MLC was an independent prognostic marker in this Western cohort of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. The patients with PND and D tumors had worse survival than those with DND tumors.

Survival after antireflux surgery versus medication in patients with reflux oesophagitis or Barrett's oesophagus: multinational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to examine the hypothesis that antireflux surgery with fundoplication improves long-term survival compared with antireflux medication in patients with reflux oesophagitis or Barrett's oesophagus. METHOD: Individuals aged between 18 and 70 years with reflux oesophagitis or Barrett's oesophagus (intestinal metaplasia) documented from in-hospital and specialized outpatient care were selected from national patient registries in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, and Sweden from 1980 to 2014. The study investigated all-cause mortality and disease-specific mortality, comparing patients who had undergone open or laparoscopic antireflux surgery with fundoplication versus those using antireflux medication. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 per cent confidence intervals for all-cause mortality and disease-specific mortality, adjusted for sex, age, calendar period, country, and co-morbidity. RESULTS: Some 240 226 patients with reflux oesophagitis or Barrett's oesophagus were included, of whom 33 904 (14.1 per cent) underwent antireflux surgery. The risk of all-cause mortality was lower after antireflux surgery than with use of medication (HR 0.61, 95 per cent c.i. 0.58 to 0.63), and lower after laparoscopic (HR 0.56, 0.52 to 0.60) than open (HR 0.80, 0.70 to 0.91) surgery. After antireflux surgery, mortality was decreased from cardiovascular disease (HR 0.58, 0.55 to 0.61), respiratory disease (HR 0.62, 0.57 to 0.66), laryngeal or pharyngeal cancer (HR 0.35, 0.19 to 0.65), and lung cancer (HR 0.67, 0.58 to 0.80), but not from oesophageal cancer (HR 1.05, 0.87 to 1.28), compared with medication, The decreased mortality rates generally remained over time. CONCLUSION: In patients with reflux oesophagitis or Barrett's oesophagus, antireflux surgery is associated with lower mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, laryngeal or pharyngeal cancer, and lung cancer, but not from oesophageal cancer, compared with antireflux medication.

Impact of co-morbidity on reoperation or death within 90 days of surgery for oesophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The impact of preoperative co-morbidity on postoperative outcomes in patients with oesophageal cancer is uncertain. A population-based and nationwide cohort study was conducted to assess the influence of preoperative co-morbidity on the risk of reoperation or mortality within 90 days of surgery for oesophageal cancer. METHODS: This study enrolled 98 per cent of patients who had oesophageal cancer surgery between 1987 and 2015 in Sweden. Modified Poisson regression models provided risk ratios (RRs) with 95 per cent confidence intervals (c.i.) to estimate associations between co-morbidity and risk of reoperation or death within 90 days of oesophagectomy. The RRs were adjusted for age, sex, educational level, pathological tumour stage, neoadjuvant therapy, annual hospital volume, tumour histology and calendar period of surgery. RESULTS: Among 2576 patients, 446 (17.3 per cent) underwent reoperation or died within 90 days of oesophagectomy. Patients with a Charlson Co-morbidity Index (CCI) score of 2 or more had an increased risk of reoperation or death compared with those with a CCI score of 0 (RR 1.78, 95 per cent c.i. 1.44 to 2.20), and the risk increased on average by 27 per cent for each point increase of the CCI (RR 1.27, 1.18 to 1.37). The RR was increased in patients with pulmonary disease (RR 1.66, 1.36 to 2.04), cardiac disease (RR 1.37, 1.08 to 1.73), diabetes (RR 1.50, 1.14 to 1.99) and cerebral disease (RR 1.40, 1.06 to 1.85). CONCLUSION: Co-morbidity in general, and pulmonary disease, cardiac disease, diabetes and cerebral disease in particular, increased the risk of reoperation or death within 90 days of oesophageal cancer surgery. This highlights the value of tailored patient selection, preoperative preparation and postoperative care.

Adjuvant therapy following oesophagectomy for adenocarcinoma in patients with a positive resection margin.

BACKGROUND: The role of adjuvant therapy in patients with oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy is contentious. In UK practice, surgical resection margin status is often used to classify patients for receiving adjuvant treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the survival benefit of adjuvant therapy in patients with positive (R1) resection margins. METHODS: Two prospectively collected UK institutional databases were combined to identify eligible patients. Adjusted Cox regression analyses were used to compare overall and recurrence-free survival according to adjuvant treatment. Recurrence patterns were assessed as a secondary outcome. Propensity score-matched analysis was also performed. RESULTS: Of 616 patients included in the combined database, 242 patients who had an R1 resection were included in the study. Of these, 112 patients (46·3 per cent) received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, 46 (19·0 per cent) were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and 84 (34·7 per cent) had no adjuvant treatment. In adjusted analysis, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy improved recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0·59, 95 per cent c.i. 0·38 to 0·94; P = 0·026), with a benefit in terms of both local (HR 0·48, 0·24 to 0·99; P = 0·047) and systemic (HR 0·56, 0·33 to 0·94; P = 0·027) recurrence. In analyses stratified by tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, non-responders (Mandard tumour regression grade 4-5) treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy had an overall survival benefit (HR 0·61, 0·38 to 0·97; P = 0·037). In propensity score-matched analysis, an overall survival benefit (HR 0·62, 0·39 to 0·98; P = 0·042) and recurrence-free survival benefit (HR 0·51, 0·30 to 0·87; P = 0·004) were observed for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus no adjuvant treatment. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant therapy may improve overall survival and recurrence-free survival after margin-positive resection. This pattern seems most pronounced with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in non-responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

ANTECEDENTES: El papel del tratamiento adyuvante en pacientes con adenocarcinoma esofagogástrico tratados con quimioterapia neoadyuvante es polémico. En la práctica del Reino Unido, el estado del margen de resección quirúrgico se utiliza a menudo para identificar a los pacientes que reciben tratamiento adyuvante. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el beneficio en la supervivencia del tratamiento adyuvante en pacientes con márgenes de resección positivos (R1). MÉTODOS: Se combinaron dos bases de datos de instituciones del Reino Unido que recogen información de forma prospectiva para identificar pacientes elegibles. Se utilizaron análisis de regresión de Cox ajustados para comparar la supervivencia global y la supervivencia libre de recidiva según el tratamiento adyuvante. Los patrones de recidiva se evaluaron como resultado secundario. También se realizó un análisis de emparejamiento por puntaje de propensión. RESULTADOS: De 616 pacientes incluidos en la base de datos combinada, se incluyeron en el estudio 242 pacientes con resección R1. De estos pacientes, 112 (46%) recibieron quimiorradioterapia adyuvante, 46 (19%) pacientes fueron tratados con quimioterapia adyuvante y 84 (35%) pacientes no recibieron ningún tratamiento. En el análisis ajustado, la quimiorradioterapia adyuvante mejoró la supervivencia libre de recidiva (cociente de riesgos instantáneos, hazard ratio, HR 0,59, i.c. del 95% 0,38-0,94; P = 0,026) con un beneficio tanto para la recidiva local (HR 0,48, i.c. del 95% 0,24-0,99; P = 0,047) como para la sistémica (HR 0,56, i.c. del 95% 0,33-0,94; P = 0,027). Cuando los pacientes se clasificaron según la respuesta tumoral a la quimioterapia neoadyuvante, los no respondedores (Mandard Grado 4/5) tratados con quimiorradioterapia adyuvante obtuvieron un beneficio en la supervivencia (HR 0,61, i.c. del 95% 0,38-0,97; P = 0,037). En el análisis por emparejamiento por puntaje de propensión, se observó un beneficio en la supervivencia global (HR 0,62, i.c. del 95% 0,39-0,98; P = 0,042) y en la supervivencia libre de recidiva (HR 0,51.i.c. del 95% 0,30-0,87; P = 0,004) con la quimiorradioterapia adyuvante frente a no recibir tratamiento adyuvante. CONCLUSIÓN: El tratamiento adyuvante puede mejorar la supervivencia global y la supervivencia libre de recidiva en pacientes con margen de resección positivo. Este patrón parece más pronunciado con la quimiorradioterapia adyuvante en pacientes que no responden a la quimioterapia.

Risk factors for implant failure following revision surgery in breast cancer patients with a previous immediate implant-based breast reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The aim of the current study was to evaluate risk factors and timing of revision surgery following immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR). METHODS: This retrospective cohort included women with a previous therapeutic mastectomy and implant-based IBR who had undergone implant revision surgery between 2005 and 2015. Data were collected by medical chart review and registered in the Stockholm Breast Reconstruction Database. The primary endpoint was implant removal due to surgical complications, i.e. implant failure. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 475 women with 707 revisions in 542 breasts. Overall, 33 implants were removed due to complications. The implant failure rate (4.7%) was lower without RT (2.4%) compared to RT administered after mastectomy (7.5%) and prior to IBR (6.5%) (p = 0.007). While post-mastectomy RT (OR 3.39, 95% CI 1.53-7.53), smoking (OR 3.90, 95% CI 1.76-8.65) and diabetes (OR 5.40, 95% CI 1.05-27.85) were confirmed as risk factors, time from completion of RT (> 9 months, 6-9 months, < 6 months) was not (OR 3.17, 95% CI 0.78-12.80, and OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.20-2.71). Additional risk factors were a previous axillary clearance (OR 4.91, 95% CI 2.09-11.53) and a history of a post-IBR infection (OR 15.52, 95% CI 4.15-58.01, and OR 12.93, 95% CI 3.04-55.12, for oral and intravenous antibiotics, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Previous axillary clearance and a history of post-IBR infection emerged as novel risk factors for implant failure after revision surgery. While known risk factors were confirmed, time elapsed from RT completion to revision surgery did not influence the outcome in this analysis.

Quality of life and patient satisfaction after implant-based breast reconstruction with or without acellular dermal matrix: randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in implant-based breast reconstructions (IBBRs) aims to improve cosmetic outcomes. Six-month data are presented from a randomized trial evaluating whether IBBR with ADM provides higher health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and patient-reported cosmetic outcomes compared with conventional IBBR without ADM. METHODS: In this multicentre open-label RCT, women with breast cancer planned for mastectomy with immediate IBBR in four centres in Sweden and one in the UK were allocated randomly (1 : 1) to IBBR with or without ADM. HRQoL, a secondary endpoint, was measured as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) using three validated instruments (EORTC-QLQC30, QLQ-BR23, QLQ-BRR26) at baseline and 6 months. RESULTS: Between 24 April 2014 and 10 May 2017, 135 women were enrolled, of whom 64 with and 65 without ADM were included in the final analysis. At 6 months after surgery, patient-reported HRQoL, measured with generic QLQ-C30 or breast cancer-specific QLQ-BR23, was similar between the groups. For patient-reported cosmetic outcomes, two subscale items, cosmetic outcome (8·66, 95 per cent c.i. 0·46 to 16·86; P = 0·041) and problems finding a well-fitting bra (-13·21, -25·54 to -0·89; P = 0·038), yielded higher scores in favour of ADM, corresponding to a small to moderate clinical difference. None of the other 27 domains measured showed any significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: IBBR with ADM was not superior in terms of higher levels of HRQoL compared with IBBR without ADM. Although two subscale items of patient-reported cosmetic outcomes favoured ADM, the majority of cosmetic items showed no significant difference between treatments at 6 months. Registration number: NCT02061527 ( www.clinicaltrials.gov).

ANTECEDENTES: Se ha propuesto la utilización de mallas dérmicas acelulares (acellular dermal matrix, ADM) en las reconstrucciones mamarias con prótesis (implant'based breast reconstructions, IBBR) como forma de mejorar los resultados estéticos. Se presentan los resultados a 6 meses de un ensayo aleatorizado, que evaluó si la IBBR con ADM proporcionaba mejor calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (health'related quality of life, HRQOL) y mejores resultados estéticos percibidos por la paciente en comparación con la IBBR convencional sin ADM. MÉTODOS: Se ha propuesto la utilización de mallas dérmicas acelulares (acellular dermal matrix, ADM) en las reconstrucciones mamarias con prótesis (implant'based breast reconstructions, IBBR) como forma de mejorar los resultados estéticos. Se presentan los resultados a 6 meses de un ensayo aleatorizado, que evaluó si la IBBR con ADM proporcionaba mejor calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (health'related quality of life, HRQOL) y mejores resultados estéticos percibidos por la paciente en comparación con la IBBR convencional sin ADM. RESULTADOS: Entre el 24 de abril de 2014 y el 10 de mayo de 2017, se consideraron 135 mujeres, de las que se incluyeron en el análisis final 64 con ADM y 65 sin ADM. A los 6 meses de la intervención, la HRQOL medida con los cuestionarios QLQ-C30 (genérico) y QLQ-BR23 (específico para el cáncer de mama) fue similar en los dos grupos. Con respecto a los resultados estéticos percibidos por la paciente, se obtuvieron mejores puntuaciones a favor de la ADM en dos sub-escalas: "resultado estético" (8,66, i.c. del 95%, 0,46-16,86, P = 0,041) y "problemas para encontrar un sujetador que se ajuste bien" −13,21 (i.c. del 95% −25, 54 a −0,89, P = 0,038), lo que representa una diferencia clínica pequeña-moderada. No hubo diferencias significativas entre los dos grupos en ninguno de los otros 27 dominios medidos. CONCLUSIÓN: No se pudo demostrar la superioridad de la IBBR con ADM mediante variables relacionadas con la calidad de vida. Aunque se obtuvieron mejores puntuaciones con la ADM en dos sub-escalas de los PROMs, no hubo diferencias entre ambos tratamientos en la mayoría de las variables estéticas a los 6 meses.

Reintervention or mortality within 90 days of bariatric surgery: population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery carries a risk of severe postoperative complications, sometimes leading to reinterventions or even death. The incidence and risk factors for reintervention and death within 90 days after bariatric surgery are unclear, and were examined in this study. METHODS: This population-based cohort study included all patients who underwent bariatric surgery in one of the five Nordic countries between 1980 and 2012. Data on surgical and endoscopic procedures, diagnoses and mortality were retrieved from national high-quality and complete registries. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs), adjusted for country, age, sex, co-morbidity, type of surgery and approach, year and hospital volume of bariatric surgery. RESULTS: Of 49 977 patients, 1111 (2·2 per cent) had a reintervention and 95 (0·2 per cent) died within 90 days of bariatric surgery. Risk factors for the composite outcome reintervention/mortality were older age (HR 1·65, 95 per cent c.i. 1·36 to 2·01, for age at least 50 years versus less than 30 years) and co-morbidity (HR 2·66, 1·53 to 4·62, for Charlson co-morbidity index score 2 or more versus 0). The risk of reintervention/mortality was decreased for vertical banded gastroplasty compared with gastric bypass (HR 0·37, 0·28 to 0·48) and more recent surgery (HR 0·51, 0·39 to 0·67, for procedures undertaken in 2010 or later versus before 2000). Sex, surgical approach (laparoscopic versus open) and hospital volume did not influence risk of reintervention/mortality, but laparoscopic surgery was associated with a lower risk of 90-day mortality (HR 0·29, 0·16 to 0·53). CONCLUSION: Reintervention and death were uncommon events within 90 days of bariatric surgery even in this unselected nationwide cohort from five countries. Older patients with co-morbidities have an increased relative risk of these outcomes.

ANTECEDENTES: La cirugía bariátrica conlleva un riesgo de complicaciones postoperatorias graves, que algunas veces ocasionan reintervenciones o incluso son causa de mortalidad. La incidencia y los factores de riesgo de reinterveniones y mortalidad a los 90 días tras cirugía bariátrica no están claros, y fueron examinados en este estudio. MÉTODOS: Todos los pacientes que fueron sometidos a cirugía bariátrica en uno de los cinco países nórdicos en 1980-2012 fueron incluidos en un estudio de cohortes de base poblacional. Los datos de los procedimientos quirúrgicos y endoscópicos, diagnóstico, y mortalidad se obtuvieron a partir de registros nacionales completos y de alta calidad. Mediante una regresión de Cox multivariable se obtuvieron los cocientes de riesgos instantáneos (hazard ratios, HR) y los intervalos de confianza 95% (i.c. del 95%) ajustados por país, edad, sexo, comorbilidad, y tipo, abordaje, año y volumen de casos de cirugía bariátrica del hospital. RESULTADOS: De un total de 49.977 pacientes, 1.111 (2,2%) precisaron una reintervención y 95 (0,2%) fallecieron durante los primeros 90 días tras la cirugía bariátrica. Los factores de riesgo para el resultado compuesto reintervención/mortalidad fueron la edad avanzada (HR = 1,7 (i.c. del 95% 1,4-2,0) edad ≥ 50 versus < 30 años)) y la comorbilidad (HR = 2,7 (i.c. del 95% 1,5-4,6) puntuación del índice de comorbilidad de Charlson ≥ 2 versus 0)). Se observó una disminución de los HRs tras la gastroplastia vertical con banda en comparación con el bypass gástrico (HR = 0,4, (i.c. del 95% 0,3-0,5)) y el periodo de estudio más reciente (HR = 0,5 (i.c. del 95% 0,4-0,7) ≥ 2010 versus < 2000)). El sexo, el abordaje quirúrgico laparoscópico versus abierto y el volumen del hospital no influyeron sobre el riesgo de reintervención/mortalidad, pero la cirugía laparoscópica se asoció con una mortalidad a los 90 días más baja (HR 0,3, i.c. del 95% 0,2-0,5). CONCLUSIÓN: La reintervención y la mortalidad son eventos infrecuentes durante los primeros 90 días tras la cirugía bariátrica, incluso en esta cohorte nacional y no seleccionada de cinco paises. Los pacientes mayores con comorbilidades tienen un riesgo relativo aumentado de reintervención y mortalidad.

Influence of socioeconomic status on immediate breast reconstruction rate, patient information and involvement in surgical decision-making.

BACKGROUND: Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) rates in breast cancer differ between healthcare regions in Sweden. This is not explained by regional differences in patient age distribution or tumour characteristics, but by differences in patient-reported information and patient involvement in the decision-making process. As socioeconomic status may play a significant role in surgical decision-making, its potential associations with IBR rates were analysed. METHODS: Women who had undergone therapeutic mastectomy for primary breast cancer in Sweden in 2013 were included in the analysis. Tumour and treatment data were retrieved from the Swedish National Breast Cancer Register, and socioeconomic background data from the Central Bureau of Statistics Sweden. Postal questionnaires regarding information about reconstruction and perceived involvement in the preoperative decision-making process had been sent out in a previous survey. RESULTS: In addition to regional differences, lower tumour and nodal category, independent factors increasing the likelihood of having IBR for the 3131 women in the study were living without a registered partner, having current employment and high income per household. Patient-reported perceived preoperative information (odds ratio (OR) 12·73, 95 per cent c.i. 6·03 to 26·89) and the feeling of being involved in the decision-making process (OR 2·56, 1·14 to 5·76) remained strong independent predictors of IBR despite adjustment for socioeconomic factors. Importantly, responders to the survey represented a relatively young and wealthy population with a lower tumour burden. CONCLUSION: Several socioeconomic factors independently influence IBR rates; however, patient-reported information and involvement in the surgical decision-making process remain independent predictors for the likelihood of having IBR.

ANTECEDENTES: El carcinoma hepatocelular con trombo tumoral (TT) en la vena cava inferior (inferior vena cava, IVC) o en la aurícula derecha (right atrium, RA) es un estado avanzado de la enfermedad raro, con un pronóstico desfavorable. En este estudio analizamos la supervivencia después de la resección quirúrgica. MÉTODOS: Se incluyeron pacientes con carcinoma hepatocelular con TT en la IVC o en la RA, que se sometieron a resección hepática entre febrero de 1997 y julio de 2017. Los resultados a corto y a largo plazo de estos pacientes y los detalles quirúrgicos se analizaron retrospectivamente. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 37 pacientes. Entre estos pacientes, se identificaron 16 pacientes con TT en la IVC infradiafragmática, 8 pacientes con TT en la IVC supradiafragmática y 13 pacientes con TT entrando en la AR. Doce pacientes asociaron TT avanzado en la vena porta más allá de vp 3 y 4, 10 pacientes tenían enfermedad bilobar y 12 pacientes tenían enfermedad extrahepática. A pesar de que la tasa de mortalidad hospitalaria fue cero, dos pacientes fallecieron a los 90 días. Aunque la mediana del tiempo de supervivencia no fue diferente entre el grupo al que se le realizó resección con intención curativa (18,7 meses) y aquellos con tumor residual solo en el pulmón (20,7 meses), la supervivencia fue extremadamente pobre para los pacientes con tumor residual en el hígado (8,3 meses). CONCLUSIÓN: La resección hepática con trombectomía para el carcinoma hepatocelular avanzado con trombo tumoral en la vena cava inferior o en la aurícula derecha es segura y factible, asociándose a una supervivencia moderada.

Socioeconomic status differs between breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy and breast conservation, and affects patient-reported preoperative information.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer treatment is reported to be influenced by socioeconomic status (SES). Few reports, however, stem from national, equality-based health care systems. The aim of this study was to analyse associations between SES, rates of breast-conserving surgery (BCS), patient-reported preoperative information and perceived involvement in Sweden. METHODS: All women operated for primary breast cancer in Sweden in 2013 were included. Tumour and treatment data as well as socioeconomic data were retrieved from national registers. Postal questionnaires regarding preoperative information about breast-conserving options and perceived involvement in the decision-making process had previously been sent to all women receiving mastectomy. RESULTS: Of 7735 women, 4604 (59.5%) received BCS. In addition to regional differences, independent predictors of BCS were being in the middle or higher age groups, having small tumours without clinically involved nodes, being born in Europe outside Sweden, having a higher education than primary school and an intermediate or high income per household. Women with smaller, clinically node-negative tumours felt more often involved in the surgical decision and informed about breast-conserving options (both p < 0.001). In addition, women who perceived that BCS was discussed as an alternative to mastectomy were more often in a partnership (p < 0.001), not born in Sweden (p = 0.035) and had an employment (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic factors are associated with surgical treatment even in a national health care system that is expected to offer all women the same standard of care. This should be taken into account and adapted to in preoperative counselling on surgical options in breast cancer.

Prediction of a positive circumferential resection margin at surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus.

Background: A positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) has been associated with higher rates of locoregional recurrence and worse survival in oesophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to establish if clinicopathological and radiological variables might predict CRM positivity in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery for oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Methods: Multivariable analysis of clinicopathological and CT imaging characteristics considered potentially predictive of CRM was performed at initial staging and following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Prediction models were constructed. The area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (c.i.) from 1000 bootstrapping was assessed. Results: A total of 223 patients were included in the study. Poor differentiation (odds ratio (OR) 2·84, 95 per cent c.i. 1·39 to 6·01) and advanced clinical tumour status (T3-4) (OR 2·93, 1·03 to 9·48) were independently associated with an increased CRM risk at diagnosis. CT-assessed lack of response (stable or progressive disease) following chemotherapy independently corresponded with an increased risk of CRM positivity (OR 3·38, 1·43 to 8·50). Additional CT evidence of local invasion and higher CT tumour volume (14 cm3) improved the performance of a prediction model, including all the above parameters, with an AUC (c-index) of 0·76 (0·67 to 0·83). Variables associated with significantly higher rates of locoregional recurrence were pN status (P = 0·020), lymphovascular invasion (P = 0·007) and poor response to chemotherapy (Mandard score 4-5) (P = 0·006). CRM positivity was associated with a higher locoregional recurrence rate, but this was not statistically significant (P = 0·092). Conclusion: The presence of advanced cT status, poor tumour differentiation, and CT-assessed lack of response to chemotherapy, higher tumour volume and local invasion can be used to identify patients at risk of a positive CRM following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Antecedentes: Un margen de resección circunferencial (circumferential resection margin, CRM) positivo se ha asociado con tasas más elevadas de recidiva locorregional y peor supervivencia en el cáncer de esófago. El objetivo de este estudio fue establecer si las variables clínico­patológicas y radiológicas podrían predecir la positividad del CRM en el adenocarcinoma de esófago tras quimioterapia neoadyuvante antes de la cirugía. Métodos: Se realizó un análisis multivariable de las características clínico­patológicas y de la tomografía computarizada (computed tomography, CT) que se consideraron potencialmente predictivas de CRM en la estadificación inicial y tras la quimioterapia neoadyuvante. Se construyeron modelos de predicción. Se evaluó el área bajo la curva (area under curve, AUC) con el i.c. del 95% a partir de 1.000 muestras bootstrap. Resultados: Se incluyeron 223 pacientes en el estudio. Una pobre diferenciación (razón de oportunidades, odds ratio, OR 2,84, i.c. del 95% 1,39­6,01) y un estadio clínico T avanzado (T3­4) (OR 2,93, i.c. del 95% 1,03­9,48) se asociaron de forma independiente con un riesgo aumentado de CRM en el diagnóstico. La falta de respuesta en la CT (estable o enfermedad en progresión) tras la quimioterapia se correspondía de forma independiente con un riesgo aumentado de CRM positivo (OR 3,38, i.c. del 95% 1,43­8,50). Además, la evidencia por CT de invasión local y un mayor volumen del tumor en CT (14 cm3) mejoraron el funcionamiento del modelo predictivo, incluyendo todos los parámetros previamente señalados; con AUC (índice c) de 0,76 (0,68­0,83). Las variables asociadas de forma significativa con tasas más elevadas de recidiva locorregional fueron el estado de los ganglios linfáticos patológicos (P = 0,002), la invasión linfovascular (P = 0,007) y la respuesta pobre a la quimioterapia (Mandard 4 y 5 (P = 0,006)). La positividad del CRM se asoció con una tasa de recidiva locorregional más elevada pero sin alcanzar significación estadística (P = 0,09). Conclusión: La presencia de un estadio clínico T avanzado, tumor pobremente diferenciado, falta de respuesta a la quimioterapia en la TC, mayor volumen del tumor en la TC e invasión local pueden ser utilizados para identificar pacientes en riesgo de un CRM positivo tras quimioterapia neoadyuvante.

Population-based study of anastomotic stricture rates after minimally invasive and open oesophagectomy for cancer.

Background: The population-based incidence of anastomotic stricture after minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIO) and open oesophagectomy (OO) is not known. The aim of this study was to compare rates of anastomotic stricture requiring dilatation after the two approaches in an unselected cohort using nationwide data from Finland and Sweden. Methods: All patients who had MIO or OO for oesophageal cancer between 2007 and 2014 were identified from nationwide registries in Finland and Sweden. Outcomes were the overall rate of anastomotic stricture and need for single or repeated (3 or more) dilatations for stricture within the first year after surgery. Multivariable Cox regression provided hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 per cent confidence intervals, adjusted for age, sex, co-morbidity, histology, stage, year, country, hospital volume, length of hospital stay and readmissions. Results: Some 239 patients underwent MIO and 1430 had an open procedure. The incidence of strictures requiring one dilatation was 16·7 per cent, and that for strictures requiring three or more dilatations was 6·6 per cent. The HR for strictures requiring one dilatation was not increased after MIO compared with that after OO (HR 1·19, 95 per cent c.i. 0·66 to 2·12), but was threefold higher for repeated dilatations (HR 3·25, 1·43 to 7·36). Of 18 strictures following MIO, 14 (78 per cent) occurred during the first 2 years after initiating this approach. Conclusion: The need for endoscopic anastomotic dilatation after oesophagectomy was common, and the need for repeated dilatation was higher after MIO than following OO. The increased risk after MIO may reflect a learning curve.

Antecedentes: Se desconoce la incidencia poblacional de estenosis anastomóticas tras esofaguectomía mínimamente invasiva (minimally invasive oesophagectomy, MIO) y esofaguectomía abierta (open oesophagectomy, OO). El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar las tasas de estenosis anastomótica que precisan dilataciones después de los dos abordajes de esofaguectomía en una cohorte no seleccionada utilizando los datos poblacionales de Finlandia y Suecia. Métodos: Todos los pacientes sometidos a MIO (n = 239) o OO (n = 1430) por cáncer de esófago entre 2007 y 2014 fueron identificados a partir de los registros nacionales en Finlandia y Suecia. Las variables de resultados fueron la incidencia global de estenosis anastomótica y la necesidad de una sola dilatación o dilataciones repetidas (≥ 3) para la estenosis durante el primer año de la cirugía. La regresión multivariable de Cox proporcionó los cocientes de riesgos instantáneos (hazard ratios, HRs) con los i.c. del 95% ajustados por edad, sexo, comorbilidad, histología, estadio, año, país, volumen del hospital, duración de la estancia hospitalaria y reingresos. Resultados: La incidencia de estenosis que precisaron una dilatación fue del 16,7%, y del 6,6% para estenosis que precisaron ≥ 3 dilataciones. El HR de estenosis que requirieron una dilatación no se incrementó tras MIO en comparación con OO (HR 1,19, i.c. del 95% 0,66­2,12), pero fue 3 veces más para dilataciones repetidas (≥ 3) (HR 3,25, i.c. del 95% 1,43­7,36). De las 18 estenosis tras MIO, 14 (78%) ocurrieron durante los primeros dos años en los que se inició este abordaje. Conclusión: La necesidad de dilatación endoscópica de la anastomosis tras esofaguectomía fue frecuente y la necesidad de dilataciones repetidas fue más alta tras MIO en comparación con OO. El riesgo aumentado tras MIO puede deberse a la curva de aprendizaje.

Menopausal hormone therapy and biliary tract cancer: a population-based matched cohort study in Sweden.

BACKGROUND: This study tested the hypothesis that contemporary menopausal hormonal therapy (MHT) increases the risk of biliary tract cancer. The risk of cancer of the biliary tract (gallbladder and extra-hepatic bile ducts) may be increased following estrogen exposure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a nationwide population-based matched cohort study in Sweden. Data from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register identified all women exposed to systemic MHT in 2005-2012. Group-level matching (1:3 ratio) was used to select women unexposed to MHT from the same study base, matched for history of delivery, thrombotic events, hysterectomy, age, smoking- and alcohol related diseases, obesity, and diabetes. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Comparing 290,186 women exposed to MHT with 870,165 unexposed, MHT did not increase the OR of biliary tract cancer. The OR of gallbladder cancer was rather decreased in MHT users (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.79), but this association became attenuated and statistically non-significant after adjusting for gallstone disease (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.60-1.15). The OR of extra-hepatic bile duct cancers was 0.83 (95% CI 0.61-1.15). There were no clear differences when the analyses were stratified for estrogen or estrogen/progestogen combinations. MHT increased the risk of gallstone disease (OR 6.95, 95% CI 6.64-7.28). CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary MHT does not seem to increase the risk of biliary tract cancer. The decreased risk of gallbladder cancer may be explained by the increased use of surgery for symptomatic gallstones in MHT users.

Outcomes of nutritional jejunostomy in the curative treatment of esophageal cancer.

Substantial weight loss and eating problems are common before and after esophagectomy for cancer. The use of jejunostomy might prevent postoperative weight loss, but studies evaluating other outcomes are scarce. This study aims to assess the influence of jejunostomy on postoperative health-related quality of life (HRQOL), complications, reoperation, hospital stay, and survival. This prospective and population-based cohort study included all patients operated on for esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer in Sweden in 2001-2005 with follow-up until 31st December 2016. Data regarding patient and tumor characteristics and treatment were prospectively collected. Multivariable logistic regression provided odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), whereas Cox regression provided hazard ratios with 95% CI. All risk estimates were adjusted for age, sex, tumor histology, stage, comorbidity, surgical approach, neoadjuvant therapy, and body mass index and weight loss at baseline. Among 397 patients, 181 (46%) received a jejunostomy during surgery. The use of jejunostomy did not influence the HRQOL at 6 months or 3 years after treatment. Jejunostomy users had no statistically significantly increased risk of postoperative complications (OR 1.27; 95% CI 0.86-1.87) or reoperation (OR 1.70; 95% CI 0.88-3.28). Intensive unit care and length of hospital stay was the same independent of the use of jejunostomy. The all-cause mortality was not increased in the jejunostomy group (HR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.74-1.07). This study indicates that jejunostomy does not influence postoperative HRQOL, complications, or survival after esophageal cancer surgery, it can be considered a safe method for early enteral nutrition after esophageal cancer surgery but benefits for the patients need further investigations.

A seven-Gene Signature assay improves prognostic risk stratification of perioperative chemotherapy treated gastroesophageal cancer patients from the MAGIC trial.

Background: Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable gastroesophageal cancer, lymph node metastasis is the only validated prognostic variable; however, within lymph node groups there is still heterogeneity with risk of relapse. We hypothesized that gene profiles from neoadjuvant chemotherapy treated resection specimens from gastroesophageal cancer patients can be used to define prognostic risk groups to identify patients at risk for relapse. Patients and methods: The Medical Research Council Adjuvant Gastric Infusional Chemotherapy (MAGIC) trial (n = 202 with high quality RNA) samples treated with perioperative chemotherapy were profiled for a custom gastric cancer gene panel using the NanoString platform. Genes associated with overall survival (OS) were identified using penalized and standard Cox regression, followed by generation of risk scores and development of a NanoString biomarker assay to stratify patients into risk groups associated with OS. An independent dataset served as a validation cohort. Results: Regression and clustering analysis of MAGIC patients defined a seven-Gene Signature and two risk groups with different OS [hazard ratio (HR) 5.1; P < 0.0001]. The median OS of high- and low-risk groups were 10.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) of 6.5 and 13.2 months] and 80.9 months (CI: 43.0 months and not assessable), respectively. Risk groups were independently prognostic of lymph node metastasis by multivariate analysis (HR 3.6 in node positive group, P = 0.02; HR 3.6 in high-risk group, P = 0.0002), and not prognostic in surgery only patients (n = 118; log rank P = 0.2). A validation cohort independently confirmed these findings. Conclusions: These results suggest that gene-based risk groups can independently predict prognosis in gastroesophageal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This signature and associated assay may help risk stratify these patients for post-surgery chemotherapy in future perioperative chemotherapy-based clinical trials.

Population-based cohort study of diabetes mellitus and mortality in gastric adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Gastric adenocarcinoma is a common cause of cancer death globally. It remains unclear whether coexisting diabetes mellitus influences survival in patients with this tumour. A cohort study was conducted to determine whether coexisting diabetes increases mortality in gastric adenocarcinoma. METHODS: This nationwide population-based cohort study included all patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma in Sweden between 1990 and 2014. Cox proportional hazards regression and competing risks regression were used to assess the influence of coexisting diabetes on disease-specific mortality in gastric adenocarcinoma with adjustment for sex, age, calendar year and co-morbidity (Charlson Co-morbidity Index score excluding diabetes). RESULTS: Among 23 591 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma, 2806 (11·9 per cent) had coexisting diabetes. Overall, patients with diabetes had a moderately increased risk of disease-specific mortality after diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma compared with those without diabetes, as shown by both Cox regression (hazard ratio (HR) 1·17, 95 per cent c.i. 1·11 to 1·22) and competing risks regression (sub-HR 1·08, 1·02 to 1·13). The HRs for disease-specific mortality were notably increased in diabetic patients without other co-morbidity (HR 1·23, 1·15 to 1·32) and in diabetic patients who had surgery with curative intent (HR 1·27, 1·16 to 1·38). CONCLUSION: These findings indicate a worse prognosis in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma and coexisting diabetes compared with those without diabetes.

Lymph node regression and survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to define the pathological response in lymph nodes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for oesophageal adenocarcinoma and to quantify any associated survival benefit. METHODS: Lymph nodes retrieved at oesophagectomy were examined retrospectively by two pathologists for evidence of a response to chemotherapy. Patients were classified as lymph node-negative (either negative nodes with no evidence of previous tumour involvement or negative with evidence of complete regression) or positive (allocated a lymph node regression score based on the proportion of fibrosis to residual tumour). Lymph node responders (score 1, complete response; 2, less than 10 per cent remaining tumour; 3, 10-50 per cent remaining tumour) and non-responders (score 4, more than 50 per cent viable tumour; 5, no response) were compared in survival analyses using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 377 patients, 256 had neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Overall, 68 of 256 patients (26·6 per cent) had a lymph node response and 115 (44·9 per cent) did not. The remaining 73 patients (28·5 per cent) had negative lymph nodes with no evidence of regression. Some patients had a lymph node response in the absence of a response in the primary tumour (27 of 99, 27 per cent). Lymph node responders had a significant survival benefit (P < 0·001), even when stratified by patients with or without a response in the primary tumour. On multivariable analysis, lymph node responders had decreased overall (hazard ratio 0·53, 95 per cent c.i. 0·36 to 0·78) and disease-specific (HR 0·42, 0·27 to 0·66) mortality, and experienced reduced local and systemic recurrence. CONCLUSION: Lymph node regression is a strong prognostic factor and may be more important than response in the primary tumour.

Obesity surgery and risk of cancer.

BACKGROUND: Obesity increases the risk of several types of cancer. Whether bariatric surgery influences the risk of obesity-related cancer is not clear. This study aimed to uncover the risk of hormone-related (breast, endometrial and prostate), colorectal and oesophageal cancers following obesity surgery. METHODS: This national population-based cohort study used data from the Hospital Episode Statistics database in England collected between 1997 and 2012. Propensity matching on sex, age, co-morbidity and duration of follow-up was used to compare cancer risk among obese individuals undergoing bariatric surgery (gastric bypass, gastric banding or sleeve gastrectomy) and obese individuals not undergoing such surgery. Conditional logistic regression provided odds ratios (ORs) with 95 per cent confidence intervals. RESULTS: In the study period, from a cohort of 716 960 patients diagnosed with obesity, 8794 patients who underwent bariatric surgery were matched exactly with 8794 obese patients who did not have surgery. Compared with the no-surgery group, patients who had bariatric surgery exhibited a decreased risk of hormone-related cancers (OR 0·23, 95 per cent c.i. 0·18 to 0·30). This decrease was consistent for breast (OR 0·25, 0·19 to 0·33), endometrium (OR 0·21, 0·13 to 0·35) and prostate (OR 0·37, 0·17 to 0·76) cancer. Gastric bypass resulted in the largest risk reduction for hormone-related cancers (OR 0·16, 0·11 to 0·24). Gastric bypass, but not gastric banding or sleeve gastrectomy, was associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (OR 2·63, 1·17 to 5·95). Longer follow-up after bariatric surgery strengthened these diverging associations. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery is associated with decreased risk of hormone-related cancers, whereas gastric bypass might increase the risk of colorectal cancer.