Disease-specific health-related quality of life trajectories up to 15 years after curative treatment for esophageal cancer-a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The presence of distinct long-term disease-specific HRQL trajectories after curative treatment for esophageal cancer and factors associated with such trajectories are unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This population-based and longitudinal cohort study included 425 esophageal cancer patients who underwent curative treatment, including esophagectomy, in Sweden in 2001-2005 and were followed up until 2020, that is, 15-year follow-up. The outcomes were 10 disease-specific HRQL symptoms, measured by the well-validated EORTC QLQ-OES18 questionnaire at 6 months (n = 402 patients), and 3 (n = 178), 5 (n = 141), 10 (n = 92), and 15 years (n = 52) after treatment. HRQL symptoms were examined for distinct trajectories by growth mixture models. Weighted logistic regression models provided odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for nine factors in relation to HRQL trajectories: age, sex, education, proxy baseline HRQL, comorbidity, tumor histology, chemo(radio)therapy, pathological tumor stage, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Distinct HRQL trajectories were identified for each of the 10 disease-specific symptoms. HRQL trajectories with more symptoms tended to persist or alleviate over time, while trajectories with fewer symptoms were more stable. Eating difficulty had three trajectories: persistently less, persistently moderate, and persistently more symptoms. The OR of having a persistently more eating difficulty trajectory was decreased for adenocarcinoma histology (OR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.95), and increased for pathological tumor stage III-IV (OR = 2.19, 95% CI 0.99-4.82) and 30-day postoperative complications (OR = 2.54, 95% CI 1.26-5.12). CONCLUSION: Distinct trajectories with long-term persistent or deteriorating disease-specific HRQL symptoms were identified after esophageal cancer treatment. Tumor histology, tumor stage, and postoperative complications may facilitate detection of high-risk patients for unwanted trajectories.

Occurrence of Dumping Syndrome After Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Dumping syndrome occurs frequently after esophageal cancer surgery, but the reported prevalence varied across previous studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to clarify the prevalence of dumping syndrome after esophageal cancer surgery, particularly exploring the sources of heterogeneity in previous studies. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases, supplemented by hand-search of reference lists, through March 2023. Random-effects meta-analysis estimated the average prevalence of dumping syndrome after esophageal cancer surgery. Heterogeneity across studies was examined by the I2 statistic and Cochran's Q test. RESULTS: Among the 2949 articles retrieved from the databases, 16 articles (15 cohort studies and 1 randomized controlled trial) met the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of dumping syndrome ranged 0-74% in these studies, showing high heterogeneity (I2 = 99%, P < 0.01), with the pooled prevalence of 27% (95% confidence interval [CI] 14-39%). The pooled prevalence in the three studies using specialized questionnaires was 67% (95% CI 60-73%), with reduced heterogeneity (I2 = 43%, P = 0.17). The prevalence also varied by year of publication, study population, and length and completeness of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings revealed that dumping syndrome is common after esophageal cancer surgery. The varying prevalence across previous studies was probably owing to differences in measurement of dumping syndrome. Using specific patient reported outcome questionnaires is recommended for future investigations on dumping syndrome after esophageal cancer surgery.

Trajectories of patient-reported outcomes after oesophageal cancer surgery - A population-based study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the trajectories of patient-reported outcomes for individuals who have undergone surgery for oesophageal cancer over a five-year post-surgical period, and to identify modifiable factors that contribute to a decline in quality of life. METHODS: Patients who underwent resection in Sweden between 2013 and 2020 were included. Data were collected at one-year post-surgery and at regular pre-determined intervals during the five-year post-surgical period. Latent class analysis and logistic regression models were used to identify symptom trajectories and determine their association with lifestyle factors, respectively. RESULTS: This study included 408 patients, and the majority experienced consistent symptom burdens during the five-year post-surgery period. Current smokers had a higher risk of belonging to the severe dysphagia, severe eating restriction, and severe reflux trajectory. Physically active patients were less likely to belong to the severe dysphagia, severe eating restriction, and severe pain and discomfort trajectory. Patients with a stable weight were less likely to belong to the severe eating restriction and to the recovering body image trajectory. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who are smokers, have a low level of physical activity, and experience weight loss need further attention and individual support to mitigate long-term symptom burden.

Severe reflux, malnutrition and health-related quality of life after oesophageal cancer surgery: A prospective nationwide cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: While most survivors of oesophageal cancer suffer from multiple symptoms, studies on combined symptom burden are scarce, particularly when looking at long-term outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association between gastro-oesophageal reflux and health-related quality of life in malnourished survivors during the first years after oesophagectomy for cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This nationwide prospective cohort study included all Swedish patients who underwent curatively intended oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer between 2013 and 2020 with 3-year follow-up. Linear mixed effect models were used to analyse the associations between reflux symptoms, malnutrition and HRQL at 1-, 2- and 3 years post-surgery and were presented with mean score difference (MSD) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Among 406 included individuals, malnourished survivors with severe reflux reported more problems with nausea/vomiting (MSD 16.3, 95 % CI: 11.4 to 21.3), pain (MSD 16.5, 95 % CI: 10.2 to 22.8), body image (MSD 12.3, 95 % CI: 5.6 to 19.0), eating restrictions (MSD 11.3, 95 % CI: 6.1 to 16.5), swallowing saliva (MSD 10.0, 95 % CI: 5.2 to 14.8), dry mouth (MSD 10.5, 95 % CI: 2.4 to 18.7), and taste (MSD 14.1, 95 % CI: 7.1 to 21.0) compared to malnourished survivors with no reflux. Nausea/vomiting, financial difficulties, body image, and cognitive function were consistently worse for malnourished individuals with reflux throughout the 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that gastro-oesophageal reflux negatively influences health-related quality of life in malnourished oesophageal cancer survivors. Nausea and/or vomiting were consistently worse for malnourished individuals with reflux independent of time point.

Recurrence and Survival After Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Ensure Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of operative approach [open (OE), hybrid minimally invasive (HMIE), and total minimally invasive (TMIE) esophagectomy] on operative and oncologic outcomes for patients treated with curative intent for esophageal and junctional cancer. BACKGROUND: The optimum oncologic surgical approach to esophageal and junctional cancer is unclear. METHODS: This secondary analysis of the European multicenter ENSURE study includes patients undergoing curative-intent esophagectomy for cancer between 2009 and 2015 across 20 high-volume centers. Primary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and the incidence and location of disease recurrence. Secondary endpoints included among others R0 resection rate, lymph node yield, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In total, 3199 patients were included. Of these, 55% underwent OE, 17% HMIE, and 29% TMIE. DFS was independently increased post-TMIE [hazard ratio (HR): 0.86 (95% CI: 0.76-0.98), P = 0.022] compared with OE. Multivariable regression demonstrated no difference in absolute locoregional recurrence risk according to the operative approach [HMIE vs OE, odds ratio (OR): 0.79, P = 0.257; TMIE vs OE, OR: 0.84, P = 0.243]. The probability of systemic recurrence was independently increased post-HMIE (OR: 2.07, P = 0.031), but not TMIE (OR: 0.86, P = 0.508). R0 resection rates ( P = 0.005) and nodal yield ( P < 0.001) were independently increased after TMIE, but not HMIE ( P = 0.424; P = 0.512) compared with OE. OS was independently improved following both HMIE (HR: 0.79, P = 0.009) and TMIE (HR: 0.82, P = 0.003) as compared with OE. CONCLUSION: In this European multicenter study, TMIE was associated with improved surgical quality and DFS, whereas both TMIE and HMIE were associated with improved OS as compared with OE for esophageal cancer.

Sex-related differences in oncologic outcomes, operative complications and health-related quality of life after curative-intent oesophageal cancer treatment: multicentre retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Oesophageal cancer, in particular adenocarcinoma, has a strong male predominance. However, the impact of patient sex on operative and oncologic outcomes and recovery of health-related quality of life is poorly documented, and was the focus of this large multicentre cohort study. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent oncological oesophagectomy from 2009 to 2015 in the 20 European iNvestigation of SUrveillance after Resection for Esophageal cancer study group centres were assessed. Clinicopathologic variables, therapeutic approach, postoperative complications, survival and health-related quality of life data were compared between male and female patients. Multivariable analyses adjusted for age, sex, tumour histology, treatment protocol and major complications. Specific subgroup analyses comparing adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell cancer for all key outcomes were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 3974 patients were analysed, 3083 (77.6%) male and 891 (22.4%) female; adenocarcinoma was predominant in both groups, while squamous cell cancer was observed more commonly in female patients (39.8% versus 15.1%, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated improved outcomes in female patients for overall survival (HRmales 1.24, 95% c.i. 1.07 to 1.44) and disease-free survival (HRmales 1.22, 95% c.i. 1.05 to 1.43), which was caused by the adenocarcinoma subgroup, whereas this difference was not confirmed in squamous cell cancer. Male patients presented higher health-related quality of life functional scores but also a higher risk of financial problems, while female patients had lower overall summary scores and more persistent gastrointestinal symptoms. CONCLUSION: This study reveals uniquely that female sex is associated with more favourable long-term survival after curative treatment for oesophageal cancer, especially adenocarcinoma, although long-term overall and gastrointestinal health-related quality of life are poorer in women.

Randomized controlled trial of nasogastric tube use after esophagectomy: study protocol for the kinetic trial.

Esophagectomy is a complex and complication laden procedure. Despite centralization, variations in perioparative strategies reflect a paucity of evidence regarding optimal routines. The use of nasogastric (NG) tubes post esophagectomy is typically associated with significant discomfort for the patients. We hypothesize that immediate postoperative removal of the NG tube is non-inferior to current routines. All Nordic Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer centers were invited to participate in this open-label pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT). Inclusion criteria include resection for locally advanced esophageal cancer with gastric tube reconstruction. A pretrial survey was undertaken and was the foundation for a consensus process resulting in the Kinetic trial, an RCT allocating patients to either no use of a NG tube (intervention) or 5 days of postoperative NG tube use (control) with anastomotic leakage as primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include pulmonary complications, overall complications, length of stay, health related quality of life. A sample size of 450 patients is planned (Kinetic trial: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN39935085). Thirteen Nordic centers with a combined catchment area of 17 million inhabitants have entered the trial and ethical approval was granted in Sweden, Norway, Finland, and Denmark. All centers routinely use NG tube and all but one center use total or hybrid minimally invasive-surgical approach. Inclusion began in January 2022 and the first annual safety board assessment has deemed the trial safe and recommended continuation. We have launched the first adequately powered multi-center pragmatic controlled randomized clinical trial regarding NG tube use after esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction.

Self-care advice for patients after surgery for oesophageal cancer - a mixed-methods systematic review.

PURPOSE: The aim of the literature review was to identify and synthesise research on self-care advice for oesophageal cancer survivors. METHODS: A mixed-methods systematic review and synthesis of existing literature on the topic. Five databases were searched for studies providing information on self-care advice for survivorship after oesophageal cancer surgery, in English, with no time filter. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program was used to assess the risk of bias. Data were presented by textual descriptions and grouping of data. RESULTS: Among the 13 studies included in the review, five pieces of self-care advice were identified; reconstructing eating habits, bed-head elevation, health-promoting advice, monitoring symptoms and body functions, and involving family and friends. The self-care advice was experienced to be hard work, but worth the effort. They also provided reassurance and an increased understanding of bodily changes and social consequences of the disease and treatment. CONCLUSIONS: There are is little evidence-based self-care advice for oesophageal cancer survivors. However, the existing self-care advice was appreciated and contributed to an increased understanding of the situation. Comprehensible and easy-to-follow recommendations should be provided to all oesophageal cancer survivors. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Evidence-based self-care advice helpful for the individual oesophageal cancer survivor may be imperative to cope with the consequences of oesophagectomy after hospital discharge.

Validity assessment of the POLARS score tool in the prediction of post rectal cancer surgery LARS score in a population-based Swedish cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is one of the most common functional impairments after rectal cancer surgery with a high impact on quality of life. The Pre-Operative LARS score (POLARS) nomogram and its online tool has been developed to predict the degree of postoperative LARS. The aim of this study was to analyse how accurately the POLARS score could predict LARS scores when compared with actual patient-reported LARS (PR-LARS) scores in a population-based Swedish cohort. DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent curative rectal cancer surgery between 2007 and 2013 in Stockholm County and were identified using the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry (SCRCR). Information regarding preoperative risk factors, patient and treatment characteristics, and presence of LARS postoperatively were collected from patient charts, SCRCR and patient questionnaires. The POLARS model formula was used to predict LARS scores, which then were compared with the actual PR-LARS scores. Individual LARS score differences between the two estimates were shown with a modified Bland-Altman plot of difference. RESULTS: The cohort included 477 patients, of whom 359 (75%) of patients were categorised as having no/minor LARS based on the POLARS score. The correctly identified patients by the POLARS score were 80/255 (31%) in the major LARS group and 184/222 (83%) no/minor LARS group. The sensitivity was 31% for major LARS and the positive predictive value was 68%. CONCLUSION: The POLARS score has a low sensitivity for major LARS in this Swedish cohort. Other methods to predict the risk of LARS need to be developed.

Coeliac disease in the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT), Norway, a population-based cohort of coeliac disease patients.

PURPOSE: Coeliac disease (CD) is a common disorder and affects about 1% of the population worldwide. CD in the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT) is a population-based cohort study which was established to provide new knowledge about CD that can improve the diagnostics and management, prevent the onset or progression and expand the knowledge about the role of genetics of the disease. PARTICIPANTS: The cohort is based on the fourth wave of the population-based HUNT study (HUNT4), Norway, performed during 2017-2019, also including linkage to hospital records and the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR). A total of 54 541 HUNT4 participants with available sera were screened for CD by serology. All seropositive participants were invited to a clinical assessment, including endoscopy with duodenal biopsies, during 2019-2023. FINDINGS TO DATE: A total of 1107 HUNT4 participants (2%) were seropositive for CD and 1048 were eligible for clinical assessment, including biopsy. Of these, 724 participants attended the clinical assessment and 482 were identified with CD. In addition, 371 participants with CD were identified through the hospital records and NPR. In total, 853 participants in HUNT4 with biopsy-verified CD diagnosis were identified. FUTURE PLANS: All participants in the study will be invited to a follow-up assessment after at least 1 year, including repeated standard serological testing, endoscopy and tissue sampling. The collected data and material will be used to establish the true population-based prevalence of CD. The consequences of CD, including symptoms, deficiencies and comorbidity, will be investigated and possible triggers and predictors, will be studied. With access to serum samples from the previous HUNT surveys in HUNT Biobank, serological signs of CD in prediagnostic samples of seropositive individuals will be used. Genetic studies will identify new CD markers, assess genotype-phenotype links and explore gene-environment correlations. REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04041622.

Cancer-related fatigue trajectories up to 5 years after curative treatment for oesophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Whether cancer-related fatigue develops differently after curative-intended oesophageal cancer treatment and the related modifiable factors are unclear. METHODS: This population-based and longitudinal cohort included 409 oesophageal cancer patients who underwent curative oesophagectomy in 2013-2020 in Sweden. The main outcome was cancer-related fatigue trajectories with measurements at 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4 and 5 years postoperatively by validated EORTC QLQ-FA12 questionnaire, and analysed using growth mixture models. Weighted logistic regressions provided odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for underlying sociodemographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcome factors in relation to the identified trajectories. RESULTS: Two distinct overall cancer-related fatigue trajectories were identified: low level of persistent fatigue and high level of increasing fatigue, with 64% and 36% of patients, respectively. The odds of having high level of fatigue trajectory were increased by Charlson comorbidity index (≥ 2 versus 0: OR = 2.52, 95% CI 1.07-5.94), pathological tumour Stage (III-IV versus 0-I: OR = 2.52, 95% CI 1.33-4.77), anxiety (OR = 7.58, 95% CI 2.20-26.17), depression (OR = 15.90, 95% CI 4.44-56.93) and pain (continuous score: OR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.04). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term trajectories with high level of increasing cancer-related fatigue and the associated modifiable factors were identified after oesophageal cancer treatment. The results may facilitate early identification and targeted intervention for such high-risk patients.

Health-related quality of life trajectories up to 15 years after curative treatment for esophageal cancer: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The differentiation of specific, long-term health-related quality of life (HRQL) trajectories among esophageal cancer survivors remains unclear. The authors aimed to identify potentially distinctly different HRQL-trajectories and uncover the underlying factors of such trajectories in patients having undergone surgery (esophagectomy) for esophageal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This nationwide, prospective, and longitudinal cohort study included 420 patients who underwent curative treatment for esophageal cancer, including esophageal cancer surgery, in Sweden from 2001to 2005. The main outcome was HRQL summary score trajectories, measured by the well-validated EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire at 6 months, 3, 5, 10, and 15 years after esophagectomy, and analyzed using growth mixture models. Potentially underlying factors for these trajectories (age, sex, education, proxy baseline HRQL, comorbidity, tumor histology, chemo(radio)therapy, pathological tumor stage, and postoperative complications) were analyzed using weighted logistic regression providing odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI. RESULTS: Four distinct HRQL summary score trajectories were identified: Persistently good, improving, deteriorating, and persistently poor. The odds of belonging to a persistently poor trajectory were decreased by longer education (>12 years versus <9 years: OR 0.18, 95% CI: 0.05-0.66) and adenocarcinoma histology (adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma: OR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.16-0.85), and increased by more advanced pathological tumor stage (III-IV versus 0-I: OR 2.82, 95% CI: 1.08-7.41) and postoperative complications (OR 2.94, 95% CI: 1.36-6.36). CONCLUSION: Distinct trajectories with persistently poor or deteriorating HRQL were identified after curative treatment for esophageal cancer. Education, tumor histology, pathological tumor stage, and postoperative complications might influence HRQL trajectories. The results may contribute to a more tailored follow-up with timely and targeted interventions. Future research remains to confirm these findings.

Improved health-related quality of life during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with neuroendocrine tumours.

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) can arise in different locations in the body, and may give rise to hormonal symptoms, which amongst other factors may affect patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Up to four cycles of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) have been shown effective for symptom alleviation and prolonging progression-free survival. The aim of this study was to assess the patient's perspective regarding changes in their HRQoL during PRRT. HRQoL was assessed using the questionnaires for cancer in general, EORTC QLQ-C30, and the gastrointestinal NET-specifically EORTC QLQ-GINET21. Patients with NET (n = 204) rated their HRQoL before PRRT cycles one and four. The medical records of patients were reviewed and their HRQoL was compared to a matched reference population (n = 4910). HRQoL was found to improve during PRRT in aspects of global quality of life; role, social, and emotional functioning, and multiple symptom relief. Potential risk groups for worse HRQoL during PRRT were patients with overweight (BMI >25) who completed four cycles of PRRT and older patients (>65 years old). In conclusion, we found that PRRT improves HRQoL in patients with NETs. The results of this study may be used to improve person-centred care.

Comparison between Swedish EORTC QLQ-C30 general population norm data published in 2000 and 2019.

BACKGROUND: Normative health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data from the general population are regularly used to facilitate the interpretation of HRQoL as reported by cancer patients participating in cancer clinical trials, especially when conducting long-term follow-up studies after treatment. The aim of the present study is to compare two Swedish normative data sets, published in 2000 and 2019 respectively, and explore whether HRQoL as reported by the Swedish general population has changed over time. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 'Sample 2000' was comprised of normative data from the Swedish general population who responded to the EORTC QLQ-C30 in a Swedish mail survey in 1999 (n = 3069). 'Sample 2019' consisted of data from the Swedish general population collected as part of a European norm data study using online panels, published in 2019 (n = 1027). Data were analyzed stratified by sex and age (40-49; 50-59; 60-69; 70-79 years). RESULTS: For most of the subscales and single items, no age group differences between the two samples were found, with the exception of the oldest age group (70-79 years), where Sample 2019 generally showed better HRQoL as compared to Sample 2000. Lower (worse) levels of Global quality of life and higher (worse) levels of Dyspnoea were found in Sample 2019 for most age groups. CONCLUSION: There were no differences found between the samples for most EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales and single items, with the exception of the oldest age group of both sexes in Sample 2019 who reported better HRQoL on many variables. When deciding which normative dataset to use, the mode of data collection and age group have to be considered.

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Versus Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in the European Multicenter ENSURE Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare clinicopathologic, oncologic, and health-related quality of life (HRQL) outcomes following neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) and chemotherapy (nCT) in the ENSURE international multicenter study. BACKGROUND: nCT and nCRT are the standards of care for locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC) treated with curative intent. However, no published randomized controlled trial to date has demonstrated the superiority of either approach. METHODS: ENSURE is an international multicenter study of consecutive patients undergoing surgery for LAEC (2009-2015) across 20 high-volume centers (NCT03461341). The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS), secondary outcomes included histopathologic response, recurrence pattern, oncologic outcome, and HRQL in survivorship. RESULTS: A total of 2211 patients were studied (48% nCT, 52% nCRT). pCR was observed in 4.9% and 14.7% ( P <0.001), with R0 in 78.2% and 94.2% ( P <0.001) post nCT and nCRT, respectively. Postoperative morbidity was equivalent, but in-hospital mortality was independently increased [hazard ratio (HR)=2.73, 95% CI: 1.43-5.21, P= 0.002] following nCRT versus nCT. Probability of local recurrence was reduced (odds ratio=0.71, 95% CI: 0.54-0.93, P =0.012), and distant recurrence-free survival time reduced (HR=1.18, 95% CI: 1.02-1.37, P =0.023) after nCRT versus nCT, with no difference in OS among all patients (HR=1.10, 95% CI: 0.98-1.25, P =0.113). On subgroup analysis, patients who underwent R0 resection following nCT as compared with nCRT had improved OS (median: 60.7 months, 95% CI: 49.5-71.8 vs 40.8 months, 95% CI: 42.8-53.4, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this European multicenter study, nCRT compared with nCT was associated with reduced probability of local recurrence but reduced distant recurrence-free survival for patients with LAEC, without differences in OS. These data support tailored patient-specific decision-making in the overall approach to achieving optimum outcomes in LAEC.

Prediction of conditional survival in esophageal cancer in a population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The authors aimed to produce a prediction model for survival at any given date after surgery for esophageal cancer (conditional survival), which has not been done previously. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using joint density functions, the authors developed and validated a prediction model for all-cause and disease-specific mortality after surgery with esophagectomy, for esophageal cancer, conditional on postsurgery survival time. The model performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and risk calibration, with internal cross-validation. The derivation cohort was a nationwide Swedish population-based cohort of 1027 patients treated in 1987-2010, with follow-up throughout 2016. This validation cohort was another Swedish population-based cohort of 558 patients treated in 2011-2013, with follow-up throughout 2018. RESULTS: The model predictors were age, sex, education, tumor histology, chemo(radio)therapy, tumor stage, resection margin status, and reoperation. The medians of AUC after internal cross-validation in the derivation cohort were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.69-0.78) for 3-year all-cause mortality, 0.76 (95% CI: 0.72-0.79) for 5-year all-cause mortality, 0.74 (95% CI: 0.70-0.78) for 3-year disease-specific mortality, and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.72-0.79) for 5-year disease-specific mortality. The corresponding AUC values in the validation cohort ranged from 0.71 to 0.73. The model showed good agreement between observed and predicted risks. Complete results for conditional survival any given date between 1 and 5 years of surgery are available from an interactive web-tool: https://sites.google.com/view/pcsec/home . CONCLUSION: This novel prediction model provided accurate estimates of conditional survival any time after esophageal cancer surgery. The web-tool may help guide postoperative treatment and follow-up.

The long-term experience of being a family caregiver of patients surgically treated for oesophageal cancer.

AIM: This qualitative study aimed to explore the experience of being family caregivers of patients treated for oesophageal cancer 2 years after treatment. To better understand the family caregiver's situation, a conceptual model was used in the analysis. The results of the study can guide future interventions to support family caregivers of patients treated for oesophageal cancer. DESIGN: A qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured telephone interviews. An abductive approach was used in the analysis to reach deeper knowledge about the family caregivers' experiences and to better understand deeper patterns. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted and included 13 family caregivers of patients surgically treated for oesophageal cancer in Sweden in 2018 who participated in a population-based nationwide cohort study. Individual telephone interviews were held in 2020, 2 years after the patients' surgery. The analysis of the interviews started with an inductive approach using thematic analysis. Thereafter, a deductive approach was used to interpret the findings in relation to the conceptual model, The Cancer Family Caregiving Experience. RESULTS: The most essential/evident stress factors for the family caregivers were distress regarding the patients' nutrition, fear of tumour recurrence and worry about the future. In addition, a transition was experienced, going from a family member to a caregiver, and the many psychosocial aspects of this transition were highlighted during the disease trajectory. CONCLUSION: Despite, the long-term survival of the patient, family caregivers were still struggling with psychosocial consequences because of the patient's cancer diagnosis and treatment. Furthermore, there is a need to improve supportive interventions for family caregivers during the whole disease trajectory. IMPACT: The current study includes comprehensive information about the family caregivers' experiences when caring for a patient treated for oesophageal cancer. Family caregivers struggle with the psychosocial consequences of the patient's cancer and worry about tumour recurrence even 2 years after surgery. These findings can be useful in the development of supportive interventions, which may facilitate life for family caregivers. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The study was discussed and planned together with our research partnership group including patients and family caregivers. In addition, the manuscript was reviewed by some of the members to cross-check the results and discussed them to avoid misinterpretation.

Home-based physical activity after treatment for esophageal cancer-A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of most esophageal cancer patients includes chemo(radio)therapy and extensive surgery, causing physical decline with loss of muscles. This trial aimed to test the hypothesis that a tailored home-based physical activity (PA) intervention improves muscle strength and mass in patients having undergone curative treatment for esophageal cancer. METHODS: Patients operated for esophageal cancer 1 year earlier were included in a nationwide randomized controlled trial in Sweden in 2016-2020. The intervention group was randomized to a 12-week home-based exercise program, while the control group was encouraged to maintain routine daily PA. The primary outcomes were changes in maximal/average hand grip strength measured with hand grip dynamometer and lower extremity strength measured using 30-second chair stand test and muscle mass measured using a portable bio-impedance analysis monitor. Intention-to-treat analysis was used, and results were presented as mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Among 161 randomized patients, 134 completed the study, 64 in the intervention group and 70 in the control group. Compared with the control group (MD 2.73; 95% CI 1.75-3.71), patients in the intervention group (MD 4.48; 95% CI 3.18-5.80) had statistically significantly (p = 0.03) improved lower extremity strength. No differences were seen for hand grip strength or muscle mass. CONCLUSION: A home-based PA intervention 1 year after surgery for esophageal cancer improves lower extremity muscle strength.

Quality of life and patient reported symptoms after colorectal cancer in a Swedish population.

AIM: A proportion of patients treated for colorectal cancer have impaired quality of life (QoL) but it is uncertain if the level of QoL differs from the corresponding background population. This population-based cohort study aimed to evaluate health-related QoL in colorectal cancer patients and compare their QoL with that of a Swedish reference population. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer Stages I-III in the Stockholm-Gotland region in 2013-2015 received the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and the QLQ-CR29 questionnaires and the low anterior resection syndrome score, 1 year after surgery. Patient and tumour data were collected from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. The patient cohort was matched to a Swedish reference population regarding EORTC QLQ-C30. Global QoL was compared to the reference population and a patient group with impaired QoL was defined. Detailed patient-reported outcomes were analysed in relation to global QoL in the patient cohort. RESULTS: A total of 925 patients returned the questionnaires and 358 patients (38.70%) reported a clinically relevant impaired global QoL compared to the reference population. Patients with impaired QoL reported clinically relevant and statistically significantly more complaints regarding bowel habits, pain and anxiety. After adjustment for sex, age and stoma, anxiety was the strongest predictor for impaired QoL, with OR 6.797 (95% CI 4.677-9.879). CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of patients treated for colorectal cancer have impaired global QoL. This impairment is strongly associated with several physical symptoms and anxiety.

Health-related quality of life 15 years after oesophageal cancer surgery: a prospective nationwide cohort study.

PURPOSE: We aimed to study oesophageal cancer survivors' health-related quality of life (HRQL) 15 years after surgery and to identify factors related to reduced HRQL. METHODS: A nationwide, prospective cohort study enrolling 616 patients who underwent open oesophageal cancer surgery in Sweden between April 2, 2001, and December 21, 2005. HRQL was evaluated by questionnaires 15 years after surgery. HRQL data for the 15-year survivors were individually matched for age, sex and comorbidity by using values from a Swedish background population. Multivariable linear regression models provided mean score differences (MSD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each HRQL scale and item. RESULTS: Among the 616 individuals in the original study group, 70 (11%) survived for 15 years and 52 (74%) responded to the questionnaires. Compared with a matched background population, the survivors reported problems in 10 of 25 HRQL aspects. Most of these were related to symptoms of the digestive tract, such as reflux (MSD 26.4, 95%CI: 18.3 to 34.4), dysphagia (MSD 17.7, 95%CI: 10.0 to 25.4) and eating difficulties (MSD 16.4, 95%CI: 11.3 to 21.4). Major postoperative complications after surgery were related to worse HRQL in 11 of 25 aspects. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that surgery for oesophageal cancer entails long-term, possibly life-long, symptoms related to the digestive tract. IMPLICATION FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Comprehensive support from healthcare may be imperative for oesophageal cancer survivors to adapt to and cope with consequences of oesophageal cancer surgery. Prevention, early identification and adequate treatment of postoperative complications may improve patient outcome.