Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 35(25): 5409-5415, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33847210

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The number of triplet pregnancies in the United States has increased significantly. Perinatal morbidity and mortality are higher in these pregnancies mainly due to higher preterm birth rates. Interventions to decrease the risk of preterm delivery in this population are needed. Evidence regarding cerclage placement in triplets is limited. We performed a population-based, retrospective cohort study to study the risk of preterm birth and neonatal outcomes after cerclage placement in triplet pregnancies. METHODS: All U.S. triplet deliveries from 2006 to 2013 with risk factors for cervical insufficiency were selected, excluding cases with indicated preterm delivery. Cases were categorized according to cerclage placement status. The risk of preterm birth and adverse neonatal outcomes were calculated using propensity score analysis, generalized linear, and logistic regression models. RESULTS: From ∼33 million deliveries, 43,000 were triplets, and 7308 fulfilled eligibility criteria. There was no difference in the gestational age at delivery between the cerclage and noncerclage groups, aOR (95% CI) = 1.0(0.9-1.0). The difference between the risk of preterm delivery at <34 weeks and <32 weeks was not statistically significant. The risk of the composite outcome of neonatal complications was higher in the cerclage compared to the noncerclage group, aOR (95% CI) = 1.5 (1.1-2.2). CONCLUSIONS: Cerclage placement in triplet pregnancies does not appear to decrease preterm birth rates and seems to increase the risk of neonatal complications.


Assuntos
Cerclagem Cervical , Gravidez de Trigêmeos , Nascimento Prematuro , Gravidez , Feminino , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Cerclagem Cervical/efeitos adversos , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Nascimento Prematuro/etiologia , Nascimento Prematuro/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Trigêmeos , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia
2.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 31(2): 178-183, 2018 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28056569

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Evidence supports the need of dose-adjustment of several drugs according to body mass index (BMI) to prevent toxicity in the underweight, and ensure efficacy in obese women. However, for MgSO4 neuroprotection, the effect of BMI on maternal toxicity and fetal neuroprotection is understudied. We analyze the effect of BMI on maternal/infant outcomes after MgSO4. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a clinical trial that studied MgSO4 neuroprotection. Maternal side effects, magnesium cord levels, and offspring cerebral palsy/death were analyzed along BMI strata using ANOVA and chi-square test. Logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios according to the treatment and BMI, using nonobese that received placebo as reference. Interaction analyses were performed to validate differential efficacy of BMI. RESULTS: From 2241 women, more side effects and higher magnesium cord levels were seen in underweight women (p = 0.05). MgSO4 neuroprotection was effective in the non-obese (p = 0.02), but not in obese women (p = 1.00). In multivariate analyses, MgSO4 significantly reduced cerebral palsy only in nonobese women. Interaction analyses showed the moderator effect of BMI (p = 0.169). Increasing MgSO4 dose in obese mothers may ensure neuroprotective efficacy without representing increased maternal risks. Considering costs of studying this association, current analysis may form the basis for reasonable practice.


Assuntos
Paralisia Cerebral/tratamento farmacológico , Paralisia Cerebral/epidemiologia , Sulfato de Magnésio/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Neuroprotetores/uso terapêutico , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Índice de Massa Corporal , Paralisia Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Magnésio/sangue , Sulfato de Magnésio/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Neuroprotetores/efeitos adversos , Pré-Eclâmpsia/tratamento farmacológico , Gravidez , Fatores de Risco
3.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 43(6): 982-990, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28422358

RESUMO

AIM: Platelet activation and destruction is a well recognized feature of pre-eclampsia, but the current literature is contradictory regarding the role of mean platelet volume (MPV) in the diagnosis of this condition. We investigated whether MPV, compared with other routine laboratory markers such as platelet count, is a more significant biomarker of pre-eclampsia, giving special attention to the intrapartum period. METHODS: Biochemical and hematological markers along pregnancy including MPV were compared retrospectively between pre-eclampsia and matched controls. Laboratory marker data were compared using independent t-test. A logistic regression model was used to compare the strength of the associations of MPV and other routine markers such as platelet count with pre-eclampsia. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted. RESULTS: There were a total of 150 cases of pre-eclampsia and 297 controls. In the pre-eclampsia group, there were 60 cases of mild pre-eclampsia (40.0%); 84, severe (56.0%); and six of eclampsia (4.0%). MPV was significantly higher in the pre-eclampsia than in the control group (11.3 ± 1.0 vs 10.1 ± 0.8 fL, P = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, MPV was the only statistically significant biomarker of pre-eclampsia (OR, 4.5; 95%CI: 1.5-13.7), and severe pre-eclampsia (OR, 6.2; 95%CI: 1.6-24.6); performing superiorly to platelet count. CONCLUSIONS: Mean platelet volume is a more significant biomarker of pre-eclampsia. It is more significantly associated with this condition than other routinely measured laboratory markers such as platelet count. MPV is routinely obtained on complete blood cell count and its utilization in the assessment of pre-eclampsia in a clinical setting should continue to be evaluated.


Assuntos
Volume Plaquetário Médio , Pré-Eclâmpsia/sangue , Biomarcadores/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 43(5): 834-838, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28188975

RESUMO

AIM: Uterine rupture is a rare but feared perinatal event. Despite abundant research and changes to guidelines implemented to reduce this complication, evaluation of whether uterine rupture still engenders significant maternal/neonatal morbidity has not been conducted. We analyzed recent cases of maternal/neonatal morbidity after uterine rupture. METHODS: Deliveries complicated by uterine rupture from 2011 to 2012 in the United States were selected. Comparison cases without uterine rupture were used as controls. Measures of maternal/neonatal complications were compared with χ2 test, and relative risks were calculated. Logistic regression was used to identify the most significant complications. P < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. RESULTS: From 7 922 016 births, 1925 cases of uterine rupture and 3765 controls were identified. Regression models retained four maternal outcomes; blood transfusion was the most common (~15%) and unplanned hysterectomy had the highest odds (~97-fold). For newborns, the model retained three measures of morbidity; neonatal intensive care unit admission was the most common (~35%) and seizures had the highest odds (~20-fold). CONCLUSIONS: Despite efforts to reduce complications, mothers remain at significant risk of unplanned hysterectomy and intensive care unit admission. Neonates are at sizeable risk for neonatal intensive care unit admission and seizures, recognized markers of long-term neurobehavioral abnormality. Uterine rupture remains a major risk for mothers and babies.


Assuntos
Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças do Recém-Nascido/epidemiologia , Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Puerperais/epidemiologia , Ruptura Uterina/epidemiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
5.
Obstet Gynecol Sci ; 59(6): 434-443, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27896245

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: New-onset postpartum preeclampsia is a poorly defined condition that accounts for a significant percentage of eclampsia cases. It is unclear whether new-onset postpartum preeclampsia is a different disorder from or belongs to the same spectrum of classic antepartum preeclampsia. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical presentation and pregnancy outcomes of antepartum preeclampsia and new-onset postpartum preeclampsia. METHODS: A retrospective study including 92 patients with antepartum preeclampsia and 92 patients with new-onset postpartum preeclampsia was performed. Clinical presentation and pregnancy outcomes were compared. Chi-square test was used to analyze categorical variables, and independent t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test for numerical variables. P-values of <0.05 were used to indicate statistical signifi cance. RESULTS: Patients with antepartum preeclampsia and new-onset postpartum preeclampsia differ significantly in profile, symptoms at presentation, laboratory markers and pregnancy outcomes. CONCLUSION: New-onset postpartum preeclampsia has a distinct patient profile and clinical presentation than antepartum preeclampsia, suggesting they may represent different disorders. Characterization of a patient profile with increased risk of developing this condition will help clinicians to identify patients at risk and provide early and targeted interventions to decrease the morbidity associated with this condition.

6.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 294(1): 77-81, 2016 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26590575

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Despite the well-known neonatal morbidity risks after elective cesarean deliveries performed before 39 weeks, there are scarce data regarding mortality risks. The objective of this study was to calculate the risk of neonatal mortality after elective repeat cesarean delivery (ERCD) by gestational age. METHODS: The Linked Birth-Infant Death Data Files from the Vital Statistics Data of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention of the U.S. from 2004 to 2008 were analyzed. Only ERCD cases were included. Early death (<7 days), neonatal death (<28 days), and infant death (<1 year) were evaluated. A logistic regression model was used to calculate odds ratios. Cases delivered at 37-41 weeks were studied with 40 weeks as reference. RESULTS: A total of 483,052 cases were included for analysis. The distribution of rates and odds ratios for infant, neonatal and early death was U-shaped with the nadir at 39 weeks. There was a statistically significant increase in early death at 37 compared to 40 weeks' gestation [OR (95 %) CI = 1.929(1.172-3.176)]. No statistical increase was found in any of the other mortality risks. CONCLUSION: There is an increased risk in early death with ERCD performed at 37 weeks. Our study provides evidence of neonatal harm beyond the reported morbidity risks.


Assuntos
Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Idade Gestacional , Mortalidade Infantil , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Razão de Chances , Gravidez
7.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 29(8): 1279-82, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26004983

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The recommendation for elective induction of labor (IOL) is to await ≥ 39 weeks. Studies show earlier maturity of Blacks compared to Whites. The objective was to examine the effect of the Black race on the risk of intrapartum and neonatal complications after IOL. METHODS: Black women with non-indicated IOL at 37-42 weeks were selected from the CDC-Birth Cohorts 2007-2010. Congenital anomalies, hypertension/diabetes, low-birth weight, breech presentation, previous cesarean and premature rupture of membranes were excluded. Intrapartum/neonatal complications were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios, using 39 weeks as reference. RESULTS: 311,264 black were compared with 2,451,774 deliveries of other races. For Blacks, the risks of cesarean delivery and intrapartum complications were lower at 38 weeks. Chance of vaginal delivery was greater at 38 weeks. Risks of neonatal complications was not increased at 38 compared to 39 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Intrapartum complications were lower at 38 than at 39 weeks in Blacks with no increased risk of neonatal complications. Meconium staining and fetal distress were higher as early as at 40 weeks, perhaps due to accelerated maturation. While a 39-week goal is simple and benefits many patients, a more "personalized medicine" approach may benefit even more mothers and babies.


Assuntos
População Negra/estatística & dados numéricos , Idade Gestacional , Trabalho de Parto Induzido , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Cesárea , Parto Obstétrico , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Modelos Logísticos , Oxigenoterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA