Effective Invasiveness Recognition of Imbalanced Data by Semi-Automated Segmentations of Lung Nodules.

Over the past few decades, recognition of early lung cancers was researched for effective treatments. In early lung cancers, the invasiveness is an important factor for expected survival rates. Hence, how to effectively identify the invasiveness by computed tomography (CT) images became a hot topic in the field of biomedical science. Although a number of previous works were shown to be effective on this topic, there remain some problems unsettled still. First, it needs a large amount of marked data for a better prediction, but the manual cost is high. Second, the accuracy is always limited in imbalance data. To alleviate these problems, in this paper, we propose an effective CT invasiveness recognizer by semi-automated segmentation. In terms of semi-automated segmentation, it is easy for doctors to mark the nodules. Just based on one clicked pixel, a nodule object in a CT image can be marked by fusing two proposed segmentation methods, including thresholding-based morphology and deep learning-based mask region-based convolutional neural network (Mask-RCNN). For thresholding-based morphology, an initial segmentation is derived by adaptive pixel connections. Then, a mathematical morphology is performed to achieve a better segmentation. For deep learning-based mask-RCNN, the anchor is fixed by the clicked pixel to reduce the computational complexity. To incorporate advantages of both, the segmentation is switched between these two sub-methods. After segmenting the nodules, a boosting ensemble classification model with feature selection is executed to identify the invasiveness by equalized down-sampling. The extensive experimental results on a real dataset reveal that the proposed segmentation method performs better than the traditional segmentation ones, which can reach an average dice improvement of 392.3%. Additionally, the proposed ensemble classification model infers better performances than the compared method, which can reach an area under curve (AUC) improvement of 5.3% and a specificity improvement of 14.3%. Moreover, in comparison with the models with imbalance data, the improvements of AUC and specificity can reach 10.4% and 33.3%, respectively.

Survival outcomes of east Asian patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A network meta-analysis of real-world evidence.

BACKGROUND: The comparative efficacies of different generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain largely unknown. Moreover, whether one EGFR-TKI confers superior survival remains unclear, especially in East Asians. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing the survival outcomes of East Asian patients with advanced NSCLC treated with first-line EGFR-TKIs. METHODS: The NMA included observational real-world evidence studies on adult patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC who received first (gefitinib and erlotinib), second (afatinib), or third (osimertinib) generation EGFR-TKIs as frontline therapy. Studies were identified through an online bibliographic search of Medline articles in the PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. RESULTS: For overall survival (OS), afatinib had significantly better hazard ratios (HRs) than osimertinib (HR: 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.91), gefitinib (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.43-0.72), and erlotinib (HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.54-0.92). For progression-free survival (PFS), afatinib had significantly better HRs than gefitinib (HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.36-0.56) and erlotinib (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.49-0.81). Moreover, afatinib was most likely to achieve the longest OS (81.3%), followed by erlotinib (13%), osimertinib, and gefitinib. Furthermore, afatinib was most likely to achieve the longest PFS (48.3%), followed by osimertinib (34.9%) and erlotinib. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world evidence shows that afatinib confers better survival than other first-line EGFR-TKIs in East Asian patients with advanced NSCLC.

Do patient characteristics affect EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment outcomes? A network meta-analysis of real-world survival outcomes of East Asian patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line EGFR-TKIs.

BACKGROUND: Despite the well-established efficacies of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there is limited real-world evidence comparing their effectiveness according to patients' clinical characteristics. This network meta-analysis (NMA) compared survival outcomes among first-line EGFR-TKIs in different subgroups of East Asian patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: This NMA included real-world observational studies reporting outcomes with TKIs in patients aged >65 years, with baseline brain metastasis, with different Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) statuses, or with different common EGFR mutation types. RESULTS: In patients with the EGFR L858R mutation, afatinib resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than erlotinib (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.46-0.75) and gefitinib (HR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.32-0.53). Similarly, in patients with the EGFR Del19 mutation, afatinib and erlotinib resulted in significantly longer PFS than gefitinib (HR: 0.48 with 95% CI: 0.33-0.71 and HR: 0.54 with 95% CI: 0.36-0.80, respectively). Moreover, afatinib resulted in significantly longer PFS than gefitinib in patients with brain metastasis (HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.33-0.87) or ECOG status 0-1 (HR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.23-0.59). CONCLUSION: This NMA suggests that afatinib results in similar PFS to erlotinib and superior PFS than gefitinib in patients with Del19 mutant NSCLC, aged ≥65 years, with ECOG scores of 0-1, and with baseline brain metastasis.

Comprehensive analysis of PD-L1 in non-small cell lung cancer with emphasis on survival benefit, impact of driver mutation and histological types, and archival tissue.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to assess programmed death-ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression in different histological types and gene mutation status of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A total of 4062 pathology-confirmed lung cancer patients were retrospectively screened at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital from November 2010 to June 2017. There were 699 NSCLC patients with confirmed PD-L1 expression level retrospectively enrolled for analysis. RESULTS: There was a trend of higher PD-L1 expression in squamous cell carcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinoma than in adenocarcinoma (p = 063). Significant higher PD-L1 expression in EGFR wild-type was noted (p < 0.001). No significant differences in PD-L1 expression were found between ALK wild- and mutant types, but there seem was a trend of high PD-L1 level noted in ALK mutation patients (p = 0.069). In EGFR mutation patients, a higher time to treatment failure (TTF) duration was observed in no PD-L1 expression (p = 0.011). Longer tumor tissue storage time correlated with lower PD-L1 expression in lung cancer (p < 0.001 for linear trend). CONCLUSIONS: There were a trend or significant differences in PD-L1 expression between different histological types in NSCLC, different EGFR and ALK status, and different tumor tissue storage time. A higher survival benefit was observed in no PD-L1 expression than with PD-L1 expression in adenocarcinoma, EGFR and ALK mutation patients. We recommend that PD-L1 assay should be performed as early as possible if tissue is available.

Body Mass Index, Weight Loss, and Mortality Risk in Advanced-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Focus on EGFR Mutation.

Body mass index (BMI) influences the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including both early-stage and late-stage NSCLC patients that are undergoing chemotherapies. However, earlier research on the relationship between BMI and survival in patients taking epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) yielded contradictory results. These publications either had a limited number of patients or were getting TKIs in various lines of therapy, which might explain why the outcomes were contradictory. As a result, we undertook retrospective study to examine the effect of BMI on survival outcomes in patients with advanced EGFR mutant NSCLC receiving first-line EGFR-TKIs. We also compared the findings to those with wild-type EGFR. Between November 2010 and March 2014, 513 patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled in the study. According to the adjusted BMI cut-off point for Asia, 35 out of 513 (6.8%) patients were underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), whereas 197 (38.4%) were overweight (BMI > 24 kg/m2). Overweight patients with wild-type EGFR exhibited longer progression-free survival (4.6 vs. 2.1 months, p = 0.003) and overall survival (OS) (8.9 vs. 4.3 months, p = 0.003) than underweight patients. Overweight patients with EGFR mutations had a longer OS than normal-weight patients (23.0 vs. 20.2 months, p = 0.025). Bodyweight reduction was related to a shorter OS in both the mutant EGFR patients (17.1 vs. 30.5 months, p < 0.001) and the wild-type EGFR patients (7.8 vs. 18.7 months, p < 0.001). In conclusion, advanced stages NSCLC patients with a lower BMI and early weight loss had a worse outcome that was independent of EGFR mutation status.

Comparing survival and treatment response of patients with acquired T790M mutation second-line osimertinib versus sequential treatment of chemotherapy followed by osimertinib: A real-world study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the survival benefit with first/second generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and osimertinib in different treatment sequences. METHODS: We retrospectively screened 3807 patients diagnosed with cancer between 2013 and 2019 at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. In total, 76 patients with EGFR T790M mutation who received osimertinib after re-biopsy or liquid biopsy were enrolled for the analysis. RESULTS: The median progression-free survival (PFS), median overall survival (OS), and median OS2 of the 76 patients were 11.93, 66.53, and 29.57 months, respectively. A significant difference was observed in the disease control rate between those who received osimertinib treatment after chemotherapy (group A) and those who received osimertinib immediately following EGFR-TKI therapy (group B) (34 [94.4%] vs. 31 [77.5%], p = 0.036). In addition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease tended to be a poor prognostic factor for PFS and OS. CONCLUSION: This real-world analysis revealed that previous chemotherapy could affect the treatment outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with osimertinib. Osimertinib treatment following first/second generation EGFR-TKI treatment or chemotherapy resulted in improved survival benefit.

Mortality and vertebral fracture risk associated with long-term oral steroid use in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systemic review and meta-analysis.

Short-term oral steroid use may improve lung function and respiratory symptoms in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, long-term oral steroid (LTOS) use is not recommended owing to its potential adverse effects. Our study aimed to investigate whether chronic use of oral steroids for more than 4 months would increase mortality and vertebral fracture risk in patients with stable COPD. A systemic search of the PubMed database was conducted, and meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. Five studies with a total of 1795 patients showed there was an increased risk of mortality in patients using LTOS (relative risk, 1.63; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19-2.23; p < 0.0001; I2 = 86%). In addition, four studies with a total of 17,764 patients showed there was an increased risk of vertebral fracture in patients using LTOS (odds ratio, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.52-3.50; p = 0.03; I2 = 65%). Our meta-analysis showed LTOS was associated with increased mortality and vertebral fracture risk in patients with COPD, and this risk may be due to the adverse effects of LTOS and progression COPD.

The impact of de novo liver metastasis on clinical outcome in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Liver metastasis has been found to affect outcome in prostate cancer and colorectal cancer, but its role in lung cancer is unclear. The current study aimed to evaluate the impact of de novo liver metastasis (DLM) on stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) outcomes and to examine whether tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) reverse poor prognosis in patients with DLM and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant NSCLC. Among 1392 newly diagnosed NSCLC patients, 490 patients with stage IV disease treated between November 2010 and March 2014 at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital were included. Patients were divided into two groups according to DLM status. There were 75 patients in the DLM group and 415 patients in the non-DLM group. The DLM group included more patients with bone metastasis, fewer patients with a lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) > 3.1, and fewer patients with pleural metastasis. In the DLM group, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 3-4 and LMR ≦3.1 were associated with poor outcome. In patients without DLM, overall survival (OS) was longer in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC than in those without (20.2 vs. 7.3 months, p < 0.001). Among DLM patients, OS was similar between the EGFR-mutant and wild-type EGFR tumor subgroups (11.9 vs. 7.7 months, p = 0.155). We found that DLM was a significant poor prognostic factor in the EGFR-mutant patients treated with EGFR-TKIs, whereas DLM did not affect the prognosis of EGFR-wild-type patients.

Impact of epidermal growth factor receptor gene expression level on clinical outcomes in epidermal growth factor receptor mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients taking first-line epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are first-choice treatments for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients harboring EGFR mutations. Although EGFR mutations are strongly predictive of patients' outcomes and their response to treatment with EGFR-TKIs, early failure of first-line therapy with EGFR-TKIs in patients with EGFR mutations is not rare. Besides several clinical factors influencing EGFR-TKI efficacies studied earlier such as the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status or uncommon mutation, we would like to see whether semi-quantify EGFR mutation gene expression calculated by 2-ΔΔct was a prognostic factor in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving first-line EGFR-TKIs. This retrospective study reviews 926 lung cancer patients diagnosed from January 2011 to October 2013 at the Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taiwan. Of 224 EGFR-mutant adenocarcinoma patients, 148 patients who had 2-ΔΔct data were included. The best cutoff values of 2-ΔΔct for in-frame deletions in exon 19 (19 deletion) and a position 858 substituted from leucine (L) to an arginine (R) in exon 21 (L858R) were determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. Patients were divided into high and low 2-ΔΔct expression based on the above cutoff level. The best cutoff point of 2-ΔΔct value of 19 deletion and L858R was 31.1 and 104.7, respectively. In all, 92 (62.1%) patients showed high 2-ΔΔct expression and 56 patients (37.9%) low 2-ΔΔct expression. The mean age was 65.6 years. Progression-free survival of 19 deletion mutant patients with low versus high expression level was 17.07 versus 12.04 months (P = 0.004), respectively. Progression-free survival of L858 mutant patients was 13.75 and 7.96 months (P = 0.008), respectively. EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients with lower EGFR gene expression had longer progression-free survival duration without interfering overall survival.

A Survival Scoring System for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with De Novo Bone Metastases.

In the pre-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) era, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with de novo bone metastases had a worse prognosis than those without. However, whether epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-TKIs affect the outcomes of EGFR mutant NSCLC patients with de novo bone metastases has not been well studied thus far. We retrospectively studied the effect of EGFR mutation status and first-line EGFR-TKIs on patient outcomes and created a survival scoring system for NSCLC patients with de novo bone metastases. This retrospective study evaluated 1510 NSCLC patients diagnosed between November 2010 and March 2014. Among these patients, 234 patients had de novo bone metastases. We found that 121 of these 234 patients (51.7%) had positive EGFR mutation tests, and a positive EGFR mutation test significantly affected overall survival (OS) (EGFR mutant: 15.2 months, EGFR wild type: 6.5 months; p < 0.001). Other prognostic factors significant in the multivariable analysis for NSCLC with de novo bone metastases included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) (OS; PS 0-2: 11.2 months, PS 3-4: 4.9 months; p = 0.002), presence of extraosseous metastases (OS; with extraosseous metastases: 8.8 months, without extraosseous metastases: 14.0 months; p = 0.008), blood lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) (OS; LMR > 3.1: 17.1months, LMR ≤ 3.1: 6.9months; p < 0.001). A positive EGFR mutation status reversed the poor outcomes of NSCLC patients with de novo bone metastases. A simple and useful survival scoring system including the above clinical parameters was thus created for NSCLC patients with de novo bone metastases.

Impact of clinical parameters and systemic inflammatory status on epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients readministration with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) readministration to lung cancer patients is common owing to the few options available. Impact of clinical factors on prognosis of EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving EGFR-TKI readministration after first-line EGFR-TKI failure and a period of TKI holiday remains unclear. Through this retrospective study, we aimed to understand the impact of clinical factors in such patients. METHODS: Of 1386 cases diagnosed between December 2010 and December 2013, 80 EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients who were readministered TKIs after failure of first-line TKIs and intercalated with at least one cycle of cytotoxic agent were included. We evaluated clinical factors that may influence prognosis of TKI readministration as well as systemic inflammatory status in terms of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR). Baseline NLR and LMR were estimated at the beginning of TKI readministration and trends of NLR and LMR were change amount from patients receiving first-Line TKIs to TKIs readministration. RESULTS: Median survival time since TKI readministration was 7.0 months. In the univariable analysis, progression free survival (PFS) of first-line TKIs, baseline NLR and LMR, and trend of LMR were prognostic factors in patients receiving TKIs readministration. In the multivariate analysis, only PFS of first-line TKIs (p < 0.001), baseline NLR (p = 0.037), and trend of LMR (p = 0.004) were prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Longer PFS of first-line TKIs, low baseline NLR, and high trend of LMR were good prognostic factors in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients receiving TKI readministration.

Advanced non-Small cell lung cancer patients at the extremes of age in the era of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES: The clinical characteristics and survival of very young (≤40 years) and very old (>80years) patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are distinct. However, the benefits of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to patients at the extremes of age with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutation have not been well studied. We retrospectively studied the effect of extreme age on patients' clinical characteristics and prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 1510 lung cancer patients diagnosed between November 2010 and March 2014, 555 patients who were tested for EGFR mutations were included. Patients were divided into the following groups according to age: young (≤40 years), lower medium (41-60 years), higher medium (61-80years), and very old (>80years). RESULTS: Of the 555 patients, 20 (3.6%) patients were aged ≤40 years and 60 (10.8%) patients were aged >80years. Young NSCLC patients had a lower BMI (p=0.003), more brain (p=0.016) and bone metastases (p=0.002) Very young lung cancer patients still have poor prognosis even they were EGFR mutant. (EGFR mutant vs. wild type patients, OS: 12 vs. 7.3 months, p=0.215) Very old NSCLC patients had a lower BMI (p=0.003) and poor ECOG PS (p=0.028). Positive EGFR mutation test reverses poor prognosis of elderly NSCLC patients. (EGFR mutant vs. wild type patients, OS: 13.2 vs. 4.9 months, p=0.003) CONCLUSION: We observed EGFR mutations reverse the poor prognosis of old patients with NSCLC. However, young patients with lung cancer have a poor prognosis even if they harbor EGFR mutations.

The impact of clinical parameters on progression-free survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring EGFR-mutations receiving first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES: In daily practice, some patients with certain clinical characteristics may have better responses to the administration of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). It is therefore reasonable to stratify and weigh the importance of these clinical parameters which may not only affect patients' responses to TKIs but also progression-free survival (PFS) other than the impact of EGFR mutation status per se. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated EGFR-mutant, non-small cell lung cancer patients who received EGFR-TKIs as a first-line therapy between January 2011 and December 2013. Several potential prognostic factors were analyzed with respect to PFS, and the results of this analysis were validated in another time cohort. RESULTS: A total of 262 patients were included in the study. Age ≤ 40 years, uncommon EGFR mutations, poor performance status, more sites of distal metastasis, and blood lymphocyte to monocyte ratio ≤ 3 were independently associated with poor PFS. These five factors were included in a scoring system and three prognostic groups A, B, and C, were formed based on total scores of 0-1, 2, and ≥ 3, respectively. In the test group, the PFS was 15.7 month, 9.3 month, and 4.0 month in groups A, B, and C, respectively (p<0.001). Between the test and validation groups, no significant differences were found in each one of the three prognostic groups. CONCLUSIONS: The scoring system appears valid and reproducible for PFS prognosis in EGFR-mutant patients who received first-line EGFR-TKIs.

Antacid Use and De Novo Brain Metastases in Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Were Treated Using First-Line First-Generation Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Antacid treatments decrease the serum concentrations of first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), although it is unknown whether antacids affect clinical outcomes. As cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of TKIs are much lower than serum concentrations, we hypothesized that this drug-drug interaction might affect the prognosis of patients with de novo brain metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated 269 patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had been diagnosed between December 2010 and December 2013, and had been treated using first-line first-generation EGFR-TKIs. Among these patients, we identified patients who concurrently used H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) as antacids. Patients who exhibited >30% overlap between the use of TKIs and antacids were considered antacid users. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients (57/269, 21.2%) were antacid users, and antacid use did not significantly affect progression-free survival (PFS; no antacids: 11.2 months, H2RAs: 9.4 months, PPIs: 6.7 months; p = 0.234). However, antacid use significantly reduced overall survival (OS; no antacids: 25.0 months, H2RAs: 15.5 months, PPIs: 11.3 months; p = 0.002). Antacid use did not affect PFS for various metastasis sites, although antacid users with de novo brain metastases exhibited significantly shorter OS, compared to non-users (11.8 vs. 16.3 months, respectively; p = 0.041). Antacid use did not significantly affect OS in patients with bone, liver, or pleural metastases. CONCLUSION: Antacid use reduced OS among patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who were treated using first-line first-generation EGFR-TKIs, and especially among patients with de novo brain metastases.

Baseline, Trend, and Normalization of Carcinoembryonic Antigen as Prognostic Factors in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutant Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With First-Line Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

Among epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status unknown nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, those with higher carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level are more likely to response to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) because they tend to have mutant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). However, patients with higher CEA also have more tumor burden. With the above paradoxical evidence, it is prudent to understand the prognostic significance of baseline CEA in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with first-line EGFR-TKIs. The clinical significance of the trend in CEA after treatment and the impact of CEA normalization during EGFR-TKI therapy are also unknown and potentially important. A total of 241 patients who received first-line EGFR-TKIs were included. As to baseline CEA, patients were divided into normal, low, and high baseline CEA by cut point determined by receiver operating characteristic curves. As to CEA responses, patients were divided into 3 groups accordingly to their amount of CEA change after taking TKIs. In group A, 1-month follow-up CEA level decreased more than 35% with nadir CEA normalization; in group B, 1-month follow-up CEA level decreased more than 35% without nadir CEA normalization; and in group C, 1-month follow-up CEA level decreased less than 35% or increased. Patients with higher baseline CEA levels had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (CEA > 32 vs 5-32 vs <5  ng/mL, PFS = 8.8 vs 11.3 vs 14.4 months, respectively, P < 0.001; OS = 17.8 vs 22.0 vs 27.9 months, respectively, P = 0.01). For trend and CEA normalization in groups A, B, and C, PFS was 14.3, 10.6, and 7.1 months, respectively (P < 0.001); OS was 29.7, 20.0, and 16.2 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Baseline, trend, and normalization of CEA levels are potential prognostic markers for patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC treated with first line EGFR-TKIs.

Baseline and Trend of Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio as Prognostic Factors in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with First-Line Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Patients with early-stage lung cancer who have a high baseline lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) have a favorable prognosis. However, the prognostic significance of LMR in patients with advanced-stage EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving first-line epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has not been established. We conducted a retrospective analysis to investigate the influence of LMR on clinical outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in EGFR-mutant patients with NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 1310 lung cancer patients diagnosed between January 2011 and October 2013, 253 patients receiving first-line EGFR-TKIs for EGFR-mutant NSCLC were included. The cut-off values for baseline and the 1-month-to-baseline ratio of LMR (MBR), determined by using receiver operating characteristic curves, were 3.29 and 0.63, respectively. Patients were divided into 3 prognostic groups: high LMR and MBR, high LMR or MBR, and low LMR and MBR. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 65.2 years, and 41% were men. The median PFS and OS were 10.3 and 22.0 months, respectively. The PFS in patients with high LMR and MBR, high LMR or MBR, and low LMR and MBR were 15.4, 7.1, and 2.0 months, respectively (p < 0.001), whereas the OS were 32.6, 13.7, and 5.1 months, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A combination of baseline and trend of LMR can be used to identify patients with a high mortality risk in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients receiving first-line EGFR-TKIs.

Improving effects of chitosan nanofiber scaffolds on osteoblast proliferation and maturation.

Osteoblast maturation plays a key role in regulating osteogenesis. Electrospun nanofibrous products were reported to possess a high surface area and porosity. In this study, we developed chitosan nanofibers and examined the effects of nanofibrous scaffolds on osteoblast maturation and the possible mechanisms. Macro- and micro observations of the chitosan nanofibers revealed that these nanoproducts had a flat surface and well-distributed fibers with nanoscale diameters. Mouse osteoblasts were able to attach onto the chitosan nanofiber scaffolds, and the scaffolds degraded in a time-dependent manner. Analysis by scanning electron microscopy further showed mouse osteoblasts adhered onto the scaffolds along the nanofibers, and cell-cell communication was also detected. Mouse osteoblasts grew much better on chitosan nanofiber scaffolds than on chitosan films. In addition, human osteoblasts were able to adhere and grow on the chitosan nanofiber scaffolds. Interestingly, culturing human osteoblasts on chitosan nanofiber scaffolds time-dependently increased DNA replication and cell proliferation. In parallel, administration of human osteoblasts onto chitosan nanofibers significantly induced osteopontin, osteocalcin, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) messenger (m)RNA expression. As to the mechanism, chitosan nanofibers triggered runt-related transcription factor 2 mRNA and protein syntheses. Consequently, results of ALP-, alizarin red-, and von Kossa-staining analyses showed that chitosan nanofibers improved osteoblast mineralization. Taken together, results of this study demonstrate that chitosan nanofibers can stimulate osteoblast proliferation and maturation via runt-related transcription factor 2-mediated regulation of osteoblast-associated osteopontin, osteocalcin, and ALP gene expression.

Successful treatment of bilateral emphysematous pyelonephritis in a uremic patient without nephrectomy.

Emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN) is a severe and complicated renal infection characterized by gas formation within the infected kidney and its surrounding tissues. Early diagnosis with a high index of suspicion and aggressive treatment are important for improving outcome. Bilateral involvement is rare, and surgical intervention is usually required because of its high mortality rate. A literature review found that EPN has rarely been noted in chronic dialysis patients, and those who show bilateral EPN have demonstrated no survival at all until now. Herein, we presented a 51-year-old diabetic uremic woman who developed right emphysematous pyelitis initially and then progressed to bilateral EPN when hospitalized. Percutaneous drainage (PCD) with simultaneous antibiotic therapy successfully eradicated her renal infection. In this study, all reported cases of EPN in chronic dialysis patients were also reviewed.