RESUMO
External fixation of distal tibial fractures is often associated with delayed union. We have investigated whether union can be enhanced by using recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-7 (rhBMP-7). Osteoinduction with rhBMP-7 and bovine collagen was used in 20 patients with distal tibial fractures which had been treated by external fixation (BMP group). Healing of the fracture was compared with that of 20 matched patients in whom treatment was similar except that rhBMP-7 was not used. Significantly more fractures had healed by 16 (p=0.039) and 20 weeks (p=0.022) in the BMP group compared with the matched group. The mean time to union (p=0.002), the duration of absence from work (p=0.018) and the time for which external fixation was required (p=0.037) were significantly shorter in the BMP group than in the matched group. Secondary intervention due to delayed healing was required in two patients in the BMP group and seven in the matched group. RhBMP-7 can enhance the union of distal tibial fractures treated by external fixation.
Assuntos
Proteínas Morfogenéticas Ósseas/uso terapêutico , Fixadores Externos , Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Consolidação da Fratura/efeitos dos fármacos , Fraturas da Tíbia/tratamento farmacológico , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Proteína Morfogenética Óssea 7 , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Fraturas não Consolidadas/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radiografia , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapêutico , Reoperação , Fraturas da Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Tíbia/cirurgia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
There is great variation in the organisation of trauma care in European countries. The state of trauma care in Finnish hospitals has not been appropriately reviewed in the past. The aim of the present study conducted by the Finnish Trauma Association (FTA) was to assess the number of Finnish hospitals admitting severe trauma patients, and to evaluate the organisation and training of trauma care in those hospitals. In 2004, a telephone survey to all the Finnish hospitals was conducted, and information on the number of severe trauma patients treated per month, the organisation of acute trauma care, and the existence of multidisciplinary trauma care training was collected. Thirty-six Finnish hospitals admitted trauma patients. The range of estimated number of severely injured trauma patients treated in individual hospitals per month varied from 0.5 to 12, resulting in an estimated number of 1000-1300 patients with severe trauma treated in Finland every year (19-25/100.000 inhabitants). About 20% of the hospitals had a trauma team, and 25% had a systematic trauma education program. Only one hospital had established multidisciplinary and systematic trauma team training. The case load of severe trauma patients is low in most Finnish hospitals making it difficult to obtain and maintain sufficient experience. Too many hospitals admit too few patients, and only a few hospitals have been working on updating their trauma management protocols and education. There is an obvious need for leadership, discussion, legislation and initiatives by the professional organisations and the government to establish a modern trauma system in Finland.
Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia , Educação Médica Continuada/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/normas , Finlândia/epidemiologia , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Auditoria Médica , Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Especialização , Traumatologia/educação , Carga de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Antegrade intramedullary nailing with four different implants was used in 126 humeral shaft fractures. There were 74 acute fractures, 17 pathologic fractures, 16 fractures malaligned in a hanging cast or brace, 15 fractures with delayed union and 4 fractures that were nailed after failed open reduction and internal fixation. The nonunion rate was 21/95 after primary operation, and after reoperations 14/95. Distraction of the fracture was a significant cause of nonunion, but not type of fracture, localization, implant, and delay between injury and surgery. Shoulder joint function was significantly impaired in 25/67 patients. The patients regarded the result as good or satisfactory in 41/67 of the cases who were followed mean 3 (0.5-10) years. We conclude that antegrade intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures leads to a substantial risk of non-union and impairment of shoulder function. It can be recommended as primary treatment only when nonoperative treatment is likely to fail.