Detection of PD-L1 in circulating tumor cells and white blood cells from patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Background: Expression of PD-L1 in tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating immune cells has been associated with improved efficacy to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and emerged as a potential biomarker for the selection of patients to cancer immunotherapies. We investigated the utility of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating white blood cells (WBCs) as a noninvasive method to evaluate PD-L1 status in advanced NSCLC patients. Patients and methods: CTCs and circulating WBCs were enriched from peripheral blood samples (ISET® platform; Rarecells) from 106 NSCLC patients. PD-L1 expression on ISET filters and matched-tumor tissue was evaluated by automated immunostaining (SP142 antibody; Ventana), and quantified in tumor cells and WBCs. Results: CTCs were detected in 80 (75%) patients, with levels ranging from 2 to 256 CTCs/4 ml, and median of 60 CTCs/4 ml. Among 71 evaluable samples with matched-tissue and CTCs, 6 patients (8%) showed ≥1 PD-L1-positive CTCs and 11 patients (15%) showed ≥1% PD-L1-positive tumor cells in tumor tissue with 93% concordance between tissue and CTCs (sensitivity = 55%; specificity = 100%). From 74 samples with matched-tissue and circulating WBCs, 40 patients (54%) showed ≥1% PD-L1-positive immune infiltrates in tumor tissue and 39 patients (53%) showed ≥1% PD-L1 positive in circulating WBCs, with 80% concordance between blood and tissue (sensitivity = 82%; specificity = 79%). We found a trend for worse survival in patients receiving first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy treatments, whose tumors express PD-L1 in CTCs or immune cells (progression-free and overall survival), similar to the effects of PD-L1 expression in matched-patient tumors. Conclusions: These results demonstrated that PD-L1 status in CTCs and circulating WBCs correlate with PD-L1 status in tumor tissue, revealing the potential of CTCs assessment as a noninvasive real-time biopsy to evaluate PD-L1 expression in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC.

Comparative study of the PD-L1 status between surgically resected specimens and matched biopsies of NSCLC patients reveal major discordances: a potential issue for anti-PD-L1 therapeutic strategies.

BACKGROUND: High expression of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) on tumor cells (TC) and/or on tumor-infiltrating immune cells (IC) is associated with a high response rate in patients with advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with PD-L1 inhibitors. The use of a PD-L1 immunohistochemical (IHC) test in determining the responsiveness to immunotherapy has raised the question of the reliability and reproducibility of its evaluation in lung biopsies compared with corresponding resected surgical specimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PD-L1 expression in TC and IC was assessed in 160 patients with operable NSCLC on both whole surgical tissue sections and matched lung biopsies, by using a highly sensitive SP142 IHC assay. The specimens were scored as TC 0-3 and IC 0-3 based on increasing PD-L1 expression. RESULTS: PD-L1 expression was frequently discordant between surgical resected and matched biopsy specimens (the overall discordance rate = 48%; 95% confidence interval 4.64-13.24) and κ value was equal to 0.218 (poor agreement). In all cases, the biopsy specimens underestimated the PD-L1 status observed on the whole tissue sample. PD-L1-positive IC tumors were more common than PD-L1-positive TC tumors on resected specimens. The discrepancies were mainly related to the lack of a PD-L1-positive IC component in matched biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate relatively poor association of the PD-L1 expression in TC and IC between lung biopsies and corresponding resected tumors. Although these results need to be further validated in larger cohorts, they indicate that the daily routine evaluation of the PD-L1 expression in diagnostic biopsies can be misleading in defining the sensitivity to treatment with PD-L1 targeted therapy.

Discrepancies between FISH and immunohistochemistry for assessment of the ALK status are associated with ALK 'borderline'-positive rearrangements or a high copy number: a potential major issue for anti-ALK therapeutic strategies.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas expressing ALK rearrangements are highly responsive to crizotinib, a dual ALK/c-MET inhibitor. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is an easy clinically and routinely applicable cost-effective assay for ALK, c-MET and ROS1 protein expression for potential treatment with crizotinib. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the percentage and the pattern of ALK-rearranged cells, the variation in the native ALK copy number, as well as ALK, c-MET and ROS1 protein expression, and their significance on outcome of crizotinib-treated lung adenocarcinoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive lung adenocarcinoma specimens (n = 176) 'double-negative' (wild-type EGFR and KRAS) were tested for ALK rearrangements/copy number alterations and for ALK, c-MET and ROS1 protein expression using automated standardized protocols. Preliminary data on the outcome of crizotinib-treated patients were recorded. RESULTS: FISH analysis identified 26/176 (15%) cases with ALK rearrangements. Seven cases had discordant results between the ALK FISH and IHC. Five cases with discordant FISH-positive/IHC-negative revealed FISH 'borderline' positivity (15%-20%). Three cases overexpressed c-MET and responded to crizotinib, and two cases with ALK-'borderline' rearranged cells only, not associated with c-MET expression, progressed under crizotinib. Two cases with discordant FISH-negative/IHC-positive revealed ALK gene amplification without associated c-MET or ROS1 protein expression. CONCLUSIONS: The discrepancies observed between the IHC and FISH data revealed unexpected biological events, rather than technical issues, which potentially can have a strong impact on the therapeutic strategy with crizotinib.