Pitfalls in imaging the submandibular glands with PET/CT.

Imaging of the submandibular glands can provide vital information about malignant neoplastic processes. One of these modalities, fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT), has become very important in the detection of malignancies because it provides functional and metabolic information as well as anatomic localization. However, there are several pitfalls associated with FDG-PET/CT in terms of salivary gland imaging. For example, a normal increase in the uptake of radiotracer might be mistaken for a neoplastic process. Other routine findings may include normal physiologic uptake in some structures, benign tumors and medical conditions, and iatrogenic abnormalities. We review a case in which compensatory hypertrophy of a submandibular gland was suspected to be a possible malignancy.

Prescription drug cost reduction in Native Hawaiians after laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass.

OBJECTIVE: Native Hawaiians (NH) represent a unique population where socioeconomic factors have contributed to higher incidence rates of obesity and related comorbidities than in the general population resulting in substantial prescription medication costs. Studies demonstrate that laparoscopic Roux-en-y gastric bypass (LRYGB) surgery results in significant weight loss, improvement of comorbidities, and decreased costs for prescription medications in Caucasians. This study aimed to analyze the effects of LRYGB surgery on Native Hawaiians and their prescription drug costs. METHODS: Demographics, baseline body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, preoperative, and postoperative data were analyzed for NH patients who underwent LRYGB between January 2004 and April 2009. Medication costs were determined using the online pharmacy . Generic drugs were selected when appropriate, while vitamins and nutritional supplements were not included in this study. RESULTS: Fifty (14 Men, 36 women) NH patients had sufficient data and follow-up for analysis. Average preoperative BMI was 49 kg/m(2), while at one year follow-up it decreased to 33 kg/m(2) (P<.001). This correlates to an average of 61% excess body weight lost (P<.001). The average number of prescription medications decreased from 3.5/patient preoperatively to 1.1/patient at one year (P<.001), equating to a monthly cost savings of US $195.8/patient (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: LRYGB provided substantial weight loss for morbidly obese NH patients, resulting in significantly less prescription medication use and substantial cost savings. Thus, bariatric surgery for weight management has the potential to improve the overall well-being and lower the financial burden of medical care in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities such as the NH.

Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass performed in a community hospital setting: the future of bariatric surgery?

INTRODUCTION: Since receiving Food and Drug Administration approval in 2000, surgery utilizing a robot has been successfully performed in numerous procedures including gastric bypass. However, despite the proven safety profile, reported lower complication rates, and technical benefits of robotic surgery, only a few centers in the USA have consistently applied this technology to bariatric surgery. In addition, there are limited studies with relatively small sample sizes comparing robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RRYGB) with laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). METHODS: Through a retrospective analysis of our database, we compared outcomes of RRYGB versus LRYGB in the treatment of morbid obesity. All patients who underwent RRYGB and LRYGB through the Comprehensive Weight Management Program of the Queen's Medical Center (Honolulu, HI) from January 2007 to December 2009 were included. Outcomes data included weight loss, operative times, and hospital length of stay. All complications were reported. RESULTS: 105 patients who underwent RRYGB were compared with 195 patients who received LRYGB. Excess weight loss, estimated blood loss, and length of hospital stay were similar in both groups. There were no mortalities in either group. The RRYGB group experienced a 9.5% complication rate versus 9.7% in LRYGB patients. Operative time was the only statistically significant difference, being approximately 17 min in favor of LRYGB. However, there was a steady decrease in RRYGB operative time with increasing experience. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates a favorable safety profile with nearly equivalent outcomes and some previously unidentified qualitative benefits of the RRYGB approach to bariatric surgery in a community setting. These results are despite our early experience with the robotic surgery platform and confirm noninferiority of RRYGB versus LRYGB. While the RRYGB operative time was longer than LRYGB, the demonstrated decrease in operative time commensurate with increase in operative experience holds tremendous promise for the future.