Differential Engagement by Race/Ethnicity in Experimental Trials of Mental Health Treatment Interventions: A Systematic Review.

Objective: Research on mental health interventions, largely from observational studies, suggests that individuals who are Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) have lower treatment engagement than non-Latino Whites. This systematic review focuses on prospective, experimental treatment trials, which reduce variability in patient and intervention characteristics and some access barriers (eg, cost), to examine the association of race/ethnicity and engagement.Data Sources: A systematic search of PubMed and PsycINFO through May 2020 using terms covering mental health treatment, engagement, and race/ethnicity.Study Selection: US-based, English-language, prospective experimental (including quasi-experimental) trials of adults treated for DSM-defined mental disorders were included. Studies had to compare engagement (treatment initiation and retention, medication adherence) across 2 or more ethnoracial groups. Fifty-five of 2,520 articles met inclusion criteria.Data Extraction: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and the Cochrane Collaboration bias-risk assessment tool were used to report study findings.Results: Twenty-nine articles (53%) reported significant ethnoracial engagement differences, of which 93% found lower engagement among BIPOC groups compared largely to non-Latino Whites. The proportion of significant findings was consistent across quality of studies, covariate adjustments, ethnoracial groups, disorders, treatments, and 4 engagement definitions. Reporting limitations were found in covariate analyses and disaggregation of results across specific ethnoracial groups.Conclusions: Prospective experimental treatment trials reveal consistently lower BIPOC engagement, suggesting persisting disparities despite standardized study designs. Future research should improve inclusion of understudied groups, examine covariates systematically, and follow uniform reporting and analytic practices to elucidate reasons for these disparities.

Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Among Publicly Insured Mental Health Service Outpatients With Serious Mental Illness.

OBJECTIVE: The study investigated factors associated with unmet need for dental care and oral health-related quality of life (OHQoL) among individuals with serious mental illness receiving outpatient care in a public mental health program serving a largely low-income population, mostly from racial-ethnic minority groups. METHODS: Cross-sectional interview data were collected from a convenience sample (N=150) of outpatients. Adjusted risk ratios (ARRs) and adjusted risk differences (ARDs) were estimated by logistic regression models to examine the independent contribution of sociodemographic and clinical factors to low OHQoL and past-year unmet dental need, defined as inability to obtain all needed dental care. RESULTS: More than half of participants reported low OHQoL (54%) and a past-year dental visit (61%). Over one-third (39%) had past-year unmet dental need. Financial barriers (ARR=3.16) and nonfinancial barriers (ARR=2.18) were associated with greater risk for past-year unmet dental need after control for age, gender, high dental anxiety, and limited English proficiency. ARDs for financial and nonfinancial barriers indicated absolute differences of 40 and 27 percentage points, respectively. Unmet dental need (ARR=1.31), xerostomia severity (ARR=1.20), and a schizophrenia spectrum diagnosis (ARR=1.33) were associated with low OHQoL, after control for age and current smoking, with ARDs ranging from 11 to 15 percentage points. CONCLUSIONS: Improving oral health promotion, oral health service access, and the integration of the mental and oral health systems may help reduce the high prevalence of low OHQoL in this population, given that low OHQoL is partly driven by unmet dental need.

Feasibility, acceptability and clinical utility of the Cultural Formulation Interview: mixed-methods results from the DSM-5 international field trial.

BackgroundThere is a need for clinical tools to identify cultural issues in diagnostic assessment.AimsTo assess the feasibility, acceptability and clinical utility of the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) in routine clinical practice.MethodMixed-methods evaluation of field trial data from six countries. The CFI was administered to diagnostically diverse psychiatric out-patients during a diagnostic interview. In post-evaluation sessions, patients and clinicians completed debriefing qualitative interviews and Likert-scale questionnaires. The duration of CFI administration and the full diagnostic session were monitored.ResultsMixed-methods data from 318 patients and 75 clinicians found the CFI feasible, acceptable and useful. Clinician feasibility ratings were significantly lower than patient ratings and other clinician-assessed outcomes. After administering one CFI, however, clinician feasibility ratings improved significantly and subsequent interviews required less time.ConclusionsThe CFI was included in DSM-5 as a feasible, acceptable and useful cultural assessment tool.