Cardiac dimensions in athletes in relation to variations in their training program.

The cardiac dimensions of male long-distance runners (LDR) and cycle racers (CR) were determined echocardiographically during four different training seasons, i.e., a preparation, a competitive, a slowing-down and a resting season, and were compared with those of control subjects (CS). Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was also assessed from the electrocardiogram. The maximal aerobic performance was determined on a bicycle ergometer. In the athletes, left ventricular mass was significantly greater in all seasons than the values in the CS. This difference resulted from a thicker interventricular septum and left ventricular posterior wall as well as a larger left ventricular internal diameter. The existence of LVH was confirmed by the electrocardiographic findings. No differences were observed between the four different training seasons, despite considerable changes in the training program for weeks to months. The maximal aerobic performance test in LDR showed a significantly higher workload during the competitive than during the preparation season. The CR reached significantly lower values during the resting season than during the other seasons. The results indicate that the possible adaptation of the cardiac dimensions to variations in the heaviness of the training program is relatively slow.

Echocardiographic dimensions in athletes in relation to their training programs.

The cardiac dimensions of long-distance runners (LDR), cycle racers (CR), and weight lifters (WL) were determined echocardiographically and were compared with those of control subjects (CS). Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was also assessed from the electrocardiogram. Training information was obtained through a questionnaire. The maximal aerobic performance was assessed on a cycle ergometer. Comparison of the cardiac dimensions revealed that left ventricular mass (LVmass) was significantly increased in LDR and CR as compared to CS. This resulted from thickening of the interventricular septum and left ventricular posterior wall as well as from enlargement of the left ventricular internal diameter. The existence of LVH was confirmed by electrocardiographic investigation. Although the left ventricular wall was enlarged in WL, their LVmass was not significantly increased as compared with CS. These results are in agreement with the training program followed. Weight lifters almost exclusively performed strength training, while LDR and CR were mainly involved in endurance training. The LDR and CR reached significantly higher maximal aerobic performance levels than WL. The present results suggest a close relationship between the type of cardiac enlargement and the training program followed by the athletes.

Propagation velocity and reflection of pressure waves in the canine coronary artery.

In this study the pressure wave velocity in the anterior descending branch of the left coronary artery (LADC) of the dog was measured by determining the delay time between pressure pulses along this artery. This method can only be applied if reflections of the pressure wave distal to the sites of pressure measurement are insignificant. From araldite casts of the coronary arteries the following relation between the diameter proximal to (dprox) and distal to (ddist 1, ddist 2) a bifurcation was found: dprox2.55 = ddist12.55 + ddist 22.55, indicating that reflections at a bifurcation areminimal. In dogs reflections were studied by inducing during diastole a pressure pulse in the aorta and measuring pressure and volume flow proximal to and pressure distal to a segment of the LADC at various levels of the coronary peripheral resistance. Reflection of high-frequency components (greater than 7 Hz) was found to be insignificant, allowing application of the above-mentioned method for measuring the wave-front velocity, which is insensitive to low-frequency reflection. At a pressure in the LADC of 13.3 kPa this velocity was 8.6 +/- 1.4 m.s-1 (mean +/- SD). The calculated dynamic cross-sectional stiffness (deltaP/(deltaA/A)) of the LADC was 97 +/- 11 kPa (mean +/- SE) at an arterial pressure of 13.3 kPa.