Tumor markers in colorectal cancer, gastric cancer and gastrointestinal stromal cancers: European group on tumor markers 2014 guidelines update.

Biomarkers currently play an important role in the detection and management of patients with several different types of gastrointestinal cancer, especially colorectal, gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) adenocarcinomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). The aim of this article is to provide updated and evidence-based guidelines for the use of biomarkers in the different gastrointestinal malignancies. Recommended biomarkers for colorectal cancer include an immunochemical-based fecal occult blood test in screening asymptomatic subjects ≥50 years of age for neoplasia, serial CEA levels in postoperative surveillance of stage II and III patients who may be candidates for surgical resection or systemic therapy in the event of distant metastasis occurring, K-RAS mutation status for identifying patients with advanced disease likely to benefit from anti-EGFR therapeutic antibodies and microsatellite instability testing as a first-line screen for subjects with Lynch syndrome. In advanced gastric or GOJ cancers, measurement of HER2 is recommended in selecting patients for treatment with trastuzumab. For patients with suspected GIST, determination of KIT protein should be used as a diagnostic aid, while KIT mutational analysis may be used for treatment planning in patients with diagnosed GISTs.

[Diagnosis and multimodal therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma]. / Diagnose und multimodale Therapie des hepatozellulären Karzinoms.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in the world. The majority of HCCs develops on the basis of a chronic liver disease. This often complicates diagnosis and therapy. Non-invasive diagnostic criteria are based on dynamic imaging techniques and the serum level of AFP (alpha-fetoprotein). When evaluating HCC patients for therapy, besides tumor burden and localisation, the therapeutic evaluation must also consider the general condition of the patient and his/her liver function. For this purpose, the BCLC algorithm of the Barcelona Clinic for Liver Disease has proven helpful. Only one-third of the patients can be cured by resection, transplantation or local tumour ablation. In locally advanced cases transarterial procedures including transarterial chemoembolisation and radioembolisation are applied. HCC is a chemo-resistant tumour and chemotherapy is not accepted as standard of care in HCC. Sorafenib is the first systemic treatment with proven efficacy approved for the treatment of advanced and metastatic HCC. Interdisciplinary management of HCC patients is essential in order to provide every patient with the optimal therapy at his specific stage of disease.

Tumor markers in pancreatic cancer: a European Group on Tumor Markers (EGTM) status report.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is one of the most difficult malignancies to diagnose and treat. The aim of this article is to review how tumor markers can aid the diagnosis and management of patients with this malignancy. The most widely used and best validated marker for pancreatic cancer is CA 19-9. Inadequate sensitivity and specificity limit the use of CA 19-9 in the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. In non-jaundiced patients, however, CA 19-9 may complement other diagnostic procedures. In patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, presurgical and postresection CA 19-9 levels correlate with overall survival. In advanced disease, elevated pretreatment levels of CA 19-9 are associated with adverse patient outcome and thus may be combined with other factors for risk stratification. Most, but not all, reports indicate that serial levels of CA 19-9 correlate with response to systemic therapy. Use of CA 19-9 kinetics in conjunction with imaging is therefore recommended in monitoring therapy. Although several potential serum and tissue markers for pancreatic cancer are currently undergoing evaluation, none are sufficiently validated for routine clinical use. CA 19-9 thus remains the serum pancreatic cancer marker against which new markers for this malignancy should be judged.

Tumour markers in colorectal cancer: European Group on Tumour Markers (EGTM) guidelines for clinical use.

The aim of this article is to present updated guidelines for the use of serum, tissue and faecal markers in colorectal cancer (CRC). Lack of specificity and sensitivity preclude the use of all existing serum markers for the early detection of CRC. For patients with stage II or stage III CRC who may be candidates for either liver resection or systemic treatment should recurrence develop, CEA should be measured every 2-3 months for at least 3 years after diagnosis. Insufficient evidence exists to recommend routine use of tissue factors such as thymidylate synthase, microsatellite instability (MSI), p53, K-ras and deleted in colon cancer (DCC) for either determining prognosis or predicting response to therapy in patients with CRC. Microsatellite instability, however, may be used as a pre-screen for patients with suspected hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Faecal occult blood testing but not faecal DNA markers may be used to screen asymptomatic subjects 50 years or older for early CRC.

Clinical relevance of tumor markers for the control of chemotherapy.

This presentation is based on our experience with tumor marker monitoring of surgery therapy and chemotherapy effects. The control of chemotherapy is one of the most important problems in oncological practice. The correlation between the clinical status of the patient and tumor size changes, based on the results of different imaging methods, has been the most important and most frequently used method. However, the therapy effect has been recently assessed by markers of the biological activity of the tumor. Using tumor markers for the assessment of the effect of surgery therapy is already part of routine practice in many different types of cancer. Pre-operative and post-operative values of tumor markers are essential for a proper evaluation. However, tumor marker monitoring of the effect of radiotherapy and chemotherapy has been used very rarely, mostly only for research purposes. Besides monitoring by classical tumor markers, monitoring by markers of angiogenesis and apoptosis seem to be promising for the assessment of chemotherapy effect. Measurement of circulating cancer cells by means of mRNA also seems to be intriguing for therapy effect control and monitoring of the course of disease. Unfortunately, the routine use of these methods has been applied in only a few institutes worldwide. A completely different situation has been observed in palliative treatment. In most cases, changes of serum levels of tumor markers correlate with therapy effect. Thus, the effect of treatment on tumor proliferation can be successfully estimated by decreasing tumor marker levels.

Changes of thymidine kinase (TK) during adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy.

UNLABELLED: Thymidine kinase is involved in nucleic acid synthesis and is, therefore, considered to be an important proliferation tumor marker. For this reason, we monitored this marker in the course of colorectal cancer chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined thymidine kinase (TK) levels in 30 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy (CHT schemes). The condition for being included in the study was a minimum of 3 cycles of chemotherapy. TK was always assessed with radio-receptor analysis, before and after every chemotherapy cycle, together with other tumor markers. RESULTS: From the monitored tumor markers, only TK changed typically in the course of chemotherapy. In adjuvant chemotherapy, it was mostly low at the beginning of the cycle and its values usually increased considerably at the end. On the other hand, in palliative chemotherapy the dynamics of TK varied mainly depending on the effect of the therapy. Other tumor markers showed nonstandard behavior and minimal correlation with TK changes. CONCLUSION: Thymidine kinase seems to be a suitable parameter for monitoring the effect of adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy in colorectal cancer.

Are serial CA 19-9 kinetics helpful in predicting survival in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine and cisplatin?

BACKGROUND: Serial kinetics of serum CA 19-9 levels have been reported to reflect response and survival in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. We prospectively studied serial kinetics of serum CA 19-9 levels of patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease treated with gemcitabine and cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Enrolled in the study were 87 patients (female/male = 26/61; stage III/IV disease = 24/63). Patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 plus cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15, every 4 weeks. Serum samples were collected at the onset of chemotherapy and before the start of a new treatment cycle (day 28). RESULTS: 77 of 87 patients (88.5%) with initially elevated CA 19-9 levels were included for evaluation. According to imaging criteria, 4 (5.2%) achieved a complete remission and 11 (14.3%) achieved partial remission, yielding an overall response rate of 19.5%. 43 (55.8%) patients were CA 19-9 responders, defined by a > or = 50% decrease in CA 19-9 serum levels within 2 months after treatment initiation. Except for one, all patients who had responded by imaging criteria (n = 14) fulfilled the criterion of a CA 19-9 responder. Despite being characterized as non-responders by CT-imaging criteria (stable/progressive disease), 29 patients were classified as CA 19-9 responders (positive predictive value 32.5%). Independent of the response evaluation by CT, CA 19-9 responders survived significantly longer than CA 19-9 nonresponders (295 d; 95% CI: 285-445 vs. 174 d; 95% CI: 134-198; p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: CA 19-9 kinetics in serum serve as an early and reliable indicator of response and help to predict survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving effective treatment with gemcitabine and cisplatin.

Clinical utility of biochemical markers in colorectal cancer: European Group on Tumour Markers (EGTM) guidelines.

In recent years, numerous serum and cell/tissue-based markers have been described for colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this article was to provide guidelines for the routine clinical use of some of these markers. Lack of sensitivity and specificity preclude the use of any available serum markers such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CA 19-9, CA 242, CA 72-4, tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) or tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) for the early detection of CRC. However, preoperative measurement of CEA is desirable as this may give independent prognostic information, help with surgical management and provide a baseline level for subsequent determinations. For patients with stage 2 (Dukes' B) and 3 (Dukes' C) disease who may be candidates for liver resection, CEA levels should be measured every 2-3 months for at least 3 years after diagnosis. For monitoring treatment of advanced disease, CEA should also be tested every 2-3 months. Insufficient evidence is presently available to recommend the routine use of other serum markers for monitoring purposes. Similarly, the new cell and tissue-based markers (e.g, ras, P53) cannot yet be recommended for routine clinical use.

[Treatment monitoring, recurrence detection, prognosis. Here's where tumor markers make good sense]. / Therapie überwachen, Rezidiv erkennen, Prognose abschätzen. Hier liegen die wahren Stärken von Tumormarkern.

Of the growing group of cancer biomarkers, circulating humoral tumour markers (TM) are the longest-known subgroup of substances with protein, lipid, glycolipid or carbohydrate structure, that can be used as probes for identifying the origin, growth and therapy-related debulking of a tumor. Relevant TM are well-defined and easy to determine, and disturbing factors and statistical characteristics well-known. They are most commonly used not so much for early detection, localization and diagnosis, but for treatment monitoring, detection of recurrence and, latterly, also for outcome prediction. Their particular value lies in their supporting role in invasive imaging or endoscopic procedures. In some cases, they may also prolong the intervals between for such procedures.

Human biliary mucin binds to E-selectin: a possible role in modulation of inflammation.

E-selectin, expressed on endothelial cells, mediates adhesion of leukocytes and tumor cells to endothelium. CA19-9 (sialyl-Lewis(a)) and sialyl-Lewis(x) are specific ligands for E-selectin. We have recently shown that mucin-rich culture media from human gallbladder epithelial cells contains CA19-9. In this study, we have tested whether human biliary mucin binds to E-selectin. The ability of mucins to inhibit the adhesion of HL-60 cells to immobilized E-selectin was taken as an index for E-selectin binding. Gallbladder bile, hepatic bile, and culture medium from human gallbladder epithelial cells completely inhibited the adhesion of HL-60 cells to E-selectin. The mucin-rich fractions of human bile exhibited strong inhibition, whereas mucin-free fractions had little effect. In contrast to human bile samples, CA19-9-free medium from cultured dog gallbladder epithelial cells failed to inhibit HL-60 binding. Furthermore, after CA19-9 immunoaffinity chromatography, which selectively extracted CA19-9 from bile, bile samples showed poor inhibition of HL-60 adhesion to immobilized E-selectin. A good correlation was observed between E-selectin binding and CA 19-9 concentrations in bile. Our results show that human bile has E-selectin binding activity that is mediated by the CA19-9 side chain of biliary mucin.

Amplification of cyclin D1 gene in multiple myeloma: clinical and prognostic relevance.

Approximately 30% of myeloma patients express cyclin D1 RNA and protein. The low incidence of translocation t(11; 14) detected by conventional cytogenetics suggests that the up-regulation of cyclin D1 protein might result from other mechanisms as well as from gene amplification. Therefore, the frequency and the clinical and prognostic implications of cyclin D1 amplification were examined. We highly purified myeloma cells from bone marrow by magnetic cell sorting and analysed 50 myelomas by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using probes specific for cyclin D1 and 20 samples by immunoblotting to detect cyclin D1 expression. The amplification of cyclin D1 gene was found in 19 of 50 analysed patients and was associated with expression of cyclin D1 protein. The amplification correlated significantly with the bone marrow infiltration, plasma cell morphology and labelling index as well as serum beta2-microglobulin, C-reactive protein (CRP) and creatinine levels. In univariate analysis, the amplification of the cyclin D1 gene was a significantly unfavourable parameter with regard to overall survival (P = 0.0064) and progression-free survival (P = 0. 0005). In multivariate analysis, cyclin D1 amplification and serum beta2-microglobulin were independent and well-suited parameters for predicting survival. The detection of cyclin D1 amplification seems to be of promising prognostic value in multiple myeloma.

Multivariate analysis of the prognostic value of CEA and CA 19-9 serum levels in colorectal cancer.

UNLABELLED: Carcinoembrionic Antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) are the most commonly used tumor-associated antigens in the management of patients with colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of preoperative serum levels of CEA and/or CA 19-9 and the classical prognostic factors (age, sex, tumor infiltration and staging) in 495 patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The retrospective study was performed on frozen sera (stored at -70 degrees C) of patients with histologically proven colorectal cancer. Survival function estimates were calculated (Kaplan-Meier). The patients were separated into two groups according to the preoperative marker levels. Cut-off levels calculated at a specificity of 100% versus healthy individuals were used: < 4 ng/mL versus > or = 4 ng/mL for CEA and < 60 U/mL versus > or = 60 U/mL for CA 19-9. Survival curve differences were assessed using the log-rank-test. Mulivariate Cox's proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to examine the association between tumor marker levels and survival time. Classical prognostic factors such as age, sex, tumor infiltration, tumor stage (Dukes' classification) were included as covariants. The mantel-Haenszel method was used to assess the survival rate of patients with colorectal carcinoma and high versus low levels of tumor-associated antigens according to tumor stages. RESULTS: The Dukes' stages (log-rank chi-square = 231.9; p < 0.0001) represent the best prognostic factor besides the preoperative values of CA 19-9 (log-rank chi-square = 162.5). CEA shows a log-rank chi-square of 71.4. Thus, CEA and CA 19-9 can be used to discriminate two groups of patients with significantly different survival times (p < 0.0001). The importance of different parameters in providing additional prognostic information was evaluated by multivariate analysis. Only items of statistically significant prognostic relevance (univariate analysis) were used for this analysis. Estimated relative risks of death adjusted for tumor stage were 5.5 considering Dukes' stage A versus Dukes' stage B/C and Dukes' stage B/C versus Dukes' stage D, respectively, and an increasing relative risk of 27.5 for Dukes' stage A versus Dukes' stage D (p < 0.001). The relative risk for preoperative CA 19-9 serum concentrations (> or = 60 U/mL versus < 60 U/mL) was 2.3 (p < 0.001) and for preoperative CEA concentrations (> or = 4 ng/mL versus < 4 ng/mL) 1.4 (p < 0.07). For CEA the 2-year survival rates in the group of patients with preoperative serum concentrations > 4 ng/mL versus < 4 ng/mL and Dukes' stage D were 16% versus 38%, in Dukes' stage B/C 73% versus 91% and in Dukes' stage A 100% versus 98%. For CA 19-9 the 2-year survival rates in the group of patients with preoperative serum concentrations > or = 60 U/mL versus < 60 U/mL and Dukes' stage D were 10% versus 39%, whilst in Dukes' stage B/C 58% versus 87%. In the group of patients with Dukes' stage A with serum levels > or = 60 U/mL a 2-years survival rate of 100% was found. CONCLUSION: The postoperative Dukes' classification represents the best prognostic information besides the preoperative values of CA 19-9. The predictive information provided by preoperative CA 19-9 serum levels is independent from that obtained by the other factors investigated. Only Dukes' classification and CA 19-9 levels showed statistical significance (p < 0.001).

Value of human chorionic gonadotropin compared to CEA in discriminating benign from malignant effusions.

Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) is expressed in germ cell tumors and urothelial, breast, lung and colon cancers. The aim of the study was to investigate if the determination of HCG in comparison with CEA is able to discriminate between malignant and benign effusions. Effusion and partially serum samples of 61 patients with benign (g.i., heart/kidney isnuff.) and 116 patients with malignant diseases (g.i., gynec., lung, misc., CUP) were investigated. HCG was specifically determined by an IRMA using 2 monoclonal antibodies, CEA by a conventional double Ab RIA. Cytological staining was preformed using the Pappenheim-method on cytospin preparations. Significant differences (p < 0.001) were found for HCG between benign and malignant ascitic effusions with the best discrimination at 5 IU/l (ROC) and an overall sensitivity of 31.3% (spec. vs benign eff. 93.4%) increasing in subgroups from hematol. (5.8%) < misc. (31.3%) < gynec. (32.1%) < g.i. (36%) < lung (38.1%) to CUP (50%). CEA also showed significant differences between benign and malignant total and ascitic effusions, and weaker for the pleural subgroup (cutoff 9 ng/ml) with a total sensitivity of 44.6% (sp = 100%) increasing from misc. (30.8%) < lung (47.1%) < CUP (50%) < gynec. (60%) < g.i. (60.9%). Comparative cytology and TM determinations increased the positiverate of cytology (45.2%) to 58.3% for either cytology or HCG positive cases, or to 61.6% for either cytology or CEA positive cases. For the combined determination of cytologoy and HCG and CEA, the overall TM positive rate for 33 cytology-pos. cases was 78.8%, but in 40 cytology-negative cases 37.5% for TM positive cases. In conclusion HCG is useful in ascitic > pleural effusions with high specificity (90% at 5 IU/l) but low sensitivity of 31% increasing in g.i., lung and gynecologic cases, CEA a more general TM with higher sensitivity of 45% increasing in g.i., gynecologic and lung cases (sp. 100% at 9 ng/ml) both adding significantly to cytology-negative effusions.

Use of serum PIVKA-II (DCP) determination for differentiation between benign and malignant liver diseases.

BACKGROUND: The concentration of Des-gamma-carboxy-prothrombin (DCP) or PIVKA-II has been described to be increased in patients with hepatocellular cancer, along with its elevation in vitamin K deficient states by warfarin or dicoumarol treatment. The aim of the study was to investigate its clinical value in HCC in comparison with alpha-fetoprotein. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Measurements were performed in duplicate in serum of 87 patients with benign (acute/chronic hepatitis B/C/autoimmune, liver cirrhosis B/C/alcoholic) and 154 patients with highly probable (CT, MRT imaging) or histologically proven HCC. Two commercial or research ELISA tests (1: Eitest MonoP-II, Eisai, Tokyo, Japan; 2: Asserachrom PIVKA-II, Stago, France) using murine monoclonal anti-PIVKA-II antibodies were used comparatively and compared with a laboratory-developed conventional AFP-RIA. RESULTS: By ROC analysis, a highly significant discrimination (p < 0.0001) was found at cutoffs of 0.09 AU/ml (Eisai) or 0.8 ng/ml (Stago) at a specificity of about 90% (Eisai: s = 78.6%, ppv = 0.92, npv = 0.70; Stago: s = 77.9%, ppv = 0.93, npv = 0.70) compared with the AFP-test at a cutoff of 45 ng/ml (sp = 91%, s = 58.4%, ppv = 0.92, npv = 0.55). A higher significant correlation was seen between both DCP tests in malignant (rS = 0.89, p < 0.0001) than benign groups (rS = 0.41, p < 0.001) and a lower correlation between the AFP and Eisai (rS = 0.27/0.36, p < 0.01) and Stago test for the malignant group (0.16; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: DCP determination in serum/plasma adds significantly in the discrimination between benign and malignant liver diseases.

Role of tumour markers, cytogenetics.

A review is presented on the role of conventional and molecular tumour markers (TM) in diagnosis and monitoring of patients with biliopancreatic malignancies. For biliopancreatic malignancy, following CEA as more historical and basic TM of gastrointestinal diseases, the mainstay marker is CA 19-9 as monosialo-ganglioside/glycolipid and sialyl derivative of lacto-N-fucopentaose II (sialyl-Lewis(a), hapten of human Lewis(a) bloodgroup determinant). It is detected in serum of healthy individuals at low concentration < 40 U/ml, with lower and often transitional elevation in benign hepatobiliary diseases and with highest levels in excretory ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma (s = 70%-95%, sp = 72%-90%), biliary (s = 55%-79%), hepatocellular and cholangiocellular cancer (s = 22%-51%) besides gastric, colorectal and ovarian cancer and occasionally in lung, breast and uterine cancer. Physiologically elevated concentrations in healthy individuals have to be considered in all sorts of secretions (e.g. sputum, saliva, bronchial/gastric secretions, bile juice) of individuals with Lewis(a)-positive secretor status in contrast with low or lacking serum levels of CA 19-9 in patients with Lewis(a-/b-) status (7%-10% of population). In biliopancreatic malignancies, especially pancreatic cancer, CA 19-9 correlates well with clinical course of disease following surgical, chemo- or radiotherapy by a quick normalisation within 2-4 weeks after complete surgery, a transient decrease with successful palliative therapy and an often anticipated increase (lead time up to 6 months) before clinical detection in case of relapse or progressive disease. From CA 19-9 related TM tests some are detecting in addition to sialyl-Lewis(a) (sialyllacto-N-fucopentaose II) also the non-fucosylated precursor sialyl-Lewis(c) (sialyllacto-N-tetraose: CA 50, CA 242, Span-1) solely detected by the DUPAN-2 test and independent of the Lewis(a) secretor status. Some other markers comprise in addition to sialyl-Lewis(a) partially the non-sialylated Lewis(a) antigen (CA 195, CAM 43, CA 494) or are less related (CAM 17.1). The initial phase of screening and early detection is hoped to be better assessed by using molecular markers detecting gene mutations (p53, K-ras), growth factors (EGF, TGF-alpha, TGF-beta, HB-EGF, a/bFGFs, KGF) and growth factor receptor alterations (EGFr, c-erbB2/3/4). From these, K-ras mutations detected in blood, stool and bile juice of patients at risk for pancreatic cancer seem to be more promising than p53 alterations as a more later step in carcinogenesis, although they are neither yet well established nor standardised by reliable assays. In contrast growth factor and growth factor receptor alterations mainly concerning signal transducing systems seem to reflect increased tumour aggressiveness, thus shorter survival and poorer prognosis thereby contributing in the selection of patients for more aggressive therapy.