Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 79(10): 2543-2553, 2024 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39092963

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic overuse leads to the emergence of antibiotic resistance that threatens immunocompromised cancer patients. Infections caused by MDR Gram-negative pathogens are difficult to treat and associated with high mortality. Hence, empirical therapy with standard-of-care (SOC) antibiotics could be suboptimal in these vulnerable patients. New antibiotics covering potential resistant pathogens may be considered. METHODS: We conducted a randomized non-inferiority study comparing safety and efficacy of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (IPM/REL), a ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination, with SOC antibiotics (cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam or meropenem) in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia. Patients received at least 48 h of IV antibiotics and were assessed at end-of-IV (EOIV) therapy, test of cure (TOC; Days 21-28), and late follow-up (LFU; Days 35-42). RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were enrolled (49 IPM/REL and 50 SOC). Demographics and rates of documented microbiological infections were similar in both groups. In the SOC arm, 86% of antibiotics consisted of cefepime. Patients on IPM/REL had a higher favourable clinical response at EOIV than those on SOC (90% versus 74%; P = 0.042); however, responses were similar at TOC and LFU. Microbiological eradication was comparable at all three timepoints. Study drug-related adverse events and adverse events leading to drug discontinuation were similar in both groups, with no study drug-related mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that compared with SOC antibiotics, predominantly cefepime, IPM/REL for empirical coverage of febrile neutropenia in cancer patients is generally safe and could be associated with a better clinical outcome at EOIV. The current SOC consisting mainly of agents that do not cover for ESBL-producing and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales bacteria should be reconsidered.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Compostos Azabicíclicos , Combinação Imipenem e Cilastatina , Neutropenia Febril , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Neoplasias , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neutropenia Febril/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Combinação Imipenem e Cilastatina/uso terapêutico , Compostos Azabicíclicos/uso terapêutico , Compostos Azabicíclicos/efeitos adversos , Compostos Azabicíclicos/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Imipenem/uso terapêutico , Imipenem/efeitos adversos , Imipenem/administração & dosagem , Padrão de Cuidado , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Cilastatina/uso terapêutico , Cilastatina/efeitos adversos , Cilastatina/administração & dosagem , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais
2.
Elife ; 122023 02 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36748905

RESUMO

Background: An increasing number of observational studies have reported the persistence of symptoms following recovery from acute COVID-19 disease in non-cancer patients. The long-term consequences of COVID-19 are not fully understood particularly in the cancer patient population. The purpose of this study is to assess post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) in cancer patients following acute COVID-19 recovery. Methods: We identified cancer patients at MD Anderson Cancer Center who were diagnosed with COVID-19 disease between March 1, 2020, and September 1, 2020, and followed them till May 2021. To assess PASC, we collected patients reported outcomes through questionnaires that were sent to patients daily for 14 days after COVID-19 diagnosis then weekly for 3 months, and then monthly thereafter. We also reviewed patients' electronic medical records to capture the persistence or emergence of new COVID19-related symptoms reported during any clinic or hospital encounter beyond 30 days of the acute illness and up to 14 months. Results: We included 312 cancer patients with a median age of 57 years (18-86). The majority of patients had solid tumors (75%). Of the 312 patients, 188 (60%) reported long COVID-19 symptoms with a median duration of 7 months and up to 14 months after COVID-19 diagnosis. The most common symptoms reported included fatigue (82%), sleep disturbances (78%), myalgias (67%), and gastrointestinal symptoms (61%), followed by headache, altered smell or taste, dyspnea (47%), and cough (46%). A higher number of females reported a persistence of symptoms compared to males (63% vs. 37%; p=0.036). Cancer type, neutropenia, lymphocytopenia, and hospital admission during acute COVID-19 disease were comparable in both groups. Among the 188 patients with PASC, only 16 (8.5%) were re-admitted for COVID-related reasons. Conclusions: More than one out of two cancer patients, and more likely females, report PASC that may persist beyond 6 months and even 1 year. The most common symptoms are non-respiratory and consist of fatigue, sleep disturbance, myalgia, and gastrointestinal symptoms. Most of the cancer patients with PASC were managed on outpatient basis with only 8.5% requiring a COVID-19-related re-admission. Funding: This research is supported by the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute under award number P30CA016672, which supports the MD Anderson Cancer Center Clinical Trials Office. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Estados Unidos , Feminino , Masculino , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Síndrome de COVID-19 Pós-Aguda , Teste para COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Fadiga
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA