Resistance to cabergoline as compared with bromocriptine in hyperprolactinemia: prevalence, clinical definition, and therapeutic strategy.

To evaluate the prevalence of resistance to cabergoline treatment, we studied 120 consecutive de novo patients (56 macroadenoma, 60 microadenoma, 4 nontumoral hyperprolactinemia) treated with cabergoline (CAB) compared with 87 consecutive de novo patients (28 macroadenoma, 44 microadenoma, 15 nontumoral hyperprolactinemia) treated with bromocriptine (BRC) for 24 months. Resistance was evaluated as inability to normalize serum PRL levels (first end point) and to induce tumor shrinkage (second end point). After 24 months, PRL normalization and tumor shrinkage after CAB and BRC treatments, respectively, were obtained in 82.1% and 46.4% of macroprolactinomas (P < 0.001) and in 90% vs. 56.8% of microprolactinomas (P < 0.001). The median doses of CAB and BRC able to fulfill the two criteria of treatment success were 1 mg/wk and 7.5 mg/d in macroprolactinomas, 1 mg/wk and 5 mg/d in microprolactinomas, and 0.5 mg/wk and 3.75 mg/d in nontumoral hyperprolactinemia. Hyperprolactinemia persisted in 17.8% of macroprolactinomas, 10% of microprolactinomas, and after CAB at doses of 5-7 mg/wk and in 53.6% of macroprolactinomas, 43.2% of microprolactinomas, and 20% of nontumoral hyperprolactinemic patients, after BRC at doses of 15-20 mg/d. In these resistant macro- and microprolactinomas, the maximal tumor diameter was reduced by 43.7 +/- 3.6% and 22.1 +/- 3.7% and by 59.3 +/- 7.1% and 4.3 +/- 2.1% after CAB and BRC, respectively (P < 0.001). In conclusion, long-term CAB treatment induced the successful control of hyperprolactinemia associated with tumor shrinkage in a higher proportion of patients than did BRC treatment. In a small number of patients (i.e. 17.8% of macroprolactinomas and 10% of microprolactinomas), however, CAB treatment did not normalize serum PRL levels despite reducing tumor mass, even at very high doses. Therefore, an absence of tumor shrinkage cannot be considered as end point to indicate resistance to CAB, and increasing the dose of CAB higher than 3 mg/wk does not seem to be helpful in controlling PRL hypersecretion.

New medical approaches in pituitary adenomas.

Recently, the medical approach to patients with secreting and clinically non-functioning pituitary adenomas has received great impulse thanks to the availability of new, selective and long-lasting compounds with dopaminergic activity, such as cabergoline, and of somatostatin analogues provided in slow-release formulations, such as lanreotide and octreotide long acting release (LAR). In particular, the use of cabergoline has induced control of hyperprolactinaemia and tumour shrinkage in the great majority of patients with micro- and macroprolactinomas. Cabergoline treatment restores fertility both in women and men, and partially improves osteoporosis, one of the major complications of hyperprolactinaemia. In acromegaly, disease control (growth hormone [GH] <2.5-1.0 microg/l as a fasting or glucose-suppressed value, respectively, together with age-normalised insulin-like growth factor [IGF]-I) is achievable in more than half of patients receiving treatment with lanreotide or octreotide-LAR. Improvement in cardiomyopathy, sleep apnoea and arthropathy has been reported during GH/IGF-I suppression after pharmacotherapy. A synthetic GH analogue, B2036-PEG, that antagonises endogenous GH binding to its receptor-binding sites and a GH-releasing hormone antagonist that blocks the effect of this releasing factor on the hypothalamus and pituitary are presently under investigation in acromegaly. Preliminary studies have clearly demonstrated the effectiveness of the GH receptor antagonist in suppressing IGF-I levels in acromegalic patients previously unresponsive to somatostatin analogues. Beneficial effects of subcutaneous octreotide and lanreotide have also been reported in adenomas secreting thyroid-stimulating hormone, while the results of treatment with dopamine agonists or somatostatin analogues remain disappointing in patients with clinically non-functioning adenomas. In these patients the possibility of visualising in vivo the expression of D(2) receptors using specific radiotracers such as (123)I-methoxybenzamide has allowed selection of patients likely to respond to cabergoline. Scant effects of pharmacotherapy have also been reported in patients with adenomas secreting adrenocorticotropic hormone. However, some preliminary data suggest a potential use of cabergoline in combination with ketoconazole, or alone, in selected cases of Cushing's disease or Nelson's syndrome.

The effect of quinagolide and cabergoline, two selective dopamine receptor type 2 agonists, in the treatment of prolactinomas.

OBJECTIVE: To compare effectiveness and tolerability of quinagolide (CV 205-502) and cabergoline (CAB) treatments in 39 patients with prolactinoma. STUDY DESIGN: All 39 patients were treated first with quinagolide for 12 months and then with cabergoline for 12 months. A wash-out period was performed in all patients after 12 months of both treatments in order to evaluate recurrence of hyperprolactinaemia. PATIENTS: Twenty-three patients with microprolactinoma (basal serum PRL levels 1620-18750 mU/l) and 16 patients with macroprolactinoma (basal serum PRL levels 4110-111000 mU/l), previously shown to be intolerant of bromocriptine. All patients had gonadal failure and 11 patients with macroprolactinoma had visual field defects. Five patients with macro- and one with microprolactinoma had previously undergone surgery. STUDY PROTOCOL: The starting doses of quinagolide and CAB were 0.075 mg/day and 0.5 mg/week, respectively, subsequently increased up to 0.6 mg once daily and 1.5 mg twice weekly, respectively. Serum PRL levels were measured monthly for the first 3 months and then quarterly for 12 months. PRL levels were assayed weekly for the first month and then monthly during the wash-out period. Tumour shrinkage was evaluated by serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of the hypothalamus-pituitary region at study entry and after 6 and 12 months of both treatments in micro- and macroprolactinomas. RESULTS: After 12 months of quinagolide treatment, serum PRL levels normalized in all 23 patients with microprolactinoma (100%) and in 14 out of 16 with macroprolactinoma (87.5%). A tumour volume reduction of greater than 80% was documented by MRI studies in five of 23 (21.7%) patients with microprolactinoma and in four of 16 (25%) with macroprolactinoma. All patients had recurrence of hyperprolactinaemia after 15-60 days withdrawal of quinagolide treatment. However, before starting CAB treatment basal PRL levels were significantly lower than before quinagolide treatment both in microprolactinomas (4667.4 +/- 714.7 vs. 2636.1 +/- 262.3 mU/l, P = 0.006) and in macroprolactinomas (24853.1 +/- 7566.7 vs. 3576.6 +/- 413.0 mU/l, P = 0.013). After 12 months of CAB treatment, serum PRL levels normalized in 22 out of 23 patients with microprolactinoma (95.6%) and in 14 out of 16 with macroprolactinoma (87.5%). No difference in PRL nadir was found after quinagolide and CAB treatments both in micro 174.6 +/- 30.6 vs. 169.8 +/- 37.9 mU/l, P = 0.5) and in macroprolactinomas (277.5 +/- 68.4 vs. 341.8 +/- 95.2 mU/l, P = 0.6). A tumour volume reduction of greater than 80% was documented by MRI studies in seven other patients with microprolactinoma (30.4%) and in five other patients with macroprolactinoma (31.2%). After CAB treatment, further tumour shrinkage ranging 4-40% and 2-70% was observed in 12 micro- and seven macroprolactinomas, respectively. The percentage of tumour shrinkage after CAB was significantly higher than that observed after quinagolide in microprolactinomas (48.6 +/- 9.5 vs. 26.7 +/- 4. 5%, P = 0.046) but not in macroprolactinomas (47.0 +/- 10.6 vs. 26.8 +/- 8.4%, P = 0.2). The withdrawal from CAB treatment, induced an increase in serum PRL levels in all macroprolactinomas between 15 and 30 days, in 15 out of 23 microprolactinoma after 30 days, and in four patients after 2-4 months. In the remaining four patients serum PRL levels remained normal after 12 months of CAB withdrawal. Both compounds were tolerated satisfactorily by all patients. In the first week of quinagolide treatment, 12 patients reported nausea and postural hypotension, which spontaneously disappeared during the second-third week of treatment. None of the 39 patients reported side-effects during CAB treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Both quinagolide and CAB treatments, induced the normalization of serum PRL levels in the great majority of patients with prolactinoma. Tumour shrinkage was recorded in 22-25% of patients after quinagolide and in 30-31% after CAB treatment

Macroprolactinoma shrinkage during cabergoline treatment is greater in naive patients than in patients pretreated with other dopamine agonists: a prospective study in 110 patients.

To investigate whether previous treatment with bromocriptine (BRC) or quinagolide (CV) impairs a subsequent response to long-term cabergoline (CAB) treatment, we prospectively studied 110 patients with macroprolactinoma. Four groups of patients were considered: 1) naive: 26 untreated patients with a mean serum PRL levels of 1013.4 +/- 277.7 microg/L (+/- SEM; range, 185.5-5611 microg/L); 2) intolerant: 19 patients previously shown to be intolerant of BRC treatment with a mean serum PRL level of 539.4 +/- 172.2 microg/L (range, 174-3564 microg/L); 3) resistant: 37 patients shown to be resistant/hyporesponsive to BRC, CV, or both, with a mean serum PRL level of 602.6 +/- 136.8 microg/L (range, 148-3511 microg/L); and 4) responsive: 28 patients previously treated with BRC or CV for 1-5 yr, achieving normoprolactinemia and restoration of gonadal function, but no longer treated with BRC or CV because of poor compliance or because the drug was not available. After a 15- to 30-day washout period, the serum PRL level was 397 +/- 43.1 microg/L (140-978 microg/L). CAB treatment was given at doses ranging 0.25-3.5 mg weekly for 1 yr to 110 patients, for 2 yr to 104 patients, and for 3 yr to 81 patients. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed before and after 12, 24, and 36 months of CAB treatment to evaluate significant tumor shrinkage (>80% reduction of pretreatment tumor volume). Among the 26 naive patients, normoprolactinemia was achieved in 21 (80.8%) after 1-6 months at 0.25-2 mg/week and in 5 patients after 24 months at 0.5-3 mg/week. Tumor volume was reduced from 1431.5 +/- 310.3 to 47.2 +/- 21.5 mm3 (P < 0.0001); average tumor shrinkage was 92.1 +/- 2.9%; significant tumor shrinkage was observed in 92.3% of patients, and tumor mass completely disappeared in 16 patients (61.5%). Among the 19 intolerant patients, normoprolactinemia was achieved in 18 (94.7%) after 1-6 months of CAB treatment at 0.25-1 mg/week. One patient remained mildly hyperprolactinemic. Tumor volume was reduced from 1925 +/- 423.1 to 842.0 +/- 330.7 mm3 (P < 0.001); average tumor shrinkage was 66.2 +/- 6.4%; significant tumor shrinkage was obtained in 42.1% of patients, and tumor mass completely disappeared in 4 patients (21%). Among the 37 resistant patients, normoprolactinemia was achieved in 19 (51.3%) after 6-12 months at 1-2 mg/week and in the remaining 18 patients after 18-24 months at 3-3.5 mg/week. Tumor volume was reduced from 1208.0 +/- 173.7 to 471.2 +/- 87.3 mm3 (P < 0.005); average tumor shrinkage was 58.4 +/- 4.9%; significant tumor shrinkage was obtained in 10 of 33 patients (30.3%), and in no patient did tumor mass completely disappear. Among the 28 responsive patients, normoprolactinemia was achieved in 23 (82.1%) after 1-6 months at 1-2 mg/week and in 5 patients after 12 months at 3 mg/week. Tumor volume was reduced from 1351.3 +/- 181.5 to 757.1 +/- 193.6 mm3 (P < 0.01); average tumor shrinkage was 59.2 +/- 6.2%; significant tumor shrinkage was obtained in 10 of 26 patients (38.4%), and tumor mass completely disappeared in 4 patients (15.4%). Nadir PRL levels and percent tumor shrinkage during CAB treatment in naive patients were significantly lower (P < 0.001) and higher (P < 0.001), respectively, than those in the remaining three groups, and the average weekly dose of CAB in resistant patients was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than that in the remaining three groups. A significant association was found between tumor shrinkage and previous treatments (chi2 = 27.1; P < 0.0001). At the multistep correlation analysis, nadir PRL levels were the strongest predictors of tumor shrinkage (r2 = 0.556; P < 0.0001), followed by CAB dose (r2 = 0.577; P < 0.0001). The tolerability was excellent in 105 patients (95.4%). In conclusion, the prevalence of macroprolactinoma shrinkage after CAB treatment at standard doses for 1-3 yr was higher in naive patients (92.3%) than in intolerant (42.1%), resistant (30.3%), and responsive patients (38.4%). Thus, C

Prolactinomas in children and adolescents. Clinical presentation and long-term follow-up.

In this study, we report the clinical presentation, response to medical treatment, and long-term follow-up of 26 patients with prolactinoma (15 macro- and 11 micro-adenomas) diagnosed at the age of 7-17 yr. All patients were first treated with bromocriptine (BRC) at doses ranging from 2.5-20 mg/day orally. BRC was discontinued for intolerance and/or resistance to the drug and was replaced by quinagolide (CV) at doses ranging from 0.075-0.6 mg/day or by cabergoline at doses ranging from 0.5-3.5 mg/week orally. Two patients received external conventional radiotherapy after surgery. In 7 prepubertal males and 6 females with macroprolactinoma, headache and/or visual defects were the first symptoms. All females presented with primary or secondary amenorrhea. Growth arrest was observed in a male patient with microadenoma, whereas all the remaining patients had normal heights, and pubertal development was appropriate for their age. Spontaneous or provocative galactorrhea was observed in 12 patients (3 males and 9 females) and gynecomastia in 4 males. Mean serum PRL concentration (+/-SE) at the time of diagnosis was 1080 +/- 267 microg/L in patients with macroadenoma and 155 +/- 38 microg/L in patients with microadenoma. In 10 patients, BRC normalized PRL levels and caused variable, but significant, tumor shrinkage. CV normalized PRL concentrations and reduced tumor size in 5 patients. Cabergoline normalized PRL concentrations in 7 of 10 patients resistant to CV. Pregnancy occurred in 2 patients while on treatment. Pregnancies were uncomplicated, and the patients delivered normal newborns at term. Only 4 patients are still moderately hyperprolactinemic. Impairment of other pituitary hormone secretion was documented at the time of diagnosis in 7 patients, 5 of whom underwent surgery. Four patients became GH deficient in adult age. In conclusion, the medical treatment with dopaminergic compounds is effective and safe in patients with prolactinoma with onset in childhood, allowing preservation of the anterior pituitary function.

Cabergoline treatment rapidly improves gonadal function in hyperprolactinemic males: a comparison with bromocriptine.

This study evaluated the effects of chronic treatment with cabergoline (CAB), a new, potent and long-lasting ergoline-derived dopamine agonist, on seminal fluid parameters and sexual and gonadal function in hyperprolactinemic males in comparison with the effect of bromocriptine (BRC) treatment. Seventeen males with macroprolactinoma were treated with CAB at a dose of 0.5-1.5 mg/week (n = 7), or BRC at a dose of 5-15 mg/day (n = 10) for 6 months. Baseline prolactin (PRL) was 925.7 +/- 522.6 microg/l in the CAB-treated group and 1059.4 +/- 297.6 microg/l in the BRC-treated group. All the patients suffered from libido impairment, ten from reduced sexual potency, and six had infertility. In five patients provocative bilateral galactorrhea was found. Seminal fluid analysis, functional seminal tests and penis rigidity and tumescence, measured by nocturnal penile tumescence (NPT) using Rigiscan equipment, were assessed before and after 1, 3 and 6 months of CAB or BRC treatment. Hormone profiles were assessed before and after 15, 30, 60, 90 and 180 days of both treatments. Before treatment, all patients had a low sperm count with oligoasthenospermia, reduced motility and rapid progression with an abnormal morphology and decreased viability, and a low number of erections. After 1 month, serum PRL levels were significantly reduced in both groups of patients (20.6 +/- 6.6 microg/l during CAB and 256.3 +/- 115.1 microg/l during BRC treatment) and were normalized after 6 months in all patients (CAB: 7.9 +/- 2.2 microg/l; BRC: 16.7 +/- 1.8 microg/l). After 6 months, a significant increase of number, total motility, rapid progression and normal morphology was recorded in patients treated with both CAB and BRC. An increase in the number of erections during the first 3 months of both treatments was noted by NPT. However, the improvements in seminal fluid parameters and sexual function were more evident and rapid in patients treated with CAB. The number of erections was normalized after 6 months of treatment in all patients submitted to CAB treatment, and in all patients but one treated by BRC. In addition, a significant increase of serum testosterone (from 3.7 +/- 0.3 to 5.3 +/- 0.2 microg/l) and dihydrotestosterone (from 0.4 +/- 0.1 to 1.1 +/- 0.1 nmol/l) was recorded. At the beginning of treatment, mild side-effects were recorded in two patients after CAB and mild-to-moderate side-effects in five patients after BRC administration. The treatment with CAB normalized PRL levels, improving gonadal and sexual function and fertility in males with prolactinoma, earlier than did BRC treatment, providing good tolerability and excellent patient compliance to medical treatment.

Bone marker and bone density responses to dopamine agonist therapy in hyperprolactinemic males.

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine and femoral neck levels and biochemical parameters of bone turnover in 20 consecutive hyperprolactinemic males before and after an 18-month treatment with different dopamine agonists. Six patients received bromocriptine at a dose of 2.5-10 mg/day; 7 patients received quinagolide at a dose of 0.075-0.3 mg/day; 7 patients received cabergoline at a dose of 0.5-1.5 mg/week. BMD, serum PRL, testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, and osteocalcin (OC), and urinary cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen (Ntx) levels were measured before and every 6 months during treatment. At study entry, BMD values were lower in patients than controls at both lumbar spine (0.82 +/- 0.03 vs. 1.18 +/- 0.01 g/cm2; P < 0.001) and femoral neck (0.85 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.92 +/- 0.02 g/cm2; P < 0.05) levels. Osteopenia or osteoporosis was diagnosed in 16 patients at the lumbar spine and in 6 of them at the femoral neck level. A significant inverse correlation was found between lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD values and both PRL levels and disease duration (P < 0.01). In the 20 patients, serum OC levels were significantly lower (2.1 +/- 0.1 vs. 9.3 +/- 2.4 microg/L; P < 0.01), whereas Ntx levels were significantly higher (157.8 +/- 1.1 vs. 96.4 +/- 7.4 nmol bone collagen equivalent/mmol creatinine; P < 0.001) than control values. A significant inverse correlation was found between serum PRL and OC (P < 0.01), but not Ntx, levels. After 18 months of treatment, serum PRL levels were suppressed, and gonadal function was restored in all 20 patients, as shown by the normalization of serum T (from 2.2 +/- 0.2 to 5.0 +/- 0.2 microg/L) and dihydrotestosterone (0.3 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.5 +/- 0.01 nmol/L) levels, without any significant difference among groups. A progressive significant increase in serum OC levels together with a significant decrease in Ntx levels were observed after 6, 12, and 18 months of treatment in the 3 groups of patients. A slight, although significant, increase in BMD values was recorded in all patients after 18 months of bromocriptine, quinagolide, and cabergoline treatment, serum OC levels were normalized after treatment, whereas neither urinary Ntx levels nor BMD values were normalized by 18 months of treatment with dopaminergic agents. In conclusion, treatment with bromocriptine, quinagolide, and cabergoline for 18 months, although successfull in suppressing serum PRL levels and restoring gonadal function, was unable to restore lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD and normalize Ntx levels. However, BMD was slightly increased during treatment, suggesting that additional bone loss was prevented after treatment of hyperprolactinemia.

Different sensitivity to sodium valproate in healthy, non-tumoral and tumoral hyperprolactinemic subjects.

GABAergic drugs affect PRL secretion in both rat and man. Sodium valproate (SV) inhibits GABA transaminase so increasing the endogenous GABAergic tone. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of SV at low and high doses on PRL release in healthy subjects and hyperprolactinemic patients. Fifteen patients with prolactinomas, 8 patients with non-tumoral hyperprolactinemia and 10 healthy subjects were studied: in non consecutive days, all subjects received placebo and SV at the dose of 400 and 800 mg po. Serum PRL levels were assessed 30, 15 and 5 min before and every 30 min for 4 hours after administration. SV at the dose of 400 mg induced a significant decrease of serum PRL in healthy subjects (p < 0.05), whereas no effect was noted in both tumoral and non-tumoral hyperprolactinemia. The administration of 800 mg SV induced a significant decrease of PRL levels in healthy subjects and in patients with non-tumoral hyperprolactinemia (p < 0.05). Conversely, in prolactinomas a paradoxical increase of serum PRL concentration (p < 0.05) was observed 120 min after the administration of the drug. These data confirm the inhibitory activity of SV on PRL release in healthy subjects, and suggest the existence of a partial resistance to GABA in non-tumoral hyperprolactinemia. In prolactinomas, the paradoxical PRL increase after high dose of SV suggests the existence of a complete pituitary resistance to GABA. This finding might be explained by the appearance of the stimulatory effect of GABA at hypothalamic level that could have been unmasked by the lack of pituitary GABA effects on adenomatous lactotrophs.

Long-term and low-dose treatment with cabergoline induces macroprolactinoma shrinkage.

Cabergoline (CAB), a long-lasting dopamine-agonist, specific for the D2 receptor, is effective in normalizing serum PRL levels in most patients with microprolactinoma or idiopathic hyperprolactinemia. Because few data are presently available on the effects of CAB treatment in macroprolactinomas, the aim of this open-label study was to investigate whether this drug was effective in producing tumor shrinkage, as well as in normalizing PRL levels. Twenty-three patients with macroprolactinoma entered this study 15 patients had had no treatment, whereas the remaining 8 patients had been previously treated with bromocriptine, which was with-drawn because of intolerance. Three of 23 patients had undergone unsuccessful surgery. Pretreatment serum PRL levels ranged from 100-3860 micrograms/L. CAB was administered at a dose of 0.5-3 mg once or twice a week for 12-24 months. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were performed before and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after the beginning of treatment, to evaluate tumor shrinkage, defined as a decrease of at least 80% of baseline tumor volume. After 3-6 months of treatment with a low dose (0.5-1 mg/week), serum PRL levels normalized in 18 patients. In the remaining 5 patients, whose serum PRL levels were not normalized, the dose was increased to 2-3 mg/week. This schedule caused the normalization of PRL levels in 1 patient, whereas in the remaining 4 patients, PRL levels were reduced to 30-82 micrograms/L. A tumor volume reduction greater than 80% at MRI occurred in 14 of 23 patients (61%) after CAB treatment (from 2609.4 +/- 534.7 to 530.1 +/- 141.3 mm3 at the 12-24th month follow-up, P < 0.001). A volume reduction of 41.8 +/- 3.4% was already evident after 3 months (1436 +/- 285.9 mm3; P < 0.001). The complete disappearance of the tumor mass at MRI occurred after 6 months of treatment with CAB in 1 patient, and in 5 patients after 1 yr of treatment. An improvement of visual field defects was obtained in 9 of the 10 patients presenting visual impairment before CAB treatment. The drug was tolerated well by all patients. Only 1 patient experienced mild nausea, which disappeared spontaneously after the 2nd day of treatment. Long-term, a low dose of the D2 receptor agonist CAB significantly reduced tumor volume and normalized serum PRL levels in a great majority of patients bearing macroprolactinoma. This treatment met with excellent patient compliance. This study suggests that CAB can be used as a first choice drug treatment in macroprolactinomas, as already shown for microprolactinomas and idiopathic hyperprolactinemia.

Chronic treatment with CV 205-502 restores the gonadal function in hyperprolactinemic males.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a chronic treatment with the non-ergot-derived dopamine agonist quinagolide (CV 205-502) on sexual and gonadal function in hyperprolactinemic males. Thirteen males with macroprolactinoma and one with microprolactinoma were treated with CV 205-502 at the dose of 0.15-0.6 mg/day for 6-24 months. Baseline prolactin (PRL) was 464 +/- 75.7 microg/l. All the patients suffered from libido impairment, five of reduced sexual potency, six had infertility and in four bilateral induced galactorrhea was shown. The semen analysis revealed a severe oligoasthenospermia with reduced sperm count, motility and forward progression, with an abnormal morphology and decreased viability. A significant reduction of serum PRL levels (nadir PRL = 12.3 +/- 5.4 microg/l) was obtained during the treatment. Normalization of prolactinemia was reached in 13 of the 14 patients after 3 months. After 1 year, a significant improvement of sperm parameters, in terms of increase of number (from 5600 +/- 111 to 20,564 +/- 587 mm3), motility at 1 h (from 24.8 +/- 0.1 to 52.6 +/- 0.5%), forward progression (from 24 +/- 1.4 to 62.3 +/- 2.9%) and normal morphology (from 53.8 +/- 2.5 to 62.2 +/- 2.4%), was recorded. In addition, a significant increase of serum follicle-stimulating hormone (from 5.3 +/- 0.6 to 7.8 +/- 0.4 U/l), luteinizing hormone (from 4.4 +/- 0.5 to 7.7 +/- 0.4 U/l) and testosterone (from 3.4 +/- 0.4 to 4.7 +/- 0.2 microg/l) was recorded. A significant increase of luteinizing hormone (9.4 +/- 0.7 U/l) and testosterone (5.2 +/- 0.4 microg/l), as well as a further improvement of sperm parameters, was found after 2 years of therapy. Sellar computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance showed a considerable shrinkage (> or = 30%) of tumoral mass in 8 out of 13 patients with macroprolacinoma. Side effects were recorded in only one patient. In conclusion, the treatment with CV 205-502 normalizing PRL levels improves gonadal and sexual function and fertility in males with prolactinoma, providing good tolerability and excellent patient compliance to medical treatment. This result demonstrates that the impairment of gonadal function in hyperprolactinemic patients is a functional modification.

Cardiovascular aspects in acromegaly: effects of treatment.

Patients with acromegaly have significant morbidity and mortality, associated with cardiovascular disease. Acromegaly is often complicated by other diseases such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and coronary artery disease, so the existence of acromegalic cardiomyopathy remains uncertain. Cardiac performance was investigated in patients with uncomplicated acromegaly. A subgroup of hypertensive acromegalics was also studied. In addition, the effects of chronic octreotide therapy or surgery on cardiac structure and function in acromegaly were studied. Twenty-six patients and 15 healthy controls underwent gated blood-pool cardiac scintigraphy and echocardiography at rest and during exercise. Echocardiography was repeated after 6 months of octreotide therapy (n = 11). Cardiac scintigraphy was repeated after 12 and 24 months of octreotide therapy (n = 10) or 12 to 24 months after surgery (n = 8). ECG, blood pressure, and heart rate were monitored during cardiac scintigraphy. Left ventricular mass (LVM) was calculated from the findings of the echocardiography. Serum growth hormone (GH) levels and plasma insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels were monitored. LVM index was significantly higher (P < .003) in acromegalics than controls and in hypertensive acromegalics than normotensives, but all other indices of cardiac function were similar. Chronic octreotide decreased GH and IGF-1 levels and improved the structural abnormalities as measured by echocardiography. Chronic octreotide or surgery did not alter cardiac function parameters. Thus, important changes in cardiac structure and function occur in uncomplicated acromegaly, and improvements can be demonstrated after chronic octreotide therapy. Heart disease in acromegaly appears to be secondary to high circulating GH levels.

Comparison among different dopamine-agonists of new formulation in the clinical management of macroprolactinomas.

BACKGROUND: In the last decade, the treatment of macroprolactinomas has been significantly improved by the introduction in the clinical practice of new drugs with dopamine-agonist properties. In particular, the availability of different forms of bromocriptine (BRC) with long duration of action and slow absorption, suitable for injectable (BRC-LAR) or oral (BRC-SRO) administration, has allowed one to obtain a more constant bromocriptinemia than with standard BRC, thus reducing adverse reactions. Moreover, a selective action on dopamine D2 receptors has been achieved using a new non-ergot derivative: the quinagolide (CV 205-502). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of BRC-LAR, BRC-SRO and CV 205-502 in 34 patients with macroprolactinoma. PROTOCOL OF THE STUDY: BRC-LAR was given at the monthly dose of 50-100 mg for 6-24 months to 8 patients whose PRL levels were 150-700 micrograms/l. BRC-SRO was given at the daily dose of 5-20 mg for 1-24 months to 10 patients whose PRL levels were 120-900 micrograms/l. CV 205-502 was given at the daily dose of 0.075-0.6 mg for 6-12 months to 16 patients whose PRL levels were 250-2,050 micrograms/l. CT and/or MRI scans were performed before and during treatment to evaluate tumor shrinkage. Data are presented as Mean +/- SD. RESULTS: Serum PRL levels normalized in 8/8 with BRC-LAR, 7/10 with BRC-SRO and 12/16 patients with CV 205-502. A significant shrinkage of tumor mass was obtained in 7/8 with BRC-LAR, 9/10 with BRC-SRO and 16/16 patients with CV 205-502, with consequent improvement of visual-field defects. Overall, the drugs were rather well tolerated: no patient stopped BRC-LAR or BRC-SRO and only 2 stopped CV 205-502. In particular, nausea, vomiting, headache, hypotension that disappeared spontaneously were observed in 5/8 with BRC-LAR, 4/10 with BRC-SRO and 4/16 with CV 205-502. CONCLUSIONS: The medical approach with long-acting BRC preparations and CV 205-502 which selectively binds D2 receptors allows one to obtain rapid normalization of PRL levels and shrinkage of macroprolactinomas in a large series of patients. These drugs are rather well tolerated also by patients proven to be untolerant to standard BRC.

Positive response to compound CV 205-502 in hyperprolactinemic patients resistant to or intolerant of bromocriptine.

The clinical effects of CV 205-502, a potent and non-ergot-derived dopamine agonist, were investigated in 24 selected patients with hyperprolactinemia previously treated with standard oral bromocriptine, the slow-release oral form of bromocriptine (BRC-SRO) and/or the long-acting injectable form of bromocriptine (BRC-LAR); 14 were chosen because of their resistance to treatment and ten because they were intolerant of the different forms of bromocriptine. A macroprolactinoma was present in seven patients and a microprolactinoma in ten, whereas seven had no radiological images of a pituitary tumor and were classified as having non-tumoral hyperprolactinemia. All the 24 patients were treated with CV 205-502 at a daily dose of 0.075-0.6 mg for 3-12 months. All the patients had gonadal dysfunction and galactorrhea. Basal serum prolactin values ranged from 70 to 1677 ng/ml. CV 205-502 was effective in 11 of the 14 patients resistant bromocriptine, BRC-SRO and BRC-LAR; serum prolactin levels became normal within 6 months and a tumor shrinkage was obtained in five of the seven macroprolactinomas. In general, the drug was effective and well tolerated. Only three patients (two resistant and one intolerant) manifested nausea, vomiting and postural hypotension. In conclusion, this study shows that CV 205-502 is effective in bromocriptine-resistant hyperprolactinemic patients. Furthermore, CV 205-502 has insignificant and tolerable side-effects in patients intolerant of bromocriptine. CV 205-502 can, therefore, be considered a useful and effective drug, and an interesting therapeutic alternative to the ergot-derived dopamine-agonist drugs in use today.

CV 205-502 in the treatment of tumoral and non-tumoral hyperprolactinemic states.

CV 205-502 (octahydrobenzol[g]quinoline), a non-ergot dopamine agonist drug, was administered to 40 patients with hyperprolactinemic syndrome: 16 patients with macroprolactinoma, 14 with microprolactinoma and 10 with non-tumoral hyperprolactinemia. Twenty-four out of 40 patients had previously been treated by surgery and/or bromocriptine, with variable results. All had gonadal dysfunction and 22 patients had galactorrhea. Eight patients with macroprolactinoma had defects of the visual field. Pre-treatment serum PRL levels ranged from 60 to 2050 micrograms/l. The daily dose of CV 205-502 used in this trial ranged from 0.075 to 0.600 mg. After 6-12 months of treatment, serum PRL level decreased in all the patients reaching normoprolactinemia in 31 of them (77.5%) who demonstrated restoration of menses and disappearance of galactorrhea. The remaining nine patients (22.5%) had only a decrease of PRL levels without reaching normoprolactinemia and without any clinical effect. In 12 out of 16 patients with macroprolactinoma not previously surgically treated, a significant tumor shrinkage was shown by means of Computed Tomography and/or Magnetic Resonance Imaging. The disappearance of visual defects was obtained in four out of eight patients. CV 205-502 was tolerated satisfactorily: mild side-effects occurred in four patients in the first week of treatment and spontaneously disappeared, whereas six patients (15%) needed to withdraw the therapy after 6 months because of side-effects. In conclusion CV 205-502 is a potent and well-tolerated drug in the treatment of tumoral and non-tumoral hyperprolactinemic states and is an effective alternative to other dopamine agonists in use today.