Absorbable antibiotic beads for treatment of LVAD driveline infections.

BACKGOUND: Infections of the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) driveline are a dreaded complication that results in high mortality and morbidity. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed five consecutive patients with severe continuous-flow LVAD (HVAD, Heartmate 2, and Heartmate 3) driveline infection. These infections, which developed on an average of 960.4 ± 843.9 days after LVAD placement, were refractory to systemic antibiotics and local wound care. All were treated with extensive surgical debridement, local installation of absorbable antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate beads (vancomycin and tobramycin), primary wound closure, and 6 weeks of systemic antibiotics after surgery. RESULTS: Four patients had resolution of DLI, and one had a recurrent infection at another part of the driveline 7 months after the complete resolution of the previous site. This patient was successfully treated with debridement and bead placements. Three patients still have their LVADs, while two received orthotopic heart transplants. At the time of the transplant, there was no evidence of gross infection of the LVAD drivelines or pumps. At the average follow-up time of 425.8 ± 151 days, no patients have an active infection. CONCLUSION: Treatment of LVAD driveline infection with absorbable antibiotic beads with primary wound closure is a viable option and merits further investigation.

Axillary mechanical circulatory support improves renal function prior to heart transplantation in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Impaired kidney function is often associated with acute decompensation of chronic heart failure and portends a poor prognosis. Unfortunately, current data have demonstrated worse survival in patients with acute kidney injury than in patients with chronic kidney disease during durable LVAD placement as bridge therapy. Furthermore, end-stage heart failure patients undergoing combined heart-kidney transplantation have poorer short- and long-term survival than heart transplants alone. We evaluated the kidney function recovery in our heart failure population awaiting heart transplantation at our institution, supported by temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support (tMCS) with Impella 5.5. The protocol (#22004000) was approved by the Mayo Clinic institutional review board, after which we performed a retrospective review of all patients with acute on chronic heart failure and kidney disease in patients considered for only heart and kidney combined organ transplant and supported by tMCS between January 2020 and February 2021. Hemodynamic and kidney function trends were recorded and analyzed before and after tMCS placement and transplantation. After placement of tMCS, we observed a trend towards improvement in creatinine, Fick cardiac index, mixed venous saturation, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which persisted through transplantation and discharge. The average duration of support with tMCS was 16.5 days before organ transplantation. The median pre-tMCS creatinine was 2.1 mg/dL (IQR 1.75-2.3). Median hematocrit at the time of tMCS placement was 32% (IQR 32-34), and the median estimated glomerular filtration rate was 34 mL/min/BSA (34-40). The median GFR improved to 44 mL/min/BSA (IQR 45-51), and serum creatinine improved to 1.5 mg/dL (1.5-1.8) after tMCS. Median discharge creatinine was 1.1 mg/dL (1.19-1.25) with a GFR of 72 (65-74). None of these six patients supported with tMCS required renal replacement therapy after heart transplantation. Early adoption of Impella 5.5 in this patient population resulted in renal recovery without needing renal replacement therapies or dual organ transplantation and should be further evaluated.

Aggressive Management of a Bilateral Chylothorax Complicating an Orthotopic Heart-Kidney Transplantation.

Chylothorax after an orthotopic heart transplant is a rare but potentially detrimental occurrence. This is the first reported case of bilateral chylothorax complicating a heart-kidney transplant patient. No universally accepted protocol exists for the management of chylothorax in general population, let alone the immunocompromised transplant patient. This case presents unique challenges to the management of postoperative chylothorax given heart-kidney transplant's effect on the patient's volume status and immunocompromised state. We make the argument for aggressive treatment of chylothorax in an immunocompromised heart-kidney transplant patient to limit complications in a patient population predisposed to infection.

One-year survival in recipients older than 50 bridged to heart transplant with Impella 5.5 via axillary approach.

BACKGROUND: Optimizing patients with advanced heart failure before orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT), especially in patients greater than 50 years old, is imperative to achieving successful post-transplant outcomes. Complications are well-described for patients bridged to transplant (BTT) with durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support. Given the lack of data available in older recipients after the recent increase in mechanical support use, we felt it crucial to report our center's one-year outcomes in older recipients after heart transplantation with percutaneously placed Impella 5.5 as a BTT. METHODS: Forty-nine OHT patients were supported with the Impella 5.5 intended as a bridge between December 2019 and October 2022 at Mayo Clinic in Florida. Data were extracted from the electronic health record at baseline and during their transplant episode of care after Institutional Review Boards approval as exempt for retrospective data collection. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients aged 50 or older were supported with Impella 5.5 as BTT. Ten patients underwent heart and kidney transplantation within this cohort. The median age at OHT was 63 (58-68) years, with 32 male (84%) and six female patients (16%). Etiology was divided into ischemic (63%) and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (37%). The baseline median ejection fraction was 19% (15-24). Most patients were in blood group O (60%), and 50% were diabetic. The average duration of support was 27 days (range 6-94). The median duration of follow-up is 488 days (185-693). For patients that have reached the 1-year follow-up timeframe (22 of 38, 58%), the 1-year post-transplant survival is 95%. CONCLUSION: Our single-center data provides awareness for using the Impella 5.5 percutaneously placed axillary support device in older heart failure patients in cardiogenic shock as a bridge to transplantation. One-year survival outcomes after heart transplantation are excellent despite the older recipient's age and prolonged pre-transplant support.

Short-term outcomes of heart transplant patients bridged with Impella 5.5 ventricular assist device.

AIMS: We sought to investigate the outcomes of heart transplant patients supported with Impella 5.5 temporary mechanical circulatory support. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patient demographics, perioperative data, hospital timeline, and haemodynamic parameters were followed during initial admission, Impella support, and post-transplant period. Vasoactive-inotropic score, primary graft failure, and complications were recorded. Between March 2020 and March 2021, 16 advanced heart failure patients underwent Impella 5.5 temporary left ventricular assist device support through axillary approach. Subsequently, all these patients had heart transplantation. All patients were either ambulatory or chair bound during their temporary mechanical circulatory support until heart transplantation. Patients were kept on Impella support median of 19 days (3-31) with the median lactate dehydrogenase level of 220 (149-430). All Impella devices were removed during heart transplantation. During Impella support, patients had improved renal function with median creatinine serum level of 1.55 mg/dL decreased to 1.25 (P = 0.007), pulmonary artery pulsatility index scores increased from 2.56 (0.86-10) to 4.2 (1.3-10) (P = 0.048), and right ventricular function improved (P = 0.003). Patients maintained improved renal function and favourable haemodynamics after their heart transplantation as well. All patients survived without any significant morbidity after their heart transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Impella 5.5 temporary left ventricular assist device optimizes care of heart transplant recipients providing superior haemodynamic support, mobility, improved renal function, pulmonary haemodynamics, and right ventricular function. Utilizing Impella 5.5 as a direct bridging strategy to heart transplantation resulted in excellent outcomes.

Survival Outcomes of Lung Transplant Recipients From Donors With Abnormal Kidney Function.

BACKGROUND: Recovering lungs with pulmonary edema due to abnormal kidney function is considered one of the expanded selection criteria for lung transplant. The aim of this study is to assess lung transplant recipients' survival from donors with abnormal kidney function and to determine differences in lung recovery rates from donors with and donors without abnormal kidney function. METHODS: We reviewed the United Network for Organ Sharing registry for first-time adult lung transplant donors and recipients from June 2005 to March 2017. Donor kidney function was categorized into three groups based on estimated glomerular filtration rate: group I, greater than 60 mL/min; group II, 15 to 59 mL/min; and group III, less than 15 mL/min. Recipient survival was stratified based on estimated glomerular filtration rate using Kaplan-Meier. A multivariate Cox Regression model with known risk factors that affect survival was used to compare survival among groups. Comparison of lung recovery among the three groups was also performed. RESULTS: Lung recovery rates were 29.7% (15,670 of 52,747), 19.4% (3879 of 20,040), and 18.1% (704 of 3898) for groups I, II, and III, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year recipient survival rates were 86.2%, 69.2%, and 55.7% for group I; 84.9%, 66.9%, and 53.8% for group II; and 85.5%, 65.3%, and 50.3% for group III, respectively (adjusted P = .25; multivariate Cox regression method). When group I was used as reference, the adjusted hazard ratio for group II was 1.04 (95% CI, 0.98-1.10) and for group III, it was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.96-1.23), after adjusting with the multivariate Cox regression model. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in lung recipient survival. The lung recovery rate from donors with abnormal kidney function was lower compared with that of donors with normal kidney function.

Aggressive Management of a Bilateral Chylothorax Complicating an Orthotopic Heart-Kidney Transplantation

ABSTRACT Chylothorax after an orthotopic heart transplant is a rare but potentially detrimental occurrence. This is the first reported case of bilateral chylothorax complicating a heart-kidney transplant patient. No universally accepted protocol exists for the management of chylothorax in general population, let alone the immunocompromised transplant patient. This case presents unique challenges to the management of postoperative chylothorax given heart-kidney transplant's effect on the patient's volume status and immunocompromised state. We make the argument for aggressive treatment of chylothorax in an immunocompromised heart-kidney transplant patient to limit complications in a patient population predisposed to infection.

Initial experience and outcomes with a hybrid extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and cardiopulmonary bypass circuit for lung transplantation.

Background: The utilization of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for intraoperative support during lung transplantation has increased over the past decade. Although veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has recently emerged as the preferred modality over cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), many centers continue to use both forms of ECLS during lung transplantation. Our novel hybrid VA-ECMO/CPB circuit allows for seamless transition from VA-ECMO to CPB at a significant cost savings compared to a standalone VA-ECMO circuit. This study describes our initial experience and outcomes in the first 100 bilateral lung transplantations using this novel hybrid VA-ECMO/CPB circuit. Methods: Medical records from September 2017 to May 2021 of the first 100 consecutive patients undergoing bilateral lung transplantation with intraoperative hybrid VA-ECMO support were examined retrospectively. We excluded patients with single lung transplants, retransplantations, preoperative ECLS bridging, and veno-venous (VV) ECMO and those supported with CPB only. Perioperative recipient, anesthetic, perfusion variables, and outcomes were assessed. Results: Of the 100 patients supported with VA-ECMO, 19 were converted intraoperatively to CPB. Right ventricular dysfunction was seen in 37% of patients, and the median mean pulmonary artery pressure was 28 mm Hg. No oxygenator clotting was observed with a median heparin dose of 13,000 units in the VA-ECMO group. Primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 hours was observed in 10.1% of all patients and observed 1-year mortality was 4%. Conclusions: The use of a hybrid VA-ECMO/CPB circuit in our institution allows for rapid conversion to CPB with acceptable outcomes across a diverse recipient group at a significantly reduced cost compared to standalone VA-ECMO circuits.

Safe heart flush technique during recovery from donors after circulatory death.

BACKGROUND: Donation after circulatory death is the donation after cardiac arrest. This technique has been employed and adopted by clinicians to overcome the shortage of available hearts for transplant. Warm ischemia time plays a pivotal role in the survival outcome of the heart recipients. AIM OF THE STUDY: To assess the efficacy of using the Foley catheter to flush the heart during procurement from donation after circulatory death donors. METHODS: We utilized a 2-WAY Foley catheter to flush the heart during procurement. The catheter was prepared and modified on the back table. RESULTS: We were successfully able to flush the heart within 3 minutes from skin incision with a good recipient outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Using the Foley catheter to flush the heart during recovery from donation after circulatory death donors was both efficient and fast.

Regression of Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation After Lung Transplant: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Although tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is common in candidates for lung transplant, no data or established guidelines exist regarding the need for surgical repair at the time of transplant. We aimed to evaluate the natural course of TR by assessing the incidence and extent of TR regression among patients who did not undergo tricuspid valve repair (TVR) concomitantly with lung transplant. METHODS: We retrospectively identified adult patients who underwent lung transplant without TVR at our institution from 2001 through 2017. Pretransplant and posttransplant echocardiograms were reviewed to assess severity of TR, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, central venous pressure, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, and right ventricular size and function. RESULTS: Among 553 included patients, 324 (58.7%) were men, the mean (SD) age was 61.9 years (12.7), and 417 (75.4%) had a double lung transplant. TR before transplant was reported as trivial in 265 patients (47.9%), mild in 235 (42.5%), moderate in 40 (7.2%), and severe in 13 (2.4%). After transplant, TR improved significantly overall (P < .001). TR improved in 193 patients: 158 patients (81.9%) by 1 grade and 35 patients (18.1%) by 2 or more grades. Additionally, of 53 patients with pretransplant moderate or severe TR, 44 (83%) had improvement to mild, trivial, or no TR. After transplant, 12 patients (2.2%) had no remaining TR. CONCLUSION: The severity of TR improved or showed no change in most patients after lung transplant, which obviates the need for TVR among most lung transplant recipients.

Packing the donor heart: Is SherpaPak cold preservation technique safer compared to ice cold storage.

INTRODUCTION: The present study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of heart transplant patients whose donor hearts were preserved with the SherpaPak controlled cold organ system versus the conventional ice storage technique. METHODS: All patients undergoing heart transplantation at our center between January 2019 and April 2021 were divided into two groups according to the technique used during donor heart preservation and transport. The first group consisted of 34 SherpaPak controlled temperature preservation patients, and the second group consisted of 47 patients where the conventional three bags and ice technique was utilized during organ transportation. The two groups were compared based on demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups regarding Vasoactive Inotropic Score (VIS), Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD), and the need for a transient pacer. However, the VIS, PGD, and pacing trends were lower in the SherpaPak patients even though the total ischemic and cardiopulmonary bypass times were significantly longer. Furthermore, SherpaPak patients exhibited a shorter stay in the ICU with no severe PGD and mortality. CONCLUSION: The SherpaPak donor heart preservation provides safe outcomes in heart transplant patients. Further research is needed to utilize this method for longer durations of ischemic time and expand travel distances for organ transportation.

Characteristics and Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Immunocompromised Patients.

Immunocompromised (IC) patients are at greater risk of adverse outcomes from cardiac surgery, and less invasive options for treating severe aortic stenosis among IC patients are often sought. However, despite greater preference for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in this population, there are limited data on outcomes in IC patients. Between January 2015 and December 2019, we studied patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVI. We defined IC status by the presence of active malignancy and receipt of oncologic treatment, post-organ transplantation-associated immunosuppression, human immunodeficiency virus, chronic steroid use (>5 mg/day), or active autoimmune disorder, and compared characteristics and outcomes of IC patients with those of non-IC patients. Of 173 patients who underwent TAVI, 56 (32%) were IC, 30 (54%) had active malignancy and underwent active treatment, 19 (34%) were IC without malignancy, and 7 (13%) were both IC and had active malignancy. IC patients, compared with non-IC patients, had similar baseline demographics, Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk scores (median 4.3% vs 4.4%), and overall complications (29% vs 26%). There were 37 deaths (16 IC and 21 non-IC) over a median follow-up of 17 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 14 to 20 months), and 1-year survival after TAVI was 84.0% for IC patients and 89.0% for non-IC patients (p = 0.51 by log-rank). After adjusting for Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk scores, IC patients had a nonsignificant trend toward greater risk of death compared with non-IC patients (adjusted hazard ratio 1.48, 95% CI 0.77 to 2.84). IC patients had a significantly smaller risk of cardiac-related death (adjusted hazard ratio 0.21, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.98) but a greater risk of noncardiac-related death (adjusted hazard ratio 4.14, 95% CI 1.71 to 10.0) than non-IC patients. In conclusion, IC patients who underwent TAVI have similar complication rates as non-IC patients, with a nonsignificant trend toward greater mortality, specifically related to noncardiac causes.

Combined cardiac surgery procedures and liver transplant: a single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE: Morbidity and mortality rates associated with liver transplant are high for patients with concomitant heart disease. Traditionally, such cases were considered contraindications for transplant. The objective of our study was to assess the outcome of combined surgical approaches. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was analyzed of patients undergoing cardiac surgery and liver transplant at our institution. Twelve identified patients underwent combined cardiac operation and liver transplant. A control group was created (n = 24) with the same selection criteria. RESULTS: Median patient age was 64.94 years in the combined group vs 63.80 in the control, and in both groups, 58% were male. Left ventricular ejection fraction (0.60), body mass index (30.1), and median (range) score of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (18 [9-33]) were the same in both groups. The cardiac operations combined with liver transplant were coronary artery bypass grafting, valve replacement procedures, and ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm repair. Piggyback liver transplant was performed for all patients. Survival periods of 1, 5, and 10 years for control vs combined cases were 90 vs 62%, 79 vs 55%, and 70 vs 45%, respectively (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Concomitant cardiac procedure and liver transplant is a valid treatment option and should be considered with risk stratification criteria of the patient with end-stage liver disease and cardiac surgical pathologic characteristics.