Meta-review on the efficacy of psychological therapies for the treatment of substance use disorders.

This meta-review aimed to summarize the current state of knowledge provided by meta-analyzes on the efficacy of psychotherapies for substance use disorders. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Meta-analyzes were included if they quantitatively examined the efficacy of a psychotherapy on substance use. Among the 6866 potential articles that were screened for eligibility, 23 meta-analyzes were eligible (78 effect sizes). Each meta-analysis included 2-156 studies, with samples ranging between approximately 130 to over 33,000 individuals. The quality of evidence was evaluated as being globally of low to moderate quality. Substances were categorized as: alcohol (k = 12), cannabis (k = 7), stimulants (k = 4), opioids (k = 3) and benzodiazepines (k = 1). Interventions comprised brief intervention, cognitive-behavioral therapy, contingency management, voucher-based reinforcement therapy, motivational interview, motivational enhancement therapy, significant other people involved in the treatment, and cue-expose therapy. Concerning solely significant results, small benefits were observed for significant other people involved in treatment, motivational interviewing, and the combination of cognitive-behavioral therapy with motivational interviewing for alcohol use disorder. Likewise, small-to-moderate effects were found for motivational approaches, and cognitive-behavioral therapy as well as the combination of cognitive-behavioral therapy and motivational enhancement therapy in the case of cannabis use disorder. Small effects were observed for contingency management as well as cognitive behavioral-therapy for amphetamine-type use disorder. Small effects were similarly found for contingency management for cocaine use disorder. Concerning opioid use disorder, moderate effects were observed for contingency management and voucher-based reinforcement intervention. For benzodiazepine use disorder, small effects were noted for cognitive-behavioral therapy with taper. Results often displayed small to moderate heterogeneity when reported and were generally compared to inactive controls, such as treatment-as-usual. In all, the psychosocial treatments for substance use disorders included in this meta-review have shown to be at best moderately effective over inactive controls in the short term. Nevertheless, further trials are needed as well as meta-analyzes on interventions not included in this meta-review.

Systematic Review on the Mental Health and Treatment Impacts of COVID-19 on Neurocognitive Disorders.

Objectives. The COVID-19 pandemic has had many public health impacts, especially on vulnerable individuals including adults with neurocognitive disorders (NCD). With increasing literature, this systematic literature review aimed to address the mental health effects of COVID-19 on people with NCD in addition to examine the impact of the pandemic on treatments/resources for NCD. Methods. A literature search was conducted in the electronic databases of PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Studies were included so long as they assessed the mental health or therapeutic effects of COVID-19 on NCD. Results. Among the retrieved articles, 59 met eligibility criteria. First, the pandemic and resulting self-isolation led to many detrimental effects on psychological well-being. Exacerbation and relapses of neurocognitive and behavioral symptoms were observed, as well as emergences of new psychological symptoms (i.e., depression, anxiety). Second, therapeutic and community services for individuals suffering from NCD, such as social support services and outpatient clinics, were disrupted or reduced leading to postponed appointments and evaluations, as well as reduced access to medications. These issues were somewhat palliated with the growth of telemedicine. Conclusions. This systematic review highlights the extent of the effects of the pandemic, and the topics addressed should be taken into consideration by healthcare practitioners, institutions, and policymakers to ensure that proper measures are employed to protect this population from additional harm.