Exploring workplace-based learning in distributed healthcare settings: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Distributed healthcare settings such as district hospitals, primary care, and public health facilities are becoming the real-life settings for workplace-based learning required to educate the future healthcare workforce. Therefore, a major focus should be on designing and developing workplace-based learning in these learning environments. Healthcare professionals and educational policymakers play a significant role in these settings as role models in workplace-based learning, and as leaders in integrating learning into their work environments. It is relevant to explore their beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors towards workplace-based learning in their own settings, in order to provide context-relevant recommendations that can assist in shaping workplace-based learning environments. METHODS: We used individual interviews to understand professionals' experiences with workplace-based learning in distributed healthcare settings. We - three clinicians, an educationalist, and a philosopher - thematically analyzed transcripts of 13 interviews with healthcare professionals and educational policymakers from different healthcare settings who were involved in the clinical phase of undergraduate medical education. RESULTS: Clustering and categorizing of the data led to the construction of five overarching themes: Identification with and attitude towards medical education, Sense of ownership, Perceived time and space, Mutual preconceptions and relations, and Curriculum for a changing profession. CONCLUSIONS: These themes accentuate aspects relevant to the development of workplace-based learning in distributed healthcare settings on the individual, team, or organizational level. We highlight the significance of individual professionals in the development of workplace-based learning and emphasize the need for recognition and support for those occupying the 'broker' role at the intersection of education and practice. For future research and educational practice, we recommend prioritizing initiatives that build on good-practices in workplace-based learning and involve dedicated individuals in distributed healthcare settings.

Workplace-based learning about health promotion in individual patient care: a scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: To outline current knowledge regarding workplace-based learning about health promotion in individual patient care. DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, ERIC, CINAHL and Web of Science from January 2000 to August 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included articles about learning (activities) for healthcare professionals (in training), about health promotion in individual patient care and in the context of workplace-based learning. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: The studies were evaluated using a charting template and were analysed thematically using a template based on Designable Elements of Learning Environments model. RESULTS: From 7159 studies, we included 31 that described evaluations of workplace-based learning about health promotion, around a variety of health promotion topics, for different health professions. In the articles, health promotion was operationalised as knowledge, skills or attitudes related to specific lifestyle factors or more broadly, with concepts such as health literacy, advocacy and social determinants of health. We assembled an overview of spatial and instrumental, social, epistemic and temporal elements of learning environments in which health promotion is learnt. CONCLUSIONS: The studies included in our analysis varied greatly in their approach to health promotion topics and the evaluation of learning outcomes. Our findings suggest the importance of providing opportunities for health profession learners to engage in authentic practice situations and address potential challenges they may experience translating related theory into practice. Additionally, our results highlight the need for conscious and articulated integration of health promotion in curricula and assessment structures. We recommend the exploration of opportunities for health profession students, professionals and patients to learn about health promotion together. Additionally, we see potential in using participatory research methods to study future health promotion learning. STUDY REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6QPTV.

Risk factors for intensive care admission in children with severe acute asthma in the Netherlands: a prospective multicentre study.

RATIONALE: Severe acute asthma (SAA) can be fatal, but is often preventable. We previously observed in a retrospective cohort study, a three-fold increase in SAA paediatric intensive care (PICU) admissions between 2003 and 2013 in the Netherlands, with a significant increase during those years of numbers of children without treatment of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). OBJECTIVES: To determine whether steroid-naïve children are at higher risk of PICU admission among those hospitalised for SAA. Furthermore, we included the secondary risk factors tobacco smoke exposure, allergic sensitisation, previous admissions and viral infections. METHODS: A prospective, nationwide multicentre study of children with SAA (2-18 years) admitted to all Dutch PICUs and four general wards between 2016 and 2018. Potential risk factors for PICU admission were assessed using logistic regression analyses. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: 110 PICU and 111 general ward patients were included. The proportion of steroid-naïve children did not differ significantly between PICU and ward patients. PICU children were significantly older and more exposed to tobacco smoke, with symptoms >1 week prior to admission. Viral susceptibility was not a significant risk factor for PICU admission. CONCLUSIONS: Children with SAA admitted to a PICU were comparable to those admitted to a general ward with respect to ICS treatment prior to admission. Preventable risk factors for PICU admission were >7 days of symptoms without adjustment of therapy and exposure to tobacco smoke. Physicians who treat children with asthma must be aware of these risk factors.

Episodic viral wheeze and multiple-trigger wheeze in preschool children are neither distinct nor constant patterns. A prospective multicenter cohort study in secondary care.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether episodic viral wheeze (EVW) and multiple-trigger wheeze (MTW) are clinically distinguishable and stable preschool wheezing phenotypes. METHODS: Children of age 1 to 4 year with recurrent, pediatrician-confirmed wheeze were recruited from secondary care; 189 were included. Respiratory and viral upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) symptoms were recorded weekly by parents in an electronic diary during 12 months. Every 3 months, diary-based symptoms were classified as EVW or MTW and compared to phenotypes assigned by pediatricians based on clinical history. We collected nasal samples for respiratory virus PCR during URTI, respiratory symptoms and in absence of symptoms. RESULTS: Of 660 3-month periods, the diary-based phenotype was EVW in 11%, MTW in 54% and 35% were free from respiratory episodes. Pediatrician-based classification showed 59% EVW and 26% MTW. The Kappa measure of agreement between diary-based and pediatrician-assigned phenotypes was very low (0.12, 95%CI, 0.07-0.17). Phenotypic instability was observed in 32% of cases. PCR was positive in 71% during URTI symptoms, 66% during respiratory symptoms and 38% in the absence of symptoms. CONCLUSION: This study shows that EVW and MTW are variable over time within patients. Pediatrician classification of these phenotypes based on clinical history does not correspond to prospectively recorded symptom patterns. The applicability of these phenotypes as a basis for therapeutic decisions and prognosis should be questioned.

Barriers and Facilitators When Implementing Web-Based Disease Monitoring and Management as a Substitution for Regular Outpatient Care in Pediatric Asthma: Qualitative Survey Study.

BACKGROUND: Despite their potential benefits, many electronic health (eHealth) innovations evaluated in major studies fail to integrate into organizational routines, and the implementation of these innovations remains problematic. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe health care professionals' self-identified perceived barriers and facilitators for the implementation of a Web-based portal to monitor asthmatic children as a substitution for routine outpatient care. Also, we assessed patients' (or their parents) satisfaction with this eHealth innovation. METHODS: Between April and November 2015, we recruited 76 health care professionals (from 14 hospitals). During a period of 6 months, participants received 3 questionnaires to identify factors that facilitated or impeded the use of this eHealth innovation. Questionnaires for patients (or parents) were completed after the 6-month virtual asthma clinic (VAC) implementation period. RESULTS: Major perceived barriers included concerns about the lack of structural financial reimbursement for Web-based monitoring, lack of integration of this eHealth innovation with electronic medical records, the burden of Web-based portal use on clinician workload, and altered patient-professional relationship (due to fewer face-to-face contacts). Major perceived facilitators included enthusiastic and active initiators, a positive attitude of professionals toward eHealth, the possibility to tailor care to individual patients ("personalized eHealth"), easily deliverable care according to current guidelines using the VAC, and long-term profit and efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of Web-based disease monitoring and management in children is complex and dynamic and is influenced by multiple factors at the levels of the innovation itself, individual professionals, patients, social context, organizational context, and economic and political context. Understanding and defining the barriers and facilitators that influence the context is crucial for the successful implementation and sustainability of eHealth innovations.

Cost-effectiveness of FENO-based and web-based monitoring in paediatric asthma management: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In children with asthma, web-based monitoring and inflammation-driven therapy may lead to improved asthma control and reduction in medications. However, the cost-effectiveness of these monitoring strategies is yet unknown. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the cost-effectiveness of web-based monthly monitoring and of 4-monthly monitoring of FENO as compared with standard care. METHODS: An economic evaluation was performed alongside a randomised controlled multicentre trial with a 1-year follow-up. Two hundred and seventy-two children with asthma, aged 4-18 years, were randomised to one of three strategies. In standard care, treatment was adapted according to Asthma Control Test (ACT) at 4-monthly visits, in the web-based strategy also according to web-ACT at 1 month intervals, and in the FENO-based strategy according to ACT and FENO at 4-monthly visits. Outcome measures were patient utilities, healthcare costs, societal costs and incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found in QALYs and costs between the three strategies. The web-based strategy had 77% chance of being most cost-effective from a healthcare perspective at a willingness to pay a generally accepted €40 000/QALY. The FENO-based strategy had 83% chance of being most cost-effective at €40 000/QALY from a societal perspective. CONCLUSIONS: Economically, web-based monitoring was preferred from a healthcare perspective, while the FENO-based strategy was preferred from a societal perspective, although in QALYs and costs no statistically significant changes were found as compared with standard care. As clinical outcomes also favoured the web-based and FENO-based strategies, these strategies may be useful additions to standard care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Netherlands Trial Register (NTR1995).

Monitoring strategies in children with asthma: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Asthma guidelines recommend monitoring of asthma control. However, in a substantial proportion of children, asthma is poorly controlled and the best monitoring strategy is not known. OBJECTIVES: We studied two monitoring strategies for their ability to improve asthma outcomes in comparison with standard care (SC): web-based monthly monitoring with the (Childhood) Asthma Control Test (ACT or C-ACT) and 4-monthly monitoring of FENO. METHODS: In this randomised controlled, partly blinded, parallel group multicentre trial with a 1-year follow-up, children aged 4-18 with a doctor's diagnosis of asthma treated in seven hospitals were randomised to one of the three groups. In the web group, treatment was adapted according to ACT obtained via a website at 1-month intervals; in the FENO group according to ACT and FENO, and in the SC group according to the ACT at 4-monthly visits. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in the proportion of symptom-free days (SFD). RESULTS: Two-hundred and eighty children (mean age 10.4 years, 66% boys) were included; 268 completed the study. Mean changes from baseline in SFD were similar between the groups: -2.1% (web group, n=90), +8.9% (FENO group, n=91) versus 0.15% (SC, n=87), p=0.15 and p=0.78. Daily dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) decreased more in the web-based group compared with both other groups (-200 µg/day, p<0.01), while ACT and SFD remained similar. CONCLUSIONS: The change from baseline in SFD did not differ between monitoring strategies. With web-based ACT monitoring, ICS could be reduced substantially while control was maintained. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR 1995.

Monitoring childhood asthma: web-based diaries and the asthma control test.

BACKGROUND: Data from asthma diaries are frequently used as an end point in asthma studies; however, data on the validity of Web-based diaries are scarce. OBJECTIVES: First, we examined the validity of a Web-based diary in assessing asthma control. Second, we determined the cutoff points for well-controlled asthma of the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) and the Asthma Control Test (ACT), and calculated the minimal important difference for both tests. METHODS: Children with asthma, ages 4-18 years (n = 228) completed a 4-week Web-based diary, C-ACT, ACT, and an asthma-related quality-of-life questionnaire at baseline and after 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: The completion rate of the Web-based diaries was 89%. The diary scores correlated strongly with C-ACT and ACT scores (r = -0.73, P < .01; r = -0.64, P < .01, respectively) and the changes in diary scores correlated well with changes in C-ACT and ACT scores. The best cutoff points for well-controlled asthma were C-ACT ≥ 22 and ACT ≥ 23. The minimal important differences were 1.9 (95% CI, 1.3-2.5) for ACT and 1.6 (95% CI, 1.1-2.1) for C-ACT, and -0.7 points/d (95% CI, -1.1 to -0.4) for the Web-based diary. CONCLUSIONS: Our Web-based diary was valid for recording asthma symptoms. Cutoff points of ≥22 (C-ACT) and ≥23 (ACT) define well-controlled asthma. We recommend a 2 C-ACT and ACT points difference as minimally important.

Rapid enterovirus molecular testing in cerebrospinal fluid reduces length of hospitalization and duration of antibiotic therapy in children with aseptic meningitis.

We studied the potential benefits of introducing a rapid enterovirus molecular test in children with enterovirus meningitis. The 2 groups of pediatric patients were comparable with respect to clinical and laboratory data, but differed in availability of enterovirus test results. In the control group, the results were available within 3 to 7 days, whereas in the study group, rapid enterovirus molecular test results were available within 3 to 24 hours. The median duration of hospitalization and the duration of antibiotics were significantly reduced to, respectively, 2 days and 1 day in the study group when compared with the control group (P < 0.001). Mean costs per patient calculation showed an average reduction of more than US $1450 (P < 0.001).

The influence of intravenous hydrocortisone on cytokine levels in children with asthma.

Nocturnal airway obstruction occurs frequently in childhood asthma and results from increased airway inflammation. Lymphocytes are believed to be key effector cells of airway wall inflammation, releasing pro-inflammatory mediators and cytokines. A previous study showed that hydrocortisone infusion, an effective anti-inflammatory treatment, improves nocturnal and daytime FEV(1) values. This study in 16 children with moderate asthma was designed to assess whether there exists day and night differences in IL-4, IL-5, IL-8, and IFN-gamma production of concanavaline A stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Furthermore, we investigated whether substitution of low serum cortisol levels with intravenous hydrocortisone would affect those parameters. Saline (as a placebo) or hydrocortisone (30 microg/m(2) body surface area/24 h) was intravenously administered in a randomized, double blind, cross-over design. Measurements under saline or hydrocortisone infusions were separated by 1 wk. At 04:00 and 16:00 hours 10 ml blood was taken for determination of peripheral blood mononuclear cell isolation and stimulation, and an eosinophil count. Hydrocortisone infusion significantly reduced the nocturnal fall in FEV(1). Median values of IFNgamma, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-8 produced by peripheral blood mononuclear cells did not significantly differ at 04:00 and 16:00 hours, both with saline and hydrocortisone infusion. Our results suggest that FEV(1) improvement is not due to suppression of circulating peripheral blood mononuclear cell activation. We hypothesize that it is rather due to its effect on local lung tissue epithelial and/or fibroblasts thereby reducing airway inflammation and vascular leakage.

Role of serum cortisol levels in children with asthma.

Decreased serum cortisol levels have been proposed to contribute to nocturnal airway obstruction. We investigated whether endogenous cortisol levels are lower, and also whether the 24-h cortisol variation is greater, in children with asthma than in control subjects and assessed the relationship between serum cortisol and nocturnal airflow limitation in children with asthma. Cortisol and FEV(1) were measured every 4 h over 24 h; blood eosinophils, airway responsiveness to methacholine and adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) were measured at 0400 and 1600. Children with asthma had lower cortisol levels than did control subjects; at midnight the difference was significant. Subjects with nocturnal asthma (24-h FEV(1) variation > or =15%) had significantly lower cortisol levels than did control subjects at 0000, 0800, and 1200. A higher mean 24-h cortisol level in subjects with asthma was associated with a significantly higher FEV(1) as a percentage of the predicted value (FEV(1) %pred) at 0400, 0800, and 2000, yet not in control subjects. Higher 24-h cortisol variation was associated with lower FEV(1) %pred at all time points in both control subjects and subjects with nonnocturnal asthma. There was no significant association between the level or variation of cortisol and PD(20) methacholine (provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV(1)), PD(20) AMP, or eosinophils. Our data suggest that lower cortisol levels contribute to both overall lower levels of FEV(1) especially at night. This may be due to a lack of suppression of airway inflammation.