Single institution experience of cloacal malformation.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to report on the outcomes of patients born with cloacal malformation, managed at a single institution more than the last 28 years. The focus of this study is the long term renal and colorectal outcomes. METHODS: Patients were identified from the departmental database from 1994 to 2021. The medical records and operative notes were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Eleven long common channel (LCC) and ten short common channel (SCC) cloacae patients were identified. Median age at the time of primary reconstruction was 11 months in both groups. In the LCC group, seven (63.6%) patients underwent a Total Urogenital Mobilisation (TUM), and 4 (36.4%) required a vaginal replacement. 6/11 (54.5%) of patients required drainage of a hydrocolpos. In the SCC group, four patients required a TUM, two patients underwent mobilisation of the rectum and vagina alone, and three underwent rectal mobilisation alone. Two patients have required renal transplant for congenital renal dysplasia, and two have developed chronic renal failure associated with the sequalae of vesicoureteric reflux. Eleven (52.3%) of the patients manage their bowels with an antegrade continent enema (ACE), and two of the LCC cloaca are defunctioned with a colostomy. Clean intermittent catheterisation is performed by 12 (57%) of the patients, either per urethra or via a Mitrofanoff channel. CONCLUSION: The urinary and faecal continence are the main challenges in the management of cloaca patients. Many require surgical intervention to achieve social continence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Assessing the previously repaired patient with an anorectal malformation who is not doing well.

In this review, the care of children with a previously repaired anorectal malformation is explored. We know that the surgical care of children with anorectal malformations is complex; however, despite an increased understanding of the congenital anomaly and significant technical advances in the operative repair, many of these children continue to have poor functional outcomes. In this article we focus on the common surgical complications, discuss typical presentations, consider appropriate investigations, and review the risks and benefits of revisional surgery in those patients that are 'not doing well' following their primary reconstruction.

Clinical Quiz: Reconstructive Strategies in a 5-Month-Old Infant with a Cloaca.

Herein we present a case of 5-month-old female born with a cloaca. She underwent a colostomy at birth and then underwent endoscopy and cloacagram to plan for the definitive reconstruction. The case is presented with a focus on the reconstructive strategies, and questions for the readers are posed in a quiz format.

Diagnosis and management of a remnant of the original fistula (ROOF) in males following surgery for anorectal malformations.

PURPOSE: A complication of the surgical management of anorectal malformations (ARMs) is a retained remnant of the original fistula (ROOF) formerly called a posterior urethral diverticulum (PUD). A ROOF may have multiple presentations or may be incidentally discovered during the work-up of ARM after previous surgery. We sought to define the entity and the surgical indications for excision of a ROOF when found. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all male patients who presented to our center following previous repair for ARM at another institution, who came for evaluation of problems with urinary and/or fecal continence, from 2014 to 2017. Charts were reviewed for symptoms, original type of malformation, preoperative imaging, treatment, and postoperative follow-up. RESULTS: Of 180 referred male patients, 16 had a ROOF. 14 underwent surgical repair to address this and for other redo indications, and 2 did not require intervention. 13 patients had an additional reason for a redo such as anal mislocation or rectal prolapse. Indications for ROOF excision were urinary symptoms (e.g. UTI, dribbling, passage of mucous via urethra, stone formation), to make a smoother posterior urethra for intermittent catheterization, or for prophylactic reasons. Patients were repaired at an average age of 4.2 years, using a PSARP only approach with excision of the ROOF for all except one patient who needed a laparotomy due to abdominal extension of the ROOF. No patient needed a colostomy. The original ARM repairs of the patients were PSARP (9), laparoscopic assisted (4) and abdominoperineal pullthrough (3). Preoperative evaluation included pelvic MRI, VCUG, and cystoscopy. The ROOF was visualized on 14 of 16 MRIs, 10 of 14 VCUGs, and 14 of 15 cystoscopies. Urinary symptoms associated with a ROOF and ease of catheterization were improved in all repaired cases. CONCLUSION: Patients not doing well from a urinary or bowel standpoint post ARM pull-through need a complete evaluation which should include a check for a ROOF. Both modalities MRI and cystoscopy are needed as a ROOF can be missed on either alone. A VCUG was not reliable in identifying a ROOF. Excision is needed in patients to improve urinary symptoms associated with these lesions and to minimize the small but theoretical oncologic risk present in a ROOF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Development of a Patient-reported Experience and Outcome Measures in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Bowel Management for Constipation and Fecal Incontinence.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review is develop a reliable and valid questionnaire that assesses patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of caregivers, families, and patients with severe constipation and fecal incontinence who failed conservative treatments and require a formal bowel management program (BMP). METHODS: A 5-step iterative process was utilized to ensure the reliability and validity of the final instrument. Parents or guardians of patients undergoing our week-long BMP were first asked 20 open-ended questions aimed at understanding the challenges in managing their child's condition. Responses were transformed into an initial 41-item survey constituted of 2 constructs relating to PREMs (24 items) and PROMs (17 items). Survey items were then administered to 359 parents and guardians undergoing BMP. Cognitive interviews were performed with 20 families to assess face validity and to further refine the survey. Instrument readability and reliability was assessed by Flesch-Kincaid and Crohnbach α analyses. Items that weakly correlated were deleted to yield a final instrument that was both valid and reliable. RESULTS: A 33-statement survey was developed that encompasses important physical and emotional health concerns, quality of life, treatment success, financial considerations, schooling, parental employment, and social concerns. The final instrument, the Patient-Reported Experience and Outcome Measure in a Bowel Management Program (PREOM-BMP), is divided into 2 separate constructs that assess important patient-reported experience (22 items) and outcome (11 items) measures. Reliability analyses on the final instrument yielded a Crohnbach α of 0.925. CONCLUSIONS: The PREOM-BMP offers physicians and nursing professionals a brief and valid tool to measure the impact of a bowel management program on both the child and the family unit.

Primary or Redo Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty without a Stoma: To Feed or Not to Feed?

INTRODUCTION: Repair of anorectal malformations (ARMs), primarily or with a reoperation, may be performed in certain circumstances without a diverting stoma. Postoperatively, the passage of bulky stool can cause wound dehiscence and anastomotic disruption. To avoid this, some surgeons keep patients NPO (nothing by mouth) for a prolonged period. Here, we report the results of a change to our routine from NPO for 7 days to clear fluids or breast milk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After primary or redo ARM surgery, patients given clear liquids were compared to those who were kept strictly NPO. Age, indication for surgery, incision type, use of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line, and wound complications were recorded. RESULTS: There were 52 patients, including 15 primary and 37 redo cases. Group 1 comprised 11 female and 15 male patients. The mean age at surgery was 4.9 years (standard deviation [SD]: 2.3). There were 8 primary cases and 18 redo cases. Twelve (46.6%) received a PICC line. The average start of clear liquids was on day 5.3 (SD: 2.2) after examination of the wound, and the diet advanced as tolerated. The first stool passage was recorded on average on day 2.3 (SD: 1.3). Four minor wound complications and no major wound complications occurred.Group 2 comprised 14 females and 12 male patients. The mean age at surgery was 3.5 (SD: 2.4) years. There were 7 primary and 19 redo cases. One (3.8%) patient required a PICC line. A clear liquid diet was started within 24 hours after surgery. A regular diet was started on average on day 5.8 (SD: 1.3). The first stool passage was recorded on an average of day 1.6 (SD: 0.9). Three minor wound complications occurred; however, there was no significant difference between the two groups (SD: 0.71). One major wound complication occurred. However, there was no significant difference in major wound complications between the groups (SD: 0.33). CONCLUSION: No increase in wound problems was noted in children receiving clear liquids or breast milk compared with the strict NPO group, and PICC line use was reduced. We believe this change in practice simplifies postoperative care without increasing the risk of wound complications.

The Impact of Manuscript Learning vs. Video Learning on a Surgeon's Confidence in Performing a Difficult Procedure.

Introduction: Operative surgical videos are a popular educational resource, not commonly a part of a peer-reviewed article. We wanted to evaluate the impact of either reading a peer-reviewed manuscript or watching an operative video on a surgeon's confidence in performing a complex case. Methods: Pediatric surgeons and fellows were asked to complete an initial questionnaire to assess their confidence (formulated as a score) in the diagnosis and operative repair of anal stenosis and rectal atresia. Results: Of 101 pediatric surgeons and fellows, 52 (51%) were randomized into a "manuscript" group and 49 (49%) into a "video" group. The mean confidence before the intervention was the same in the two groups (6.4 vs. 6.6). Attending surgeons started with more confidence than trainees (7.1 vs. 5.3, p < 0.001). In the manuscript group, the average confidence increased to 7.7 (p = 0.005), and in the video group the average confidence increased to 7.9 (p = 0.001) globally. Trainees in the video group significantly improved their confidence to a score of 6.6 (p = 0.035), as did attending surgeons to 8.5 (p = 0.01). In the manuscript group, only attendings significantly improved their confidence by 1.5-8.3 (p < 0.001), whereas trainees did not with a difference of 1.3 (p = 0.194). When considering experience level, physicians who reported never having performed this surgery improved only by reading the manuscript (3.9-6.2) (p = 0.004), not by watching the video (5.4-6.6) (p = 0.106). Surgeons with experience doing this operation (>5 times) did not improve their confidence by reading the manuscript (p = 0.10), nor by watching the video (p = 0.112). Conclusion: Reviewing either a detailed manuscript or operative video on the surgical management of rectal atresia and anal stenosis demonstrated a significant increase in self-reported confidence. Trainees benefitted the most from operative videos, whereas experienced surgeons did not improve their confidence by reading the manuscript nor watching the video.

A structured bowel management program for patients with severe functional constipation can help decrease emergency department visits, hospital admissions, and healthcare costs.

BACKGROUND: Published health-care costs related to constipation in children in the USA are estimated at $3.9 billion/year. We sought to assess the effect of a bowel management program (BMP) on health-care utilization and costs. METHODS: At two collaborating centers, BMP involves an outpatient week during which a treatment plan is implemented and objective assessment of stool burden is performed with daily radiography. We reviewed all patients with severe functional constipation who participated in the program from March 2011 to June 2015 in center 1 and from April 2014 to April 2016 in center 2. ED visits, hospital admissions, and constipation-related morbidities (abdominal pain, fecal impaction, urinary retention, urinary tract infections) 12 months before and 12 months after completion of the BMP were recorded. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-four patients were included (center 1 = 96, center 2 = 88). Sixty-three (34.2%) patients had at least one unplanned visit to the ED before treatment. ED visits decreased to 23 (12.5%) or by 64% (p < 0.0005). Unplanned hospital admissions decreased from 65 to 28, i.e., a 56.9% reduction (p < 0.0005). CONCLUSION: In children with severe functional constipation, a structured BMP decreases unplanned visits to the ED, hospital admissions, and costs for constipation-related health care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Gynecologic anatomic abnormalities following anorectal malformations repair.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Patients may present with gynecologic concerns after previous posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) for repair of an anorectal malformation (ARM). Common findings include an inadequate or shortened perineal body, as well as introital stenosis, retained vaginal septum, and remnant rectovestibular fistula. An inadequate or shortened perineal body may impact fecal continence, sexual function and recommendations regarding obstetrical mode of delivery. We describe our experience with female patients referred to our center for evaluation of their previously repaired ARM, with a specific focus on perineal body anatomy and concomitant gynecologic abnormalities. We outline our collaborative evaluation process and findings as well as subsequent repair and outcomes. MATERIAL/METHODS: A single site retrospective chart review from May 2014 to May 2016 was performed. Female patients with a history of prior ARM repair who required subsequent reoperative surgical repair with perineoplasty were included. The decision for reoperation was made collaboratively after a multidisciplinary evaluation by colorectal surgery, urology, and gynecology which included examination under anesthesia (EUA) with cystoscopy, vaginoscopy, rectal examination, and electrical stimulation of anal sphincters. The type of original malformation, indication for reoperative perineoplasty, findings leading to additional procedures performed at time of perineoplasty, postoperative complications, and the length of follow up were recorded. RESULTS: During the study period 28 patients were referred for evaluation after primary ARM repair elsewhere and 15 patients (60%) met inclusion criteria. Thirteen patients (86.6%) originally had a rectovestibular fistula with prior PSARP and 2 patients (13.4%) originally had a cloacal malformation with prior posterior sagittal anorectovaginourethroplasty. The mean age at the time of the subsequent perineoplasty was 4.6years (0.5-12). Patients had an inadequate perineal body requiring reoperative perineoplasty due to: anterior mislocation of the anus (n=11, 73.3%), prior perineal wound dehiscence with perineal body breakdown (n=2, 13.4%), acquired rectovaginal fistula (n=1, 6.6%), and posterior mislocated introitus with invasion of the perineal body (n=1, 6.6%). During the preoperative evaluation, additional gynecologic abnormalities were identified that required concomitant surgical intervention including: introital stenosis (n=4, 26.6%), retained vaginal septum (n=3, 20%) and remnant recto vestibular fistula (n=2, 13.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a previously repaired ARM may present with gynecologic concerns that require subsequent surgical intervention. The most common finding was an inadequate perineal body, but other findings included introital stenosis, retained vaginal septum and remnant recto vestibular fistula. Multidisciplinary evaluation to assess and identify abnormalities and coordinate timing and surgical approach is crucial to assure optimal patient outcomes. TYPE OF STUDY: Case series with no comparison group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Determinants of quality of life in children with colorectal diseases.

BACKGROUND: Health related Quality of Life (HRQoL) is an important outcome in medical care. The aim of our study was to identify characteristics associated with lower HRQoL scores in children with anorectal malformation (ARM) and Hirschsprung disease (HD). METHODS: Patients younger than 18years, with HD or ARM, who were evaluated at our center from April 2014 to August 2015, were identified. The results of comprehensive questionnaires regarding diagnosis, symptoms, comorbidities and previous medical/surgical history, and validated tools to assess urinary status, stooling status and HRQoL were evaluated. RESULTS: In children aged 0-4years, vomiting and abdominal distension were found to be associated with a significant reduction in total HRQoL scores. In children >4years of age, vomiting, nausea, abdominal distension, and abdominal pain were also associated with a significantly lower HRQoL. The strongest predictor of lower HRQoL scores on regression tree analysis, in all age groups, was the presence of a psychological, behavioral or developmental comorbidity. CONCLUSION: Patients with either HD or an ARM who have a psychological, behavioral or developmental problem experience significantly lower HRQoL than children without such problems, suggesting that provision of behavioral/developmental support as part of the multidisciplinary care of these children may have a substantial impact on their HRQoL.

Use of a Heineke-Mikulicz like stricturoplasty for intractable skin level anal strictures following anoplasty in children with anorectal malformations.

INTRODUCTION: We introduced a modification of the Heineke-Mikulicz technique to treat intractable skin level anal strictures post posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP). The aim of this article is to describe the technique and outcome in a series of patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective evaluation of patients who had Heineke-Mikulicz like stricturoplasty performed for a post PSARP skin level stricture over a one-year period. RESULTS: Five patients who were operated using the technique were reviewed. All had severe anal strictures that could admit Hegar dilator sizes 6 to 9 at 16months to 5years after PSARP. All underwent routine dilatations, which became increasingly painful. As an alternative to continued dilatations, an operative procedure was offered. The surgery was done as a day case and lasted 10 to 30min. The anus at the end of the procedure could comfortably accept a Hegar dilator size 14 to 17. None of the patients had a colostomy after the procedure and there were no complications. CONCLUSIONS: The Heineke-Mikulicz like stricturoplasty is a simple surgical procedure that can be done in an ambulatory setting to treat children with intractable skin level anal stricture if this develops following definitive surgery for anorectal malformations.

A standardized approach for the assessment and treatment of internationally adopted children with a previously repaired anorectal malformation (ARM).

INTRODUCTION: A significant number of internationally adopted children have congenital birth defects. As a specialist center for colorectal diagnoses, we evaluate such children with an anorectal malformation (ARM) and have found that a significant number need a reoperation. Knowledge of the common complications following ARM surgery has led us to develop treatment algorithms for patients with unknown past medical and surgical history, a situation typically encountered in the adopted population. METHODS: The results of investigations, indications, and rate of reoperation were assessed for adopted children with an ARM evaluated between 2014 and 2016. RESULTS: 56 patients (28 males) were identified. 76.8% required reoperative surgery. Mislocation of the anus outside the sphincter complex was seen in 50% of males and 39.3% of females. Anal stricture, rectal prolapse, retained vaginal septum, and a strictured vaginal introitus were also common. CONCLUSION: The reoperative surgery rate in the internationally adopted child with an ARM is high. Complete, systematic evaluation of these children is required to identify complications following initial repair. Development of mechanisms to improve the primary surgical care these children receive is needed.

Low vertebral ano-rectal cardiac tracheo-esophageal renal limb screening rates in children with anorectal malformations.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to establish the rate of screening for associated cardiac, vertebral, spinal cord, urologic, and limb anomalies vertebral ano-rectal cardiac tracheo-esophageal renal limb (VACTERL) in children with anorectal malformation (ARM). METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the Medicaid Analytic eXtract database which contains enrollment and utilization claims and demographic information from all Medicaid enrollees. Patients born between January 2005 and December 2008 with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes for a diagnosis of ARM within 30 days of life, an ARM procedure code during the first year of life, and a minimum of 12 months of continuous enrollment were included. VACTERL screening was determined using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Current Procedural Terminology codes for diagnostic tests used to detect these anomalies. RESULTS: A total of 406 patients were identified (231 males). Evaluation of the spinal vertebrae was performed in 94% of patients (381 of 406). Spinal cord evaluation was performed in 57% (231 of 406): 52% (121 of 231) received spinal ultrasound (US), 24% (56 of 231) received spinal magnetic resonance imaging, and 23% (54 of 231) received both. Sacral radiographs were performed in 8% (32 of 406) and 77% (313 of 406) underwent an echocardiogram. Genitourinary evaluation was performed in 84% (341 of 406): 67% (229 of 341) received renal US, 8% (27 of 341) received abdominal US, and 25% (85 of 341) received both. Limb evaluation was recorded in 19% (76 of 406). Multiple screening including an echocardiogram, spinal radiograph, spinal cord evaluation, and renal evaluation was performed in 45% (181 of 406); 2% (7 of 406) did not receive any screening tests. CONCLUSIONS: Low VACTERL screening in children with ARM suggests that associated anomalies may be undiagnosed which may lead to increased long-term morbidity.

Surgical decision-making in the management of children with intractable functional constipation: What are we doing and are we doing it right?

BACKGROUND: Children with intractable functional constipation (FC) may eventually require surgery, often guided by motility testing. However, there are no evidence-based guidelines for the surgical management of intractable FC in children. AIM: To assess the diagnostic and surgical approach of pediatric surgeons and pediatric gastroenterologists towards children with intractable FC. METHODS: A survey was administered to physicians attending an international conference held simultaneously in Columbus (Ohio, USA) and Nijmegen (the Netherlands). The survey included 4 questions based on cases with anorectal and colonic manometry results. RESULTS: 74 physicians completed the questionnaire. Anorectal manometry was used by 70%; 52% of them would consider anal sphincter botulinum toxin injections for anal achalasia and 21% would use this to treat dyssynergia. Colonic manometry was used by 38%; 57% of them reported to use this to guide surgical decision-making. The surgical approach varied considerably among responders answering the case questions based on motility test results; the most commonly chosen treatments were antegrade continence enemas and anal botulinum injections. CONCLUSION: Surgical decision-making for children with intractable FC differs among physicians. There is a need for clinical guidelines regarding the role of anorectal and colonic manometry in surgical decision-making in children with intractable FC.

The Posterior Sagittal Approach to Bladder Neck Closure in Patients With Anorectal Malformation: A Novel Collaborative Technique.

Bladder neck closure may be beneficial in patients with refractory urinary incontinence secondary to outlet deficiency. The location of the bladder neck deep within the pelvis may make exposure difficult during an open approach. We describe a novel approach to bladder neck closure in patients with anorectal malformations using a posterior sagittal approach. Our approach provides superior visualization of the bladder neck and easy access to tissue to provide additional layers of coverage, and prevents the need for an abdominal incision in patients undergoing simultaneous rectal or vaginal surgeries.