Comparison of three triple regimens with omeprazole or ranitidine bismuth citrate for Helicobacter pylori eradication.

BACKGROUND: Regimens with ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) or omeprazole (O) are effective in eradicating Helicobacter pylori. This randomized, open, multicentre trial compares three different regimens with these drugs. METHODS: Consecutive H. pylori +ve outpatients were included. The alternative regimens were: 1) O 20 mg, clarithromycin (C) 250 mg and metronidazole (M) 500 mg (O.C.M), 2) RBC 400 mg, C 250 mg and M 500 mg (RBC.C.M), 3) RBC 400 mg, tetracycline (T) 1000 mg and M 500 mg [RBC.T.M]. All drugs were given twice daily for 7 days. H. pylori infection was assessed with H. pylori urea breath tests. RESULTS: 426 H. pylori +ve patients were included (mean age 58 years [range 18-88], male/female: 244/182). The eradication rates (intention to treat) in the O.C.M, RBC.C.M and RBC.T.M groups were 117/137 (85%), 141/146 (97%) and 117/143 (82%), respectively (P < 0.001, overall assessment). There were no significant differences in side effects between the alternatives. CONCLUSION: In this trial, RBC.C.M was the most effective one, it was well tolerated and compliance was satisfactory. RBC.T.M is an alternative to regimens with clarithromycin.

The symptomatic effect of cisapride in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and constipation.

BACKGROUND: Cisapride improves symptoms in patients with idiopathic constipation. This trial compares the effect of cisapride with that of placebo in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and constipation. METHODS: Seventy patients were randomized to 12 weeks' treatment with 5 mg cisapride three times daily or placebo in a double-blind trial. The dose could be doubled after 4 weeks in patients without satisfactory improvement. The patients scored their symptoms on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) (0 = best, 100 = worst), and the investigators evaluated the symptomatic effect. RESULTS: The dose was doubled in 17 and 23 patients in the cisapride and placebo groups, respectively, after 4 weeks. The patients' mean VAS score for global evaluation of IBS symptoms in the cisapride and placebo groups was 73 and 71 mm, respectively, at the start of treatment and 47 and 41 mm at the end. The difference between cisapride and placebo at the end was 6 mm in favour of placebo (95% confidence interval (CI), -6, 18) (NS). The investigators evaluated the effect as good or excellent in 39.2% and 58.8% in the cisapride and placebo groups, respectively. The difference in favour of placebo was 19.5% (95% CI, -5, 44) (NS). Nor were any statistically significant differences seen between cisapride and placebo in the other effect factors. CONCLUSIONS: The trial seems to exclude a clinically significant effect of 15-30 mg cisapride daily in patients with IBS and constipation during a 12-week treatment period.

["Microscopic colitis" and collagenous colitis. Unusual explanation of diarrhea of unknown origin]. / "Mikroskopisk kolitt" og kollagenkolitt. Sjeldne forklaringer på diaré uten annen kjent årsak.

The article describes two female patients with severe diarrhoea. Both patients were suspected of having an organic diarrhoea syndrome and underwent extensive investigations. No specific diagnoses such as inflammatory bowel disease, pancreatic cholera, malabsorption and surreptitous ingestion of laxatives could be established. Histologic examination of biopsy specimens from apparently normal colon revealed microscopic changes characteristic of "microscopic colitis" in one of the patients, and of collagenous colitis in the other. The authors discuss similarities between these two microscopic abnormalities in colonic mucosa and their close association with chronic watery diarrhoea.

Low-dose antacids versus 400 mg cimetidine twice daily for reflux oesophagitis. A comparative, placebo-controlled, multicentre study.

Ninety-one patients with reflux oesophagitis were randomly allocated to treatment with one chewable antacid tablet (acid-neutralizing capacity, 30 mmol) four times daily, 400 mg cimetidine twice daily, or placebo. The study was double-blind, with a double-dummy technique. Endoscopy was performed before inclusion and after 8 weeks' treatment. Symptoms were recorded on diary cards and on visual analogue scales. Statistically significant healing of oesophagitis was achieved in all three treatment groups, but none of the active regimens were significantly superior to placebo. Symptoms were significantly reduced with both cimetidine and antacids compared with placebo. Patients taking antacids consumed significantly less extra antacids for pain relief and had significantly better global assessment score than patients taking cimetidine during the first and second half of the study, respectively. In conclusion, neither cimetidine nor antacids were significantly superior to placebo in healing of reflux oesophagitis. Both the active regimens were superior to placebo for symptomatic relief.