Air travel in patients suffering from pulmonary hypertension-A prospective, multicentre study.

The PEGASUS study is the first multicentric and prospective assessment of the safety of air travel flying in pulmonary hypertension (PH) (NCT03051763). Data of air travel from 60 patients with PH was available. No severe adverse events occurred. Nine patients self-reported mild adverse events during flight (13%), while after landing, 12 patients reported events (20%). Solely one patient (2%) had an adverse event leading to medical consultation. In patients with PH and World Health Organization functional classes II and III, air travel was safe.

Four-Strata Risk Assessment in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Treated with Selexipag in Real-World Settings (EXPOSURE Study).

INTRODUCTION: Risk assessment can aid management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and clinical decision-making. This analysis describes characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with PAH, categorised by risk status at time of treatment escalation with selexipag in clinical settings. METHODS: Patients initiating selexipag in the ongoing multicentre, prospective EXPOSURE (EUPAS19085) study were grouped as low, intermediate-low, intermediate-high or high risk of 1-year mortality according to the ESC/ERS 4-strata method. RESULTS: As of November 2022, 77% (535/698) of patients initiating selexipag had data allowing for risk calculation; 14% (N = 76) were low, 31% (N = 168) intermediate-low, 34% (N = 182) intermediate-high and 20% (N = 109) high risk of 1-year mortality. Overall, patients were predominantly female (71%), with idiopathic/heritable PAH (56%) or PAH associated with connective tissue disease (CTD-PAH; 27%), median age of 60 years and prevalent (2 years) disease. From low to high risk, proportion of CTD-PAH and age increased (from 12%-40% and 46-68 years, respectively); time from diagnosis decreased and presence of cardiovascular risk factors increased. Most patients across risk groups (74-81%) initiated selexipag as part of triple oral combination therapy. Overall median (Q1, Q3) selexipag exposure duration was 10.1 (3.5, 24.1) months. Proportions of hospitalised patients increased with increasing risk group (16-42% from low to high, respectively); more hospitalisations were PAH-related for the high risk (71%) versus other risk groups (47-54%). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were 98%, 98%, 93% and 80% at 1-year and 98%, 92%, 81% and 67% at 2-years, from low to high risk, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical settings, selexipag is initiated across all risk groups, predominantly as triple therapy. Only 45% of patients being at low/intermediate-low risk at selexipag initiation suggests an opportunity for more frequent patient monitoring and earlier treatment escalation, given that 4-strata risk assessment was prognostic for hospitalisations and survival in this contemporary PAH cohort. A graphical abstract is available with this article.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a disease that gets worse over time. To make decisions about treatment, we need to know the stage of the disease. We can do this by measuring the patient's risk of death during the next few years. Selexipag is a medication for PAH. This analysis included patients living in Europe and Canada who started treatment with selexipag for their PAH disease. Our findings suggest that the monitoring of patients' health and the timing of starting selexipag can be improved. This analysis includes 698 patients taking part in the EXPOSURE study (EUPAS19085), which looks at the real-life treatment of patients with PAH. Overall, 71% of patients were female, the median age was 60 years, most had been diagnosed with PAH for around 2 years and were already taking two other medications for their PAH disease. At the beginning of selexipag treatment, 14% of patients were classified as low risk, 31% as intermediate-low risk, 34% as intermediate-high risk and 20% as high risk of mortality within the next year. More high-risk patients were hospitalised compared with the lower risk groups. After 1 year of treatment, more patients in the low (98%) and intermediate-low groups (98%) were alive than those in the intermediate-high (93%) and high risk groups (80%). The same was true after 2 years of treatment with selexipag (98%, 92%, 81% and 67%, respectively). This study confirms that assessing patients' risk levels can indicate how well they will do over time and shows that earlier treatment with selexipag should be considered to potentially prevent worsening of the disease.

Selexipag in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with connective tissue disease (PAH-CTD): Real-world experience from EXPOSURE.

Selexipag is indicated for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), including PAH associated with connective tissue disease (CTD), and further insights into the management of selexipag-treated PAH-CTD patients in clinical settings are needed. These analyses of the ongoing, multicenter, prospective EXPOSURE (EUPAS19085) study describe characteristics, treatment patterns, tolerability, and outcomes of PAH-CTD patients initiating selexipag in Europe/Canada. All analyses were descriptive, with idiopathic PAH patients who typically display better prognosis included for context. Six hundred ninety-eight selexipag-treated patients had follow-up information; 178 (26%) had PAH-CTD. The median age was 68 years, patients were predominantly female (88%), and with WHO functional class III symptoms (63%); the median time since diagnosis was 1.7 years. There were 5% patients at low, 25% intermediate-low, 40% intermediate-high, and 30% high risk of 1-year mortality, according to the ESC/ERS 4-strata risk score. Most (80%) initiated selexipag as a triple oral therapy, and most of these (62%) remained on triple therapy 6 months post-baseline. Over a median (Q1-Q3) selexipag exposure period of 8.6 (2.5-17.2) months, 79 (44%) patients discontinued selexipag; 36 (20%) due to tolerability/adverse events. Sixty (34%) patients were hospitalized at least once; 120 hospitalizations occurred, with 49 (48%) deemed PAH-related. Survival at 1 year was 85%, and at 2 years was 71%; 29 (16%) patients died. These results describe the use of combination therapy with selexipag for patients with PAH-CTD. These findings suggest an opportunity to optimize the benefits of selexipag among patients with PAH-CTD by moving from escalating after years in response to clinical deterioration to escalating sooner to prevent clinical deterioration.

Intravenous Opioid Medication with Piritramide Reduces the Risk of Pneumothorax During CT-Guided Percutaneous Core Biopsy of the Lung.

PURPOSE: CT-guided percutaneous core biopsy of the lung is usually performed under local anesthesia, but can also be conducted under additional systemic opioid medication. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the effect of intravenous piritramide application on the pneumothorax rate and to identify risk factors for post-biopsy pneumothorax. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and seventy-one core biopsies of the lung were included in this retrospective single center study. The incidence of pneumothorax and chest tube placement was evaluated. Patient-, procedure- and target-related variables were analyzed by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The overall incidence of pneumothorax was 39.2% (67/171). The pneumothorax rate was 31.5% (29/92) in patients who received intravenous piritramide and 48.1% (38/79) in patients who did not receive piritramide. In multivariable logistic regression analysis periinterventional piritramide application proved to be the only independent factor to reduce the risk of pneumothorax (odds ratio 0.46, 95%-confidence interval 0.24, 0.88; p = 0.018). Two or more pleura passages (odds ratio 3.38, 95%-confidence interval: 1.15, 9.87; p = 0.026) and prone position of the patient (odds ratio 2.27, 95%-confidence interval: 1.04, 4.94; p = 0.039) were independent risk factors for a higher pneumothorax rate. CONCLUSION: Procedural opioid medication with piritramide proved to be a previously undisclosed factor decreasing the risk of pneumothorax associated with CT-guided percutaneous core biopsy of the lung. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4: small study cohort.

Positive Vasoreactivity Testing in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Therapeutic Consequences, Treatment Patterns, and Outcomes in the Modern Management Era.

BACKGROUND: Among patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), acute vasoreactivity testing during right heart catheterization may identify acute vasoresponders, for whom treatment with high-dose calcium channel blockers (CCBs) is recommended. However, long-term outcomes in the current era remain largely unknown. We sought to evaluate the implications of acute vasoreactivity response for long-term response to CCBs and other outcomes. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with PAH between January 1999 and December 2018 at 15 pulmonary hypertension centers were included and analyzed retrospectively. In accordance with current guidelines, acute vasoreactivity response was defined by a decrease of mean pulmonary artery pressure by ≥10 mm Hg to reach <40 mm Hg, without a decrease in cardiac output. Long-term response to CCBs was defined as alive with unchanged initial CCB therapy with or without other initial PAH therapy and World Health Organization functional class I/II and/or low European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society risk status at 12 months after initiation of CCBs. Patients were followed for up to 5 years; clinical measures, outcome, and subsequent treatment patterns were captured. RESULTS: Of 3702 patients undergoing right heart catheterization for PAH diagnosis, 2051 had idiopathic, heritable, or drug-induced PAH, of whom 1904 (92.8%) underwent acute vasoreactivity testing. A total of 162 patients fulfilled acute vasoreactivity response criteria and received an initial CCB alone (n=123) or in combination with another PAH therapy (n=39). The median follow-up time was 60.0 months (interquartile range, 30.8-60.0), during which overall survival was 86.7%. At 12 months, 53.2% remained on CCB monotherapy, 14.7% on initial CCB plus another initial PAH therapy, and the remaining patients had the CCB withdrawn and/or PAH therapy added. CCB long-term response was found in 54.3% of patients. Five-year survival was 98.5% in long-term responders versus 73.0% in nonresponders. In addition to established vasodilator responder criteria, pulmonary artery compliance at acute vasoreactivity testing, low risk status and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) levels at early follow-up correlated with long-term response and predicted survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our data display heterogeneity within the group of vasoresponders, with a large subset failing to show a sustained satisfactory clinical response to CCBs. This highlights the necessity for comprehensive reassessment during early follow-up. The use of pulmonary artery compliance in addition to current measures may better identify those likely to have a good long-term response.

Real-World Management of Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Insights from EXPOSURE.

INTRODUCTION: Further insights into real-world management and outcomes of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) are needed. This interim analysis of the ongoing, multicentre, prospective EXPOSURE (EUPAS19085) observational study describes characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with PAH initiating a new PAH-specific therapy in Europe/Canada. METHODS AND RESULTS: All analyses were descriptive. In total, 1944 patients with follow-up information were included; the majority were female, with World Health Organization functional class II/III symptoms and with idiopathic PAH or connective tissue disease-associated PAH. Most incident patients (N = 1100; diagnosed for ≤ 6 months) initiated treatment as monotherapy (48%) or double therapy (43%). Of those initiating monotherapy, 38% (199/530) escalated to double therapy (median [Q1, Q3] time to escalation 3.4 [1.9, 6.6] months), and of those initiating double therapy, 17% (78/457) escalated to triple therapy (median [Q1, Q3] time to escalation 7.0 [3.4, 12.7] months) during the observation period (median [Q1, Q3]: 17.0 [7.5, 29.9] months). The majority of the 834 prevalent patients (diagnosed > 6 months) entered the study on initiation of combination therapy and most did not change treatment regimen during the observation period (median [Q1, Q3]: 19.6 [10.2, 32.2] months). One-year survival was 88% for incident patients and 90% for prevalent patients. CONCLUSIONS: Results from EXPOSURE suggest a shift towards combination therapy and the alignment of real-world treatment patterns with current guideline recommendations. While survival estimates are encouraging, the extent of monotherapy use at treatment initiation and follow-up highlight an opportunity for further improvements through optimisation of treatment strategies in line with current guidelines. A graphical abstract is also available with this article. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EUPAS19085.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive disease. Clinical guidelines recommend that most patients start treatment with a combination of different PAH medications. While there is no cure for PAH, these medications help to control symptoms and slow disease worsening. To understand treatments currently used in clinical practice, we analysed data from EXPOSURE (EUPAS19085), an ongoing study collecting information from patients starting a new PAH medication in Europe and Canada. Most patients in the study were female, with World Health Organization functional class II/III symptoms, and idiopathic (unknown cause) PAH or PAH associated with connective tissue disorders. Among 1100 patients who were 'recently diagnosed' (diagnosed with PAH in the past 6 months), 88% were alive after 1 year. We found that 48% started treatment with one PAH medication, and 38% of those patients had a second medication prescribed within a median period of 3 months. Among the 457 'recently diagnosed' patients treated with two PAH medications when they entered the study, 17% had a third medication prescribed within a median period of 7 months. Among 834 patients with 'established PAH' (diagnosed more than 6 months ago), 90% were alive after 1 year. Most entered the study when they started a third medication and did not have further changes in treatment. Our findings show that patients with PAH are often treated with one medication in clinical practice as well as a combination of medications. While survival rates are encouraging, the extent to which one PAH medication is used suggests there is room for treatment improvement.

Treatment strategies and survival of patients with connective tissue disease and pulmonary arterial hypertension: a COMPERA analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) occurs in various connective tissue diseases (CTDs). We sought to assess contemporary treatment patterns and survival of patients with various forms of CTD-PAH. METHODS: We analysed data from COMPERA, a European pulmonary hypertension registry, to describe treatment strategies and survival in patients with newly diagnosed PAH associated with SSc, SLE, MCTD, UCTD and other types of CTD. All-cause mortality was analysed according to the underlying CTD. For patients with SSc-PAH, we also assessed survival according to initial therapy with endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5is) or a combination of these two drug classes. RESULTS: This analysis included 607 patients with CTD-PAH. Survival estimates at 1, 3 and 5 years for SSc-PAH (n = 390) were 85%, 59% and 42%; for SLE-PAH (n = 34) they were 97%, 77% and 61%; for MCTD-PAH (n = 33) they were 97%, 70% and 59%; for UCTD-PAH (n = 60) they were 88%, 67% and 52%; and for other CTD-PAH (n = 90) they were 92%, 69% and 55%, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, the survival of patients with SSc-PAH was significantly worse compared with the other conditions (P = 0.001). In these patients, the survival estimates were significantly better with initial ERA-PDE5i combination therapy than with initial ERA or PDE5i monotherapy (P = 0.016 and P = 0.012, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Mortality remains high in patients with CTD-PAH, especially for patients with SSc-PAH. However, for patients with SSc-PAH, our results suggest that long-term survival may be improved with initial ERA-PDE5i combination therapy compared with initial monotherapy.

[Targeted therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients without comorbidities]. / Gezielte medikamentöse Therapie der pulmonalarteriellen Hypertonie bei Patient*innen ohne Komorbiditäten.

The 2022 guidelines on pulmonary hypertension from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) provide therapeutic strategies that account for the variability in the clinical presentation of newly diagnosed patients. We summarize treatment recommendations for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in patients without significant comorbidities, particularly for idiopathic, hereditary, drug/toxin-induced, or connective tissue disease-associated PAH. In this group of patients, multidimensional assessments for short-term mortality risk guide initial treatment decisions and treatment decisions during follow-up. Upfront dual combination therapy (phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor and endothelin receptor antagonist) is recommended for low- and intermediate-risk patients, and triple therapy including a parenteral prostacyclin should be considered in high- or intermediate-high-risk patients. If a low or intermediate-low-risk profile cannot be achieved during therapy, sequential add-on therapy escalation with parenteral prostacyclin or a prostacyclin receptor agonist should be considered, and switching from a phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor to a guanylate cyclase stimulator may also be considered.

[Medication treatment in pulmonary arterial hypertension with comorbidities - Which phenotypes and points to consider]. / Medikamentöse Therapie der pulmonalarteriellen Hypertonie mit Komorbiditäten ­ Welche Phänotypen gibt es, was gibt es zu beachten?

Within the last decade, the age at diagnosis of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension has increased, which led to a change of the clinical phenoype being associated with more comorbidities. Cluster analyses of registry data have identified cardiac, cardio-pulmonary and classical phenotypes of pulmonary arterial hypertension.Subgroup analyses of randomised controlled trials and registry data indicate, that in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and cardiac comorbidities, especially the left-heart phenotype, a closely supervised combination treatment may be considered. The 4-strata model may be used for monitoring and risk stratification in these patients. Individual treatment decisions should be made in the pulmonary hypertension centre. Factors such as hemodynamics, age, phenotype, number and severity of comorbidities, therapy response, adverse reactions and the wish of the patient should be considered.Prospective, randomized studies to assess the efficacy and safety profile of pulmonary arterial hypertension treatments are desirable. Patients with a mainly pulmonary phenotype (smoking, diffusion capacity of the lung < 45 % and/or lung parenchymal changes) may have less benefit of oral medication.

Lipidomics for diagnosis and prognosis of pulmonary hypertension.

Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) poses a significant health threat with high morbidity and mortality, necessitating improved diagnostic tools for enhanced management. Current biomarkers for PH lack functionality and comprehensive diagnostic and prognostic capabilities. Therefore, there is a critical need to develop biomarkers that address these gaps in PH diagnostics and prognosis. Methods: To address this need, we employed a comprehensive metabolomics analysis in 233 blood based samples coupled with machine learning analysis. For functional insights, human pulmonary arteries (PA) of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) lungs were investigated and the effect of extrinsic FFAs on human PA endothelial and smooth muscle cells was tested in vitro. Results: PA of idiopathic PAH lungs showed lipid accumulation and altered expression of lipid homeostasis-related genes. In PA smooth muscle cells, extrinsic FFAs caused excessive proliferation and endothelial barrier dysfunction in PA endothelial cells, both hallmarks of PAH.In the training cohort of 74 PH patients, 30 disease controls without PH, and 65 healthy controls, diagnostic and prognostic markers were identified and subsequently validated in an independent cohort. Exploratory analysis showed a highly impacted metabolome in PH patients and machine learning confirmed a high diagnostic potential. Fully explainable specific free fatty acid (FFA)/lipid-ratios were derived, providing exceptional diagnostic accuracy with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89 in the training and 0.90 in the validation cohort, outperforming machine learning results. These ratios were also prognostic and complemented established clinical prognostic PAH scores (FPHR4p and COMPERA2.0), significantly increasing their hazard ratios (HR) from 2.5 and 3.4 to 4.2 and 6.1, respectively. Conclusion: In conclusion, our research confirms the significance of lipidomic alterations in PH, introducing innovative diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. These findings may have the potential to reshape PH management strategies.

Refined risk stratification, current treatment, and new therapeutic approaches in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

The 2022 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society (ESC/ERS) guidelines for pulmonary hypertension have introduced a refined risk stratification to guide both initial and subsequent treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The risk stratification at PAH diagnosis still comprises three risk categories (low, intermediate, high) and lists some new parameters. As the estimated 1­year mortality is more than 20% in high-risk patients after diagnosis, an initial triple-combination therapy including parenteral prostacyclin analogues is recommended for this group. All other patients should receive a dual-combination therapy with an endothelin receptor antagonist and a phosphodiesterase­5 inhibitor. However, this approach of initial combination therapy is only recommended for classic PAH, while monotherapy followed by regular follow-up and individualized therapy should be used for patients with cardiopulmonary comorbidities. For PAH patients without cardiopulmonary comorbidities, it is recommended to assess their risk at follow-up with a new 4­strata classification, where the intermediate-risk group is split on the basis of three noninvasive parameters. Importantly, changes from intermediate-high to intermediate-low risk have been shown to be associated with a better prognosis. In addition, the recommendations on treatment escalation became more precise with the addition of a prostacyclin receptor agonist or switching a phosphodiesterase­5 inhibitor to a soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator for intermediate-low risk and proceeding to triple-combination therapy with parenteral prostacyclin analogues already for intermediate-high risk. With sotatercept, the first non-vasodilator PAH treatment will become available in the near future to further enrich our treatment options for this chronic and still severe disease.

Risk stratification and response to therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and comorbidities: A COMPERA analysis.

BACKGROUND: A diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) is frequently made in elderly patients who present with comorbidities, especially hypertension, coronary heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and obesity. It is unknown to what extent the presence of these comorbidities affects the response to PAH therapies and whether risk stratification predicts outcome in patients with comorbidities. METHODS: We assessed the database of COMPERA, a European pulmonary hypertension registry, to determine changes after initiation of PAH therapy in WHO functional class (FC), 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal fragment of probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP), and mortality risk assessed by a 4-strata model in patients with IPAH and no comorbidities, 1-2 comorbidities and 3-4 comorbidities. RESULTS: The analysis was based on 1,120 IPAH patients (n = 208 [19%] without comorbidities, n = 641 [57%] with 1-2 comorbidities, and n = 271 [24%] with 3-4 comorbidities). Improvements in FC, 6MWD, BNP/NT-pro-BNP, and mortality risk from baseline to first follow-up were significantly larger in patients with no comorbidities than in patients with comorbidities, while they were not significantly different in patients with 1-2 and 3-4 comorbidities. The 4-strata risk tool predicted survival in patients without comorbidities as well as in patients with 1-2 or 3-4 comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that patients with IPAH and comorbidities benefit from PAH medication with improvements in FC, 6MWD, BNP/NT-pro-BNP, and mortality risk, albeit to a lesser extent than patients without comorbidities. The 4-strata risk tool predicted outcome in patients with IPAH irrespective of the presence of comorbidities.

Phenotyping of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension: a registry analysis.

BACKGROUND: Among patients meeting diagnostic criteria for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH), there is an emerging lung phenotype characterised by a low diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and a smoking history. The present study aimed at a detailed characterisation of these patients. METHODS: We analysed data from two European pulmonary hypertension registries, COMPERA (launched in 2007) and ASPIRE (from 2001 onwards), to identify patients diagnosed with IPAH and a lung phenotype defined by a DLCO of less than 45% predicted and a smoking history. We compared patient characteristics, response to therapy, and survival of these patients to patients with classical IPAH (defined by the absence of cardiopulmonary comorbidities and a DLCO of 45% or more predicted) and patients with pulmonary hypertension due to lung disease (group 3 pulmonary hypertension). FINDINGS: The analysis included 128 (COMPERA) and 185 (ASPIRE) patients with classical IPAH, 268 (COMPERA) and 139 (ASPIRE) patients with IPAH and a lung phenotype, and 910 (COMPERA) and 375 (ASPIRE) patients with pulmonary hypertension due to lung disease. Most patients with IPAH and a lung phenotype had normal or near normal spirometry, a severe reduction in DLCO, with the majority having no or a mild degree of parenchymal lung involvement on chest computed tomography. Patients with IPAH and a lung phenotype (median age, 72 years [IQR 65-78] in COMPERA and 71 years [65-76] in ASPIRE) and patients with group 3 pulmonary hypertension (median age 71 years [65-77] in COMPERA and 69 years [63-74] in ASPIRE) were older than those with classical IPAH (median age, 45 years [32-60] in COMPERA and 52 years [38-64] in ASPIRE; p<0·0001 for IPAH with a lung phenotype vs classical IPAH in both registries). While 99 (77%) patients in COMPERA and 133 (72%) patients in ASPIRE with classical IPAH were female, there was a lower proportion of female patients in the IPAH and a lung phenotype cohort (95 [35%] COMPERA; 75 [54%] ASPIRE), which was similar to group 3 pulmonary hypertension (336 [37%] COMPERA; 148 [39%] ASPIRE]). Response to pulmonary arterial hypertension therapies at first follow-up was available from COMPERA. Improvements in WHO functional class were observed in 54% of patients with classical IPAH, 26% of patients with IPAH with a lung phenotype, and 22% of patients with group 3 pulmonary hypertension (p<0·0001 for classical IPAH vs IPAH and a lung phenotype, and p=0·194 for IPAH and a lung phenotype vs group 3 pulmonary hypertension); median improvements in 6 min walking distance were 63 m, 25 m, and 23 m for these cohorts respectively (p=0·0015 for classical IPAH vs IPAH and a lung phenotype, and p=0·64 for IPAH and a lung phenotype vs group 3 pulmonary hypertension), and median reductions in N-terminal-pro-brain-natriuretic-peptide were 58%, 27%, and 16% respectively (p=0·0043 for classical IPAH vs IPAH and a lung phenotype, and p=0·14 for IPAH and a lung phenotype vs group 3 pulmonary hypertension). In both registries, survival of patients with IPAH and a lung phenotype (1 year, 89% in COMPERA and 79% in ASPIRE; 5 years, 31% in COMPERA and 21% in ASPIRE) and group 3 pulmonary hypertension (1 year, 78% in COMPERA and 64% in ASPIRE; 5 years, 26% in COMPERA and 18% in ASPIRE) was worse than survival of patients with classical IPAH (1 year, 95% in COMPERA and 98% in ASPIRE; 5 years, 84% in COMPERA and 80% in ASPIRE; p<0·0001 for IPAH with a lung phenotype vs classical IPAH in both registries). INTERPRETATION: A cohort of patients meeting diagnostic criteria for IPAH with a distinct, presumably smoking-related form of pulmonary hypertension accompanied by a low DLCO, resemble patients with pulmonary hypertension due to lung disease rather than classical IPAH. These observations have pathogenetic, diagnostic, and therapeutic implications, which require further exploration. FUNDING: COMPERA is funded by unrestricted grants from Acceleron, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, and OMT. The ASPIRE Registry is supported by Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.

Prognostic value of improvement endpoints in pulmonary arterial hypertension trials: A COMPERA analysis.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of improvement endpoints that have been used in clinical trials of treatments for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) needs to be further investigated. METHODS: Using the COMPERA database, we evaluated the prognostic value of improvements in functional class (FC) and absolute or relative improvements in 6-min walking distance (6MWD) and N-terminal fragment of pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). In addition, we investigated multicomponent endpoints based on prespecified improvements in FC, 6MWD and NT-proBNP that have been used in recent PAH trials. Finally, we assessed the predictive value of improvements determined by risk stratification tools. The effects of changes from baseline to first follow-up (3-12 months after initiation of PAH therapy) on consecutive survival were determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis with Log-Rank testing and Cox proportional hazard analyses. RESULTS: All analyses were based on 596 patients with newly diagnosed PAH for whom complete data were available at baseline and first follow-up. Improvements in FC were associated with improved survival, whereas absolute or relative improvements in 6MWD had no predictive value. For NT-proBNP, absolute declines conferred no prognostic information while relative declines by ≥35% were associated with better survival. Improvements in multicomponent endpoints were associated with improved survival and the same was found for risk stratification tools. CONCLUSION: While sole improvements in 6MWD and NT-proBNP had minor prognostic relevance, improvements in multicomponent endpoints and risk stratification tools based on FC, 6MWD, and NT-proBNP were associated with improved survival. These tools should be further explored as outcome measures in PAH trials.

Gene panel diagnostics reveals new pathogenic variants in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

BACKGROUND: A genetic predisposition can lead to the rare disease pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Most mutations have been identified in the gene BMPR2 in heritable PAH. However, as of today 15 further PAH genes have been described. The exact prevalence across these genes particularly in other PAH forms remains uncertain. We present the distribution of mutations across PAH genes identified at the largest German referral centre for genetic diagnostics in PAH over a course of > 3 years. METHODS: Our PAH-specific gene diagnostics panel was used to sequence 325 consecutive PAH patients from March 2017 to October 2020. For the first year the panel contained thirteen PAH genes: ACVRL1, BMPR1B, BMPR2, CAV1, EIF2AK4, ENG, GDF2, KCNA5, KCNK3, KLF2, SMAD4, SMAD9 and TBX4. These were extended by the three genes ATP13A3, AQP1 and SOX17 from March 2018 onwards following the genes' discovery. RESULTS: A total of 79 mutations were identified in 74 patients (23%). Of the variants 51 (65%) were located in the gene BMPR2 while the other 28 variants were found in ten further PAH genes. We identified disease-causing variants in the genes AQP1, KCNK3 and SOX17 in families with at least two PAH patients. Mutations were not only detected in patients with heritable and idiopathic but also with associated PAH. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic defects were identified in 23% of the patients in a total of 11 PAH genes. This illustrates the benefit of the specific gene panel containing all known PAH genes.

Temporal trends in pulmonary arterial hypertension: results from the COMPERA registry.

BACKGROUND: Since 2015, the European pulmonary hypertension guidelines recommend the use of combination therapy in most patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, it is unclear to what extent this treatment strategy is adopted in clinical practice and if it is associated with improved long-term survival. METHODS: We analysed data from COMPERA, a large European pulmonary hypertension registry, to assess temporal trends in the use of combination therapy and survival of patients with newly diagnosed PAH between 2010 and 2019. For survival analyses, we looked at annualised data and at cumulated data comparing the periods 2010-2014 and 2015-2019. RESULTS: A total of 2531 patients were included. The use of early combination therapy (within 3 months after diagnosis) increased from 10.0% in patients diagnosed with PAH in 2010 to 25.0% in patients diagnosed with PAH in 2019. The proportion of patients receiving combination therapy 1 year after diagnosis increased from 27.7% to 46.3%. When comparing the 2010-2014 and 2015-2019 periods, 1-year survival estimates were similar (89.0% (95% CI 87.2-90.9%) and 90.8% (95% CI 89.3-92.4%), respectively), whereas there was a slight but nonsignificant improvement in 3-year survival estimates (67.8% (95% CI 65.0-70.8%) and 70.5% (95% CI 67.8-73.4%), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The use of combination therapy increased from 2010 to 2019, but most patients still received monotherapy. Survival rates at 1 year after diagnosis did not change over time. Future studies need to determine if the observed trend suggesting improved 3-year survival rates can be confirmed.

Selonsertib in adults with pulmonary arterial hypertension (ARROW): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Data obtained in human lung tissue and preclinical models suggest that oxidative stress and increased apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) activity might have a prominent role in the pathobiology of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the ASK1 inhibitor selonsertib compared with placebo in patients with PAH. METHODS: We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial at 46 centres located in Canada, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, the UK, and the USA. Participants were aged 18-75 years and had an established diagnosis of idiopathic or hereditary PAH, or PAH associated with connective tissue disease, drugs or toxins, human immunodeficiency virus, or repaired congenital heart defects. Patients were stratified by PAH aetiology and background therapy, and randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) using an interactive voice-response or web-response system to placebo or selonsertib 2 mg, 6 mg, or 18 mg administered orally once daily. Both placebo and selonsertib were in tablet form. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in pulmonary vascular resistance, measured by right heart catheterisation, from baseline to week 24 in the full analysis set. Pair-wise comparisons between each of the selonsertib groups and the placebo group were made with a stratified Wilcoxon (van Elteren) rank sum test for participants without major protocol deviations who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02234141. FINDINGS: Between Dec 3, 2014, and Nov 13, 2015, 151 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned. Of 150 participants who received selonsertib or placebo, 134 (89%) completed 24 weeks of the randomly assigned treatment; all were on background PAH therapy (138 [92%] on combination therapy). 90 (60%) patients were in functional class II and 60 (40%) in functional class III. Mean baseline pulmonary vascular resistance was 772 (SD 334) dyn·s/cm5. Change in pulmonary vascular resistance was 6·0 dyn·s/cm5 (SD 28·0; n=31) for placebo, and 35·0 (35·4) dyn·s/cm5 (n=35; p=0·21 vs placebo) for 2 mg selonsertib, -28·0 (30·2) dyn·s/cm5 (n=34; p=0·27 vs placebo) for 6 mg selonsertib, and -21·0 (37·9) dyn·s/cm5 (n=36; p=0·60 vs placebo) for 18 mg selonsertib. The most frequent adverse events were headache (17 [15%]), abnormal dreams (eight [7%]), nausea (seven [6%]), and diarrhoea (seven [6%]) in the selonsertib groups, and headache (six [16%]), nausea (five [14%]), and diarrhoea (two [5%]) in the placebo group. Serious adverse events occurred in 23 (20%) of 113 selonsertib-treated patients and seven (19%) of 37 patients who received placebo. INTERPRETATION: Selonsertib once daily for 24 weeks did not lead to a significant reduction in pulmonary vascular resistance or to clinical improvement in patients with PAH, but appeared to be safe and well tolerated. Although these data do not support the clinical use of selonsertib in PAH, further study of the potential of targeting the ASK1-p38 pathway in PAH is warranted. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences.

COMPERA 2.0: a refined four-stratum risk assessment model for pulmonary arterial hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Risk stratification plays an essential role in the management of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The current European guidelines propose a three-stratum model to categorise risk as low, intermediate or high, based on the expected 1-year mortality. However, with this model, most patients are categorised as intermediate risk. We investigated a modified approach based on four risk categories, with intermediate risk subdivided into intermediate-low and intermediate-high risk. METHODS: We analysed data from the Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA), a European pulmonary hypertension registry, and calculated risk at diagnosis and first follow-up based on World Health Organization functional class, 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and serum levels of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP), using refined cut-off values. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses, log-rank testing and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Data from 1655 patients with PAH were analysed. Using the three-stratum model, most patients were classified as intermediate risk (76.0% at baseline and 63.9% at first follow-up). The refined four-stratum risk model yielded a more nuanced separation and predicted long-term survival, especially at follow-up assessment. Changes in risk from baseline to follow-up were observed in 31.1% of the patients with the three-stratum model and in 49.2% with the four-stratum model. These changes, including those between the intermediate-low and intermediate-high strata, were associated with changes in long-term mortality risk. CONCLUSIONS: Modified risk stratification using a four-stratum model based on refined cut-off levels for functional class, 6MWD and BNP/NT-proBNP was more sensitive to prognostically relevant changes in risk than the original three-stratum model.