Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Med ; 9(8)2020 Aug 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32756510

RESUMO

Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) and other risk stratification systems may improve ultrasound image interpretation. This prospective study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of CAD and the European Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (EU-TIRADS) classification applied by physicians with S-Detect 2 software CAD based on Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS) and combinations of both methods (MODELs 1 to 5). In all, 133 nodules from 88 patients referred to thyroidectomy with available histopathology or with unambiguous results of cytology were included. The S-Detect system, EU-TIRADS, and mixed MODELs 1-5 for the diagnosis of thyroid cancer showed a sensitivity of 89.4%, 90.9%, 84.9%, 95.5%, 93.9%, 78.9% and 93.9%; a specificity of 80.6%, 61.2%, 88.1%, 53.7%, 73.1%, 89.6% and 80.6%; a positive predictive value of 81.9%, 69.8%, 87.5%, 67%, 77.5%, 88.1% and 82.7%; a negative predictive value of 88.5%, 87.2%, 85.5%, 92.3%, 92.5%, 81.1% and 93.1%; and an accuracy of 85%, 75.9%, 86.5%, 74.4%, 83.5%, 84.2%, and 87.2%, respectively. Comparison showed superiority of the similar MODELs 1 and 5 over other mixed models as well as EU-TIRADS and S-Detect used alone (p-value < 0.05). S-Detect software is characterized with high sensitivity and good specificity, whereas EU-TIRADS has high sensitivity, but rather low specificity. The best diagnostic performance in malignant thyroid nodule (TN) risk stratification was obtained for the combined model of S-Detect ("possibly malignant" nodule) and simultaneously obtaining 4 or 5 points (MODEL 1) or exactly 5 points (MODEL 5) on the EU-TIRADS scale.

3.
Semin Dial ; 30(1): 63-68, 2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27596540

RESUMO

This report reviews the most common surgical interventions and complications of chronic peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Based on the current knowledge as well as our experience we detail the role of these surgical procedures. We supplement the reported knowledge in the field with our own experience in this area. The areas discussed include early complications such as surgical wound hemorrhage, bleeding from the catheter, intestinal perforation and urinary bladder perforation, dialysate leakage through the wound, as well as late complications including catheter kinking or occlusion, retention of fluid in the peritoneal recess, hernias and hydrothorax, and encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis. We also briefly cover the surgical aspects of exit-site infection and peritonitis. An understanding by nephrologists of the role for surgical intervention in PD patients will improve their care and outcomes.


Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/cirurgia , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversos , Diálise Peritoneal/efeitos adversos , Fibrose Peritoneal/cirurgia , Peritonite/cirurgia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/fisiopatologia , Soluções para Diálise/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hidrotórax/etiologia , Hidrotórax/cirurgia , Masculino , Diálise Peritoneal/métodos , Diálise Peritoneal Ambulatorial Contínua/efeitos adversos , Diálise Peritoneal Ambulatorial Contínua/métodos , Fibrose Peritoneal/etiologia , Fibrose Peritoneal/fisiopatologia , Peritonite/etiologia , Peritonite/fisiopatologia , Qualidade de Vida , Medição de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Pol Przegl Chir ; 85(7): 377-80, 2013 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23945114

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: Mesh biomaterials have become the standard in the treatment of hernias, regardless the location. In addition to the obvious advantages of the methods based on implantable biomaterials, one should be aware of the possible complications, such as their migration to the abdominal organs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study group comprised patients operated at the Department of General, Gastroenterological Oncology, and Plastic Surgery during the period between 2008 and 2011, due to hernia surgery with mesh implantation. We also analysed the number of patients operated, due to complications of mesh migration during the same period. RESULTS: 368 patients were subject to mesh implantation, due to hernias during the period between 2008 and 2011. Three patients underwent surgery because of symptomatic migration of the mesh (ileus, fistula). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of mesh migration is difficult to determine because of the different criteria of migration, observation period, and other factors. In patients after mesh implantation the potential migration of the biomaterial should be considered in case of unclear or acute abdominal symptoms.


Assuntos
Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis/efeitos adversos , Migração de Corpo Estranho/cirurgia , Hérnia Abdominal/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Telas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Migração de Corpo Estranho/diagnóstico , Herniorrafia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...